2012 NFL Midseason Awards

NFL Midseason Awards

11/7/12 in NFL   |   Matthew_Shovlin   |   735 respect

Nov 4, 2012; Nashville, TN, USA; Chicago Bears corner back Charles Tillman (33) knocks the ball out of the hands of Tennessee Titans tight end Jared Cook (89) during the second half at LP Field. The Bears beat the Titans 51-20. Mandatory credit: Don McPeak-US PresswireDefensive Player of the Year: Charles Tillman (CB, Chicago Bears)

The problem with picking a Bears player for DPOY is that there are so many incredible playmakers who contribute to the Bears' defense. Regardless, Tillman is having an incredible enough year to receive the award. Tillman is the leading tackler for the league's 2nd ranked scoring defense; a defense that has given up only two more touchdowns than they have scored themselves. Tillman has intercepted two passes this season, bringing both back for touchdowns. He also has six passes defended and an astounding seven forced fumbles on the season.

Close behind Tillman for DPOY honors is Houston Texans' defensive end JJ Watt. With a league-best 10.5 sacks and 10 batted passes, Watt probably causes more headaches for quarterbacks than anyone in the league. However, I have to say I'll take seven forced fumbles and two defensive touchdowns over 10.5 sacks any day of the week. Watt has also yet to force a turnover, while Tillman himself has as many or more turnovers than seven entire teams.

Honorable Mention: JJ Watt, Lance Briggs, Patrick Willis, DeMarcus Ware

Offensive Rookie of the Year: Robert Griffin III (QB, Washington Redskins)

I hope RG3 and Andrew Luck are used to being compared to one another by now, because their long careers of media-created competition with one another are just getting started. These players were the two hottest topics coming into the most recent NFL Draft, and they have completely lived up to expectations in their rookie seasons.

Robert Griffin has been absolutely outstanding, turning heads every Sunday, regardless of whether his team wins or loses. He's completed a very impressive 65.6% of his passes, while throwing eight touchdowns to only three interceptions.

Andrew Luck is a hot pick for OROY right now due to his historic performance against the Dolphins on Sunday. If Luck can keep that up, he could definitely make a run at the award, but here are some numbers to consider: Luck completes a very mediocre 56.5% of his passes, and his 10:8 touchdown to interception ratio is far from remarkable. Compared to RG3, Luck passes for much more yards per game, but when you factor in rushing yards, Luck is only ahead by 38.8. When factoring in rushing touchdowns, RG3's TD:INT ratio is 14:3, compared to Luck's 13:8.

I understand that Luck has led his team to an improbable 5-3 record (compared to RG3's 3-6), but OROY doesn't take wins into account as much as, let's say, the MVP award does. In addition, Luck has significantly better receiving options, simply due to the presence of Reggie Wayne. If you saw the Redskins' game against the Steelers, in which Redskin receivers must have dropped 10+ passes, you understand the lack of skill players that RG3 is working with. Finally, the Redskins have the 28th ranked defense, while the Colts' defense is ranked 18th.

Honorable Mention: Andrew Luck, Doug Martin, Alfred Morris, Ryan Tannehill
Notify me by email about comments that follow mine. Preview

11/8/12   |   kobe_lova   |   61894 respect

adamsprech wrote:
I don't think they'd be 8-0, no. I do think they'd still have a winning record however. The Falcons are the most well-balanced team in the league. Matt Ryan is very good, but does not mean the difference between winning and losing for this team in every game they play.

The question is loaded, anyway. MVP really just depends on what you focus on. The qb's that make a majorly noticeable difference in wins and losses for their teams right now are Romo, Eli, and Flacco, I think. Those teams' success for the most part always come down to qb play. (It's why I decided that Eli is the MVP thus far)

The Texans are the most well balanced team in football right now. Our record is misleading, our defense hasn't changed much over the last few years. I think this team is well suited for Ryan, I'm not sure we'd be above .500 with many others because of that. We rely heavily on our offense. He's been a major factor in us pulling out wins. So, could Peyton and Rodgers have success with these Falcons? Could Ben? Sure. But could Romo, or Flacco, or RG3? Maybe, but I doubt it. It's simply a matter of who you replace them with. I would probably agree more with an argument for Peyton than I would for Rodgers. Mostly because it's Peyton's first season with them.

11/8/12   |   adamsprech   |   28 respect

kobe_lova wrote:
But would they be 8-0?

I don't think they'd be 8-0, no. I do think they'd still have a winning record however. The Falcons are the most well-balanced team in the league. Matt Ryan is very good, but does not mean the difference between winning and losing for this team in every game they play.

11/8/12   |   kobe_lova   |   61894 respect

(Edited by kobe_lova)

I didn't read the Matt Ryan thing because it makes me nervous. I prefer the constant disrespect that my team receives. As for the others, I'm not really sure I agree with any of them besides maybe AP. I need to think on the best Offensive Player thus far. I shall return.

edits as they come in*

-Elli Mae may be the MVP to his team. His numbers aren't as stellar but he is why they have a winning record right now.
-Peyton F. Manning as the Comeback of the Year! It was his neck! That trumps everything else for me.

11/8/12   |   kobe_lova   |   61894 respect

adamsprech wrote:
I'll have to disagree with you on your MVP vote. I think Peyton Manning and Aaron Rodgers are both far more deserving of the award than Matt Ryan. I made this argument the other day, Matt Ryan is not nearly as valuable to his team as either of the other two. If you removed Aaron Rodgers and Peyton Manning from their teams, the results would be no different than the 2011 Colts without Manning. If you removed Matt Ryan from the Falcons they'd still probably be 5-3.

Matt Ryan and the Falcons, much like the 2008 Patriots, are an extremely balanced team that can win without the QB, unlike teams like the Saints, Broncos, Packers, and even the Colts to a lesser extent with andy Luck.

But would they be 8-0?

11/7/12   |   adamsprech   |   28 respect

I'll have to disagree with you on your MVP vote. I think Peyton Manning and Aaron Rodgers are both far more deserving of the award than Matt Ryan. I made this argument the other day, Matt Ryan is not nearly as valuable to his team as either of the other two. If you removed Aaron Rodgers and Peyton Manning from their teams, the results would be no different than the 2011 Colts without Manning. If you removed Matt Ryan from the Falcons they'd still probably be 5-3.

Matt Ryan and the Falcons, much like the 2008 Patriots, are an extremely balanced team that can win without the QB, unlike teams like the Saints, Broncos, Packers, and even the Colts to a lesser extent with andy Luck.