It is going to come down to a "He said versus He said" confrontation. Evidenciary support is going to be needed to lend credibility to the face of one side or the other!
I know I'm not buying into anyone's word on this issue; I'm just not!
This is comedy. I refuse to listen to these lies. If people are actually stupid enough to look at him as a rookie, look at him now, look at his unpecedented late career resurgence and numbers he has been able to put up into his mid 40's, and believe that he never took any kind of steroids, you are an idiot.
If anyone says Roger didn't take 'em, they better be saying that Barry didn't take 'em either.
This is comedy. I refuse to listen to these lies. If people are actually stupid enough to look at him as a rookie, look at him now, look at his unpecedented late career resurgence and numbers he has been able to put up into his mid 40's, and believe that he never took any kind of steroids, you are an idiot.
If anyone says Roger didn't take 'em, they better be saying that Barry didn't take 'em either.
And if anyone says that Roger took them, they better be saying that Barry took them too.
What else could Roger do? The circumstances surrounding this whole affair point towards Roger's guilt and that's sad. This is definitely a he-said he-said event and without clinical or other hard evidence lacks sufficient information to emphatically accuse Roger of substance abuse.
Comment!
Top comment earns 300 Points!