Welcome to FanIQ!
FanIQ is the ultimate free community for sports fans.
Talk sports with fans from all over - 1,367,994+ Comments
Track your game picks - 15,061,845+ Sports Predictions
Prove you know sports - 81,306+ Trivia Questions
Find fans of your teams - 3,529,642+ New Friends

Next Post »
« Previous Post

Brett Favre's Story Isn't Even a Comeback
28
comments
Worst.Comeback.Ever.
by TheBigThree
>7 days ago

Well, at least he won’t be nominated for “Comeback Player of the Year” at the ESPY’s.

Wanna know why? Because this isn’t a comeback. The last time the Packers played a game of any significance, he was their quarterback. The last time the Packers updated their depth chart, he sat at the top of his position. The Packers still own Brett Favre’s rights, because Brett Favre is still under contract. What does it matter that Favre is missing training camp? Michael Strahan did that once upon a time, too, and the mere “speculation” of his retirement was more convincing than Favre’s “actual” retirement. Until the Packers played at least half of 2008, I wouldn’t have thought Favre was totally gone.

No, folks: Brett Favre is not coming back to football, because Brett Favre never left football. I don’t care what he said during some press conference. I don’t care about the sobbing, the conviction in his decision, or the fact that he admitted to being burned out. Everyone’s burned out at the end of every season. Everyone has to do some soul searching from time to time. Everyone has to examine the past, ponder the present, and wonder which direction the two are pointing.

You can probably hear me ranting these words as you read this, and that’s because I am. We have to visit, revisit, and re-revisit this merciless and never-ending cycle of “so-and-so is back!” crap more often than I go to the bathroom, and even if I had to take Avodart, I’d still be beaten. MJ’s second comeback was silly. Bjorn Borg’s was embarrassing. Floyd Mayweather, Jr.’s was once inevitable and remains inevitable. Ricky Williams puffs bammy and that hasn’t stopped him—he’ll surface in a Dutch league, or something. And to be completely honest, I just had to Google whether or not Roger Clemens is currently retired. Wikipedia has him listed as a “free agent.”

This half-hearted commitment to retirement is nothing new; in fact, it’s old, it’s decrepit, and it should die.

Really, I don’t care that Brett Favre plans on going out like Willie Mays. This is what star athletes do—they wrestle with the thought of hanging it up. One minute, you think your mind is made up, and the next, you’re not so sure, because you’re a star for a reason—you have drive, you have heart, you have commitment, you have “it”. I can’t imagine being in Brett Favre’s position and trying to discover whether or not I still have “it”, because that can only be borne on the field. And until Brett Favre has his throwing arm snapped off, throws 30 picks in a season, or plays on a 14-loss team, Favre and guys like him will always have to wonder if they have any of “it” left.

But for all of this hoopla to be treated as if it is some spectacle—some story of legitimate shock and wonder—is so absurd, I can’t even speak on the subject. I’m so dumbfounded by it, my voice is mute, and what would otherwise be an Ari Gold-esque tirade is finding its way onto a computer screen. How can this even register as news? My lawn happens to be green this morning; should I call CNN? My cat meowed not once, but twice when I pulled the ham out of the fridge (and just don’t go there); I’ll inform the paper.

This is so commonplace. This is so predictable. This is so not worth our time. But here I am, being hypocritical and telling you why we, who includes me, shouldn’t care about Brett Favre. I suppose I have leeway, though—if Favre can give an Academy Award-winning performance as “The Man Who Quit the Game He Loved”, only to resurface months later with rumors and text messages that made Aaron Rodgers awaken in a cold sweat and the Packers front office collectively drink itself under the table trying to find a way out of the subsequent mess (I mean, there’s no way they didn’t do that one night), I can have a bit of latitude when it comes to my self-labeled hypocrisy.

What Favre is doing may or may not be right for him. However, it is certainly not right for his franchise, and that is condemnable. He puts his teammates and fans in a bind; teammates and fans he surely still places in front of himself.

Surely.

Do you remember that kid who wore the Favre jersey for more than 1,500 consecutive days? That kid retired that jersey, because that jersey had run its course, albeit a legendary course. He retired that #4 because Green Bay had planned on retiring theirs September 8. By September 8, Favre may be wearing someone else’s #4, and if he isn’t, he’ll be standing in the spotlight of humiliation he created for himself on the night that he’s honored.

This isn’t a comeback story—this is a complete mess. And with Brett Favre, it was unavoidable.
28
Comment!
Share it

Read More: NFL, Brett Favre, Brett Favre
« Jose Canseco Knocked Out By Former NFL Player Vai Sikahema | MLB First Half Wrap Up and Second Half Predictions »

TODAY'S TOP PICKS ON FANIQ
  1. The Iceman Wants His Belt Back. But First, He Will Need to Beat the Unbeaten
  2. As The Debate Over Which Type Of Football Is Better Rages, We're Focusing On Something Else 11
  3. Brandon Jacobs Injures Redskins For Sport 1
  4. Micahel Phelps Is Clearly Enjoying His Fame 7
  5. Perhaps The Concerns About Michael Beasley Were Warranted 5
Who Am I?
Who Am I?
Take the Trivia Challenge

Mike Tyson
Joe Louis
George Foreman
Muhammad Ali

Created by: Jon
More Sports Trivia
28 comments
Vote!
Comment!
Your votes determine top comment
Top comment earns 300 Points!
53 days ago
2
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+2
 
+0
 
-0
I don't know.  ESPN really likes to suck (up to) Brett Favre.  He might still be nominated for a comeback espy.
 
53 days ago
3
VOTE:
 
+3
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0

The "I have nothing left to give" speech reminds me of a kid who lost the game and because of that ..took his football and went home.

 
53 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
i hope he stays with the packers, but if he doesn't then i'm still gonna be a big fan of the packers. but it will never be the same team without brett as the qb.
 
53 days ago
2
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+2
 
+0
 
-0
This comeback leave this reviewer cold.
 
53 days ago
3
VOTE:
 
+2
 
+0
 
+1
 
-0
snowball0091 wrote:
i hope he stays with the packers, but if he doesn't then i'm still gonna be a big fan of the packers. but it will never be the same team without brett as the qb.
That's the crazy thing... it WILL be the same team... just with a different QB. That's what you Favre fans don't realize. And I say "Favre fans", because that's all you are. I'm not convinced that "Packers fans" actually exist... it's just a bunch of cheeseheads who stalk Brett Favre, and could care less about the actual team.

EVERY team has QB's who come and go. The 49ers had TWO QB's who were BETTER than Favre, and they had to watch them leave. Get over yourselves. The Aaron Rogers era has begun. Get on board, or crawl back into wherever you people come from.
 
53 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
He is not God, he is not the Second Coming - hell, he isn't Joe Montana or Sonny Jurgensen - he is a good quarterback for a good to average team who has RETIRED!  I am so over this s&*$ with him - if he does come back you can bet I won't watch him or pull for him - except to ride the bench.  I used to think that his drug use was the most selfish thing he had done, but this stunt takes the cake.
 
53 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
I will root for him to lose more than I usually did. I was tired of him and the man love that Madden and Peter King gave. But then ESPN went over the top. Like this guy was the greatest ever. He only won a single championship. Never have I seen a more selfish player. If he didnt want to retire why did he announce it and have a press conference? Why when offered to comeback before the draft he declined. He is a selfish little kid thats why. Go away Favre!
 
53 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
RichmondSpider wrote:
He is not God, he is not the Second Coming - hell, he isn't Joe Montana or Sonny Jurgensen - he is a good quarterback for a good to average team who has RETIRED!  I am so over this s&*$ with him - if he does come back you can bet I won't watch him or pull for him - except to ride the bench.  I used to think that his drug use was the most selfish thing he had done, but this stunt takes the cake.
Drugs, OLD, whatever, still BETTER than Rogers!
That is the FACTS!~
What else should be said?  Favre should start.
 
53 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
(Edited 07/14/08 6:58PM by TheBigThree)
Pat wrote:
That's the crazy thing... it WILL be the same team... just with a different QB. That's what you Favre fans don't realize. And I say "Favre fans", because that's all you are. I'm not convinced that "Packers fans" actually exist... it's just a bunch of cheeseheads who stalk Brett Favre, and could care less about the actual team.

EVERY team has QB's who come and go. The 49ers had TWO QB's who were BETTER than Favre, and they had to watch them leave. Get over yourselves. The Aaron Rogers era has begun. Get on board, or crawl back into wherever you people come from.
Holy moly, speaking of Ricky Williams and blunt...

that was a rather candid response.  It's one I can't disagree with, however.  I mean, it's entirely possible that Green Bay will turn the ball over less with Rodgers under center.  No, the kid may not fill the highlight reels like his (unquestionably legendary) predecessor, but maybe this new-look Packer team will play lower risk football that rewards victories over the heavily mistake-prone teams in their division.

Look at it this way: at present, it's Rodgers vs. Jackson, Kitna, and [insert inevitably doomed Bear QB here].  Call me crazy, but with the kind of players Rodgers has around him, I'd take him.  Favre or not, I still think the Vikings are gonna have to work to knock off Green Bay next year.  And if that's the worst case scenario, then Packer Nation really needs to buck up.
 
53 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+1
 
+0
 
-0
People he is not GOD. He is not the BEST QB ever. He retired...now get over it. I think Favre is scared to see the Packers succeed without him.
 
53 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+1
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
TheBigThree wrote:
Holy moly, speaking of Ricky Williams and blunt...

that was a rather candid response.  It's one I can't disagree with, however.  I mean, it's entirely possible that Green Bay will turn the ball over less with Rodgers under center.  No, the kid may not fill the highlight reels like his (unquestionably legendary) predecessor, but maybe this new-look Packer team will play lower risk football that rewards victories over the heavily mistake-prone teams in their division.

Look at it this way: at present, it's Rodgers vs. Jackson, Kitna, and [insert inevitably doomed Bear QB here].  Call me crazy, but with the kind of players Rodgers has around him, I'd take him.  Favre or not, I still think the Vikings are gonna have to work to knock off Green Bay next year.  And if that's the worst case scenario, then Packer Nation really needs to buck up.
In hindsight, perhaps I was a bit harsh. But let's be serious... we've put up with this nonsense for long enough, haven't we? Why is sports talk today dominated by a nearly 40 year old man, who is acting like a 12 year old? Add that to the fact that there are a legion of blind supporters, ready to jump off a cliff for him, and that's just plain ridiculous.
 
53 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+1
 
+0
 
-0
Pat wrote:
In hindsight, perhaps I was a bit harsh. But let's be serious... we've put up with this nonsense for long enough, haven't we? Why is sports talk today dominated by a nearly 40 year old man, who is acting like a 12 year old? Add that to the fact that there are a legion of blind supporters, ready to jump off a cliff for him, and that's just plain ridiculous.
If not that, what the hell would we argue about?

That is the great thing about sports, some things you love and want to hear, others you try not to hear but yet we end up talking about the SAME CRAP OVER AND OVER!
I cant tell you how many times I have been DONE with this subject, somehow I just keep coming back.

So Thanks Favre, because I sure would be bored if everyone was Perfect.
 
51 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+1
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Finally.  Someone writing with some sense.
 
51 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
ChicaQueso wrote:
Finally.  Someone writing with some sense.
Long time no see... welcome back.
 
50 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+1
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Pat wrote:
Long time no see... welcome back.
Thanks... took a mini break :)  I'm back.  And I see the Q is now full of Brett Bashers ;)
 
50 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+1
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
paultica wrote:
People he is not GOD. He is not the BEST QB ever. He retired...now get over it. I think Favre is scared to see the Packers succeed without him.
He is one of the best.  He is not officially retired.  And he's not scared to see the Packers succeed -- he wants to play football.  How is that so difficult for people to 'sports fans'? Especially when it has come out of his mouth 30 times the past few days.
 
50 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+1
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
RichmondSpider wrote:
He is not God, he is not the Second Coming - hell, he isn't Joe Montana or Sonny Jurgensen - he is a good quarterback for a good to average team who has RETIRED!  I am so over this s&*$ with him - if he does come back you can bet I won't watch him or pull for him - except to ride the bench.  I used to think that his drug use was the most selfish thing he had done, but this stunt takes the cake.
I'm sure he's heartbroken that you won't be watching him.