DONE!
Cheer and debate with
1,000,000+ fans!
My Team:
Charlotte
My Team:
Michael
My Team:
Britney
Welcome to FanIQ!
FanIQ is the ultimate free community for sports fans.
Talk sports with fans from all over - 1,532,540+ Comments
Track your game picks - 38,669,933,162+ Sports Predictions
Prove you know sports - 93,761+ Trivia Questions
Find fans of your teams - 6,429,880+ New Friends

Next Post »
« Previous Post

Matt Walsh's Patriots Tapes Don't Tell Us The Whole Story
13
comments
It'd Be A Mistake To Think That Spygate Means Nothing Without The Rams Walkthrough
by 100%InjuryRate
5/8/08

Obviously one of the biggest stories going on in sports - or the only story of any merit - is the tapes that former Patriots assistant Matt Walsh has now provided to the NFL.

The smoking gun that was supposed to be unearthed here was the tape showing the Rams' walkthrough before the 2002 Super Bowl. It wasn't there.

As a result, most people - including the NFL - are now pretty much calling Spygate a non-issue. But they shouldn't, and here's why.

Walsh’s tapes show that the Patriots recorded the signals of offensive and defensive coaches in regular-season games against the Miami Dolphins, the Buffalo Bills, the Cleveland Browns, the San Diego Chargers and against the Pittsburgh Steelers in the 2002 AFC championship game.

Here's what the Patriots' record was against these teams after they recorded the signals. 9-6 against the Dolphins, 12-1 against the Bills, 3-0 against the Browns, 4-1 against the Steelers and 3-1 against the Chargers. This includes three playoff victories. That's an almost unreal winning percentage of 77.5%.

The tapes are also fairly sophisticated tapes. They show shots of the opposing coaches’ signals, followed immediately by a shot of the play, usually from the end zone camera.

We also have to keep in mind that we still don't know for certain that the Patriots never taped the Rams' walkthrough. The Boston Herald is sticking by its original story that it happened, making it clear that Walsh was not the source they used. Meanwhile ESPN's Chris Mortensen says the original Rams walkthrough story didn't meet ESPN's standards. That's especially funny coming from Mortensen, who has a success rate of about 20% on reporting NFL stories.

But I digress. The point is that whether the Patriots taped the Rams' walkthough or not, they've still shown a consistent and habitual pattern of cheating. There's more than enough proof of that. Plus we'll never know how many teams they may have taped that no one knows about.

And if you think this continual cheating didn't help get them to that Super Bowl against the Rams, and help them build their dynasty, then you're kidding yourself.
13
Comment!
Share it

Read More: NFL, New England Patriots, Rumors, Rumors, Cheating
« We always hurt the ones we love | The Players Championship - 17th Hole Sawgrass »

TODAY'S TOP PICKS ON FANIQ
  1. This Probably Won't End Well 9
  2. Am I An Eternal Optimist? Or An Eternal Idiot? Because I'm Excited About The Red Sox's Chances 16
  3. Colt McCoy May Be In The Heisman Lead, But He's Not My Best Player At Midseason 9
  4. There Can't Be Anything Worse Than Getting Schooled By A V-Neck Sweater Wearing Brit 5
  5. Poll: Dallas and Detroit complete trade. 14
What is this moment best known as?
What is this moment best known as?
Take the Trivia Challenge

The Russian Rush
The Thrilla in Manila
The Golden Moment
The Miracle on Ice
The Nightmare in New York

Created by: Jon
More Sports Trivia
13 comments
Vote!
Comment!
Your votes determine top comment
Top comment earns 300 Points!
+300 points!
160 days ago
4
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+4
 
+0
 
-0
(Edited 05/08/08 2:06PM by Boski93)

Thanks Walsh, you had to tape that episode of Real World/Road Rules The Gauntlet.

Look what's happened, you bastard.

 
160 days ago
2
VOTE:
 
+2
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Yeah, I agree, and it's a shame because there was so much buildup around the potential for Super Bowl taping that if there isn't, the league will write everything else off as minuscule and want to move on.  Sad.
 
160 days ago
3
VOTE:
 
+3
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
To me it looks more and more like the NFL just wants to sweep this under the rug to not get a black eye from this. But if nothing happens from this they will have two black eyes in my book.
 
160 days ago
4
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+4
 
+0
 
-0
(Edited 05/08/08 2:06PM by Boski93)

Thanks Walsh, you had to tape that episode of Real World/Road Rules The Gauntlet.

Look what's happened, you bastard.

 
160 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Roger Goodell is a joke, so it shouldn't surprise anyone that he'll just sweep this under the rug again.
 
160 days ago
2
VOTE:
 
+2
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
RenegadeLG wrote:
Yeah, I agree, and it's a shame because there was so much buildup around the potential for Super Bowl taping that if there isn't, the league will write everything else off as minuscule and want to move on.  Sad.
I think it has a lot more to do with Goodell protecting the owner who pretty much got him his job.  Honestly, do you really think he would have treated any other team the way he did the Patriots?
 
159 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
I am not a Patriot fan, I don't like the Patriots, but come on, this is out of control ... please just end it ... all this stuff is in the past ... leave it there ... who cares ... one of my favorite teams is The Jets ... and they would have lost that game regardless ... so big deal ... let's just put this thing to bed and be done with it ... I don't care ... please just end this ... getting tired of reading about it.
 
159 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+1
 
+0
 
+0