NBA Playoffs: Round 1 Matchup Predictions

4/19/13 in NBA   |   Matthew_Shovlin   |   735 respect

WESTERN CONFERENCE
Blog Photo - NBA Playoffs: Round 1 Matchup Predictions
Oklahoma City Thunder vs. Houston Rockets: 
It's championship-or-bust for OKC this season, and they want to prove that they didn't make a mistake by trading James Harden to the Rockets. On the other hand, Harden wants to show the world that the Thunder did make a mistake, and knock his former team out of the playoffs.

Harden and Kevin Durant (5th and 2nd in points per game this season, respectively) are two of the more gifted scorers in the league, but here lies the problem - Harden is going to be locked down by the man who started over him in OKC, Thabo Sefolosha. As for who could guard Durant successfully - I'm not sure anyone on the Rockets has a shot. Jeremy Lin tends to struggle with more athletic point guards (i.e. Russell Westbrook). Kendrick Perkins and Serge Ibaka can handle Omer Asik down low.

I like the Rockets, but this just doesn't seem like a good matchup for them. Of course, who does match up well against the Thunder?

Thunder in 5.

San Antonio Spurs vs. Los Angeles Lakers: Why does Gregg Popovich rest his star players in the middle of the season, seemingly at random? Because he wants to avoid the type of situation he is in right now. The Spurs are a mess as far as injuries at the moment. Manu Ginobili is nursing a hamstring injury, while Tony Parker may or may not be fully recovered from a neck injury. Surprisingly, soon-to-be 37-year-old Tim Duncan is healthy and is the best bet to carry this team in the playoffs at the moment.

The Lakers have been on a roll, winning eight of their last nine games to earn the 7th seed. Dwight Howard has been playing the way we've been accustomed to seeing him play thus far in his career, and Pau Gasol has looked much more comfortable on the offensive end as of late. Of course, the main concern with the Lakers is that they will not have Kobe Bryant - their leading scorer and most consistent facilitator (considering Steve Nash's injuries). Nash is being called doubtful for Game 1, though he is optimistic he'll play. If he does play, there's no telling how effective he'll be. We could see the Lakers start Steve Blake and Jodie Meeks in the backcourt, with the weight of the world falling on Howard's shoulders (one of which contains a torn labrum) - I'm not sure Laker fans want that.

Somehow, someway, Popovich's Spurs often manage to pull out wins. All of the Spurs' key pieces have plenty of playoff experience, and I'm expecting some of the role players (Kawhi Leonard, Tiago Splitter) to step up and make good things happen. If Kobe and Nash were healthy, however, I'd have the Lakers in this one.

Spurs in 7.
April 15, 2013; Oakland, CA, USA; Golden State Warriors point guard Stephen Curry (30) high fives power forward David Lee (10) against the San Antonio Spurs during the fourth quarter at Oracle Arena. The Golden State Warriors defeated the San Antonio Spurs 116-106. Mandatory Credit: Kelley L Cox-USA TODAY Sports
Denver Nuggets vs. Golden State Warriors: Gaining home court advantage was huge for the Nuggets, who were an NBA-best 38-3 at home this season. They employ a balanced attack that features nine players averaging 8+ points per game. However, one of those players (Danilo Gallinari, 16.2 points per game) is out for the season with a torn ACL. It's hard to say how the Nuggets will function in a playoff game without their second leading scorer. The good news is that they have gone 5-1 (only loss was in overtime) since Gallinari's injury.

The Warriors are loaded with firepower, but a lot of it has never seen a playoff game. Stephen Curry has turned into one of the most entertaining players in the game, while All-Star power forward David Lee is one of the most efficient big men around. Klay Thompson has really come into his own this season, while Jarrett Jack has been one of the best sixth men in the NBA.

I really like the Warriors. I've been a huge fan of both Stephen Curry and David Lee for a long time, but the lack of playoff experience on this roster - compared to the Nuggets, who lost in seven games to the Lakers last year - is a concern for me. In addition, I think it will be very difficult for the Warriors to steal a game in Denver. The Nuggets are 38-3 at home, and the Warriors are 19-22 on the road. I think this series has a solid chance of going seven games, but...

Nuggets in 6.

Los Angeles Clippers vs. Memphis Grizzlies: The Clippers are easily one of the flashiest, most entertaining teams in the NBA, but are they a championship contender? That remains to be seen. On paper, they look like they have every shot of making the Finals. They have an elite point guard in Chris Paul, a shooter who can bail you out of tough situations in Jamal Crawford, a dangerous scoring big man in Blake Griffin, and a dominant paint presence in DeAndre Jordan. They score the 9th most points per game while giving up the 4th least.

The best scoring defense in the league belongs to the Grizzlies, who give up only 89.3 points per game. They have a couple of premier perimeter defenders in Tony Allen and Tayshaun Prince, as well as one of my favorite big men in the NBA, Zach Randolph. This team went down in seven games to the Clippers last season.

One difference between this Grizzlies team and last year's team concerns me, and it's probably pretty obvious - Rudy Gay is no longer on the squad. The Grizzlies no longer have a player who can bail you out of a late shot clock situation or go iso when the team is in a rut (such as a Jamal Crawford). The Clippers beat the Grizzlies in the playoffs last season, and I think the Clippers have improved while the Grizzlies have gotten a little bit worse.

Grizzlies in 6.


I apologize that I do not have one single underdog winning. I'm pretty upset about it myself. On a series-by-series basis, I just don't see it happening.
Notify me by email about comments that follow mine. Preview

4/20/13   |   AJ_88   |   166 respect

Question: You ended your paragraph on the clips/grizz series with this sentence: The Clippers beat the Grizzlies in the playoffs last season, and I think the Clippers have improved while the Grizzlies have gotten a little bit worse.
And then went on to say:
Grizzlies in 6.

Was that a mistake? Or after you explicitly say the Grizz are worse than last year, you still think they'll beat the Clippers in 6?