Please sign in to complete your action
 
DONE!
Cheer and debate with
6,000,000+ fans!
My Team:
Charlotte
My Team:
Michael
My Team:
Britney
6/26/07
NBA Draft: What's Wrong With Alando Tucker?
READ MORE:
NBA
Did I miss something?

Prior to his senior season Alando Tucker was considered a Lottery Pick and rightfully so after earning 1st Team All Big Ten honors and averaging 19.0 points per game. His final year should have done nothing to cause Tucker's stock to plummet, merely earning 1st Team All American honors while improving in his scoring ability and rebounding.

Now Tucker is projected to be taken with the 42nd pick in Chad Ford's latest Mock Draft 32.0 and NBA Draft Net has him going to Utah at a more respectable 25th.

What gives?

Doesn't Tucker remind you of Josh Howard. Roughly the very same size, both quietly drop 20+ games, above average rebounder for position, and most of all a very high basketball IQ and drive to win.

ESPN says the following about Tucker: Lacks reliable perimeter skills. Not much range from three-point line. Below- average free throw shooter. Not a great ballhandler. Undersized for his position. A power forward in a two guard's body. Had an excellent season for Wisconsin, but questions about his fit in the NBA continue to hurt his stock. On the first-round bubble, but teams are intrigued.

NBA Draft Net tends to agree: Defensively Tucker could stand to improve on his intensity … Doesn’t seem to possess great anticipation skills nor the awareness to play the passing lanes … Ball handling, while improved, still isn’t great … Perimeter shooting remains prone to streakiness … Not a great shooter coming off screens … Solid three point shooter when his feet are set but struggles to hit with regularity due in part to his slow release.

I can't disagree with the general assessment of Tucker's weaknesses above. However, there seems to be a formula for success in the NBA for a veteran 3-4 year collegiate player with high IQ that just found ways to score regardless of how it looked. Josh Howard, Tayshaun Prince, and Michael Redd all fit this description, yet have been extremely successful despite being overlooked. We'll see where Alando actually ends up, teams could just be quiet, but it appears NBA teams haven't learned from these examples. Alando Tucker should be taken in the 10-15 range.

Where do you think Tucker will end up? Where should he be drafted?
9 comments
Vote!
Comment!
Your votes determine top comment
Top comment earns 300 Points!
739 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
I think the Sixers could get him. I've loved the guy, and think he is a great player. This is what makes the draft such a good thing. Some teams change their mind, and instead he could be a late first round pick, or a 2nd round master piece.
 
739 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Excellent write-up.  I think that Howard is a little bigger/longer than Tucker but other than that I think you're dead right.

I would love to see the Rockets get him.
 
739 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Ty wrote:
Excellent write-up.  I think that Howard is a little bigger/longer than Tucker but other than that I think you're dead right.

I would love to see the Rockets get him.
They're actual quite similar

Tucker 6'6 210

Howard when drafted 6'7 203
 
739 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
I think this draft is just really deep with players that are around the same level, after the first 10 or so.  I could see him going anywhere from 14 for the Clippers to midway through the 2nd round.
 
739 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Hey CF, aren't you giving Acie Law some of the same treatment. Sure, maybe he (Law) will be a bust, but here's another skilled player with smarts who had a great college career. Obviously, Law and Tucker are two different players, but didn't Kevin Durant, a great scorer who's much taller than Law say that Acie beat him every time they played one-on-one while in LA for one of the POY awards? Or something like that...?
 
739 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
blipper21 wrote:
Hey CF, aren't you giving Acie Law some of the same treatment. Sure, maybe he (Law) will be a bust, but here's another skilled player with smarts who had a great college career. Obviously, Law and Tucker are two different players, but didn't Kevin Durant, a great scorer who's much taller than Law say that Acie beat him every time they played one-on-one while in LA for one of the POY awards? Or something like that...?
Yes, I firmly believe Law is a bust relative where he's being projected. Tucker has nothing to do with Law. You have to evaluate those two positions completely different, and Law seems to fit the mold of some previously successful college point men who didn't cut it in the Pros (Mateen Cleaves being on).

Law, while clutch at the end of games (like Cleaves), isn't a great perimeter shooter. He's not horribly fast, not a big time assist guy, and not entirely strong. More of a gut feeling than anything.

One on one doesn't tell me much. Rafer Alston would beat a lot of guys at that.

Having just read Hollinger's new analysis, this further confirms me belief. He point system has Acie Law near the end of the first round.
 
737 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
(Edited 06/28/07 12:09AM by blipper21)
CriticalFanatic wrote:
Yes, I firmly believe Law is a bust relative where he's being projected. Tucker has nothing to do with Law. You have to evaluate those two positions completely different, and Law seems to fit the mold of some previously successful college point men who didn't cut it in the Pros (Mateen Cleaves being on).

Law, while clutch at the end of games (like Cleaves), isn't a great perimeter shooter. He's not horribly fast, not a big time assist guy, and not entirely strong. More of a gut feeling than anything.

One on one doesn't tell me much. Rafer Alston would beat a lot of guys at that.

Having just read Hollinger's new analysis, this further confirms me belief. He point system has Acie Law near the end of the first round.
I'll just say this:

Perhaps Law will go the Cleaves route, but I believe he has a reasonable chance (not necessarily a stellar chance, but also not a pipe dream) of carving out a solid NBA career.
 
737 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
blipper21 wrote:
I'll just say this:

Perhaps Law will go the Cleaves route, but I believe he has a reasonable chance (not necessarily a stellar chance, but also not a pipe dream) of carving out a solid NBA career.
He'll be more successful than Cleaves, no doubt. At the peak of his career he'll be in the 8 man rotation. Not a starter, but could pull of a Howard Eisley like career for sure.
 
 
Preview
HOTTEST ARTICLES
NBA GEAR
Loading...
MEET OUR FANS
Narada
Caty
 more
12,798,192+
ANSWER TODAY'S POLL
 more
PLAY NEVER-ENDING TRIVIA
Foam
Cork
Plastic
Rubber
 more

TAKE A QUIZ
 more

PREDICT THE SCORE
NFL
NBA
NHL
NCAABB
Soccer
 more
2,555,658+
topnach thought mooser58's comment in BestOfChicago is back! (2 times) was funny.
Just now!
matty "B" is playing Sports Trivia.
Just now!
24fan thought JrCanuckFan's comment in NASCAR Weekend Preview (3 times) was smart.
Just now!
topnach thought MarkTheShark's comment in BestOfChicago is back! (2 times) was funny.
Just now!
asith gave a thumbs up (5/5) to the trivia question Who Am I?.
Just now!
sydneysihubwa joined the Soccer league 2006 World Cup.
Just now!
sydneysihubwa joined the Soccer league Fans of Brazil (Soccer).
Just now!
gio_tablizo joined the NHL league MapleLeafsFans.
Just now!
angel_locsin20062003 joined the Tennis league Fans of Mike Bryan.
Just now!
angel_locsin20062003 joined the Tennis league Tennis Fans.
Just now!
 

Join Today
About FanIQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Contact Us
Report A Bug
Help