Please sign in to complete your action
 
DONE!
Cheer and debate with
6,000,000+ fans!
My Team:
Charlotte
My Team:
Michael
My Team:
Britney
1/6/09
Texas Longhorns Prove They Were Never National Championship Worthy In 24-21 Fiesta Bowl Win Over Ohio State
One Thing We Learned In The Fiesta Bowl: Texas Fans Have No Right To Complain.


Although Texas just won the Tostitos Fiesta Bowl, it wasn't exactly their most impressive win of the year. They barely beat an 10th ranked Ohio State team 24-21 on this last minute TD from Colt McCoy to Quan Cosby:



While Texas had a very impressive season, many people thought they would (and should) beat Ohio State handily. After all, that's what fellow National Championship "snubs" USC did. They played the Buckeyes in an only slightly different situation. While USC played them without Chris "Beanie" Wells, Texas didn't have to deal with much of Beanie either. He ran well in the first half, but barely played in the second half with only 4 rushes for 10 yards. And in the second half, with Ohio State's best player barely seeing the field, Texas only outscored OSU 21-15. USC outscored them 14-0 in the second half, after jumping out to an early 21-3 first half lead.

Every since the BCS rankings put Oklahoma in the Big 12 Championship game, the Longhorns and their fans have been claiming that Texas was snubbed. Despite the fact that Oklahoma had a decisively more difficult schedule (and therefore a better resume), Texas fans continue to chant "45-35", which was the score on October 11, when the Longhorns beat Oklahoma in the Red River Rivalry game.

Did the Longhorns have a good enough season to warrant an appearance in the National Championship game? Nope. They were close, but not quite. While they might be able to make a case that they had a better year than Florida, there's really no reasonable argument that can put them ahead of Oklahoma (one game is not a reasonable argument), nor is there any way we could assume that they're better than USC, with the way they played Ohio State.

At best, the Longhorns can now be considered the #4 team in the country, behind USC, Utah and the winner of the National Championship game. Their close win over Ohio State shows that they aren't the elite team that they want everyone to think they are. While Ohio Sate is a very good team, they are NOT a National Championship contender, and that's what Texas made them look like.

After the game, Texas Coach Mack Brown had one thing to say about the rankings:

"I wasn't sure before, right now, on Friday morning I'm going to vote Texas No. 1 because I think this is the best team in the country"

Don't kid yourself, Mack. The "best team in the country" would have beaten Ohio State by 4 TD's... like USC did. They wouldn't have beaten them by 3 points on a last minute touchdown. That's not what the best team in the country does.

After the game, Colt McCoy said "I don't think there's anybody in the country that can beat us at this point". That's another pretty bold (and delusional) statement, considering how close Ohio State came. It's been months since anyone considered Ohio State to be one of the best of the best, and they dominated Texas in the first half, beating them much worse than the 6-3 first half score indicated. Ohio State proved that although the didn't actually do it, they most certainly COULD beat Texas, right now.

Congratulations to the Texas Longhorns on a win in a very good bowl game, but Ohio State really didn't even deserve to be there, based on their regular season performance. They are now 0-3 against teams who made it to BCS bowls, and are not nearly as good as the Longhorns made them appear. While the cries of Texas fans that they had been snubbed my have held some weight at one point or another, their play in the Fiesta Bowl showed that they were exactly where they belonged: NOT in the National Championship game.
47 comments
Vote!
Comment!
Your votes determine top comment
Top comment earns 300 Points!
+300 points!
178 days ago
7
VOTE:
 
+5
 
+2
 
+0
 
-0
(Edited 01/06/09 12:58PM by Pat)
 
178 days ago
2
VOTE:
 
+2
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
I'll be honest, I was for a long time in the Longhorns camp on them getting screwed out of the National Championship. How wrong I was.

By the way, why didn't my USC Trojans get the bid? Pac-10 was 5-0 in bowls, baby.
 
178 days ago
3
VOTE:
 
+3
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
100%InjuryRate wrote:
I'll be honest, I was for a long time in the Longhorns camp on them getting screwed out of the National Championship. How wrong I was.

By the way, why didn't my USC Trojans get the bid? Pac-10 was 5-0 in bowls, baby.
Because when you spend all year barely beating teams in a conference that got dominated by the MWC, people tend to (rightfully) question just how good you are.
 
178 days ago
3
VOTE:
 
+3
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
kantwistaye wrote:
Because when you spend all year barely beating teams in a conference that got dominated by the MWC, people tend to (rightfully) question just how good you are.
I shall repeat, 5-0 in bowl games.

But who cares, Utah is my national champion anyway.
 
178 days ago
3
VOTE:
 
+3
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
kantwistaye wrote:
Because when you spend all year barely beating teams in a conference that got dominated by the MWC, people tend to (rightfully) question just how good you are.
Who are these teams that USC "barely beat"? Their closest win was 17-10 @Arizona. While Arizona DID lose at New Mexico (one of the aforementioned MWC teams), they also beat BYU, who were one of the best of the MWC.

As for the rest of USC's wins, they were all by at least 2 TD's.

Courtesy of ESPN:


Their average point differential over the entire season was 28.46 ... not too shabby.
Florida: 32.30
Oklahoma: 28.69

There's really not that much difference there. Also, the SEC wasn't as strong this year as it has been in the past. Quite a few of Florida's wins were against cupcakes as well. I'm just saying.

USC has a much more legit argument than Texas does. That's all I'm saying.
 
178 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Arizona, California, and Stanford were all down to the wire or considerably closer than their scores indicate.  Also, the Pac 10 blows.

And yes, Utah = National Champs, regardless of anything else that may happen this year.
 
178 days ago
2
VOTE:
 
+2
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Why is Utah not getting any love.  They did finish the season undefeated after convincingly beating Alabama in the Sugar Bowl, a team that was a bona fide contender for the national championship game.  Sure Utah's opponents in the regular season were not that impressive and I agree that finishing the season undefeated does not necessarily mean you're the best team in the nation but Texas barely got by OSU and they should end up no better than in sixth place in the rankings.
 
178 days ago
2
VOTE:
 
+2
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
jorgemsousa wrote:
Why is Utah not getting any love.  They did finish the season undefeated after convincingly beating Alabama in the Sugar Bowl, a team that was a bona fide contender for the national championship game.  Sure Utah's opponents in the regular season were not that impressive and I agree that finishing the season undefeated does not necessarily mean you're the best team in the nation but Texas barely got by OSU and they should end up no better than in sixth place in the rankings.
Well I can tell you that 100% and Pat both think Utah should be #1, and I agree with them.  The mainstream media won't give them any love, but they are getting some from the blogs and what not. 
 
178 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+1
 
+0
 
-0
 So now Texas plays USC and Utah plays the winner of OU, UF with the winner to... Oh what was that- No?  So what you're telling me is we're screwed here?  Just as well, I prefer not to see a satisfying end to anything.
 
178 days ago
2
VOTE:
 
+1
 
+0
 
+1
 
-0
I hate comparison's, but by the way it looks the Big 12's performances in BCS bowl games thus far has been under par at best.  It's depressing to see teams from your conference loose badly or win disgustingly.  I was hoping, as an Oklahoma fan, to see some great performances from Big 12 teams this bowl season to validate OU's numbers which are impressing nonetheless.  However, I guess if they happen to be THE ONLY Big 12 team left to outperform what their conference has done thus far they will exceed my expectations at this point.  Sad sad sad.  We need a playoff badly.
 
178 days ago
2
VOTE:
 
+2
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Utah has the only true legitimate call for a piece of the National Title.  No losses and the wins to back it up.  Too many recent articles have quoted pollsters saying that they just didn't see the Utes play enough to give them any consideration. 

We all know that there will be no satisfying end to another CFB season yet again.  Too many teams crying for a piece of the title, another non-BCS team going undefeated and an undeserving BCS team losing. 
 
178 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Colin Cowherd put together the best argument I heard as to why Utah doesn't deserve to be national champs.  He said that when Boise St. went undefeated they were crushing teams, they weren't having these last minute wins or barely scraping by.  I give props to Utah for beating Bama I love the SEC I'm a huge gomer for the SEC but... Utah over Gators?  Utah over Oklahoma?  Utah over USC?  I think Utah could maybe beat Texas.  To which I say... Texas is overrated, Big 10 overrated, Big 12 overrated... I suggest if u can find Cowherd's take on the those division I really thought it was well done and thought out.  For the record I don't think the Pac-10 is that great I'm in agreeance with what I heard... just cause they did well in the bowl games do we ignore the other 13 games???? NO.  SEC all day.  Btw big love to the MWAC and WAC for doing pretty good still with their smaller none BCS conferences.
 
178 days ago
4
VOTE:
 
+3
 
+1
 
+0
 
-0
djjfrench wrote:
Colin Cowherd put together the best argument I heard as to why Utah doesn't deserve to be national champs.  He said that when Boise St. went undefeated they were crushing teams, they weren't having these last minute wins or barely scraping by.  I give props to Utah for beating Bama I love the SEC I'm a huge gomer for the SEC but... Utah over Gators?  Utah over Oklahoma?  Utah over USC?  I think Utah could maybe beat Texas.  To which I say... Texas is overrated, Big 10 overrated, Big 12 overrated... I suggest if u can find Cowherd's take on the those division I really thought it was well done and thought out.  For the record I don't think the Pac-10 is that great I'm in agreeance with what I heard... just cause they did well in the bowl games do we ignore the other 13 games???? NO.  SEC all day.  Btw big love to the MWAC and WAC for doing pretty good still with their smaller none BCS conferences.
"Utah over Gators?  Utah over Oklahoma?  Utah over USC?"

And a week ago, everyone was saying...

Utah over Alabama?
 
178 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+1
 
+0
 
-0
As a fan of B12 football, I was a little disappointed in Texas last night.  As a sports fan living in B10 country, I saw Ohio State play out their ass, nice game OSU.

Texas needed to make a statement to back up all the smack since the final BCS rankings put OU in the B12 Championship game.  And they failed...

As for USC, they had a whole season to redeem their loss, they never did.  They played a great bowl game, but they could have and should have made their statements during the season by whooping opponents 56-14 consistently.  Sorry USC, you just came a little short.

I'm not completely on the Utah bandwagon yet.  I was never that impressed with Bama...
 
178 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
 
178 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+1
 
-0
(Edited 01/06/09 10:41AM by tjpwns)
Plus Ohio State was playing some of there best football of the season. When you look at Ohio's stats then u realize that Ohio wasn't actually that horrible in defense. Ofc Texas could of easily done better, but they came out flat in the first and second quarter. With the best pass defense in the league allowing only 10 touchdowns by air out of 16 touchdowns allowed in the season, then Texas beat most of the opponents that Ohio State played. KNOW WHAT YOUR  TALKING ABOUT IDIOT.
 
178 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
tjpwns wrote:
Plus Ohio State was playing some of there best football of the season. When you look at Ohio's stats then u realize that Ohio wasn't actually that horrible in defense. Ofc Texas could of easily done better, but they came out flat in the first and second quarter. With the best pass defense in the league allowing only 10 touchdowns by air out of 16 touchdowns allowed in the season, then Texas beat most of the opponents that Ohio State played. KNOW WHAT YOUR  TALKING ABOUT IDIOT.
Read it again. The 21-3 halftime lead was in reference to the USC game.

As for Beanie Wells, I said basically the same thing you did. He only made a difference in the first half, but the Longhorns didn't exactly dominate the second half, when he was a non-factor.

There was no domination whatsoever on the part of the Longhorns. Until the last minute of the game, they were LOSING.

I watched the entire game, and was not impressed by Texas in any way, shape or form. They looked worse than I had seen from them in the past, and they barely beat an Ohio State team that several other teams would have crushed.
 
178 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+1
 
+0
 
-1
PLEASE! They didn't play their best game because they didn't want to be in the fiesta bowl.

Book Texas during the regular season where every game matters and we'll see what Ohio State can put up against a hungry Texas team. Sometimes you just have to win ugly.

Over looking the fact that you only have to win by one point, lets say Texas wins by 24 points, instead of writing about how Texas didn't play a great game, you would write about how bad Ohio State is this year and that Texas is still #4 in your opinion. If you want to rank a team #4, then do it, don't give excuses. Ohio State had everything to prove in that game and Texas had just gotten screwed and didn't play even close to their best game.....and they still won.
 
178 days ago
2
VOTE:
 
+2
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
OSU had the game and blew it.  They played with heart, but at times lost their heads.

Bad snap and a missed FG and blow 2-pt conversions due to penalty and then a drop, personal foul by Gibson on McCoy in the UT endzone to push them out to the 30 yard line.  3 dropped INT's by the Buckeye D-fense.  Really poor passing by Pryor.  We're talking three or four blown screens or passes in the flat.  How many 4th downs did UT convert?

Running, Defense, and Discipline wins Championships.  OSU ran the ball well and held UT to half their average points per game.  It was the small mistakes, the mental errors that cost them.  Discipline and execution.

The Buckeyes have no one to blame but themselves.  A great game, but every play counts.

UT, on the other hand, sneaked out with a win, but not their AP title hopes.  Regardless of how Mack Brown votes.


 
178 days ago
7
VOTE:
 
+5
 
+2
 
+0
 
-0
(Edited 01/06/09 12:58PM by Pat)
 
178 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-2
Pat wrote:
Read it again. The 21-3 halftime lead was in reference to the USC game.

As for Beanie Wells, I said basically the same thing you did. He only made a difference in the first half, but the Longhorns didn't exactly dominate the second half, when he was a non-factor.

There was no domination whatsoever on the part of the Longhorns. Until the last minute of the game, they were LOSING.

I watched the entire game, and was not impressed by Texas in any way, shape or form. They looked worse than I had seen from them in the past, and they barely beat an Ohio State team that several other teams would have crushed.
You didn't watch the game apparently.  Texas was up 17-6 at one point.  How can you say that "until the last minute of the game they were losing"?

Also, although I generally agree that Texas underachieved in this game and should have had a much better showing to make their case, this part of your article is really the most idiotic statement that I have ever read:

 "While they might be able to make a case that they had a better year than Florida, there's really no reasonable argument that can put them ahead of Oklahoma (one game is not a reasonable argument), nor is there any way we could assume that they're better than USC, with the way they played Ohio State.

Texas beat OU 45-35 on a neutral field, head to head - no need for stats comparisons, common opponent analysis or computer models.  They simply dominated them in the 4th quarter of that game.  I can't believe that you have the audacity to say "there is no reasonable argument"  That is the ONLY absolutely dispositive proof that Texas was better than OU this year.  Texas beat OU on the football field.  Go watch that game if you aren't impressed with Texas
 
178 days ago
2
VOTE:
 
+1
 
+1
 
+0
 
-0
phillippeterson2002 wrote:
You didn't watch the game apparently.  Texas was up 17-6 at one point.  How can you say that "until the last minute of the game they were losing"?

Also, although I generally agree that Texas underachieved in this game and should have had a much better showing to make their case, this part of your article is really the most idiotic statement that I have ever read:

 "While they might be able to make a case that they had a better year than Florida, there's really no reasonable argument that can put them ahead of Oklahoma (one game is not a reasonable argument), nor is there any way we could assume that they're better than USC, with the way they played Ohio State.

Texas beat OU 45-35 on a neutral field, head to head - no need for stats comparisons, common opponent analysis or computer models.  They simply dominated them in the 4th quarter of that game.  I can't believe that you have the audacity to say "there is no reasonable argument"  That is the ONLY absolutely dispositive proof that Texas was better than OU this year.  Texas beat OU on the football field.  Go watch that game if you aren't impressed with Texas
Once again... I said "One game is NOT a reasonable argument".

Look at the entire body of work.
1) Oklahoma lost to a better team than the one Texas lost to.
2) Oklahoma had much better margins of victory against similar opponents.
3) Oklahoma's strength of schedule was much better, with wins over Cincinnati, TCU, Nebraska. Texas' toughest non-common opponent was who? Colorado? Arkansas? What a joke.

For starters, when the University of Oklahoma and the University of Texas play a game in the state of Texas, that is NOT a "neutral" field.
Second, I've already seen the game. It was closer than the score indicated, and OU's best linebacker also got hurt in that game. If they played again today, after the Sooners have had a chance to adjust to his loss, it would be a far different situation.

I know you would love to say that there's "no need for stats comparisons, common opponent analysis or computer models". Because all of those things point to Oklahoma being the better team, and that's the last thing that you want to hear. But using YOUR argument, Texas Tech was a better team than Texas this year. It's funny how Texas fans conveniently disregard that fact, when trying to prove their point.

I'm a neutral (Boston College) fan, who is fed up with all of the whining that I've heard... from EVERYONE. Not just Texas, but also Penn State, USC, etc. The bottom line? If you had taken care of business, and Blake Gideon hadn't dropped an easy interception, Texas could be undefeated and playing for a championship. Unfortunately, they didn't take care of business, so they deserve whatever they get. Which is, quite simply, NOT a National Championship.
 
178 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+1
 
+0
 
+0
 
-1
whiners, all of them




 
178 days ago
2
VOTE:
 
+2
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
JacksColdSweat wrote:
PLEASE! They didn't play their best game because they didn't want to be in the fiesta bowl.

Book Texas during the regular season where every game matters and we'll see what Ohio State can put up against a hungry Texas team. Sometimes you just have to win ugly.

Over looking the fact that you only have to win by one point, lets say Texas wins by 24 points, instead of writing about how Texas didn't play a great game, you would write about how bad Ohio State is this year and that Texas is still #4 in your opinion. If you want to rank a team #4, then do it, don't give excuses. Ohio State had everything to prove in that game and Texas had just gotten screwed and didn't play even close to their best game.....and they still won.
You would think they would want to prove they belonged in Miami, but apparently they didn't really think so after all. 
 
178 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+1
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Pat wrote:
Once again... I said "One game is NOT a reasonable argument".

Look at the entire body of work.
1) Oklahoma lost to a better team than the one Texas lost to.
2) Oklahoma had much better margins of victory against similar opponents.
3) Oklahoma's strength of schedule was much better, with wins over Cincinnati, TCU, Nebraska. Texas' toughest non-common opponent was who? Colorado? Arkansas? What a joke.

For starters, when the University of Oklahoma and the University of Texas play a game in the state of Texas, that is NOT a "neutral" field.
Second, I've already seen the game. It was closer than the score indicated, and OU's best linebacker also got hurt in that game. If they played again today, after the Sooners have had a chance to adjust to his loss, it would be a far different situation.

I know you would love to say that there's "no need for stats comparisons, common opponent analysis or computer models". Because all of those things point to Oklahoma being the better team, and that's the last thing that you want to hear. But using YOUR argument, Texas Tech was a better team than Texas this year. It's funny how Texas fans conveniently disregard that fact, when trying to prove their point.

I'm a neutral (Boston College) fan, who is fed up with all of the whining that I've heard... from EVERYONE. Not just Texas, but also Penn State, USC, etc. The bottom line? If you had taken care of business, and Blake Gideon hadn't dropped an easy interception, Texas could be undefeated and playing for a championship. Unfortunately, they didn't take care of business, so they deserve whatever they get. Which is, quite simply, NOT a National Championship.
You said, "there's really no reasonable argument that can put them ahead of Oklahoma"... 

Again, idiotic...

You look at the body of work. Look at the common opponents and you will see that Texas held Kansas, Texas A&M, Baylor, etc... to much lower points than OU did even though OU scored more points because Texas has a better defense than OU and Stoops was forced to run up the score on teams he was beating to compensate for his inferior defense. The actual point differentials are actually very similar (with many favoring Texas):

Texas over Texas A&M, 49-9 (40 pts) vs. OU over Texas A&M 66-28 (38pts)

Texas over Kansas 35-7 (28pts) vs. OU over Kansas 45-31 (14pts)

Texas over Baylor 45-21 (24pts) vs. OU over Baylor 49-17 (32pts)

You are making it sound like it was some aberration that Texas beat OU.  Look at the body of work of Texas and OU and they are almost identical, EXCEPT Texas beat OU 45-35 on a neutral field.

You have never gone to a Texas/OU game if you think it is somehow an advantage to UT that the game is played in Dallas.  Half of the stadium is crimson and half is burnt orange.  And take it from someone who lives in Dallas - 99% of all OU alums move to Dallas to work - it is by no stretch a Texas friendly environment.  If you can make it to your seats without getting mauled, it is a good day.
 
178 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+1
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
phillippeterson2002 wrote:
You said, "there's really no reasonable argument that can put them ahead of Oklahoma"... 

Again, idiotic...

You look at the body of work. Look at the common opponents and you will see that Texas held Kansas, Texas A&M, Baylor, etc... to much lower points than OU did even though OU scored more points because Texas has a better defense than OU and Stoops was forced to run up the score on teams he was beating to compensate for his inferior defense. The actual point differentials are actually very similar (with many favoring Texas):

Texas over Texas A&M, 49-9 (40 pts) vs. OU over Texas A&M 66-28 (38pts)

Texas over Kansas 35-7 (28pts) vs. OU over Kansas 45-31 (14pts)

Texas over Baylor 45-21 (24pts) vs. OU over Baylor 49-17 (32pts)

You are making it sound like it was some aberration that Texas beat OU.  Look at the body of work of Texas and OU and they are almost identical, EXCEPT Texas beat OU 45-35 on a neutral field.

You have never gone to a Texas/OU game if you think it is somehow an advantage to UT that the game is played in Dallas.  Half of the stadium is crimson and half is burnt orange.  And take it from someone who lives in Dallas - 99% of all OU alums move to Dallas to work - it is by no stretch a Texas friendly environment.  If you can make it to your seats without getting mauled, it is a good day.

Also, about 75% of OU recruits come from Texas high schools. They wouldn't even have the talent provided for them if Texas didn't grow some of the best athletes in America :D

 
178 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
(Edited 01/06/09 2:39PM by Pat)
phillippeterson2002 wrote:
You said, "there's really no reasonable argument that can put them ahead of Oklahoma"... 

Again, idiotic...

You look at the body of work. Look at the common opponents and you will see that Texas held Kansas, Texas A&M, Baylor, etc... to much lower points than OU did even though OU scored more points because Texas has a better defense than OU and Stoops was forced to run up the score on teams he was beating to compensate for his inferior defense. The actual point differentials are actually very similar (with many favoring Texas):

Texas over Texas A&M, 49-9 (40 pts) vs. OU over Texas A&M 66-28 (38pts)

Texas over Kansas 35-7 (28pts) vs. OU over Kansas 45-31 (14pts)

Texas over Baylor 45-21 (24pts) vs. OU over Baylor 49-17 (32pts)

You are making it sound like it was some aberration that Texas beat OU.  Look at the body of work of Texas and OU and they are almost identical, EXCEPT Texas beat OU 45-35 on a neutral field.

You have never gone to a Texas/OU game if you think it is somehow an advantage to UT that the game is played in Dallas.  Half of the stadium is crimson and half is burnt orange.  And take it from someone who lives in Dallas - 99% of all OU alums move to Dallas to work - it is by no stretch a Texas friendly environment.  If you can make it to your seats without getting mauled, it is a good day.
I noticed that you conveniently left off three VERY notable common opponents for Texas and Oklahoma.

OU over Texas Tech 65-21 (44 pts) vs Texas Tech over Texas 39-33 (-6 pts)
OU over Ok State 61-41 (20 pts) vs Texas over Ok State 28-24 (4 pts)
OU over Mizzou 62-21 (41 pts) vs Texas over MIzzou 56-31 (25 pts)

Considering those are the three BEST common opponents, I'd say they matter the most, wouldn't you? Any reason you chose to look at A&M, Baylor and Kansas, instead?

Never mind... I already know why... it didn't fit what you're trying to prove.

In 2 of those games, Oklahoma held the opposing team to LESS than what Texas held them to, and ALSO scored more than Texas did.

Also, there's no way in hell that you can claim that the schedules are identical. Let's look at them:

Both teams played:
Baylor
Kansas
Texas Tech
Texas A&M
Missouri
Oklahoma State

OU played:
Cincinnati
Washington
TCU
Nebraska
Chattanooga
Kansas State

Texas played:
Florida Atlantic
UTEP
Rice
Colorado
Arkansas

And of course, they played each other, and now Texas played Ohio State, and Oklahoma will play Florida.

So when you take away the shared games and the bowl games, which is the harder schedule?

Cincinnati, TCU, Nebraska, Kansas State, Washington, Chattanooga?
OR
Arkansas, Colorado, Florida Atlantic, UTEP, Rice?

It's not even close. OU has the MUCH harder non-con schedule. To try to even pretend that it's equal (or even similar) is asinine.
 
178 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+1
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0

Yes, those Chattanooga and Washington games were real contests for OU.  Are you serious?  Washington finished 0-12.

Arkansas actually beat LSU.  Rice won their bowl game.  I would say Texas had better non-conference opponents and beat every team in the Big 12 except a hungry Tech team that played out of their minds for 60 minutes and had the good fortune to have a true freshman Texas safety flub an easy pick.

Did you watch the Texas Missouri game?  Texas was up 35 to 7 at HALFTIME.   The other points came in garbage time.  I'll concede that Texas played flat against OK State and obviously against Texas Tech.  It is hard to beat Texas Tech in Lubbock at night.  OU lost there last year in 2007 (34-27).  Last year, Texas beat Texas Tech in Austin (59-43). However, in 2007 OU beat Texas in the Cotton Bowl and was arguably the better team.

If memory serves Texas only scored 6 points in the first half of this year's Texas Tech game, and then finally started to wake up (Let's not forget that Orakpo and Cosby were both hurt in that game).  And yes, if only Gideon had brought that ball down, we would all be talking about the upcoming Texas vs. Florida NCG. 

What is "asinine" are the contortions and mental gymnastics that you are going through in a pathetic attempt to argue that a team that was beaten 45-35 is actually much better than the team that beat it 45-35.  The reason everyone is clamoring for a playoff system is so that the teams can actually play one another and we don't have to resort to human polls and computer rankings.  Well, here you have it!!!  Texas and OU actually played each other!!!  Hallejulah!!!  And Texas won by two scores.

 
178 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
I love how you brought up Washington, but failed to acknowledge the fact that Cincy, TCU and Nebraska were ALL better than any of the teams that Texas played.

LSU? A win over LSU makes Arkansas legit? Did you even watch football this year?

"What is "asinine" are the contortions and mental gymnastics that you are going through in a pathetic attempt to argue that a team that was beaten 45-35 is actually much better than the team that beat it 45-35."

You know what else is asinine? The fact that the SAME Texas fans who use this argument will give excuses until they're blue in the face about why they're better than Texas Tech. By YOUR OWN LOGIC, Texas Tech was the better team this year, prior to the bowl games. Since you and I both know that's not true, then obviously your logic is flawed.
 
178 days ago
2
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+2
 
+0
 
-0
Man I thought for a second Ohio State was going win that game but thankfully Quan Cosby pulled through for us. Texas Fight!
 
178 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Pat wrote:
I noticed that you conveniently left off three VERY notable common opponents for Texas and Oklahoma.

OU over Texas Tech 65-21 (44 pts) vs Texas Tech over Texas 39-33 (-6 pts)
OU over Ok State 61-41 (20 pts) vs Texas over Ok State 28-24 (4 pts)
OU over Mizzou 62-21 (41 pts) vs Texas over MIzzou 56-31 (25 pts)

Considering those are the three BEST common opponents, I'd say they matter the most, wouldn't you? Any reason you chose to look at A&M, Baylor and Kansas, instead?

Never mind... I already know why... it didn't fit what you're trying to prove.

In 2 of those games, Oklahoma held the opposing team to LESS than what Texas held them to, and ALSO scored more than Texas did.

Also, there's no way in hell that you can claim that the schedules are identical. Let's look at them:

Both teams played:
Baylor
Kansas
Texas Tech
Texas A&M
Missouri
Oklahoma State

OU played:
Cincinnati
Washington
TCU
Nebraska
Chattanooga
Kansas State

Texas played:
Florida Atlantic
UTEP
Rice
Colorado
Arkansas

And of course, they played each other, and now Texas played Ohio State, and Oklahoma will play Florida.

So when you take away the shared games and the bowl games, which is the harder schedule?

Cincinnati, TCU, Nebraska, Kansas State, Washington, Chattanooga?
OR
Arkansas, Colorado, Florida Atlantic, UTEP, Rice?

It's not even close. OU has the MUCH harder non-con schedule. To try to even pretend that it's equal (or even similar) is asinine.
You don't think Texas could beat all those teams? Remember, OU only played Missouri after Texas got screwed in the tie breaker.

Want to talk more about scheduling? How about OU gets to play in the championship game simply because they took their one loss earlier. If they had loss to Texas at the end of the season this whole "who has the better non conf. schedule" would be asinine.

Your defense point is voided also since no one scored more then 40 points on Texas all season, they are the ONLY Big 12 team to do that. Thye held their opponents to an average of 18.6 points or so. OU's avg = 24.5.

"WHAT!!!??? THAT'S CRAZY!!!"
 
178 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Pat wrote:
I love how you brought up Washington, but failed to acknowledge the fact that Cincy, TCU and Nebraska were ALL better than any of the teams that Texas played.

LSU? A win over LSU makes Arkansas legit? Did you even watch football this year?

"What is "asinine" are the contortions and mental gymnastics that you are going through in a pathetic attempt to argue that a team that was beaten 45-35 is actually much better than the team that beat it 45-35."

You know what else is asinine? The fact that the SAME Texas fans who use this argument will give excuses until they're blue in the face about why they're better than Texas Tech. By YOUR OWN LOGIC, Texas Tech was the better team this year, prior to the bowl games. Since you and I both know that's not true, then obviously your logic is flawed.
Pat,

I wrote a long response to this post, but it didn't get posted so I'll simply make a few points:

Texas played four straight Top 10 teams.  OU did not, so forget your strength of schedule argument.

I watched more CFB than you did this year and Arkansas was a better team than 0-12 Washington to be sure.

Texas lost to TT on a last second hail mary TD pass.  OU lost to Texas by two scores in front of 50,000 of their fans.

When OU throttled TT, TT was out of the discussion, and it came down to Texas and OU which both had almost identical bodies of work, except OU lost to Texas.

Which Big 12 South team is better?  Texas or OU?  That is the only question.  It boggles my mind that anyone with an IQ in the triple digits can argue that you shouldn't consider a head to head game when evaluating two teams.  Unbelievable!!!

By the way, under SEC and ACC three way tie breaker rules, Texas would have gone to the Big 12 Championship game and had the opportunity to beat Missouri AGAIN, because only the Big 12 doesn't consider head to head outcomes...

OU doesn't have the defense to contain Florida, so Texas will likely be the only Big 12 team with a solid bowl win and the OU BCS bowl fiasco will continue...
 
178 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
"I watched more CFB than you did this year and Arkansas was a better team than 0-12 Washington to be sure."

Why are you comparing Texas' BEST non-con opponent to Oklahoma's WORST?

And I'm not saying that you should consider the head to head game. I'm just saying that you can't consider ONLY the head to head game... which is essentially what Texas fans are trying to do.

"By the way, under SEC and ACC three way tie breaker rules, Texas would have gone to the Big 12 Championship game"

False. Under the SEC and ACC rules, they would go to the SEC or ACC Championship games. You can't go to the Big 12 Championship based on SEC or ACC rules. Everyone knew the rules before the season.

"OU doesn't have the defense to contain Florida, so Texas will likely be the only Big 12 team with a solid bowl win"

A solid bowl win over a team that had no business being there. That game was a disgrace. You and I both know that if Texas was half the team you're claiming they are, that game would have been a blowout.

Like I've said over and over again... let's look at the overall body of work.

Based on the Sagarin Pre-Bowl ELO_CHESS Ratings...
Oklahoma beat: #3, 9, 11, 14, 21, 26, 32, 77, 79, 90, 150 and 208
Oklahoma lost to: #2

Texas beat: #1, 11, 21, 32, 56, 58, 69, 77, 90, 100, 104
Texas lost to: #3

Although the bottom of Oklahoma's schedule is considerably weaker, the bottom really doesn't matter. Texas and Oklahoma should both be able to beat up on ANYONE under 50, easily. The TOP of the schedule is what matters. And that's where Oklahoma has a distinct advantage, with 7 games against the top 30, vs only 4 for Texas.

Continue to deny the facts all you want, but if you look at it objectively, Oklahoma simply has the better resume. Period.
 
178 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Togher schedule. Lol the experts think texas has the second worst schedule
 
178 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+1
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
 HAVING GRADUATED FROM OHIO STATE, I HAVE TO SAY, I WAS AT THE GAME, THAT OSU MADE A LOT OF MISTAKES AND STILL JUST ABOUT WON! WHAT'S THAT SAY ABOUT THE "LONGHORNS?" OKLAHOMA DESERVES #!  
 
178 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Also, you can make the argument for OU but what about for USC?
 
178 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Oh, and Im not talking about Pat
 
178 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0

McCoy, named the game's MVP, finished 41-of-58 for 414 yards through the air, while Cosby had a spectacular performance in his last collegiate game, making 14 catches for 171 yards and a pair of scores for the Longhorns (12-1). Texas' only blemish on the season was a last-second 39-33 loss at Texas Tech on November 1.

Daniel Herron ran 15 yards for the go-ahead score with 2:05 remaining for the Buckeyes (10-3), until McCoy's heroics turned the game around

 
178 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
aos035 wrote:
Also, you can make the argument for OU but what about for USC?
They won their conference, only had one loss (to a pretty good team in Oregon State), and completely obliterated the BCS Bowl-caliber teams that they played.
 
177 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+1
 
+0
 
-0
BCS DECLARES GERMANY WINNER OF WORLD WAR  II
US Ranked 4th

After determining the Big-12 championship game participants, the BCS computers were put to work on other major contests and today the BCS declared Germany to be the winner of World War II.

"Germany put together an incredible number of  victories beginning with the annexation of Austria and the Sudetenland and  continuing on into conference play with defeats of Poland, France, Norway,  Sweden, Denmark, Belgium and the Netherlands. Their only losses came  against the US and Russia; however considering their entire body of  work--including an incredibly tough Strength of Schedule--our computers  deemed them worthy of the #1 ranking."

Questioned about the #4  ranking of the United  States the BCS commissioner stated "The US only had  two major victories-- Japan and Germany .  The computer models, unlike humans, aren't influenced by head-to-head contests--they consider each contest to be only a single, equally-weighted event."

German Chancellor Adolph Hitler said "Yes, we lost to the US; but we defeated #2 ranked France in only 6 weeks." Herr  Hitler has been criticized for seeking dramatic victories to earn 'style  points' to enhance Germany 's rankings. Hitler  protested "Our contest with Poland was in doubt until the final day and  the conditions in Norway were incredibly  challenging and demanded the application of additional forces."  

The French ranking has also come under scrutiny. The BCS commented "France had a single  loss against Germany and following a  preseason #1 ranking they only fell to #2."

Japan was ranked #3 with victories  including Manchuria, Borneo and the Philippines .
 
176 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
I'm a Texas fan, and I gotta admit I was disappointed with UT's performance against Ohio State. Before that game I honestly thought they were the best team in the country, now I don't. I couldn't believe what I was watching when they went into halftime without scoring one touchdown on a team that they should of easily destroyed.
 
175 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
 People always complain when they lose or do poorly. Eh... I don't care as long as the right team wins...  YAY GATORS!
 
173 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+1
 
+0
 
-0
Its solved OU has lost 2. There. They are not the champians.
 
161 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
 
161 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+1
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
(Edited 01/23/09 12:44PM by jtwarick)
Everyone that says Texas played poorly in this game is naive and ignorant.  Obviously no one watched the previous Texas games.  The coaching was totally different in this game and they were running plays that weren't working just to get the seniors the stats.  Very clearly they weren't worried about passing to shipley or trying another running back other than ogbonnaya(sp?).  I didn't even see McGee or Chiles run one play lol.  I'm sure the coaching would be very different if they were in the title game.  Also OU played Texas Tech after a bye week and Texas played them after lets see, colorado, arkansas, OU, Missouri, and Ok State.  Texas had a much tougher schedule and didn't get any easy teams inbetween.  They also had a much more solid defense than OU did all year but the BCS computers don't compute defense only offense.  Did anyone see the bad play calling by the officiating crew as well and I didn't see the leading rusher run very much in the game either.  All the Texas haters need to get a life, can't wait til next season though.
 
27 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
And, the Pac 10 is better then the big 12{sarcasim implied}. Whining about how many points we win by is a poor attempt to put the best team down. And also, tell me, when two teams are tied at the end of the season, what do they use to determine seeds? If you didn't come up with the answer head-to-head, you must be a sooner.
 
27 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
I HATE the longhorns!!!!!!
 
27 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+1
 
+0
 
-0
aos035 wrote:
And, the Pac 10 is better then the big 12{sarcasim implied}. Whining about how many points we win by is a poor attempt to put the best team down. And also, tell me, when two teams are tied at the end of the season, what do they use to determine seeds? If you didn't come up with the answer head-to-head, you must be a sooner.
You're right. If 2 teams are tied, then they use head to head. BUT... if THREE teams are tied, then you need to go with something else.

If you pretend that the loss to Texas Tech never happened, and act like the Oklahoma-Texas game is the only game that matters, then you must be a Longhorn.
 
 
Preview
HOTTEST ARTICLES
NCAAF GEAR
Loading...
MEET OUR FANS
Stacey
Jodhvir
 more
12,798,192+
ANSWER TODAY'S POLL
 more
PLAY NEVER-ENDING TRIVIA
Cork
Plastic
Foam
Rubber
 more

TAKE A QUIZ
 more

PREDICT THE SCORE
NFL
NBA
NHL
NCAABB
Soccer
 more
2,555,658+
licious_lexy12 joined the NBA league Bulls Fans United.
Just now!
licious_lexy12 joined the NBA league NBA Fantasy.
Just now!
Just now!
m1k31nva heckled Shelle as he passed you in the Trivia rankings
Just now!
sqwack27 is playing Sports Trivia.
Just now!
messy11 heckled earl_beau as she passed earl_beau in the FanIQ rankings. She is now 2.7 points in front of earl_beau.
Just now!
mansor7695 joined the WWE league Fans of *WWE (Wrestling).
Just now!
migwetch52 joined the Equestrian Sports league Fans of Dressage.
Just now!
 

Join Today
About FanIQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Contact Us
Report A Bug
Help