Please sign in to complete your action
 
DONE!
Cheer and debate with
6,000,000+ fans!
My Team:
Charlotte
My Team:
Michael
My Team:
Britney
Former Cub and Ranger Sammy Sosa joined Alex Rodriguez this week, being the second player named from the ‘confidential’ steroid testing list of 2003. Do baseball fans deserve to know who the other 102 players from the list are? Let’s look at both sides.
On one hand, I say no. The only reason the player’s union agreed to testing in the first place was that it was supposed to be confidential. If over 5% of players tested positive, then they would agree to drug testing. It was obviously much higher. 104 players in total tested positive. You could argue that all players from that season have a right to privacy as agreed upon by the MLB and player’s union.
Even when a player is ousted by a news story, who is to say it’s correct? While there is little doubt Sammy Sosa is a cheater (corked bat included), there is no way to verify the New York Times story. What if the next story is about Ken Griffey Jr.? Everyone assumes he is innocent; but what if he was named next? Just because an investigative reporter publishes a story, the general public cannot blindly accept the story. They don’t have to name their sources and there is no evidence. It becomes nothing more than he said, he said. Steroids weren’t illegal in baseball before 2004. These players deserve the privacy that was promised their union.
On the other hand, I say yes. In the age of general public access to every facet of sports superstars' lives, we must know everything about everyone. What if Griffey was sick of being injured and decided he wanted a boost since half the lineups in baseball were doing it? Since he's considered a first ballot Hall of Famer, wouldn't we want to know that? The fans of the game deserve to know who was cheating before they are Hall of Fame eligible. Baseball is a numbers game more than any other sport. We don’t need Barry Bonds’ HR’s erased from the books to consider Aaron the Homer King in our minds. If the remaining 102 are named, it would greatly impact their all-star votes in the future, free agent earnings, endorsement deals, and overall marketability. But rightfully so! These players took a short cut to get ahead and if that hurts them in the long-run, so be it.
Do we as fans of baseball deserve to know the remaining 102 players from 2003, or are they rightfully protected by the secrecy promised to them?
27 comments
Vote!
Comment!
Your votes determine top comment

6/17/09
8
 I'm tired of hearing the argument that steroids were not illegal in baseball before 2004. They were illegal period.
Banned by federal law. MLB was so greedy and incompetent that they waited til 2003 to start testing, but that does not mean they were legal, and does not excuse any usage prior to MLB's overhauled PED policies.

6/17/09
2
The one thing that these guys all seem to have in common is that they played for the Rangers, I'm sorry to say. I mean, for all that cheating they dang sure didn't win much. At least all 102 of these guys can't have played for the Rangers, right?

Do fans deserve to know these players? I'd say so, since it is the fans game as much as it is the owners game and the players game.

But should MLB release these names? No, because that would be unethical given that MLB said they wouldn't release the name. That said, whoever is leaking these names should just leak the whole thing and get it over with.

6/17/09
0
OFF WITH THEIR HEADS!!! Or at least whoever's on the list.

6/17/09
8
 I'm tired of hearing the argument that steroids were not illegal in baseball before 2004. They were illegal period.
Banned by federal law. MLB was so greedy and incompetent that they waited til 2003 to start testing, but that does not mean they were legal, and does not excuse any usage prior to MLB's overhauled PED policies.

6/17/09
1
Good write up

6/17/09
1
These players were guaranteed confidentiality, and to release the names would be outrageous. How would you guys like it if lets say your doctor tells the world that you have E.D. lol

6/17/09
1
I  blame  Major   Baseball    for  waiting    so  long.   Did  they  say  they  have  over  102  names  left.   If    they  won't   show    all  the  names    then  they    should  burn    it.       Because    are  all  102   names    not  going  in   the  Hall  Of  Fame  ,   and  are  they  going  to      destroy    all   102   name    records .      Is   Jeter     on   steroids   to      ?    (   Because  this  is  crazy , I  blame     Major      League     Baseball ) .

6/17/09
0
ABSOLUTELY ! ... WHY NOT ! " MLB , continue to clean house ! "

6/17/09
0
I would say yep

6/18/09
1
when you a public player your life is pretty much a pu blic affair also

6/18/09
7
The players union and MLB dropped the ball on this whole mess in the first place by not destroying the results like they planned.  Now, I think it's only fair to the players who've already been named that they rest of the list be released.  Why should a couple of guys take all the fall when there are alot more names on the list that tested positive? 

6/18/09
0
 great job on this - I don't see them giving names anytime soon 

6/18/09
0
soxfan90 wrote:
These players were guaranteed confidentiality, and to release the names would be outrageous. How would you guys like it if lets say your doctor tells the world that you have E.D. lol
I'm not getting paid $28 million a year. And screw my doctor, I'll tell the whole world that I have ED if my career salary was $124,068,000. That, my friend, is outrageous. 

6/18/09
4
drunko wrote:
 I'm tired of hearing the argument that steroids were not illegal in baseball before 2004. They were illegal period.
Banned by federal law. MLB was so greedy and incompetent that they waited til 2003 to start testing, but that does not mean they were legal, and does not excuse any usage prior to MLB's overhauled PED policies.
I agree,how can you break a federal law and then promise to keep it quite. If the MLBPA and MLB know that a law was broken they are just as guilty as the players themselves, an agreement between lawbreakers would never hold up in court.I would like to see the entire list released,but i have a funny feeling as long as a certain player or players are on it it will be at least 4 more years before the entire list is released so it will not effect the HOF. It would not look good for baseball to have the career HR leader on the list and they didnt say or do anything about it.MLB is between a rock and a hard place on this subject because of their past actions.

6/18/09
0
If someone is on steroids  people deserve to know, because when that person injects the needle, they're definitley aware that they can humiliate themselves in the press.  I have suspicion of some players on steroids for almost every team, including my favorite, the Mets.  And if there's 102 people left on the list, i think most of my suspicions will be right

6/18/09
0
If the MLB is testing for steroids and not releasing it, then what's the point.  The only way they can suspend players for 50 days, is if the public knows it.  Besides, it should be fair.  Now so many players are going to start taking steroids because they know that they WON'T be released to the public

6/18/09
2
make that 101 to go, Brady Anderson was still playing then....

6/18/09
0
Go Sox!

6/18/09
0
BearcatFan wrote:
I'm not getting paid $28 million a year. And screw my doctor, I'll tell the whole world that I have ED if my career salary was $124,068,000. That, my friend, is outrageous. 
Your logic that a higher salary = less rights makes no sense

6/18/09
1
Ironically, the corked bat probably did more to help him hit homers than steroids did!

6/19/09
0
Go Mets and get the win!

6/19/09
0
REVELL THEM ALL AND KEEP THEM OUT OF THE HALL

6/20/09
0
spidey333 wrote:
REVELL THEM ALL AND KEEP THEM OUT OF THE HALL
Ridiculous to keep any deserving player on that list out of the Hall.

6/20/09
1
soxfan90 wrote:
Your logic that a higher salary = less rights makes no sense
Actually it makes a lot of sense. People who are considered "public figures" don't have the same rights against slander and defamation of character as people who aren't considered "public figures". Someone who has a salary that high is highly likely to be considered a "public figure" under the law and thus have less rights under the law for slander and defamation than others.

6/21/09
0
i agree, why would anyone take steroids! it recks your body! a true player plays for fun not just to be the best on his team

6/21/09
0
people who do drugs and playing sports. should be tested before they do. if there in a steriod in there body. they should be banned and charged.

6/22/09
0
(Edited by soxfan90)
BluDevil wrote:
Actually it makes a lot of sense. People who are considered "public figures" don't have the same rights against slander and defamation of character as people who aren't considered "public figures". Someone who has a salary that high is highly likely to be considered a "public figure" under the law and thus have less rights under the law for slander and defamation than others.

Does that include private testamonies?


6/22/09
1
soxfan90 wrote:

Does that include private testamonies?

It might, if the person who made the testimony willingly revealed that testimony to a news outlet. The person who testifies can almost always go public with their own testimony, 'cause it is their own testimony. The only people who are prevented from revealing the testimony, generally speaking, are the people who heard it. But the person who said it can go out and say it to the news if they want.

 
Notify me by email about comments that follow mine.
Preview


BEST OF THE WEB
SHOP
MLB GEAR
Reebok NFL Equipment New E..
$79.95
New Era New York Yankees N..
$33.95
adidas Los Angeles Lakers ..
$24.95
MLB TICKETS
Loading...
MEET OUR FANS
Tonique
Elisha
 more
12,798,192+
ANSWER TODAY'S POLL
 more
PLAY NEVER-ENDING TRIVIA
Detroit v. Chicago
New York v. LA
Utah v. Houston
Seattle v. Portland
 more

TAKE A QUIZ
 more

PREDICT THE SCORE
NFL
NBA
NHL
NCAABB
Soccer
 more
2,555,658+
Just now!
Just now!
lbruce entered the prediction poll CHL Pick Em 11/15 games.
Just now!
Just now!
jmmenterprises1995 joined the NASCAR league Fans of Juan Pablo Montoy.
Just now!
jmmenterprises1995 joined the NASCAR league NASCAR Fans.
Just now!
 

Join Today
About FanIQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Contact Us
Report A Bug
Help