Welcome to FanIQ!
FanIQ is the ultimate free community for sports fans.
•Talk sports with fans from all over - 1,256,833+ Comments
•Track your game picks - 14,860,103+ Sports Predictions
•Prove you know sports - 67,756+ Trivia Questions
•Find fans of your teams - 1,906,219+ New Friends
Today's Best FanIQ Fan Articles
Danica Patrick and Milka Duno Fight at Mid-Oh... - 10 Comment Doug Flutie And Joe Paterno Headline College ...
Joey Dorsey Ejected From Summer League Game H... - 1 Comment British Open Final Round Live Thread - Padra... - 6 Comment
Anderson Silva Knocks Out James Irvin; Fedor ... - 2 Comment UFC Anderson Silva Vs. James Irvin Live Threa... - 48 Comment
More Fan Articles
NewPadraig Harrington Wins The British Open For The Second Year In A Row
NewYankees And A's Play 12 Innings In The Bronx; Tampa Bay Rays Refuse To Fold - 5 Comment Comments
NewSan Francisco Crazy Crab Returns
NewFedor Emelianenko And Randy Couture Want To Fight Each Other. Affliction May Make That Happen.
NewDanica Patrick and Milka Duno Have "Discussion" in the Pits - 14 Comment Comments
NewNew England Revolution Subdue Crazy Naked Man On Plane Flight
NewGreg Norman And Chris Evert Are Taking Over The British Open; Shark Leads By Two Heading Into Final Round - 2 Comment Comments
NewChinese Bar Owners Promise Not To Serve Blacks Or Mongolians - 4 Comment Comments
NewManny Ramirez Commits Error Of All Fielding Errors As Boston Red Sox Gets Blasted By LA Angels - 3 Comment Comments
NewSven Krauss Huge Crash During Stage 13 Of Tour de France
More Featured Fan Articles
Best Sports Videos. Powered by Fans.
More Sports Videos
About the Author - CriticalFanatic
"Hell."

Jason
Chicago, IL
Male 28 years old

About Me:
Somehow remain a passionate sports fan despite living and dying with the Chicago Cubs and Michigan State athletics. Born in California, grew up in Michigan and went to college at Miami U (Ohio). All of which have shaped my sports fandom. Also a featured blogger and editor of this fine website you might have heard about called FanIQ.
22
comments
Wanted In Texas: Mack Brown's Stepson Chris Jessie Touches Football Before Fumble Recovery
by CriticalFanatic
>7 days ago



(Picture courtesy of Futon Report)

This is the most wanted man in Texas this hour. Why? He committed one of the most boneheaded plays by a non-player that only Steve Bartman could appreciate.

This Longhorns Support Staffer inexplicably stepped onto the field and reached out for a fumbled football after a Rudy Carpenter sack. Whether he touched it or not is debatable. I say no. Regardless, it was ruled he touched the football and the Sun Devils maintained possession and subsequently scored.

The young man's name? Chris Jessie. Better yet, he's apparently Mack Brown's stepson. Get off the damn field, son!

We'll update this with video when it's available. Coach Brown with a smirk wouldn't commit to the staff member being his stepson. Good stuff. Only at the Holiday Bowl.
22
Comment!
Share it

Read More: NCAAF, Arizona St. Sun Devils, Texas Longhorns
« Holiday Bowl: Texas Longhorns vs Arizona State Sun Devils Live Thread | Video: Chris Jessie, Mack Brown's Stepson Reaches Out For Fumbled Football in Holiday Bowl »

TODAY'S TOP PICKS ON FANIQ
  1. Harrington Does It Again
  2. It's Just as Awesome as We Thought 10
  3. A Fedor Vs Couture Fight Looks Like It May Finally Happen Thanks To Affliction
  4. Topic: Having a great tournament, Michelle Wie fails to sign scorecard and gets disqualified. Blames it on... well, she's not sure yet. 8
  5. Well There Goes The Gold Glove 3
Who Am I?
Who Am I?
Take the Trivia Challenge

Joe Louis
Mike Tyson
Muhammad Ali
George Foreman

Created by: Jon
More Sports Trivia
22 comments
Vote!
Comment!
Your votes determine top comment
Top comment earns 300 Points!
206 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
(Edited 12/27/07 10:10PM by Gazzo)
He did NOT touch that ball. I guess someone should have bought the NCAA new HD cameras for Christmas, cause the refs botched that call BAD!
 
206 days ago
2
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+2
 
+0
 
-0
Gazzo wrote:
He did NOT touch that ball. I guess someone should have bought the NCAA new HD cameras for Christmas, cause the refs botched that call BAD!
Whether he touched it or not, between all of the players and coaches Texas had about extra 10 guys out on the field.
 
206 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Jon wrote:
Whether he touched it or not, between all of the players and coaches Texas had about extra 10 guys out on the field.
Agreed, but thats not the call they made (though they could have). They screwed up the call that they did make. He didn't touch it.
 
206 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Jon wrote:
Whether he touched it or not, between all of the players and coaches Texas had about extra 10 guys out on the field.
If you can replay too many players on the field couldn't you replay and call holding on every play or be able to review off sides infractions?
 
206 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+1
 
+0
 
-0
Jon wrote:
Whether he touched it or not, between all of the players and coaches Texas had about extra 10 guys out on the field.
I was reading through some of the Texas message boards over halftime and about a half dozen SEC fans stopped by to make it known this is widely considered the worst officiating crew in that conference.
 
206 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
(Edited 12/27/07 11:59PM by Gazzo)
brianb722 wrote:
If you can replay too many players on the field couldn't you replay and call holding on every play or be able to review off sides infractions?
For starters your talking about two different football leagues with two different sets of rules. Second of all, the siutation your talking about the Redskins challenged a fumble and the refs noticed the 12 men thing.
 
206 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
CriticalFanatic wrote:
I was reading through some of the Texas message boards over halftime and about a half dozen SEC fans stopped by to make it known this is widely considered the worst officiating crew in that conference.
Guess they lived up to expectations, lol.
 
206 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+1
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
brianb722 wrote:
If you can replay too many players on the field couldn't you replay and call holding on every play or be able to review off sides infractions?
According to NCAA rules, the number of players on the field is reviewable.
 
206 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Jon wrote:
According to NCAA rules, the number of players on the field is reviewable.
Hmmm I stand slightly corrected than.
 
205 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+1
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
brianb722 wrote:
If you can replay too many players on the field couldn't you replay and call holding on every play or be able to review off sides infractions?
You realize that the refs know that there is holding on almost every play, right. They just try to only call it when it directly affects the play, or on a big play so as to not affect the game too much.
 
205 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Gazzo wrote:
You realize that the refs know that there is holding on almost every play, right. They just try to only call it when it directly affects the play, or on a big play so as to not affect the game too much.
That's exactly my point. If you can use instant replays to call penalties, then how do you decide what plays can and can't be reviewed? Illegal participation is no different than lining up in the neutral zone or whether a face mask should be 5 or 15 yards. There's no logical reason one is reviewable and one isn't.
 
205 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
brianb722 wrote:
That's exactly my point. If you can use instant replays to call penalties, then how do you decide what plays can and can't be reviewed? Illegal participation is no different than lining up in the neutral zone or whether a face mask should be 5 or 15 yards. There's no logical reason one is reviewable and one isn't.
Good point. No one ever said the NFL or NCAAF (especially NCAAF) was logical. They just do what ever they want to.
 
205 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0

After watching the play, it appears that Jesse's thumb probably touched the ball.  Its certainly not conclusive, but I can see why they called it they way they did.
 
205 days ago
2
VOTE:
 
+2
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
(Edited 12/28/07 12:43AM by Gazzo)
kantwistaye wrote:

After watching the play, it appears that Jesse's thumb probably touched the ball.  Its certainly not conclusive, but I can see why they called it they way they did.

I've seen it at least 40 times, and I don't see his hands ever coming within 6 inches of the ball. My brother watching with me concurs. I would say that its pretty conclusive that he didn't touch it, but thats just me.
 
205 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Gazzo wrote:
I've seen it at least 40 times, and I don't see his hands ever coming within 6 inches of the ball. My brother watching with me concurs. I would say that its pretty conclusive that he didn't touch it, but thats just me.
Well, luckily for all involved it doesn't matter anymore.  If I was the refs I wouldn't have reversed the call, but I do see where they may've thought there was contact.
 
205 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
kantwistaye wrote:
Well, luckily for all involved it doesn't matter anymore.  If I was the refs I wouldn't have reversed the call, but I do see where they may've thought there was contact.

My coaches always told me when I played, if you lose a game and have to blame it on a refs call, or a cheap shot etc. than you didn't play your best game and deserved to lose. Texas didn't allow that possible bad call to affect them and came out and won big. So your right, it really doesn't matter.
 
205 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-1
What a DOUCHE!
 
205 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+1
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Gazzo wrote:
I've seen it at least 40 times, and I don't see his hands ever coming within 6 inches of the ball. My brother watching with me concurs. I would say that its pretty conclusive that he didn't touch it, but thats just me.
6 inches? That's quite a stretch. I don't think he touched it either, but I think it was REALLY close.
 
205 days ago
1
VOTE:
 
+1
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0

It looked like he was gonna cry right there on the sidelines....

 

It was close, but I don't think he touched it.  Thankfully it didn't effect the outcome of the game
 
205 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Gazzo wrote:
For starters your talking about two different football leagues with two different sets of rules. Second of all, the siutation your talking about the Redskins challenged a fumble and the refs noticed the 12 men thing.
Actually... The Redskins challenged that there were 12 players on the field... There was a call made from the suites to Joe Gibbs informing him of 12 players, and subsequently, he challenged that.. The fumble had nothing to do with the challenge. It was a brilliant move upstairs.
 
204 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Pat wrote:
6 inches? That's quite a stretch. I don't think he touched it either, but I think it was REALLY close.
I didn't mean that literally, that was supposed to show how obvious it was that he didn't touch it. I don't think it was that close at all.
 
204 days ago
0
VOTE:
 
+0
 
+0
 
+0
 
-0
Magicfan1423 wrote:
Actually... The Redskins challenged that there were 12 players on the field... There was a call made from the suites to Joe Gibbs informing him of 12 players, and subsequently, he challenged that.. The fumble had nothing to do with the challenge. It was a brilliant move upstairs.
Oops I forgot to edit that one. This is what I was talking about when I said I stand corrected.
 
 
Preview