Please sign in to complete your action
 
DONE!
Cheer and debate with
6,000,000+ fans!
My Team:
Charlotte
My Team:
Michael
My Team:
Britney
6/29/09
Why USA Soccer, i.e Football to the rest of the world, will never be great
Why USA Soccer, AKA Football To The Rest Of The World, Will Never Be Great
READ MORE:


I watched the upstart USA sprint out to a 2-0 lead yesterday against mighty Brazil. For a moment I let myself think,  "What if.." Then the second half began, and I quickly remembered why we are the USA and why Brazil is Brazil.

Maybe the analysts will be telling us that it was poor strategy, that the US went into a protect the lead mode, when they should have looked to play the same way that led them to a 2-0 halftime score. Maybe the goalie will be blamed, who knows. There is another point though, one that always seems to go ignored...the USA just does not get enough elite athletes into the soccer program, plain and simple.

Why? Maybe because our football, is well, football to us. Our elite athletes have some choices to make when they are young. Basketball, baseball, football, and to some extent, hockey, all muddy the waters for a young kid. In junior high, fall meant football, so even if I liked soccer, I had to choose. Since I grew up in Pittsburgh, my boyhood dreams were to be Lynn Swann leaping into the air to make a spectacular catch in a future Super Bowl, or Jack Lambert blowing up Wendell Tyler and just intimidate the hell out of him.

When I realized I was not big enough for football, I turned to the other sports, hockey and baseball, winter and spring school sports where I grew up. My summers were spent playing all three of these sports, and for me, soccer was just not my thing. As a country, more kids that show signs early on of being athletic, choose one of the major sports in the US, not soccer. Now with golf & tennis gaining some popularity, the talent pool weakens even a little more.

For the rest of the world, football is the end all be all of sports. Everyone plays it, needing only a ball and a make shift goal to participate. Economics do not enter the sport, one does not need to have wealthy parents to participate. Most of the football powers do not have other major sports leagues to draw the attention of their youth. Brazilian children dream about being Pele or Ronaldo or any other of the hundreds of fantastic stars the country has produced. Sure, a few may look at basketball, the other major sport, but bar none, football is the only sport for most of the nation. 

Take a listen to sports radio, and the upset of Spain barely got a mention. Driving today I hear this:

"Soccer is so boring." - Host
"Yeah, thank god for all those horns, it's the only thing that kept me awake." -Guest

Um, yesterday's game was very exciting. Yet these two probably watch golf and are on the edge of their seats. The perception is though that the game is lacking excitement, and that seed has stayed put and rooted in the collective US sports' consciousness. Still, the crux is that the US has 4 major sports leagues, while most have football and now basketball is making major headway on the international scene.

Europe is dominated mainly by football, as its major football leagues attract the elite players from all over the world to come play there for vast sums of money. Ask Eto' o, a native of Cameroon if  I am correct, if his dream was to throw a touchdown pass to Santonio Holmes or score a World Cup goal, and well, he'd probably know little about the NFL. In fact, most impoverished nations play football in the streets or fields wearing Arizona Cardinal Super Bowl Champ t-shirts, so their history may be all askew.

Would a victory yesterday have inspired a 8 year-old promising athlete to kick araound the ball instead of practicing free throws? Maybe. The loss though just puts the improbable Spain victory out of our minds. The only silver lining is that as more South Americans immigrate to the US, soccer will continue to gain popularity to some degree, as our demographics continue to change. Until the US can seize the moment on the world stage, football will only be a sport to us with a helmet, pads and the Lombardi Trophy.
19 comments
Vote!
Comment!
Your votes determine top comment

6/29/09
5
 I liked your quip about the radio, because you are exactly right.  they probably are on the edge of their seat for golf.  I think it was Tony Realli on Around the Horn, who said, why is a 1-0 baseball game more exciting than 1-0 soccer game.  it isn't.  they both are exciting to me.

6/29/09
5
I believe this is a fair assessment.  Even if the US wins a WC, I still don't think it will ever surpass the NBA, NFL or MLB.  A WC win, would however add give the US something it has never had.  A true team world champion.  Just because you have the most popular league or are the only one who plays the sport doesn't mean you are a world champion.  Having international players in the league is BS.  The olympics really don't count, because it is a group of sports into one event.  The World Cup is the only tournament of its kind that crowns a true world champion.  Over 200 are trying to qualify for 31 spots in the tournament finals, hosts are automatic participants.  You all know this. 

Which would you rather have?  NBA, NFL, MLB, NHL or WC title.  WC title would mean more to me even though I know it would not be as appreciated by my own fellow americans, but the world would have no choice but to recognize the accomplishment and respect it.

6/29/09
1
This comment was voted poor quality by FanIQ (Show anyway)

6/29/09
5
 I liked your quip about the radio, because you are exactly right.  they probably are on the edge of their seat for golf.  I think it was Tony Realli on Around the Horn, who said, why is a 1-0 baseball game more exciting than 1-0 soccer game.  it isn't.  they both are exciting to me.

6/29/09
0
hskrdave wrote:
 I liked your quip about the radio, because you are exactly right.  they probably are on the edge of their seat for golf.  I think it was Tony Realli on Around the Horn, who said, why is a 1-0 baseball game more exciting than 1-0 soccer game.  it isn't.  they both are exciting to me.
I would have to say Soccer has indeed grown in the States since the last world cup. MLS was unheard of on TV let alone ESPN before 2006. Now they have a same what? every Wednesday or Sunday or something rather? It is growing and will continue to grow because American opinion on what sport is better is not even half way to the end all be all opinion. Imagine if someone said McDonalds wasnt the top food chain as a citizen of Mexico and they said Taco Bell is the top food chain (no racism intended) Does that make any sense to you? Cause that is what we as Americans are saying to the rest of the world.

6/29/09
4
TurkogluForMVP wrote:
I would have to say Soccer has indeed grown in the States since the last world cup. MLS was unheard of on TV let alone ESPN before 2006. Now they have a same what? every Wednesday or Sunday or something rather? It is growing and will continue to grow because American opinion on what sport is better is not even half way to the end all be all opinion. Imagine if someone said McDonalds wasnt the top food chain as a citizen of Mexico and they said Taco Bell is the top food chain (no racism intended) Does that make any sense to you? Cause that is what we as Americans are saying to the rest of the world.
 I'm not really sure how to begin this so I'm going to jump in the middle.  Americans for the most part are sheep.  (yes i am american and can be/have been a sheep at times).  If somebody tells us that it isn't good, a majority will take it as truth.  Hockey is the same as soccer, except hockey has been around in the USA longer.  Soccer has grown by leaps since we hosted the world cup in 94.  But I would say that is the "Birth" date of soccer in America.  We have done a lot in the last 15 years.  Just as with all things in life, I don't try to convert people.  I tell people my love for soccer, why I enjoy it.  I will be the first to admit that I prefer the International games, and MSL is possibly the lowest professional league out there.  The Beckham deal in MLS was a Fiasco, but could have been a bigger step in my opinion.  Soccer will probably never become the 5th major sport, but then again most sports in America are becoming niche.  For proof, just look at the poll that discussed if you could only watch one sport, what would it be.  Mine is still football, because of my love for the Nebraska Cornhuskers.  But I would pick hockey over the NFL faster than a heartbeat.  Soccer needs to find it's place in America (which it is doing) and let it grow slowly, get the decent base, before they try to convert non-believers.

6/29/09
2
well...honestly to me...soccer is just as important as any other type of sport....but to me, and my family...its GREAT no matter what!

6/29/09
1
(Edited by hskrdave)
I am a Mexico Fan die hard! Wanted to make that clear but honestly I am starting to really like the American National team. I understand the rivalry between the my team and the US team but the US Players play with heart and have turned heads in a country of "sheep" Sports fans. The thing that pisses me off is how commentators give the US sh!t for not beating Brazil in a final! Honestly I dont bother with those type of people they dont know what they are talking about obviously! As a Mexico fan I congratulate the US team 

(edited for language, cursing not allowed. thanks. hskrdave)

6/29/09
1
(Edited by carlalbert64)
 I am in the same boat.... didn't grow up playing soccer, it wasn't available to me.  I played the three major sports, football, basketball and baseball.  When I had kids, they started getting involved in soccer and I became interested in it because of them.  Since then, I play whenever I can, coach and enjoy watching soccer at all levels.  That being said, didn't I read somewhere that soccer is the fastest growing youth sport in the USA?  I may be wrong but I thought I had read that.  I think when my kids generation becomes adults, a lot of the attitudes towards soccer will change because so many of our youth have played and enjoyed the sport.  Those kids will be our sportscasters and journalists and soccer will get much more coverage.

6/29/09
1
jguzman86 wrote:
I am a Mexico Fan die hard! Wanted to make that clear but honestly I am starting to really like the American National team. I understand the rivalry between the my team and the US team but the US Players play with heart and have turned heads in a country of "sheep" Sports fans. The thing that pisses me off is how commentators give the US sh!t for not beating Brazil in a final! Honestly I dont bother with those type of people they dont know what they are talking about obviously! As a Mexico fan I congratulate the US team 

(edited for language, cursing not allowed. thanks. hskrdave)
Great post, glad to see Mexican fans and US fans can agree on some things.

You are so right. People who aren't into soccer just aren't gonna get into it. No big deal, I really don't get into hockey or NASCAR and no amount of convincing me is going to get me to sit down and watch something that I think is boring.

But I see what attendance was like at US games 20 years ago. And now I see what the MLS is doing, and I see that the US has substantial crowds at home now and soccer is moving in the right direction. So the US didn't beat Brazil, and I'm sad about that. But this US team has heart and is doing something special during this World Cup cycle.

6/29/09
1
Seriously the idea that soccer doesn't get the best athletes is retarded. If you actually understood what had occured at this tournament you would see that the US survived based on superior physical and mental toughness and work rate because they were outclassed in skill and technique. You can only accomplish this with top athletes. The U.S. will get over the hump when our technical ability catches up with our physical prowess. Please learn about this game before writing a column like this. Perhaps minor sports web sites just can't attract the top journalistic talent.

6/29/09
4
It isn't that the best athletes aren't playing soccer. Many are. Hell, look at players like Onyewu and Altidore. With those physical abilities, they could have played any sport (Gooch could play American football, without the pads). And even if we accept the fact that the best athletes arent playing soccer, the things that can be done with the proper nutrition, training, and other sports sciences bring these players up to par (the US has one of the world's best fitness and strength programs). What is lacking is the creative spark. Americans, in our effort to make everything into a science, have failed to notice the art of the game.

Will soccer ever be a top sport in the US? Maybe. I tend to think so, but I'm biased. I do think there will be a level of parity between sports in the near future. Maybe soccer won't be a top 4, but I can see the pool expanding to the top 5.

6/29/09
3
celticfc411 wrote:
It isn't that the best athletes aren't playing soccer. Many are. Hell, look at players like Onyewu and Altidore. With those physical abilities, they could have played any sport (Gooch could play American football, without the pads). And even if we accept the fact that the best athletes arent playing soccer, the things that can be done with the proper nutrition, training, and other sports sciences bring these players up to par (the US has one of the world's best fitness and strength programs). What is lacking is the creative spark. Americans, in our effort to make everything into a science, have failed to notice the art of the game.

Will soccer ever be a top sport in the US? Maybe. I tend to think so, but I'm biased. I do think there will be a level of parity between sports in the near future. Maybe soccer won't be a top 4, but I can see the pool expanding to the top 5.
I couldn't agree more... and I think the biggest reason why the US couldn't hold on to the lead and win the game is that the US has depth problems. The US does not have the 12th, 13th and 14th guys that can come in and really compete, the same way that Brazil and other top teams can. But the starters for the US are very, very competetive and that's why many US starters are playing for top club teams around the world.

And I really think that not having Michael Bradley is what doomed the US. With him in the game, the US would have defended a lot better and would have controlled posession much more than they did.

6/29/09
3
if that spain game did not excite you then you had no pulse. every time spain got the ball into our area to try and score i got so anxious and was on the end of my seat. and when the USA scored their goals i just about burnt down the house with celebration. the game is PERFECT and i am just now realising that. for the longest time i cast soccer away saying it WAS BORING and it WAS NO GOOD. but my view of the sport has since changed. i now love the sport...and if it was not for college sports it would be my favorite...i have no earthly idea why America just looks down upon it...hopefully sooner or later they will see the light and back our boys, because if nothing else they should at least watch and support because it is the American national team and they are out there representing our country....

6/29/09
1
BluDevil wrote:
I couldn't agree more... and I think the biggest reason why the US couldn't hold on to the lead and win the game is that the US has depth problems. The US does not have the 12th, 13th and 14th guys that can come in and really compete, the same way that Brazil and other top teams can. But the starters for the US are very, very competetive and that's why many US starters are playing for top club teams around the world.

And I really think that not having Michael Bradley is what doomed the US. With him in the game, the US would have defended a lot better and would have controlled posession much more than they did.
Not having Bradley hurt, but that's just one of those "what-ifs." The depth problem is, well, a problem, but I think it will fix itself in time. 15 years ago we had 4 starters who could start just about anywhere, and the rest were stand-ins. Now, we can throw 11 out there. We are getting there...slowly, but we're getting there

6/29/09
2
Well I am an 11 year old and contrary to your post I was pretty inspired. So since you obviously haven't been a kid for a long time since you falsely wrote "I wouldn't be inspired", please stick to your day job unless it's writing.

6/29/09
2
It isn't only because of a depleted talent pool... but also because a good deal of my fellow Americans are egocentric, xenophobic, and utterly stupid.  How many times do we have to hear "soccer is boring", "soccer isn't a real sport", "soccer players aren't real athletes", "soccer hooligans", and so forth.  They've all got their preconceived notions, and anyone who's ever studied psychology know that biases are hard to change.

It doesn't matter what the rest of the country thinks - I'll always support this team to the bottom of my heart and be proud of how far we've come.  I know we can compete.

The haters can shove it.

6/30/09
1
celticfc411 wrote:
It isn't that the best athletes aren't playing soccer. Many are. Hell, look at players like Onyewu and Altidore. With those physical abilities, they could have played any sport (Gooch could play American football, without the pads). And even if we accept the fact that the best athletes arent playing soccer, the things that can be done with the proper nutrition, training, and other sports sciences bring these players up to par (the US has one of the world's best fitness and strength programs). What is lacking is the creative spark. Americans, in our effort to make everything into a science, have failed to notice the art of the game.

Will soccer ever be a top sport in the US? Maybe. I tend to think so, but I'm biased. I do think there will be a level of parity between sports in the near future. Maybe soccer won't be a top 4, but I can see the pool expanding to the top 5.
Yes, we are finally getting some great players, but the two you mention are from families that came to the US from Haiti and Nigeria...As I said, immigration helps, but imagine if say, Dwight Howard had taken up soccer, and became a world class goalie...
Just look at the breakdown of high school and collegiate athletics. The mere numbers of athletes playing football, basketball and baseball ave to dilute what is available to US soccer. Also, the two you mention unfortunately play overseas. The MLS is the major vehicle that can capitalize on the US teams success, and it cannot compete with Europe. Ask David Beckham.

The reasons for soccer not catching on are many. As for US soccer being subpar, I think you cannot ignore the fact that our other sports draw many athletes away from soccer and that is my point. 

6/30/09
1
deez25 wrote:
Seriously the idea that soccer doesn't get the best athletes is retarded. If you actually understood what had occured at this tournament you would see that the US survived based on superior physical and mental toughness and work rate because they were outclassed in skill and technique. You can only accomplish this with top athletes. The U.S. will get over the hump when our technical ability catches up with our physical prowess. Please learn about this game before writing a column like this. Perhaps minor sports web sites just can't attract the top journalistic talent.
How is it retarded? Are you telling me the four major sports in the US do not have the best talent in them? I answered another poster if Dwight Howard had played soccer as a boy, would he have turned into a world class keeper?

One question for you? Man for man, is the USA roster as good as Brazil or Spain, or Italy for that matter?  No. Why is it that we cannot field an elite team when athletically, we have so many superstars in other sports? The other sports do draw away talent from soccer. 254,000 high school seniors play football, so that is a quarter million athletes not playing soccer.

To suggest our roster is as talented from top to bottom as Brazil or Spain is just not true. Sorry. I am a fan of soccer, and I hope more people do get involved in soccer and as I said, as more people immigrate from soccer hotbeds, our chances will go up.

7/1/09
0
Usa Mens soccer has proved that it is as good as any european team. There is an interview on comcast sportsnet about the Brazil and USA game. They interviews Donvan and Bradley. It is realyl interestign to see what they say about the game and USA soccer.

http://www.comcastsportsnet.tv/pages/videossportsnite
and click on the video that says...  Soccer: Bob Bradley and Landon Donovan on the loss to Brazil--6/28

 
Notify me by email about comments that follow mine.
Preview


BEST OF THE WEB
SHOP
SOCCER GEAR
Reebok NFL Equipment New E..
$79.95
New Era New York Yankees N..
$33.95
adidas Los Angeles Lakers ..
$24.95
SOCCER TICKETS
Loading...
MEET OUR FANS
Elisha
Doreen
 more
12,798,192+
ANSWER TODAY'S POLL
 more
PLAY NEVER-ENDING TRIVIA
Utah v. Houston
Seattle v. Portland
New York v. LA
Detroit v. Chicago
 more

TAKE A QUIZ
 more

PREDICT THE SCORE
NFL
NBA
NHL
NCAABB
Soccer
 more
2,555,658+
zelgay_kunaris heckled frnksparks as he passed you in the Trivia rankings
Just now!
atshhh_2008 joined the NCAAF league AlabamaA&MFans(FB).
Just now!
madhumurali_231 joined the Locker Room league Fans of Music (Hangout).
Just now!
madhumurali_231 joined the Locker Room league Hollywood Dreams.
Just now!
madhumurali_231 joined the Soccer league 2006 World Cup.
Just now!
madhumurali_231 joined the Soccer league Fans of Brazil (Soccer).
Just now!
madhumurali_231 joined the Cricket league Fans of South Africa.
Just now!
madhumurali_231 joined the Cricket league CricketFans.
Just now!
madhumurali_231 joined the Cricket league Fans of India.
Just now!
 

Join Today
About FanIQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Contact Us
Report A Bug
Help