Olympics, Summer

Too Much TV for TV: Why Sports Aren't What They Once Were

2/18/10 in Olympics, Summer   |   FavreDollars   |   24 respect


I never thought I would ever get to a day where I could legitimately say that there are too many television shows.  Anyone who complains that there isn't anything on TV isn't looking too hard. There's always something on. There's downloading, streaming, On-demanding, and DVRing. We can start shows from the beginning that are halfway through and even set up a program to record from our cell phones. The options are out there to watch basically whatever we want at anytime so saying there's nothing on is plain ridiculous.

Do we have too many television channels though?tv

We have about eight C-SPANS, eight different ESPN's, and an individual network for every single sport. We have a channel for trimming trees, one for gardening flowers, and another for mowing lawns. We have gay channels, senior citizen channels, women channels, black channels, Hispanic channels, religious channels, and every other demographic you can think of. The segregation we have for television would be like McDonalds having a separate fast food place for fries, one for burgers, one for chicken nuggets, another for condiments, and a specific place for breakfast sandwiches that was only opened from 5:00am-10:30am.

The point is we have so many options at any time that the problem is that there's too much on, not that there's nothing on.

The Winter Olympics has felt the wrath of abundance. It used to be the Olympics were a special event ever four years and everyone in America would tune into it to watch basically all the events that the Americans were good at. Now more people watched American Idol on Tuesday then tuned into the Olympics. Who knew there would be a time where the top two shows in prime time featured one gay man and one gay woman?  If you've seen Johnny Weir then I don't know if you can call that a man though.

The Olympics are on four different channels now. We have NBC, CNBC, MSNBC, and Versus. We can watch curling, hockey, figure skating, and snowboarding all at the same time. Is it that the Olympics aren't special anymore or is it that by seeing everything available we're realizing that some events are pretty boring?

The same argument was brought up with the NBA All Star game. Each year and at every all star break for every sport we have the same argument. This game is meaningless; the players don't care about the game so why should we care about the game?  The competitiveness from the game might have changed throughout the course of the last few decades, but so has our eagerness to watch these spectacles. If we feel like the all star game is unimportant now then there's plenty of other things we can watch that are probably just as entertaining if not better. There's just not that sense that these programs are that one special thing on television that we look forward to. Nothing is really like that anymore, except for the Super Bowl.

Tomorrow is the big Tiger Woods press conference. I'm sure everyone is at the edge of their seat to hear Tiger not answer any questions and give a written statement about how he hurt his wife, kids, family, friends, sponsors, supporters, and fellow PGA tour players. I'm sure he'll take the brunt of the blame and turn it into a positive like anyone else in his predicament would. He'll speak on what he has done to try and make himself a better person and talk about what he will do in the future. That's fine though; that's what he's supposed to say. Press conferences like these a decade ago used to be the biggest ordeal. Everyone would want to get around the television to see what someone important had to say. Now ESPN has to market the press conference and put up bulletins throughout their programming just to try and get people to tune in. We don't care about press conferences anymore; we'll watch it on the Internet or hear a million stories about it immediately upon its conclusion.

So who is at fault for turning these special events into flip back and forth television programs?  I guess all of us.

Its basic supply and demand principles which allow us to see that as there are more television channels, there is going to be less demand for each one. Then again we have the Internet and other technologies that have supplied us more information and we have demanded more programming, which then created the over saturation of programs. That's just how things are going to be. The evolution of television.

So programs aren't going to be special to everyone anymore. Who cares?  We can complain all we want about these events that we feel everyone should love. What we really need to learn from all these television channels is that there are millions of people out there with millions of different personality characteristics and interests and now everyone can find something special to love. I don't need you to love what I'm watching and I don't have to love what you're watching.

That's what makes it special.

Notify me by email about comments that follow mine. Preview

2/22/10   |   djjfrench   |   67 respect

Btw I OWNED that BB book lol, I got the gist of this and not gonna read it all.  I agree there's a lot on TV the sad thing is for someone who's going to complain nothing is on, isn't gonna get off their duff and go do something else.

2/19/10   |   torontolui   |   112 respect

turn it off and play wii

2/19/10   |   hapkido_warrior   |   272 respect

 Funny you should say that, because my reaction to this article was... maybe everyone could go read more books!

(On their Kindles, of course).

i was confused as to what you were referring to until you included kindle in there, i didn't know 'books' still existed.

2/18/10   |   Kenne   |   16047 respect

THE_Smoot wrote:
You have to love the Berenstain Bears. Nostalgic win.

I like the Berenstain Bears, but I prefer watching their show on TV over reading the books.

2/18/10   |   THE_Smoot   |   70 respect

You have to love the Berenstain Bears. Nostalgic win.

2/18/10   |   FavreDollars   |   24 respect

 I think the whole point I was trying to make is that, Yes, we are to a point where there's so much that we almost get sick of things, but we also have to appreciate it.  We hear about what is supposed to be special instead of just thinking about what is special to us.

2/18/10   |   PoppyGrande   |   55 respect

I think that we have too many prima donnas and that makes it less interesting to watch.

2/18/10   |   Boski93   |   375 respect

I may be in the minority, but I think the problem is that we have too much of the same thing. Now I am a wacky dude who likes the idea of having choice and I do like knowing if I need my Finland/Japan women's hockey I can catch it, but I understand where you are coming from. We get hammered from all angels and it is damn near impossible to not be numbed by it all. 

2/18/10   |   elevenbravo138again   |   1163 respect

Too true, we have variety fatigue, please someone give me more of less!