Please sign in to complete your action
 
DONE!
Cheer and debate with
6,000,000+ fans!
My Team:
Charlotte
My Team:
Michael
My Team:
Britney
For the first half of their game against the Dolphins on Sunday, the Saints didn't really look like the best team in football. Their performance in the second half, however, left no doubt whatsoever. I don't think there's another team in the NFL that could have come back like that. Without further ado, here's this week's Power Rankings:

1. Saints, 6-0, Last week: 1
The intro pretty much says it all. Only the best team in football could play that well in the second half against a Dolphins team that has been pretty decent lately.

2. Colts, 6-0, Last week: 2
Another week, another win. Peyton Manning is still far and away the leading MVP candidate, but they don't pass the Saints quite yet. Colts-Saints would be a dream Super Bowl matchup.

3. Broncos, 6-0, Last week: 3
The Broncos have a few tough games coming up, as the Ravens and Steelers will try to hand them their first loss. It they don't lose in the next two weeks, we might even see an undefeated matchup in Week 14 against the Colts.

4. Vikings, 6-1, Last week: 4
They lost to the Steelers on the road, but if that was a home game or even on a neutral field, I think the Vikings win that game. That, or if they put in Tarvaris Jackson for the last 6 minutes of the game.

5. Patriots, 5-2, Last week: 6
In the past two games, they outscored the Titans and Bucs 94-7. However, we might not know if this offense is for real again until they play the Colts in Week 10.

6. Bengals, 5-2, Last week: 8
The Bengals literally embarrassed the Bears this week. Their first 7 possessions: TD, TD, TD, TD, FG, TD, TD. This offense is officially back.

7. Steelers, 5-2, Last week: 9
They downed the undefeated Vikings, but most people realized (or should have realized) that the Vikings were overdue for a loss. Favre has been playing with fire all year, and the Steelers finally burned him.

8. Cowboys, 5-2, Last week: 15
They finally beat a pretty good team. Before their win over the Falcons, their "best" win was over the Panthers. But their losses were to the Broncos and Giants, a couple pretty good teams. At least at the time.

9. Giants, 5-2, Last week: 5
I have no idea what happened to the Giants, but they've been pretty bad in the last couple weeks. They got wrecked by the Saints, and then the Cardinals owned them in the second half. I think they'll bounce back against the Eagles, though.

10. Ravens, 3-3, Last week: 10
The Ravens have lost 3 straight, but they were 3 pretty good teams (Patriots, Bengals, Vikings). Unfortunately for them, they have the Broncos, Bengals, Colts and Steelers in 4 of the next 5 weeks. Ouch.

11. Atlanta, 4-2, Last week: 7
The Falcons needed a signature win against the Cowboys this week, but fell flat on their faces. Honestly, I almost feel bad for them this week, going into New Orleans.

12. Cardinals, 4-2, Last week: 18
Are they back to last year's form? Can't be sure yet, but they looked like they might be, the way they played against the Giants. Once again, their relatively weak division will help them.

13. Eagles, 4-2, Last week: 13
I still can't get over their loss to the Raiders. Seriously... how does that happen? The Raiders are terrible. At least the Eagles didn't embarrass themselves again against the Redskins.

14. Texans, 4-3, Last week: 14
Matt Schaub is one of the most underrated players in the NFL, and he is showing that he can compete with anyone in football.

15. Packers, 4-2, Last week: 16
I will stand by what I said last week. If they find a way to protect Aaron Rodgers, he will very decisively prove that he's one of the best QB's in the game. Seriously.

16. 49ers, 3-3, Last week: 12
I don't know what Mike Singletary is going to have to do to get this team to win, but I am looking forward to seeing what he tries to do to straighten out the ship.

17. Chargers, 3-3, Last week: 17
The Chargers need to beat a good team before we'll be able to see where they're at. They play the Raiders this week, so that might have to wait.

18. Bears, 3-3, Last week: 11
The Jay Cutler Experiment is not turning out nearly as well as the Bears had hoped. He's currently tied for 2nd in the NFL with 10 INT's, and they are killing them.

19. Jets, 4-3, Last week: 24
After a ridiculously awful hiccup in which he threw 8 picks in 2 out of 3 games, Mark Sanchez didn't really suck this week. Thanks to the Raiders, as well as Rex Ryan reigning him in a bit, with only 15 pass attempts. The Jets should probably stick with that plan.

20. Bills, 3-4, Last week: 21
Terrell Owens has 18 catches, and only 1 TD so far this year. I have a feeling the Bills expected a lot more than they signed him.

21. Jaguars, 3-3, Last week: 20
The Jaguars have won 3 of their last 4, but it hasn't been pretty. Their loss was that 41-0 shutout against the Seahawks, and the Rams took them to OT. The Rams. Yeah, I know. Awful, isn't it?

22. Dolphins, 2-4, Last week: 19
Interesting stat of the week: The Dolphins are 2-0 in their division, and 0-4 against the rest of the league. However, that will likely change when they play the Patriots.

23. Panthers, 2-4, Last week: 22
Jake Delhomme leads the league in interceptions... and John Fox still won't bench him. They should both be unemployed by the time January rolls around.

24. Seahawks, 2-4, Last week: 23
I'm sorry, but this year's Seahawks team once again just looks like they're not a good team. Their win over the Jags made it look like they had a chance, but it was just the Jags.

25. Raiders, 2-5, Last week: 25
As long as Al Davis is running the team, I would be shocked if the Raiders ever go higher than 20 in ANYONE's Power Rankings. Ever.

26. Chiefs, 1-6, Last week: 26
Now, their best player is tweeting homophobic slurs against the coach, and saying that his dad could coach better. Yeah, because we've seen how well nepotism works in football. Just ask Rod Marinelli about his son-in-law in Detroit.

27. Lions, 1-5, Last week: 27
Speaking of Detroit, here they are. They play the Rams next week, so they might be in line for their 2nd win in 2 seasons. Success... maybe.

28. Browns, 1-6, Last week: 28
The "Fire Mangini" train should be running through Cleveland soon. He was a decent coordinator in New England, but like a lot of Belichick's guys, he's not really head coach material.

29. Redskins, 2-5, Last week: 29
They have beaten the Bucs and Rams. Both games were at home, and they won by a combined total of 5 points. That is horrible.

30. Buccaneers, 0-7, Last week: 30
They are as bad as anyone has ever been. I would honestly be shocked if they win a game all year. Their schedule is no joke... unlike the team.

31. Titans, 0-6, Last week: 31
I think they're bad enough to go undefeated, but they play the Rams at home in Week 14. If they can't win that game, then I don't even know what to say.

32. Rams, 0-7, Last week: 32
Look forward to a 30-point spread for their game in Week 10 against the Saints. That should be fun to watch. Can they even beat the Lions next week? Doubt it.


Time for you guys to give your input. Let us know where you stand, and where I went wrong*. Have at it.


*Hint: I didn't. I'm right.
42 comments
Vote!
Comment!
Your votes determine top comment

10/27/09
6
I haven't downgraded anyone. I merely grade them, based on their performance. I am still anxiously awaiting an explanation, preferably in your own words, to justify placing them any higher than I already have them.

It's funny how predictably worked up you get over rankings which, when all is said and done, mean nothing. It's just a discussion piece, and you aren't even willing to intelligently discuss it, other than the weekly "wahhhhh, my Steelers are being disrespected because you're a homer, even though I have no valid way to justify this statement, so I'll just back away slowly and pretend that I'm too far above this to respond for real".

In other news, my name isn't Glenn. Not sure where you keep getting that idea, but just thought I'd let you know. It's a common mistake, no worries. Lots of people have trouble remembering names. It's all good.

10/27/09
1
Only a Steelers fan would have such a ridiculous sense of entitlement that they would feel slighted for moving up 2 spots after a home win.

I have yet to see you make a compelling case (or a case at all) for the Steelers being higher than they have been, yet you bitch about it every week. Like clockwork. Eh... whatever. Glad you enjoyed it.

10/27/09
1
Wait, are you saying they WILL beat two of the top 5 teams? Because up until this point their best win of the season came against the Chargers.

Who would you have the Steelers above? the 6-0 colts? 6-0 broncos? the 6-0 Saints? the Patriots that just scored 84 points and only allowed 7? the bengals who they lost to? the vikings with the better record?

I guess it would have to be the Vikings, but it took some of the usual "steeler magic" to get that win at home.

10/27/09
3
Can someone  let me know which direction this soap opera is headed?? i don't want to miss a thing and i am busy next week:(

10/27/09
6
I haven't downgraded anyone. I merely grade them, based on their performance. I am still anxiously awaiting an explanation, preferably in your own words, to justify placing them any higher than I already have them.

It's funny how predictably worked up you get over rankings which, when all is said and done, mean nothing. It's just a discussion piece, and you aren't even willing to intelligently discuss it, other than the weekly "wahhhhh, my Steelers are being disrespected because you're a homer, even though I have no valid way to justify this statement, so I'll just back away slowly and pretend that I'm too far above this to respond for real".

In other news, my name isn't Glenn. Not sure where you keep getting that idea, but just thought I'd let you know. It's a common mistake, no worries. Lots of people have trouble remembering names. It's all good.

10/27/09
0
Pittsburgh beat the vikings fair and square.unless the excuse is brett favre did not have enough time to let his nails dry.Well done Steelers.As for the Vikings its a reality check going into next week that they have to be better.

10/27/09
2
You know, this ranking doesn't really bother me because both teams have played a couple good teams and both have played a few bad teams. except the Pats have DEMOLISHED the bad teams and the Steelers have squeeked by the Lions and even kept the Browns fairly close.

On a neutral field, I'm not sure who'd win between the Steelers and the Pats. And I'm sure the refs wouldn't know who to give all the BS calls to.

10/27/09
2
I'll ask the same of you that I asked of Alan earlier.

Based on what they have done this season, why should the Steelers be ahead of the Patriots? Or the Bengals, for that matter, since you guys are apparently ignoring them?

Don't just say I'm wrong "just because"... make your case.

10/27/09
2
ary201 wrote:
You know, this ranking doesn't really bother me because both teams have played a couple good teams and both have played a few bad teams. except the Pats have DEMOLISHED the bad teams and the Steelers have squeeked by the Lions and even kept the Browns fairly close.

On a neutral field, I'm not sure who'd win between the Steelers and the Pats. And I'm sure the refs wouldn't know who to give all the BS calls to.
The Steelers also beat the Titans in OT. Yeah ... the Titans who lost 59-0 to the Patriots. That's their only common opponent so far. Just throwing that out there.

10/27/09
1
Rabble Rabble Rabble!

10/27/09
2
Browns higher than the Redskins??? ITS AN OUTRAGE!!!!!!!

10/27/09
0
Please point out the comment in which you posted these facts that you speak of. I'll help you out, and give you the links to all of the previous rankings. Just let me know where these alleged facts are. Also, feel free to point out where this alleged "attack" was. I am honestly looking forward to this, and I hope you can help find it... because I can't.

Last week
the week before <--- this is what I think you're referring to, but there was no attack, I just posted some specific reasoning for my rankings. nor were there any facts posted by you... just power rankings from another site, which is equally objective.
the week before
the week before
the week before
And... the first power rankings of the year.

Please point out what you're talking about, and I'll be more than happy to apologize and retract any attacks that I have made. Thanks!

10/27/09
0
I really not sold on the Colts at all. I guess they have to be in the top 3, because they're undefeated. But they have not played anyone yet... Just like the Giants, 5-0, and in their two tough games, 0-2. Their opponents combined record is 11-26, and they've played three NFC teams so far, two winless teams, and almost lost to the 2-4 Dolphins and 3-3 Jaguars. Their only tough opponent was Arizona, but they were not playing good in the early stages.

"Another week, another win"


With their schedule, they should be 6-0. It seems like their season doesn't even start until Week 10.

10/27/09
1
I suppose. Obviously their win over the Vikings is solid, but other than that, the Chargers are their best win. I think the Bengals have a better overall resume than the Steelers, especially with the head to head win, and remember that they were right there with the Broncos in Week 1. I also think that the Patriots, outside of Week 2, have looked like one of the best teams in football. They're competing with and/or handily beating the good teams, and obliterating the bad teams.

That's my basic logic. I can understand what you're saying, but outside of the Vikings game, I just don't see it.

10/27/09
1
How are the Packers 15th?  Let's think...
1) The Packers won their last two games by a large margin
2) Aaron Rodgers has a top five QB rating
3) The Packers offense has been outscoring the other team by double digits

I will guarantee the Packers will be placed in the top five teams when the destroy the Vikings at home this weekend.

10/27/09
2
I'm also confused about what to think about the Cowboys and Giants.  Even though they lost, Minnesota is clearly (as of now) the greatest threat to the Saints.  I'm trying not to think about the Bears.

10/27/09
2
dacurtjones wrote:
How are the Packers 15th?  Let's think...
1) The Packers won their last two games by a large margin
2) Aaron Rodgers has a top five QB rating
3) The Packers offense has been outscoring the other team by double digits

I will guarantee the Packers will be placed in the top five teams when the destroy the Vikings at home this weekend.
I hope you're right. I think that Aaron Rodgers is an excellent QB. My only real concern with that team is their offensive line. If they can protect Rodgers, that team will be very good. They have failed to do that, however, in most of their games.

10/27/09
0
COLTS #1

10/27/09
0
dacurtjones wrote:
How are the Packers 15th?  Let's think...
1) The Packers won their last two games by a large margin
2) Aaron Rodgers has a top five QB rating
3) The Packers offense has been outscoring the other team by double digits

I will guarantee the Packers will be placed in the top five teams when the destroy the Vikings at home this weekend.
I think the Packers are probably pretty underrated, right now. Though last time they played the Vikes, that O-Line looked fairly terrible.

10/27/09
2
Is it just me are is it only steeler fans talking about Bias rankings???

10/27/09
1
(Edited by uwgb44)

Also would anyone else Like to see a Colts/Saints Superbowl. Where they are both going for an undefeated season?? I think that would be a great game to watch.


10/27/09
4
Pat, I can't BELIEVE you ranked the Seahawks so low! Especially dropping them after a bye week which should count as a WIN! Who do you think you are? Who do you have something against on my team, because I know it isn't Hasselbeck. These rankings are hogwash!

Wait...You're right.
They suck, and the only reason they aren't lower is because of their record; which may be a little padded due to the caliber of the teams they got their wins against. Although, yea the Jags suck but, I would still like to see the Seahawks that showed up on the field that day over any other game this year.

10/27/09
0
Walking into henhouse Baak, Baaaaak! " ...Glenn..." Baak, Baaaaak!" ...It's just a discussion piece..." Baak, Baaak! "...Strength of schedule..." (are we talking college football?) "How are the Packers 15th?" Baak, Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaak!!! I gotta get outta here!

10/27/09
0
uwgb44 wrote:

Also would anyone else Like to see a Colts/Saints Superbowl. Where they are both going for an undefeated season?? I think that would be a great game to watch.

You're kidding right? we are 6 games into the season and youre talking about a SuperBowl? Super Bowl you're talking Super Bowl??? How about practice?

10/27/09
0
uwgb44 wrote:

Also would anyone else Like to see a Colts/Saints Superbowl. Where they are both going for an undefeated season?? I think that would be a great game to watch.

Well..i was posing a simple question of "Would anyone like to see this?" I didnt say it was going to happen. It was just a what if senario. Lets settle down there and actually read what is posted.

10/27/09
0
(Edited by jiggajones27)
All i read was about how the vikings were due for a loss. No credit for the Steelers. Another year as one of the top teams and still 0 respect. Only speculations. Honestly? The goddamn Bengals are better than the Steelers?? ....Wow.

10/27/09
0
Pat wrote:
The Steelers also beat the Titans in OT. Yeah ... the Titans who lost 59-0 to the Patriots. That's their only common opponent so far. Just throwing that out there.
The Steelers pretty much beat EVERYONE by very little.

10/27/09
0
jiggajones27 wrote:
All i read was about how the vikings were due for a loss. No credit for the Steelers. Another year as one of the top teams and still 0 respect. Only speculations. Honestly? The goddamn Bengals are better than the Steelers?? ....Wow.
Well the steelers did lose to the Bengals if you remember correctly.

10/27/09
1
(Edited by joe_lindberg)
I agree for the most part with the rankings its the logic that has me confused
#1 Saints HEY there are the best team in the NFL, but they did have to come back against the Dolphins, and the reason they are put there this "Only the best team in football could play that well in the second half against a Dolphins team that has been pretty decent lately." They were 2-3 going into this game.
#2 Indy OK I give you that one, but to say that "Peyton Manning is still far and away the leading MVP candidate" I don't see that yet 1- He doesn't stand a top of ever stat. 2- Hasn't played against a real defense yet. Don't get me wrong he's hands down the best all around quarterback in the league. But he's not got MVP yet.
#3 Bronco's I see the point.
#4 Vikings they belong there, to say"but if that was a home game or even on a neutral field, I think the Vikings win that game" and the on the Steelers ranking say "They downed the undefeated Vikings, but most people realized (or should have realized) that the Vikings were overdue for a loss" with that logic shouldn't the other 3 undefeated teams be due a loss.
#5 Patriots maybe but to put them there cause "In the past two games, they outscored the Titans and Bucs 94-7"  I understand that this is on there all so "However, we might not know if this offense is for real again until they play the Colts in Week 10" that almost sounds like a cop-out till week ten.
Like I said I pretty much agree with the ranking not so much on the logic.

10/27/09
0
Agreed that SF should be where they are.... but I don't think I'd have AZ over them. The niners still seem like the best team in the NFC west to me.

Going up against Indy this week is a tough test, so I guess we'll see if Alex Smith is really back or not real soon.

10/27/09
3
joe_lindberg wrote:
I agree for the most part with the rankings its the logic that has me confused
#1 Saints HEY there are the best team in the NFL, but they did have to come back against the Dolphins, and the reason they are put there this "Only the best team in football could play that well in the second half against a Dolphins team that has been pretty decent lately." They were 2-3 going into this game.
#2 Indy OK I give you that one, but to say that "Peyton Manning is still far and away the leading MVP candidate" I don't see that yet 1- He doesn't stand a top of ever stat. 2- Hasn't played against a real defense yet. Don't get me wrong he's hands down the best all around quarterback in the league. But he's not got MVP yet.
#3 Bronco's I see the point.
#4 Vikings they belong there, to say"but if that was a home game or even on a neutral field, I think the Vikings win that game" and the on the Steelers ranking say "They downed the undefeated Vikings, but most people realized (or should have realized) that the Vikings were overdue for a loss" with that logic shouldn't the other 3 undefeated teams be due a loss.
#5 Patriots maybe but to put them there cause "In the past two games, they outscored the Titans and Bucs 94-7"  I understand that this is on there all so "However, we might not know if this offense is for real again until they play the Colts in Week 10" that almost sounds like a cop-out till week ten.
Like I said I pretty much agree with the ranking not so much on the logic.
Well... first thing to keep in mind is that these blurbs aren't necessarily justifications for the rankings. Some are, but some are just my random thought of the week about that team. To be honest, the middle 15-20 teams, I try NOT to justify their rankings too much, because I feel like a lot of them are interchangeable. But I'll touch on these, just to clarify where I'm coming from.
#1) My logic with the Saints is that I don't think any other team could come back that dominantly from that kind of deficit on the road. Every team has had at least one bad half, at some point this year. But the Saints turned it around with one of the BEST 30 minutes that we've seen from any team, outside of the Patriots 1st half against the Titans. That, and this week's 12-point win was their "closest" game.
#2) He has the highest QB rating in the league, is tied with Tom Brady for the 2nd most TD passes in the league (although Brady and Matt Schaub, who is in first place, have each played 1 more game), and he only has 4 INT's. He leads the league in passing yards per game, and their blowout against the Rams was the first time he threw for less than 300 yards, and that was only because of the blowout.
#3) Ok, thanks haha
#4) I feel like the Vikings played well enough to win that game, aside from Favre's 2 late turnovers. I also think there was a pivotal bad call by the refs. Not whining, just saying that's what I believe I saw. After watching the game, I am not convinced that the Steelers are the better overall team. As I said, the Vikings have been playing with fire for a while, and have had some trouble closing out games. They've cut it close several times... this time they paid for it.
#5) The Patriots comment was to emphasize the fact that while I do believe they have looked like one of the best teams in football for about 75% of the season (i.e. not the first 3 quarters of the Bills game, or the Jets game). They lost in overtime to the Broncos, and were dominant in every other game. The Ravens and Falcons games weren't blowouts, but they were very decisive nonetheless. That's pretty much where I was going with that.

Thanks for the comment, though. I appreciate the thought that went into it, and I hope I clarified my position.

10/28/09
0
You really think LJ is the Chiefs current best player? There's a guy over there at WR named Dwayne Bowe, I hope you've heard of him. As far as I know, he's been quiet through his first couple years in the league, I'm just hoping the prima donna phase doesn't come up anytime soon.

10/31/09
1
Jays_Leafs_Ffan wrote:
Pittsburgh beat the vikings fair and square.unless the excuse is brett favre did not have enough time to let his nails dry.Well done Steelers.As for the Vikings its a reality check going into next week that they have to be better.
"fair and square"???

You must be the only other person in America (as well as the ref that threw the flag) that thought the tripping call against Minnesota late in the 4th that took away a lead changing TD was a good (or "fair") call. Every analyst and "unbiased" spectatator across America called that flag Horrendous and a game changing error. Oh btw.... the Steelers D scored 2 plays later and made it a double digit lead. FAIR win huh? I think NOT. Just yet ANOTHER game that  had the outcome arguably tainted by a TERRIBLE call  late in a game.

10/31/09
1
(Edited by zzj000)

I say AGAIN....Colts are #1 Pat ....... Saints comeback or not. At least you arent using that home win over the GMen as a reason for the Saints stature this week. Is my argument that "the Colts win in Arizona is far more impressive than the Saints win over NY" starting to sink in seeing how Arizona just layed it on NY in NY? Apparently it didnt sink in far enuff yet ...... or is it just a Patriots fan thing? lol

Oh well, at least you didnt move the Pats up to #2...... Thank God for small favors!

And despite the 2 wins at home.... I still think the Skins "deserve" to be at the bottom of the heap.


10/31/09
1
zzj000 wrote:

I say AGAIN....Colts are #1 Pat ....... Saints comeback or not. At least you arent using that home win over the GMen as a reason for the Saints stature this week. Is my argument that "the Colts win in Arizona is far more impressive than the Saints win over NY" starting to sink in seeing how Arizona just layed it on NY in NY? Apparently it didnt sink in far enuff yet ...... or is it just a Patriots fan thing? lol

Oh well, at least you didnt move the Pats up to #2...... Thank God for small favors!

And despite the 2 wins at home.... I still think the Skins "deserve" to be at the bottom of the heap.

The Saints have won every game by 12 or more points. Just throwing that out there.

10/31/09
1
Thank you for acknowledging that I'm right, and that you can't actually point out valid examples of the ridiculous claims that you're throwing around.

10/31/09
0
(Edited by zzj000)

Jus sayin huh..... Well let me point out that the Saints have defeated their opponents this year by scoring 107 more points than their opponents (an avg winning margin of 17.3), while the Colts have outscored their opponents by 102 (avg margin of 17).... AND I contend that the Colts have done that against better competition (speifically the Arizona road game which New Orleans has yet to equal that test).
Furthermore..... over the past 4 games.... the Colts winning margin is 24 while the Saints is 17. (Again citing better competition faced by the Colts while compiling that stat)
Furthermore... I expect those numbers to continue to be lopsided in the Colts favor since the Colts now have Bob Sanders back at Safety. The Collts compiled better defensive numbers than the Saints WITHOUT him. WITH him... there is NO DOUBT who has the better D.
I hope you dont try and use the Saints opponent this week as your argument that the Saints played better competiton with the Colts hosting the 49ers. You have Atlanta rated too high. The 49ers are again the better team despite their (3-3) record vs Atlanta's (4-2) record.
Jus sayin................


 
Notify me by email about comments that follow mine.
Preview


BEST OF THE WEB
SHOP
NFL GEAR
Reebok NFL Equipment New E..
$79.95
New Era New York Yankees N..
$33.95
adidas Los Angeles Lakers ..
$24.95
NFL TICKETS
Loading...
MEET OUR FANS
Lindsey
Elisha
 more
12,798,192+
ANSWER TODAY'S POLL
 more
PLAY NEVER-ENDING TRIVIA
Detroit v. Chicago
Utah v. Houston
Seattle v. Portland
New York v. LA
 more

TAKE A QUIZ
 more

PREDICT THE SCORE
NFL
NBA
NHL
NCAABB
Soccer
 more
2,555,658+
amadison74 heckled monkey_in_jar as he passed you in the Trivia rankings
3 minutes ago
amadison74 heckled Smokey54 as he passed you in the Trivia rankings
3 minutes ago
3 minutes ago
3 minutes ago
amadison74 heckled corimainville as he passed you in the Trivia rankings
3 minutes ago
rita1317 joined the NFL league RavensFans.
3 minutes ago
rita1317 joined the NFL league NFL Fantasy Football.
3 minutes ago
rita1317 joined the NFL league NFL Draft League.
3 minutes ago
rita1317 joined the Bowling league Fans of Al Thompson.
3 minutes ago
rita1317 joined the Bowling league Fans of Bowling.
3 minutes ago
 

Join Today
About FanIQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Contact Us
Report A Bug
Help