Washington Nationals Preview

The Road to Respectability Begins For the Nationals [2010 Washington Nationals Preview]

3/22/10 in MLB   |   Eric_   |   7716 respect

You may have noticed, but the Washington Nationals weren’t any good last year. They lost 103 games in last year after losing 102 games in 2008. Of course, that wasn’t the only embarrassment Washington faced last year, as “Natinals” can attest. 2010 can’t possible be worse, right?

Key Additions: Stephen Strasburg, Jason Marquis, Ivan Rodriguez, Adam Kennedy, Matt Capps, Chien-Ming Wang

Key Subtractions: Elijah Dukes

Projected Lineup
CF Nyjer Morgan
2B Adam Kennedy
3B Ryan Zimmerman
1B Adam Dunn
LF Josh Willingham
RF Willie Harris
C Ivan Rodriguez
SS Cristian Guzman

Projected Rotation

LHP John Lannan
RHP Jason Marquis
LHP Scott Olsen
RHP Livan Hernandez
RHP J.D. Martin
(Stephen Strasburg and Chien-Ming Wang are expected to factor in at some point)

Closer: RHP Matt Capps


Stephen Strasburg. Last June’s #1 overall pick will start the season in AA, but he’s already the face of this moribund franchise desperate for a pickup. I was at a Baseball Prospectus event a few weeks ago, and their scouting guy, Kevin Goldstein said that the scary thing about Strasburg is that the hype is all true. While there are many many variables with pitching prospects, the progress of Strasburg, particularly once he hits the majors, is the story of the Nationals’ season.

The Nats were fairly aggressive in the free agent market, making a bunch of signings. While it may seem like rearranging desk chairs on the Titanic, the team needed to make some moves to show the fanbase that the owners are not just willing to pocket profits. The most beneficial move should be Jason Marquis. He’s a league average pitcher at best, but league average pitchers were in short supply in DC last year.

Ryan Zimmerman had a breakout year in 2009, hitting .292/.364/.525 with 33 home runs. He and Adam Dunn will give Washington a very good heart of the order. Whether they get a lot of RBI opportunities will depend on if Nyjer Morgan can keep up his first year in DC, a year completely different than the rest of his career, and if Adam Kennedy can keep hitting in the .280s with an OBP around .350.

The Nats’ Pythagorean record, based on the amount of runs a team scores and gives up, was 70-92 last year. This means the Nationals were bad, but the 100+ losses were partially a function of luck. They could not improve at all this season, but still win more games.


This is still a very similar team that lost 205 games in the last two years. The Pythagorean record points to a turnaround in wins, but the team itself might not be much more talented save for Strasburg.

Jason Marquis and John Lannan are heading the rotation, even though they are #3 or #4 starters at best. Scott Olsen had a terrible year with injuries and ineffectiveness, and there’s no guarantee he’ll bounce back. The back end of the rotation will be filled with long washed up vets (Hernandez), who dats (Martin), and reclamation projects (Wang). Strasburg will help, but he’s just one piece.

The bullpen was about as effective as adding napalm to a fire in 2009, and there isn’t much to recommend a possible improvement. The new closer will be Matt Capps, last seen with an ERA almost 6 as the Pirates’ closer. This should end well, although in the end Capps is keeping the seat warm for last year’s 10th overall pick, Drew Storen.


The Nationals finally have some pieces in place in Zimmerman, Dunn, Strasburg, Storen, and this year’s #1 overall pick. For this year, they should be at least a little more viable, because they can’t possibly be worse. I think. Despite that, it’s another last place finish for the Nats with a 68-94 record.

What are your thought on the 2010 Washington Nationals.
Notify me by email about comments that follow mine. Preview

3/23/10   |   ary201   |   213 respect

WhoDat12 wrote:
If the Nationals can keep their Wang healthy, this season will have a better climax than last season.

I wish I could give you 2 respects for that one!

3/23/10   |   WhoDat12   |   2252 respect

If the Nationals can keep their Wang healthy, this season will have a better climax than last season.

3/23/10   |   radiowave000   |   145 respect

Natinals are the Natinals...some decent offense..terrible d and pitching that is mediocre at best...
Last again..though they might not lose 100 this year...98, 99

3/22/10   |   ML31   |   3675 respect

It is hard to imagine the Nationals will continue to be as bad for year after year.  The Pirates already buck those odds!  They ought to improve in that it is hard to get worse.  But that is about all that can be said for this franchise that was railroaded out of Montreal by MLB.  Perhaps perennial suckiness is their penance?

3/22/10   |   w_g_walters   |   223 respect

My point is that despite the long losing streaks, they got a 9-game winning streak in there. (I didn't know about the season-ender, though.) If they can pull that into something good for this season, they have a chance of a much better season, even though they have no chance of .500

3/22/10   |   Eric_   |   7716 respect

w_g_walters wrote:

Given they avoided being even worse by actually having a long winning streak last year, I'd say their chances of a better season rely on another Act Of Almighty God.

Yes, they ended on a 7 game winning streak, but during the year were a lot of losing streaks. Every team goes on streaks during the season. When the dust fell, the numbers showed that the Nats were unlucky by about 11 games. This tends to even out from season to season, thus the comment on how the Nats can be just as bad (which they probably are for the most part) but still improve in the win column.

3/22/10   |   w_g_walters   |   223 respect

Given they avoided being even worse by actually having a long winning streak last year, I'd say their chances of a better season rely on another Act Of Almighty God.