Please sign in to complete your action
 
DONE!
Cheer and debate with
6,000,000+ fans!
My Team:
Charlotte
My Team:
Michael
My Team:
Britney

10/23/09
GANDHI’S FAMILY TREE WORTH SPENDING 15 MINUTES TO READ
GANDHI’S FAMILY TREE WORTH SPENDING 15 MINUTES TO READ
At the very beginning of his book, “The Nehru Dynasty”, astrologer K. N. Rao mentions the names of Jawahar Lal’s father and grandfather. Jawahar Lal’s father was believed to be Moti Lal and Moti Lal’s father was one Gangadhar Nehru. And we all know that Jawahar Lal’s only daughter was Indira Priyadarshini Nehru, Kamala Nehru was her mother, who died in Switzerland of tuberculosis. She was totally against Indira’s proposed marriage with Feroze. Why? No one tells us that Now, who is this Feroze? We are told by many he was the son of the family grocer. The grocer supplied wines etc. to Anand Bhavan, preciously known as Ishrat Manzil, which once belonged to a Muslim lawyer named Mobarak Ali. Moti Lal was earlier an employee of Mobarak Ali. What was the family grocer’s name? One frequently hears that Rajiv Gandhi’s grandfather was Pandit Nehru. But then we all know that everyone has two grandfathers, the paternal and the material grandfather. In fact, the paternal grandfather is deemed to be the more important grandfather in most societies. Why is it then nowhere we find Rajiv Gandhi’s paternal grandfather’s name? It appears that the reason is simply this Rajiv Gandhi’s paternal grandfather was a Muslim gentleman from the Junagadh area of Gujrat. This Muslim grocer by the name of Nawab Khan, had married a Parsi woman after converting her to Islam. This is the source where from the myth of Rajiv being a Parsi was derived. Rajiv’s father Feroze was Feroze Khan before he married Indira, against Kamala Nehru’s wishes. Feroze mother’s family name was Ghandy, often associated with Parsis and this was changed to Gandhi, sometime before his wedding with Indira by an affidavit. The fact of the matter is that (and this fact can be found in many writings) Indira was very lonely. Chased out of the Shantiniketan University by Guru Dev Rabindranath himself for misdemeanor, the lonely girl was an by herself while father Jawahar was busy with polities pretty women and illicit sex; the mother was in hospital. Feroze Khan, the grocer’s son was then in England and he was quite sympathetic to Indira and soon enough she changed her religion, became a Muslim women and married Feroze Khan in a London mosque. Nehru was not happy; Kamala was dead already or dying. The news of this married eventually reached Mohandas Karan Chand Gandhi. Gandhi urgently called Nehru and practically ordered him to ask the young man to change his name from Khan to Gandhi. It had nothing to do with change of religion, from Islam to Hindustan for instance. It was just a case of a change of name by an affidavit. And so Feroze Khan became Feroze Gandhi. The surprising thing is that the apostle of truth, the old man soon to be declared India’s Mahatma and the ‘Father of the Nation’ didn’t mention this game of his in the famous book. ‘My Experiments with Truth’ Why? When they returned to India, a mock ‘Vedic marriage’ was instituted for public consumption. On the subject, writes M. O. Mathai (a longtime private secretary of Nehru) in his renowned (but now suppressed by the GOI) ‘Reminiscences of the Nehru Age’ on page no. 94, second paragraph: “For some inexplicable reason, Nehru allowed the marriage to be performed according to Vedic rited in 1942. An inter-religious and inter-caste marriage Vedic rites at that time was not valid in law. To be legal, it had to be a civil marriage. It’s a known fact that after Rajiv’s birth Indira and Feroze lived separately, but they were not divorced. Feroze used to harass Nehru frequently for money and also interfere in Nehru’s political activities. Nehru got fed up and left instructions not to allow him into the Prime Minister’s residence Trimurthi Bhavan. Mathai writes that the death of Feroze came as a relief to Nehru and Indira. The death of Feroze in 1960 before he could consolidate his own political force, is itself a mystery. Feroze had even planned to remarry. Those who try to keep tabs on our lenders in spite of all the suppressions and deliberate misinformation are aware of the fact that the second son Indira (or Mrs. Feroze Khan) known as Sanjay Gandhi was not the son of Feroze. He was the son of another Moslem gentleman, Mohammad Yunus. Here in passing, we might that the second son was originally named Sanjeev. It rhymed with Rajiv, the elder brother’s name. It was claimed to Sanjeev when he was arrested by the British police in England and his passport impounded, for having stolen a car. Krishna Menon was then India’s High Commissioner in London. He offered to issue another passport to the felon who changed his name to Sanjay. Incidentally, Sanjay’s marriage with the Sikh girl Menaka (now they call her Maneka for Indira Gandhi found the name of Lord Indra’s court dancer rather offensivet) took place quite surprisingly in Mohammad Yunus house in New Delhi. And the marriage with Manaka who was a model (She had modeled for Bombay Dyeing wearing just a towel) was not so ordinary either. Sanjay was notorious in getting unwed young women pregnant. Menaka too was rendered pregnant by Sanjay. It was then that her father. Colonel Anand threatened Sanjay with dire consequences if he did not marry her daughter. And that did the trick. Sanjay married Menaka. It was widely reported in Delhi at the time that Mohammad Yunus was unhappy at the marriage of Sanjay with Menaka; apparently he had wanted to get him married with a Muslim girl of his choice. It was Mohammad Yunus who carried the most when Sanjay died in the plane accident. In Yunus book, ‘Persons, Passions & Polities’ one discovers that baby Sanjay had been circumcised following Islamic custom, although the reason stated was phimosis. It was always believed that Sanjay used to blackmail Indira Gandhi and due to this she used to turn a blind eye when Sanjay Gandhi started to run the country as though if were his personal fiefdom. Was he black mailing her with the secret of who his real father was? When the news of Sanjay’s death reaches Indira Gandhi, the first thing she wanted to know was about the bunch of keys which Sanjay had with him. Nehru was no less a player in producing bastards. At least one case is very graphically described by M. O. Mathai in his “Reminiscences of the Nehru Age” page 206. Muthai writes: “In the antumn of 1948 ( India became free in 1947 and a great deal of work needed to be done) a young woman from Benares arrived in New Delhi as a sanyasin named Shraddha Mata ( an assumed and not a real name). She was a Sanskrit Scholar well versed in the ancient Indian scriptures and mythology .People including MPs, thronged to her to hear her discourses. One day S. D. Upadhyaya, Nehru’s old employee, brought a letter in Hindi from Shraddha Mata. Nehru gave her an interview in the PM’s House. As her departed, I noticed ( Mathai is speaking here) that she was young, shapely and beautiful. Meetings with her became rather frequent , mostly after Nehru finished his work at night. During one of Nehru’s visits to Lucknow, Shraddha Mata turned up there, and Upadhyaya brought a letter from her as usual . Nehru sent her the reply, and she visited Nehru at midnight…. Suddenly Shraddha Mata disappeared. In November 1949 a convent in Bangalore sent a decent looking person to Delhi with a bundle of letters. He said that a young woman from northern India arrived at the convent a few months ago and gave birth to a baby boy. She refused to divulge her name or give any particulars about herself. She left the convent as soon as she was well enough to move out but left the child behind. She however forgot to take with her a small cloth bundle in which, among other things, several letters in Hindi were found. The Mother superior, who was a foreigner , had the letters examined and was told they were from the Prime Minister. The person, who brought the letters surrendered them,. “I ( Mathai) made discreet inquiries repeatedly about the boy but failed to get a clue about his whereabouts. Convents in such matters are extremely tightlipped and secretive. Had I succeeded in locating the boy. I would have adopted him. He must have grown up as a Catholic Christian blissfully ignorant of who his father was.” Coming back to Rajiv Gandhi, we all know now that he changed his so called Paris religion to become a Catholic to marry Sania Maino of Turin, Italy. Rajiv become Roberto. His daughter’s name is Bianca and son’s name is Raul. Quite cleverly the same names are presented to the people of India as Priyanka and Rahul. What is amazing is the extent of our people’s ignorance in such matters. The press conference that Rajiv Gandhi gave in London after taking over as prime minister of India was very informative. In this press conference , Rajiv boasted that he was NOT a Hindu but a Paris Mind you, speaking of the Paris religion, he had no Paris ancestor at all. His grandmother (father’s mother) has turned Muslim after having abandoned the Paris religion to marry Nawab Khan. It is the western press that waged a blitz of misinformation on behalf of Rajiv. From the New York Times to the Los Angles Times and the Washington Post the big guns raised Rajiv to heaven. The children’s encyclopedias recorded that Rajiv was a qualified Mechanical Engineer from the revered University of Cambridge. No doubt US kids are among the most misinformed in the world today. The reality is that in all three years of his tenure at that University Rajiv had not passed a single examination. He had therefore to leave Cambridge without a certificate. Sonia too had the same benevolent treatment. She was stated to be student in Cambridge. Such a description is calculated to mis lead Indian. She was a student in Cambridge all right but not of the University of Cambridge but of one of those fly by night language schools where foreign student come to leave English. Sonia was working as an ‘an pair’ girl in Cambridge and trying to learn English at the same time. And surprise of surprises, Rajiv was even cremated as per vedic rites in full view of India’s public. This is the Nehru dynasty that India worships and now an Italian leads a prestigious national party because of just one qualification – being married into the Nehru family.
6 comments
Vote!
Comment!
Your votes determine top comment

10/23/09
1
Patriotic Indians should thank the President of India for having the
courage by citing a legal hitch to dissuade Ms. Sonia Gandhi from
staking her claim to form the government in May this year. She
therefore did not as expected on May 17th become the Prime Minister of
1 billion plus people of India. It can now be said that the nation has
been saved from a monumental, devastating, and permanent injury to
India's national interest and patriotic psyche of Indians. And
therefore every effort that can be made in a democracy should be made
to ensure that Ms. Sonia Gandhi is permanently out of reckoning for
any public office. For those who instinctively understand that, this
Note is to explain the factual basis for this conclusion, and suggest
what patriotic Indians can do now . My opposition to Ms. Sonia Gandhi
is not merely because she is Italian---born. In other democratic
countries, including in Italy, such an issue [of foreign-born aspiring
to be head of government] would not even arise at all because the
issue has already been settled by law, that a person cannot hold the
highest public office unless he or she is native born.
In India there is no such law, but the President according to my
knowledge, correctly acted on a proviso to Section 5 of the Indian
Citizenship Act[1955] which empowers the Union Home Ministry to lay
down conditions that apply to Indian citizenship acquired by
foreigners by registration, which conditions would be based on the
principle of reciprocity, viz., in Ms Gandhi's case such of those
conditions that apply to Indians on becoming citizens of Italy would
apply to her.The President reportedly told her that if she insisted on
being invited to form the government, he would want first to clarify,
on a reference to the Supreme Court, whether in view of this proviso
her appointment as PM could be successfully challenged in the court.
It is fair to assume that this report of the President's decision, is
correct since the President had before him my petition dated May 15,
2004 making just that point--- that Ms. Gandhi's citizenship is
conditional, and in particular she cannot be the PM legally. The
President had also given me an appointment at 12.45 PM on May 17, 2004
to explain my submissions in person, which I did. I also told him that
I would challenge such a constitutional appointment in the Supreme
Court just as I had in 2001 when the Tamil Nadu Governor illegally
swore in Ms Jayalalitha as Chief Minister.

 

10/23/09
3
Immediately after Muslim League demanded Pakistan for Muslims and exchange of population In March 1940, Dr. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar wrote his book "Thoughts on Pakistan" in which he criticized the Congress policy of
'appeasement' of Muslims, and advocated the policy of 'settlement' . As per Dr. Ambedkar, 'appeasement' sets no limits to the demands of aggressor. 'Settlement' does. Besides, appeasement increases aggressor's aggression.
Accordingly, Dr. Ambedkar held that as a 'settlement' , creation of Pakistan would end constant appeasement.
Besides, as a 'settlement' of Hindu-Muslim conflict, Dr. Ambedkar suggested that exchange of Hindu-Muslim population must accompany partition of India.  But despite Dr. Ambedkar's counsel against appeasement, Congress kept on pursuing appeasement. In the 1945-46 elections, Muslims voted for the creation of Pakistan. And despite conceding Pakistan in 1947, Congress continues to cling to its policy of appeasement. A large majority of Indian Muslims who demanded Pakistan for Muslims and exchange of population on creation of Pakistan stayed back in India, and did not go to Pakistan. But with the creation of Pakistan in 1947, it was the permanent settlement of Hindu-Muslim problem in the sub-continent. Accordingly, appeasement must come to an end. Now or never
Because of its surrender and inaction, India is being taken over by crores of Pak-Bangla infiltrators silently. Besides, countless Pak-Bangla terrorists are stalking all over India to strike at the time and target of their choice.
Since drastic situations demand drastic remedies, all nationalist organizations and individuals must come together and force the government to act as follows: a. Terrorists must be crushed; not welcomed and embraced. Chanakya Neeti as also Sun-tzu's Art of War, and countless lessons of world history emphasize the crushing of enemies before enemies crush us. b. Let infiltrators be treated as invaders. And not as vote banks. c. Let Indian borders be sealed to prevent infiltrators from entering India.
d. Let all Indo-Pak and Indo-Bangla road and rail journeys be discontinued. e. Let the Supreme Court's judgements be implemented and crores of Pak-Bangla infiltrators be deported. And their daily influx be curbed.  f. And let Pak-Bangla design to destroy India and plant one more Islamic country on Indian soil be defeated.  Here it is relevant to quote Sir Winston Churchill who deprecated the British policy of appeasement of Germany before outbreak of Second World War thus, "Still, if you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a small chance of survival."   As per Sir Winston Churchill, "An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last". Though India is being devoured bit by bit every day by its tormentors, India continues to appease them. Poisonous politics of appeasement has crippled India and ravaged its body and soul.  Genocide and eviction of Hindus from Kashmir to be made refugees in their own country; frequent Pak-Bangla sponsored terrorist attacks on security forces, civilians and temples; continuation of Article 370 conferring a special status on Muslim majority Jammu and Kashmir; infiltration of crores of Pak-Bangla nationals into India to create one more Islamic country on Indian soil represent the bitter harvest of this suicidal appeasement. Long legacy  This hideous policy of appeasement started in 1921 when Mahatma Gandhi and
Congress Party's support to Indian Muslims' demand for Khilafat (to install Sultan of Turkey as the Caliph) led to Moplah rebellion in 1921 in Malabar in which thousands of innocent Hindus were massacred by Muslims. And Hindus had nothing to do with British policy towards Turkey. Sir C. Sankaran Nair (1857-1934), a former judge of Madras High Court has described horrors of Moplah rebellion in his book "Gandhi and Anarchy". But Mahatma Gandhi reportedly described Moplahs as "God fearing," who "are fighting for what they consider as religion, and in a manner they consider as religious."
Persistent appeasement philosophy of Congress culminated in the Muslim League demanding Pakistan for Muslims in March, 1940, and creation of Pakistan in 1947 and eviction of Hindus and Sikhs from present-day Pakistan
and Bangladesh. But even
after 1947, same doctrine has guided successive Congress governments' actions.
Only a few illustrations of such countless actions are given here. Congress government under Jawaharlal Nehru started "Haj subsidy" for Muslims in 1959 though such subsidy is anti-secular and though none of the 57 Muslim
countries pays any such subsidy. And to placate Muslim uproar over Supreme Court's judgement in Shah Bano's case, the then Congress government passed the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986; and nullified the said judgement.
And the same Congress which had rejected "Communal Award" in 1932 is now spearheading Muslim reservation in government jobs; and is sharing power with Muslim League which had demanded and got Pakistan. Besides, debunking nation's security, after regaining power in 2004, Congress government repealed Prevention of terrorist Activities Act (POTA) the way it had repealed Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) in 1995. Besides, to please pro-Pakistan elements, UPA government is planning to withdraw security forces from Kashmir.
But the most vexatious outcome of this capitulation is the demographic and terrorist invasion of India. Demographic and terrorist invasion  In their bid to demolish and dismember India, Pakistan's Inter Services Intelligence, and its Bangladeshi counterpart are bent upon creating one more Islamic country on Indian soil for which they have illegally sent crores of their nationals into India.
AASU leader Sarbananda Sonowal took the issue of Bangladeshi infiltration to Supreme Court. By its judgement dated July 12, 2005, Supreme Court struck down the Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Act, 1983 as
unconstitutional; and termed Bangladeshi infiltration as "external aggression" and directed that "the Bangladesh nationals who have illegally crossed the border and have trespassed into Assam or are living in other parts of the country have no legal right of any kind to remain in India and they are liable to be deported."
But instead of deporting the infiltrators, on Feb. 10, 2006, UPA government brought in the Foreigners (Tribunals for Assam) Order to nullify the apex Court's judgement. However, on December 5, 2006, Supreme Court quashed this
Order also as illegal and unconstitutional, and called for a strict implementation of its earlier judgement dated July 12, 2005 "so as to ensure that illegal immigrants are sent out of this country." Shockingly, despite the Supreme Court's clear directions, no infiltrators have been deported by the government. Rather, thanks to UPA government's policy of soft borders, Pak-Bangla nationals are infiltrating into India every day changing the demographic map of various States in the country.
We have rightly pointed out the dangers of lakhs of Hindus getting converted to Buddhism. I see it as part of the political movement to exterminate Hindus and Hinduism. Today's converts to Buddhism are potential Muslims and Christians to make them crusaders against Hindus and Hinduism. Sharing your observation, "The only way to rejuvenate and expand Hinduism is to convert willing non-Hindus to Hinduism", I have to say the following. There is a wide spread false notion among Hindu intellectuals and even the VHP activists that Hindu Dharma is a non-proselytizing religion, meaning Hindu Dharma does not permit a non-Hindu to join Hindu religion nor permits any outsider to merge in Hindu society. So much so that many ardent Hindu votaries believe that there is nothing like a Hindu religion and, so, the question of converting a non-Hindu to Hindu religion does not arise. They even go to
> the extent of saying that non-institutionaliz ing of Hindu Dharma is a great virtue and that an apex body of Hindu Dharma, (forgetting that we had one at Kashi up the medieval period), would make Hindu Dharma a dogmatic faith like Christianity or Mohammedanism. All the above false notions emanate from Islamic and Christian  ropagandists. The dictionary meaning of religion is, "Belief  in, recognition of, or an awakened sense of a higher unseen controlling  power or powers, (God or gods), with the emotion and morality connected  with such rites or worship; any system of such belief or worship". When  we say Hindu religion, it means Hindu belief in God (Parmeshwar) , soul,  rites, way(s) of worship. There is a ten yearly census on the basis of  'Hindu religion' which alone proves declining Hindu majority in India.  There is a separate set of civil laws applicable to Hindu religionists  as distinct from Christians and Muslims. It is a different matter that  Hindu Dharma is a wider term that includes all aspects of Hindu life,  from birth to death. But, that can be said of Islam too.  During the Mohammedan rule in the medieval period,  not only a Mohammedan could not be taken into Hindu fold, one could not  voluntarily give up his  Mohammedan faith without inviting a death  penalty to him and the converter. In all probability, the doors of Hindu  Dharma and Hindu social orders had to be closed on the face of such a  cruel Islamic regime which ruled on a large part of India for centuries  together. Hindu Dharma had to freeze its mantra of K"rinvanto  vishvamaaryam" , (Let us Aryanise the whole world, i.e., convert  non-Vedics to Vedic faith & value system). Earlier, with this very
 mantra, Hindus had converted all Shakas, Huns, etc. who too came as  invaders to Indian soil from foreign lands.
 The truth is that refusal of entry to a genuine  seeker of salvation under Hindu Dharma and Hindu society is a self
 destructive sin. Our scriptural edict is "Atithi devo bhava", (a guest  is an honourable person) and Vedic mantra, cited above, "Krinvanto  vishwamaaryam" , is to bring non-Aryans of the whole world to Aryan, that  is, Vedic or Hindu fold. Our religious preachers boldly say that Hindu  philosophy is supreme and is the only panacea for world peace. Granted  that, the question is,"What is the use of this panacea if it is  forbidden to all those who need it but are not Hindus by birth?" New  entries will surely bring fresh blood in the Hindu society which is  essential for any growing religion or society for its longevity and good  health.
 We are all victims of the existing degenerate Hindu caste system. It is because, in numerous successive wars during the  first millennium of the Christian era, most of the real Brahmins and  real Kshatriyas were either killed, forced to take up menial jobs or  embrace Islam. When Shivaji in Maharashtra and Guru Gobind Singh rose  against the tyrannical rule of the Mughal ruler Aurangzeb, they had to  raise their armies largely out of the OBCs. They were given the status  of Kshatriyas. No attempt was, however, made to make up the deficiency  of real Brahmins.
 Thus there is a great need of (i) admitting  non-Hindus to Hindu Dharma and Hindu society and (ii) augment the ranks  of true Kshatriyas and true Brahmins by promoting the OBCs, the Dalits  and others on the basis of their ability and aptitude. Swami Dayanand  and his Arya Samaj tried to remove the birth based caste system, replace
 it by actual merit of the person, and admit willing non-Hindus to Hindu  Dharma, through a ceremony called, 'Shuddhi'. These, however, have had a  limited success because other Hindu bodies either opposed it or sat
 quiet. There is thus a need to have immediately an apex Hindu religious  body who should formulate a suitable simple ceremony or ceremonies to be  followed uniformly by all Hindu religious bodies throughout India and
 abroad. And even before perpetrators of 1993 bomb blasts in Mumbai could be punished, Mumbai faced fresh blasts on July 11, 2006 in trains which claimed about two hundred lives. And these attacks are in the long line of attacks Bharat has suffered since Muhammad bin Qasim's Arab army's attack in 711.  And such attacks continue to hammer India due to government's terrorist-friendly approach.  'Settlement' as against 'appeasement'
 

10/23/09
1
Whoa, that was a lot to take in without knowing all the nuances of the history. I read it all tho.

10/23/09
0
 All I can say is Congress is doing well in overall and Rahul Gandhi is doing exceptional in progressing Youth Congress trying to put some positive impact on next generation.

10/29/09
0
15 mins? you gotta be kiddin me.

 
Notify me by email about comments that follow mine.
Preview


BEST OF THE WEB
SHOP
LOCKER ROOM GEAR
Reebok NFL Equipment New E..
$79.95
New Era New York Yankees N..
$33.95
adidas Los Angeles Lakers ..
$24.95
MEET OUR FANS
Doreen
Lindsey
 more
12,798,192+
ANSWER TODAY'S POLL
 more
PLAY NEVER-ENDING TRIVIA
New York v. LA
Utah v. Houston
Seattle v. Portland
Detroit v. Chicago
 more

TAKE A QUIZ
 more

PREDICT THE SCORE
NFL
NBA
NHL
NCAABB
Soccer
 more
2,555,658+
kokethagu joined the Soccer league 2006 World Cup.
Just now!
kobe_39 created a new Cycling trivia question. Click here to answer it.
Just now!
kokethagu joined the Soccer league Fans of Nepal (Soccer).
Just now!
Just now!
ayumi_kimura96 joined the Martial Arts league Fans of Uechi Ryu.
Just now!
Just now!
Just now!
Just now!
guptabhupendra1 joined the Cricket league Fans of India.
Just now!
guptabhupendra1 joined the Cricket league CricketFans.
Just now!
 

Join Today
About FanIQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Contact Us
Report A Bug
Help