After Raiders deny his report that a portion of the Oakland franchise is being sold, ESPN's Chris Mortensen responds with, "The Raiders have lost the privilege with me of running stories past them for comment"
Aside from being funny, Mortensen admits to crossing a dangerous line. He will make the news any way he chooses and if you don't treat him the way he expects, the standards of journalistic integrity won't stop him from double-checking a source. That's really amazing.
Aside from being funny, Mortensen admits to crossing a dangerous line. He will make the news any way he chooses and if you don't treat him the way he expects, the standards of journalistic integrity won't stop him from double-checking a source. That's really amazing.
But is anyone surprised? Mort's only accurate 30% of the time anyway, so what's the use in checking his sources? If you're going to be wrong anyway, you might as well make things interesting, right?
But is anyone surprised? Mort's only accurate 30% of the time anyway, so what's the use in checking his sources? If you're going to be wrong anyway, you might as well make things interesting, right?
I'm with you. The audacity of that kind of statement is wild though.
Wait, did that imply that there was some attempt at responsible journalism happening at ESPN? If that's the case, i'm a little scared to know what they are like when they are irresponsible.