GM simply cannot afford Tiger...has nothing to do with being associated with something successful...more like someone else who is overpaid. Wait until NASCAR takes the hit with loss of sponsors
These are the kinds of articles that bug me about faniq. A headline is taken completely out of context. Nowhere in the article does it say they dont want to be associated with anyone or anything considered successful. If I want to read something made up and actually funny i'll go to theonion.com
These are the kinds of articles that bug me about faniq. A headline is taken completely out of context. Nowhere in the article does it say they dont want to be associated with anyone or anything considered successful. If I want to read something made up and actually funny i'll go to theonion.com
It is just a funny headline to get you to go read the actual article. I didn't write an article about GM dropping Tiger because they wanted to be associated with something successful. Just a funny headline.
It is just a funny headline to get you to go read the actual article. I didn't write an article about GM dropping Tiger because they wanted to be associated with something successful. Just a funny headline.
oh you burned me I am so embarrassed and ashamed....I know exactly what sarcasm is and how to use it. Obviously I didnt believe the article. Why would GM or for that matter anyone do something because they did not want to be associated with something successful. You need to relax it was a joke. If you are convinced that it wasn't well then I hope you dont lose sleep on it cause your blowing it out of proportion.
Comment!