As a South Carolina fan, I'm pretty much obligated to not cheer for Clemson, however I find it odd that Clemson only got to the line seven times in a double-overtime game. (Of course, being the strong free-throw shooting team they are, they only made one of them)
North Carolina, on the other hand, got to the line 36 times, converting 31.
Anyone out there see this game? Is there a logical explanation for this, or should I assume that UNC was the benefit of some (Mc)Lovin' from the refs? I didn't get to see the game, but it seems kind of fishy to me.....
I feel obliged to note that Xavier picked up a big win over St. Joes over the weekend. Yes they blew a big lead in the second half and yes they had to battle to win at home but it's a strong conference win against a good St. Joes team. If you want some good reading check out some of Phil Martelli's quotes about Xavier. The best are his comments about ensuring that Stanley Burrell graduates this year. Classic stuff.
As a South Carolina fan, I'm pretty much obligated to not cheer for Clemson, however I find it odd that Clemson only got to the line seven times in a double-overtime game. (Of course, being the strong free-throw shooting team they are, they only made one of them)
North Carolina, on the other hand, got to the line 36 times, converting 31.
Anyone out there see this game? Is there a logical explanation for this, or should I assume that UNC was the benefit of some (Mc)Lovin' from the refs? I didn't get to see the game, but it seems kind of fishy to me.....
I watched it, and although UNC got the benefit of the doubt on a few calls, it was maybe slightly more than a home team would expect. The logical explanation is that Clemson was fouling Hansbrough, who was 17-19 by the line himself, and Clemson wasn't exactly looking to get fouled. Also, because UNC's defense, especially on the interior is so poor, they often aren't tough enough defensively to even foul the guys down low. Great defense will always get more fouls called on them than poor defense, and UNC's defense was certainly not great until the last few minutes and in the 2nd OT.
With all that said, it was a colossal bed-crapping by the Tigers. Will they ever win in CH?
As a South Carolina fan, I'm pretty much obligated to not cheer for Clemson, however I find it odd that Clemson only got to the line seven times in a double-overtime game. (Of course, being the strong free-throw shooting team they are, they only made one of them)
North Carolina, on the other hand, got to the line 36 times, converting 31.
Anyone out there see this game? Is there a logical explanation for this, or should I assume that UNC was the benefit of some (Mc)Lovin' from the refs? I didn't get to see the game, but it seems kind of fishy to me.....
I saw the whole thing... The typical "Tobacco Road" officiating bias was definitely there. However, some of the discrepancy was due to the fact that UNC didn't play much defense on the perimeter and Clemson was hitting shots from the perimeter. Also, the Clemson guards seemed to be able to penetrate without too much trouble and get some easy layups. There were some very questionable over the back calls and non-calls in the game and there will always be the charge/block calls that aren't called correctly, but as a Clemson fan we just have to get over it.
The opportunity was there to win the game. We were up by 15 with 7 minutes left and still up by 11 with 3 minutes left. Can't make any excuses for that...
I thought that this was going to be the year to get over that D@&% 52 (now 53) game curse in Chapel Hill, but it didn't happen. Now we have to look to the rest of the season and learn to finish the game.
Also Clemson's free throw opportunities (except one I think) were all one and ones and Clemson missed the front end on all of them. Still ends up being about 14 free throws.
Also Clemson's free throw opportunities (except one I think) were all one and ones and Clemson missed the front end on all of them. Still ends up being about 14 free throws.
I thought the officiating was decent though
There were 3 misses on the front end of the 1 and 1. Other things that should be noted is that there were 31 total fouls called against Clemson and only 14 called against UNC.
James Mays- 41 minutes played. 4 personal fouls, 2 free throw attempts.
North Carolina was in the bonus with 8:26 left in the first half but Clemson never made it in the bonus because UNC was whistled for only four fouls in the first half. The Tar Heels were in the bonus with 9:48 to go in the second half and Clemson finally made it in the bonus with 48 seconds.
North Carolina was in the bonus for a total of 17:14 in regulation and Clemson spent 48 seconds in the bonus.
UNC spent 8:26 seconds in the double bonus. Clemson never made it to the double bonus.
Hansbrough had two fouls in regulation. Booker got his fourth foul with 11:35 left in regulation and Rivers got his fourth foul with 5:51 remaining in regulation.
UNC shot nine free throws in double overtime while Clemson shot seven for the entire 50 minutes.
Stitt is a point guard who plays mostly away from the basket and he played 21 minutes and had five fouls. Hansbrough, a power player, played 47 minutes and was called for three fouls.
That stat (NC 53-0 vs Clemson at home) is almost hard to believe. If it was a small school in a no-name conference it would be one thing but Clemson is a solid ACC program that has made runs in the NCAA Tournament and put players in the NBA.