Welcome to FanIQ!
FanIQ is the ultimate free community for sports fans.
Talk sports with fans from all over - 1,328,691+ Comments
Track your game picks - 15,027,509+ Sports Predictions
Prove you know sports - 79,935+ Trivia Questions
Find fans of your teams - 3,222,916+ New Friends

Next Post »
« Previous Post

Technology Making World Records Obsolete
12
comments
World Records Play Like Broken Records
by TheBigThree
>7 days ago

When I was in grade school, I was an unadulterated dork. I dressed up as anything from Captain Kirk to Peter Pan during Halloween, and regardless of the fact that I’ve traded Captain Kirk for Captain Morgan and Peter Pan’s youth and innocence for Peter Pan’s peanut butter and jelly, I remember those days fondly. I was into math. I was into English. I was into history and I was into science.

But in 1996, I was into mythology. I was into speed. I was into thinking that Michael Johnson was Hermes.

Remember those gold shoes? They glided across the grounds of Atlanta that year, putting on an air of invincibility. He owned the 400m. He defined the 200m. He became an American legend whose reputation has been subsequently secured as clean. For those three summer weeks, he was more than an Olympian—he was a bona fide Olympic god. To me and many others, the man was, indeed, the god of speed, donning footwear worthy of only a deity.

But here’s the thing about those gold shoes—they didn’t help him win the 200m, nor the 400m, nor anything else. Those gold shoes were a perhaps playful and perhaps ironic symbol befitting an athlete whose natural skill transcended his time. Now, instead of the gold shoes on the gold feet, we have the sleek swimwear on the sleek bodies. And this swimwear is not for show.

Jerry Greene of the Orlando Sentinel characterized the $500+ Speedo LZR (pronounced “laser”) Racer as “a full-body suit made from a seamless fabric that has the hydrodynamic characteristics of shark skin.” People from NASA worked on this thing. Since its introduction to swimming in February, 19 long-course and 4 short-course world records have been set. All but one record-holder wore the LZR. We might as well start handing out jet-packs to basketball players and Iron Man suits to running backs.

U.S. Olympic swim coach Mark Schubert said, “I wouldn't be surprised to see every world record broken at the Games, and hopefully we’ll get a big percentage of those.” Read that again: “…every world record…” There’s no other word to describe the LZR other than “tragic.” It’s fine for technology to supplement the athlete; for example, golf clubs have become more powerful and accurate. However, as the golf clubs have become bigger, so have the golf courses on which the golfers compete. It used to be a 250 yard drive on a 400 yard Par 4. Now it’s a 300 yard drive on a 450 yard Par 4. It’s becoming ever closer to a 350 yard drive on a 500 yard Par 4. The technology has advanced in golf, as have the athletes and the golf courses. It’s a perpetual progression that every facet of the game has undergone in mostly proportional fashion, not just driving the golf ball.

In swimming, the 50m freestyle is the 50m freestyle. The pool cannot be made to include barracudas as obstacles. As such, the meaning of what it is to be a “world record-holder” has been diminished, because the viewing public is entirely justified in wondering, “What would Mark Spitz have done in a Speedo LZR Racer?” This technology does not merely supplement the swimmer—it completely enhances the swimmer in ways that are unfair in the spirit of the competition. If every competitor wears the LZR at the Olympics, fine. Perhaps the playing field will be as level as it was sans-LZR, but the records will not mean a thing.

How is this swimwear different from steroids? In today’s ‘roid-laden competitive culture, there are those who would question the integrity of sprinters Tyson Gay and Usian Bolt, arguably the top two 100m competitors on the planet. Here’s an unassailable statement: if Gay and Bolt are someday found to be juicing, their records mean nothing. The steroids don’t merely supplement the sprinter—they completely enhance the sprinter in ways that are unfair in the spirit of the competition. And on we ago again in the same vein as the LZR should be approached.

I like swimmers who swim and sprinters who sprint. Give Michael Phelps a regular Speedo. Give Ben Johnson nothing but a weight room, a track, and Gatorade. Let’s see what these guys can do when the records are determined by the athletes and not the supplements. Unfortunately, any hope of such days hasn’t really existed in quite some time, and any sliver of hope that still lives is as good as dead.

That ten year-old boy in me still thinks that Michael Johnson is Hermes. And no matter how fast anyone sprints from here on out, he will never be supplanted. In this culture, the race is no longer sacred. Hermes never needed a syringe.
12
Comment!
Share it

Read More: Olympics, Technology
« Blog Patrol | Tampa Bay Bucaneers Rookies Aqib Talib And Cory Boyd Fight At NFL Rookie Symposium »

TODAY'S TOP PICKS ON FANIQ
  1. The Yankees Have a 3% Chance of Making the Playoffs... So Who's Going to Take the Fall? 2
  2. Get Ready To Buy Yourself An Ocho Cinco Jersey 23
  3. Turns Out The Gators Have Players Not Named Tebow 1
  4. Who Do NBA Players Owe Their Allegiance Too? 4
  5. Poll: Michigan Wolverines - Game by Game Prediction 23
Who Am I?
Who Am I?
Take the Trivia Challenge

Joe Louis
Mike Tyson
George Foreman
Muhammad Ali

Created by: Jon
More Sports Trivia
12 comments
Vote!
Comment!
Your votes determine top comment
Top comment earns 300 Points!
+300 points!
57 days ago
4
VOTE:
 
+4
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
I can't stand all this piety about sports records. Sports is entertainment and has been for a very long time. This time people are worried about swim suits. When did people ever complain about track surfaces and modern track shoes? Do you think runners would be setting their current records wearing shoes or running on tracks from the early 1900s? The only reason MLB hasn't adopted aluminum bats is because the outfields would have to be so big, they'd need 6 outfielders and pitchers would have to wear body armor or pitch from 2nd base. Do you think Ozzie Smith would have made the plays he did with an early 1900s slab of leather on his hand? Does anybody play with wooden tennis rackets anymore? Did you ever see a whole set of golf clubs from the early 1900s? They look like kitchen utensils. Please take all your old records and put them where the sun doesn't shine. Sports is entertainment. Enjoy what's happening now.
 
58 days ago
2
VOTE:
 
+2
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
I agree, the swimming records mean nothing anymore. On the broadcast of the trials, the commentators act disappointed when "only" the American record is broken.

Track, though, hasn't really hit that point where records are constantly assaulted, with the obvious exception of the men's 100m. Michael Johnson still owns the 200m and 400m records. Heck, Flo-Jo still owns the women's 100 and 200m records. I admit, I was a little surprised given the current situation in track.
 
58 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+1
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
gearhead wrote:
I agree, the swimming records mean nothing anymore. On the broadcast of the trials, the commentators act disappointed when "only" the American record is broken.

Track, though, hasn't really hit that point where records are constantly assaulted, with the obvious exception of the men's 100m. Michael Johnson still owns the 200m and 400m records. Heck, Flo-Jo still owns the women's 100 and 200m records. I admit, I was a little surprised given the current situation in track.
True story about track and field.  MJ's 200m record I would imagine is pretty secure for the long haul, because his time was so sublime that it's almost impossible.  Other records, I admit, I am not too familiar with.  The argument about track records is that ever since Ben Johnson -- and momentum is increasing with the fallouts of Justin Gatlin and Marion Jones -- I almost have to take any short-distance time with a grain of salt.  We all know the implications of "the cloud of suspicion" this day and age.  Accusations matter; it's damn near "guilty until proven innocent" in the steroid era.  And since the 100m is the race of races at the Olympics, its records are magnified.  With Tyson Gay and Usian Bolt being two of the fastest runners of all-time around the same point in time, I have to raise an eyebrow.  Nothing more, since I know nothing more, but I still have to raise an eyebrow.  Can't imagine I'm alone.
 
58 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Sport is just like anything else, you either evolve or get left in the dust... every time there was a major advancement in the sport, there's always these cries of foul and talk about how it cheapens the sport... yet as time goes on, people pay as much attention to the records as they always have.
 
58 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
RedBirdRage wrote:
Sport is just like anything else, you either evolve or get left in the dust... every time there was a major advancement in the sport, there's always these cries of foul and talk about how it cheapens the sport... yet as time goes on, people pay as much attention to the records as they always have.
I can't buy into that argument.

As I said, it's true that sports evolve.  Football players have become more physically imposing, but that's something that's shared by all of the athletes in the sport.  Golf clubs have become more advanced, but so have the golf courses.  You could even argue that steroids in baseball have been available to all competitors -- both pitchers and hitters -- so the effects of such drugs have offset each other by some inconclusive amount.

In the case of swimming and track, however, the sports themselves do not evolve.  It's a runner against a defenseless track; it's a swimmer against a defenseless pool.  Sure, maybe this swimsuit is available to all competitors, thus making the competition as level as it would be without the suits, but in this instance, we're not talking about merely winning and losing as we are with football and as we are with golf (although there's something to be said for a "course record," but hell, look at the U.S. Open scores of late and tell me the courses aren't fighting back).  In this instance, we're talking about world records.  And because these suits and these drugs make the swimmers and runners faster, their records have to absolutely be taken with a grain of salt in light of athletes like Mark Spitz and Carl Lewis.  Honestly, that portion of the argument is incontrovertible.
 
58 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Yea... I can't buy into this one.  Every sport has advancements on a regular basis to improve the performance of the participating athletes.  This is no different from a new bat in baseball, tighter uniforms in the NFL to keep from having jersey to grab, better clubs in golf...  if the author of the piece really believed what he said he would have left Gatoraide out for track and field guys - even the weightroom - taken away nutrition and vitamin advancements snd gone back to competing in the nude.
 
58 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
TheBigThree wrote:
I can't buy into that argument.

As I said, it's true that sports evolve.  Football players have become more physically imposing, but that's something that's shared by all of the athletes in the sport.  Golf clubs have become more advanced, but so have the golf courses.  You could even argue that steroids in baseball have been available to all competitors -- both pitchers and hitters -- so the effects of such drugs have offset each other by some inconclusive amount.

In the case of swimming and track, however, the sports themselves do not evolve.  It's a runner against a defenseless track; it's a swimmer against a defenseless pool.  Sure, maybe this swimsuit is available to all competitors, thus making the competition as level as it would be without the suits, but in this instance, we're not talking about merely winning and losing as we are with football and as we are with golf (although there's something to be said for a "course record," but hell, look at the U.S. Open scores of late and tell me the courses aren't fighting back).  In this instance, we're talking about world records.  And because these suits and these drugs make the swimmers and runners faster, their records have to absolutely be taken with a grain of salt in light of athletes like Mark Spitz and Carl Lewis.  Honestly, that portion of the argument is incontrovertible.

The athletes aren't competing against the track and the wind, or against the water, they're competing against other athletes... otherwise we'd have to give the field a score for every pulled hammy or turf toe injury.

 

And actually, yes the sports themselves do evolve.  Whether it's more efficient strokes or getting rid of body hair in swimming or actual track suits replacing baggy shorts and monitoring arm angles in track, there's always some way to evolve the sport.  This one just creates much more of a brouhaha because it's noticable to the untrained eye.

 
58 days ago
3
VOTE:
 
+3
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
I'm sorry people but we are giving to much into the suits. Not saying they don't make a difference but so does the lane markers that were developed for the 2000 games or the always improving drainage systems. But those only make so much of a difference. The real difference in swimming is the training and development of the swimmers. You go look at the body of Spitz and compare him to Phelps or Thorpe and the contrast is unbelievable.
 
57 days ago
3
VOTE:
 
+3
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Marshall wrote:
I'm sorry people but we are giving to much into the suits. Not saying they don't make a difference but so does the lane markers that were developed for the 2000 games or the always improving drainage systems. But those only make so much of a difference. The real difference in swimming is the training and development of the swimmers. You go look at the body of Spitz and compare him to Phelps or Thorpe and the contrast is unbelievable.
Yeah but still, even you can't deny that when people are demolishing world records in the damn prelims, something is definitely fishy. No pun intended.
 
57 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+1
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
100%InjuryRate wrote:
Yeah but still, even you can't deny that when people are demolishing world records in the damn prelims, something is definitely fishy. No pun intended.
Not as much as you might think. The Aussies had the same suits at their trails. Which puts the emphasis on the pools as much as the suits and training. I'm not disagreeing that these records aren't as sacred as they used to be just that people are putting an awful lot of the cause on the suits where there are other major (in my opinion bigger) factors.
 
57 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
hahahaha this guy looks like a Ken Doll!!!!
 
57 days ago
4
VOTE:
 
+4
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
I can't stand all this piety about sports records. Sports is entertainment and has been for a very long time. This time people are worried about swim suits. When did people ever complain about track surfaces and modern track shoes? Do you think runners would be setting their current records wearing shoes or running on tracks from the early 1900s? The only reason MLB hasn't adopted aluminum bats is because the outfields would have to be so big, they'd need 6 outfielders and pitchers would have to wear body armor or pitch from 2nd base. Do you think Ozzie Smith would have made the plays he did with an early 1900s slab of leather on his hand? Does anybody play with wooden tennis rackets anymore? Did you ever see a whole set of golf clubs from the early 1900s? They look like kitchen utensils. Please take all your old records and put them where the sun doesn't shine. Sports is entertainment. Enjoy what's happening now.
 
55 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+1
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
You have to be somewhat good to get close. Its not like the suit gets the record for them once you put it on...
 
 
Preview