DONE!
Cheer and debate with
1,000,000+ fans!
My Team:
Charlotte
My Team:
Michael
My Team:
Britney
Welcome to FanIQ!
FanIQ is the ultimate free community for sports fans.
Talk sports with fans from all over - 1,532,540+ Comments
Track your game picks - 38,669,933,162+ Sports Predictions
Prove you know sports - 93,761+ Trivia Questions
Find fans of your teams - 6,429,880+ New Friends

Next Post »
« Previous Post

On the Men's Side, American Tennis in a Rut
3
comments
Another Major, Another No-Show From the American Men
by TheBigThree
7/1/08

By most, if not all accounts, James Blake and Andy Roddick should have two of the best grass court games on the planet. Blake has a powerful flat first serve, a booming forehand, and is fleet of foot more than most players on tour. Roddick has the biggest serve in the game, a booming forehand in his own right, and decent mobility, not to mention an improving net game. Grass court tennis is very much about big weapons—Blake and Roddick have them.

So, here we are in week number two of Wimbledon, and Blake and Roddick were sent home, I dunno, three rounds ago or something. Really, it should be a head-scratcher. But reality dictates that it’s not—it’s eminently unsurprising. It’s eminently unsurprising because our nation’s tennis boys, for lack of eloquence, suck at the moment. Maybe something’s not right Blake’s mental game. Maybe something’s not right with Roddick’s inability to use his biggest shots with timeliness. Going further, maybe something’s wrong with Taylor Dent’s athleticism, with Robby Ginepri’s lack of a go-to stroke, with Mardy Fish getting in the game a little too late. Whatever the case, many things are wrong with American tennis on the men’s side. And there is no easy fix.

Blake is nearing the twilight of his career. His peak may have come in 2006, when he took a set off of Federer in the U.S. Open quarters and finished the year ranked number four. Roddick may have plenty of shelf life left. But to this point, his pinnacle was reached when he won our national championship a half-decade ago and was given SNL-hosting duties as a prize. All the other mid-to-late twenty-somethings in American tennis—the aforementioned Dent, Ginepri, Fish; and others, such as Vincent Spadea—may not have “peaks” that include top triumph. It’s a cold reality: this generation is stuck in neutral and is traveling nowhere quickly.

It’s on the shoulders of the little ones—Chicago’s electric Donald Young, Georgia Bulldog John Isner, big-serving Sam Querrey, among others—to raise the bar. Given the fact that Agassi and Sampras are still within the rearview mirror’s sight, raising that bar will not be an easy task; American men’s tennis just concluded an era of unparalleled brilliance, one that will likely never come again.

What do you think? Is it still worth keeping tabs on our tennis countrymen, despite the fact that we’ve become accustomed to let-down after let-down in recent memory?
3
Comment!
Share it

Read More: Tennis, James Blake, Andy Roddick
« Alex Rodriguez And Madonna Rumored To Be Having An Affair | Wings Re-Sign Brad Stuart »

TODAY'S TOP PICKS ON FANIQ
  1. This Probably Won't End Well 9
  2. Am I An Eternal Optimist? Or An Eternal Idiot? Because I'm Excited About The Red Sox's Chances 16
  3. Colt McCoy May Be In The Heisman Lead, But He's Not My Best Player At Midseason 9
  4. There Can't Be Anything Worse Than Getting Schooled By A V-Neck Sweater Wearing Brit 5
  5. Poll: Dallas and Detroit complete trade. 14
What is this moment best known as?
What is this moment best known as?
Take the Trivia Challenge

The Russian Rush
The Thrilla in Manila
The Golden Moment
The Miracle on Ice
The Nightmare in New York

Created by: Jon
More Sports Trivia
3 comments
Vote!
Comment!
Your votes determine top comment
Top comment earns 300 Points!
106 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Hmmm, have you guys seen those Serena and Venus Williams Brothers?  If they played on the men's side where they belonged,  the American men's tennis picture would look a lot rosier...
 
105 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
cgnz62358 wrote:

I personally have had such high hopes for Andy Roddick since I first saw him play at the French Open when he was only 18 and he fell and hurt himself in that match against Hewitt, then 3 years later he won the US Open men's singles title and I was over the moon, but then he hasn't won another grand slam title since and in watching him in match after match I feel like he doesn't really lack talent but the ability to dictate and also to predict his opponent's shots, an ability which I think he could have learned to develop if he played doubles regularly because everything goes a lot faster in doubles matches so a player learns to be double quick, and for someone with his talent if he could just add to his game that quickness and the ability to dictate and predict his opponent's shots, I'm certain he will soon win another grand slam title.  I think.

I agree.  Roddick relies to heavily on his power, and not enough on movement.  I always felt he was just slow, but now I see what you see, he can't anticipate his opponents shots, he also can't go from defense to offense.  He makes way to many unforced errors going for the winner when he should be planning 3 shots ahead.  He needs a coach who can really manage his mental game, because right now he doesn't have one.  Until then its going to be Federer, Nadal, Jokovic.

 
 
Preview