MLB ResultsSkip to Next Poll »
Are you for or against inter league play?
I think inter league play is a total joke. Isn't the whole point of the World Series to narrow the leagues down to the  best team in each league and have them play each other? If they've all ready played each other in inter league play doesn't it take something away from the World Series? I understand some people want to see the rival state teams play each other but I think the cost of useless injuries to players is totally unnecessary. Its so obvious its all money driven.
| Closed on 07/14/08 at 05:00PM
FanIQ Pts? No | MLB | Multiple Choice Opinion Poll
Team Breakout:
29 Fans 
21%a. Agree
69%b. Disagree
10%c. Don't care

 &nbp;
TOP COMMENT * * * * * * * * * * * *
#1 | 56 days ago

+8 thumbs upI am without a doubt totally for inter-league play as long as my team is winning.
Agree  
  
39 Comments | Sorted by Most Recent First | Red = You Disagreed
Vote for your favorite comments. Fans decide the Top Comment (3+ votes) and also hide poor quality comments (4+ votes).
#1 | 56 days ago

+8 thumbs upI am without a doubt totally for inter-league play as long as my team is winning.
Agree  
#2 | 56 days ago

+7 thumbs upMy only real beef with interleague play is that all the teams in a division don't play the same teams.  they should do it more like the NFL does...this year have the AL West play the NL West...next year the NL East...something like that.  That's my opinion on the matter.
Disagree  
#3 | 55 days ago

+1 thumbs upI like the geographical rivalries but I could care less about most of it. I would like to see the geographical ones stick but I have they have to go to get rid of the rest, then I wouldn't shed a tear.
#4 | 55 days ago

+2 thumbs upPQed? Wow, it's not like I said $#%& or &^%( #$%&er or *&^%er $%&#er.
Agree  
#5 | 54 days ago

I am totally against it... not only for the unnecessary injuries to the players but also for the way the fans make themselves out to be real jerks. Cubs fans and White Sox fans lose about 47 % of thier IQs whenever they play against each other. Finally to me it takes away from the excitement of the World Series because if the teams have already played each other than it is just another rerun.
Agree  
#6 | 54 days ago

(Edited by RedBirdRage)
+1 thumbs upLike it or not, it's not going anywhere, and the sport is better for it.  If you think about it, it's pretty ridiculous to say to fans "you can only watch these players and not these because group A is in your league and group B isn't".  I mean, I can totally understand your frustration by the Yanks being beaten by the NL Central cellar dwellers, but it's pretty ridiculous considering the star power (underachieving or not) the Yankees have, and saying that the only chance 16 fan bases have of seeing them live would be for their team and the Yanks to make the series.
Disagree  
#7 | 54 days ago

Beaneaters wrote:
PQed? Wow, it's not like I said $#%& or &^%( #$%&er or *&^%er $%&#er.
+2 thumbs upMaybe you wouldn't have gotten PQed if you would have... *shrug* just a thought.
Disagree  
#8 | 54 days ago

+2 thumbs upI don't understand the idea being floated about injuries; all the players play 162 games, and if your pitcher isn't coordinated enough to keep himself from getting injured while running, then I can't help you... I am all FOR interleague play, as it gives me a chance to see teams I usually don't, and then we don't have to play even more(currently 18 or 19, I think) divisional games.  As RedBirdRage put it, it's not going anywhere, so you might as well get used to it!! 
Disagree  
#9 | 54 days ago

+3 thumbs upAnd all the purists hated the Wild card also. This notion that it lessens the Ws is a joke. The NFL plays interconference games. Plus there are fewer games in the NFL and it doesnt harm the Super Bowl, same with NBA. The injury thing is BS, injuries could happen playing a division game just as they can in than interleague. Its the 21st century get with the program. If anything the DH should be abolished. A Pitcher should have to hit. That sure would decrease the amount of bean ball incidents and maybe just maybe fewer brawls
Disagree  
#10 | 53 days ago

RedBirdRage wrote:
Like it or not, it's not going anywhere, and the sport is better for it.  If you think about it, it's pretty ridiculous to say to fans "you can only watch these players and not these because group A is in your league and group B isn't".  I mean, I can totally understand your frustration by the Yanks being beaten by the NL Central cellar dwellers, but it's pretty ridiculous considering the star power (underachieving or not) the Yankees have, and saying that the only chance 16 fan bases have of seeing them live would be for their team and the Yanks to make the series.
How does it make the sport better? To me it just makes it one big league. The World Series is not the best of each league going against each other anymore it is just the end of the season.  With the White Sox and the Cubs both being in first place what if they do go to the series? It will just be a repeat of the last two weekends. So please explain to me how that makes the sport  better.
Agree  
#11 | 53 days ago

+3 thumbs upFor the people that say it lessons the World Series, only 3 times in the ten years of interleague play have 2 teams met in the World Series that played in the regular season.   In 2000 it was the Subway Series with the Mets and Yankees.  I really don't think that them playing in the regular season made that series any less exciting.  In 2006 the Tigers and Cardinals played, the Tigers swept the Cardinals 3-0 in the regular season, but the Cards won the series 4-1. And in 2007 the Red Sox and Rockies played each other in the regular season with the Rockies winning the regular season 2-1 in Boston, but getting swept in the Series.  Some of the biggest crowds of the season for home teams are at interleague games.  It is exciting to see differant teams play.  In a 162 game season, it gets kind of boring seeing the same teams play each other 17 times during the regular season.  In the NFL the Giants and New England played during the regular season.  Did that make the Super Bowl a lesser game because they had already played each other? 
Disagree  
#12 | 53 days ago

mwillie1 wrote:
For the people that say it lessons the World Series, only 3 times in the ten years of interleague play have 2 teams met in the World Series that played in the regular season.   In 2000 it was the Subway Series with the Mets and Yankees.  I really don't think that them playing in the regular season made that series any less exciting.  In 2006 the Tigers and Cardinals played, the Tigers swept the Cardinals 3-0 in the regular season, but the Cards won the series 4-1. And in 2007 the Red Sox and Rockies played each other in the regular season with the Rockies winning the regular season 2-1 in Boston, but getting swept in the Series.  Some of the biggest crowds of the season for home teams are at interleague games.  It is exciting to see differant teams play.  In a 162 game season, it gets kind of boring seeing the same teams play each other 17 times during the regular season.  In the NFL the Giants and New England played during the regular season.  Did that make the Super Bowl a lesser game because they had already played each other? 

The most exciting thing about the superbowl to me  is that it means football season is over and baseball season is just around the corner. So no it did not lessen the game for me because I cannot stand football.

Agree  
#13 | 53 days ago

Why have the american league and the national league? Why not just call them American National League of North America? Let's just become one big league... throw out the league system all together. It doesn't effect the World Series and it is exciting to see the teams play each other according to some. Then you can do away with the all star game because everyone will be in one big league and then there won't even be a need for the series at the end of the season.  So we can have a shorter baseball season and no more whining about how boring 162 games can be if they are played the way they were first designed to played each league playing in their own league until the best of each league face off in the fall.  How does that sound?
Agree  
#14 | 53 days ago

+1 thumbs upSee the purists cant stand the fact that ALL of the professional leagues in the country play the opposite conferences. It does not cheapen the championship series/game what so ever. Face it its here to stay and wildly popular. Seems to me inter league play has been a benefit for MLB. But then again you purist probably still hate the wild car. Go find Bob Costas and all you guys can commiserate together.
Disagree  
#15 | 53 days ago

danny_n94 wrote:
See the purists cant stand the fact that ALL of the professional leagues in the country play the opposite conferences. It does not cheapen the championship series/game what so ever. Face it its here to stay and wildly popular. Seems to me inter league play has been a benefit for MLB. But then again you purist probably still hate the wild car. Go find Bob Costas and all you guys can commiserate together.

I have nothing against a wild car but I do against the wild card. How has interleague play benefited the MLB? Just curious. Everyone for interleague play keeps saying it benefits the MLB but how?  By lowering the fans IQs when they play rivials?  How about stating some benefits or just leave that argument out if you cannot think of any.

Agree  
#16 | 53 days ago

tj244 wrote:

I have nothing against a wild car but I do against the wild card. How has interleague play benefited the MLB? Just curious. Everyone for interleague play keeps saying it benefits the MLB but how?  By lowering the fans IQs when they play rivials?  How about stating some benefits or just leave that argument out if you cannot think of any.

Holy crap. Yoou play your rivals 12 times or more a season. How does that lower the IQ of the fans. Attendance iis UP when teams play interleague. Or does that not matter? More TV exposure. But that probably doesn tmatter. I love how you anti-change people are so dead set against anything that is good. Lets see 9 of the 26 wild card teams have made the WS. 4 of those won the WS. Yep, you are right the changes have not benefitted Baseball.
Disagree  
#17 | 52 days ago

tj244 wrote:
Why have the american league and the national league? Why not just call them American National League of North America? Let's just become one big league... throw out the league system all together. It doesn't effect the World Series and it is exciting to see the teams play each other according to some. Then you can do away with the all star game because everyone will be in one big league and then there won't even be a need for the series at the end of the season.  So we can have a shorter baseball season and no more whining about how boring 162 games can be if they are played the way they were first designed to played each league playing in their own league until the best of each league face off in the fall.  How does that sound?
Well for one thing all the other pro sports still have conferences, with either the eastern and western conference or the AFC and NFC and still have all star games. But don't get me wrong I don't want to see them play everyone  from the other league.  I think it is just fine how they are doing it now.  Matching up a vision with each other each season and then playing your "rival".  BUT, if they did merge the AL and NL, then maybe they would get rid of that damn designated hitter!!! But, thats a whole nother story.
Disagree  
#18 | 52 days ago

tj244 wrote:
How does it make the sport better? To me it just makes it one big league. The World Series is not the best of each league going against each other anymore it is just the end of the season.  With the White Sox and the Cubs both being in first place what if they do go to the series? It will just be a repeat of the last two weekends. So please explain to me how that makes the sport  better.

If they were playing interleague games against EVERYONE, then you might have the argument, but they only play a small amount of them each year, and not against every team in the other division, so it's not just one big league... it's still a tiny proportion of games compared to their divisional rivals.  You also seem to forget (which is understandable, with the cubs not having been to a series in so long) that the playoffs are a battle of attrition, so for the Cubs and White Sox to meet, they're going to have to go through two extended series with other teams, so those "last two weeks" don't mean anything once it's for all the marbles.

 

And you have to remember there are only 4or 5 markets with teams in both leagues, so not everyone has the option to just drive to the other side of the city to go watch the other league's stars.

Disagree  
#19 | 52 days ago

tj244 wrote:

I have nothing against a wild car but I do against the wild card. How has interleague play benefited the MLB? Just curious. Everyone for interleague play keeps saying it benefits the MLB but how?  By lowering the fans IQs when they play rivials?  How about stating some benefits or just leave that argument out if you cannot think of any.

+2 thumbs upWait, so you're saying that interleague play makes fans dumber???  I could see how being a fan of a certain team could do that, but a few games making fans dumber is ridiculous.  Maybe you just need to quit looking for examples with just your own team and look at the big picture in general.
Disagree  
#20 | 51 days ago

RedBirdRage wrote:
Wait, so you're saying that interleague play makes fans dumber???  I could see how being a fan of a certain team could do that, but a few games making fans dumber is ridiculous.  Maybe you just need to quit looking for examples with just your own team and look at the big picture in general.
CWS vs CHC... always something happening in the stands... same goes for NYM and NYY.... Houston Astros and the Texas Rangers.. it seems when they are in the same city or even the same state the fans make a@@es out of themselves.  Seriously, it is not that they are stupid they just chose to act that way. I do not enjoy taking my boys to a game so that they can see grown men and women act like children.  No one is more serious about baseball than I am but inciting a fight does not seem like good support for any team.  Who wants to pay a fortune to go to a game and listen to and see all the crap? I don't.  I know that you are going to say that it happens during regular division games that is true but the fight that I saw at inter league game was unnecessary on a lot of levels.  So that is my take on fans and inter league games.
Agree  
#21 | 51 days ago

tj244 wrote:
CWS vs CHC... always something happening in the stands... same goes for NYM and NYY.... Houston Astros and the Texas Rangers.. it seems when they are in the same city or even the same state the fans make a@@es out of themselves.  Seriously, it is not that they are stupid they just chose to act that way. I do not enjoy taking my boys to a game so that they can see grown men and women act like children.  No one is more serious about baseball than I am but inciting a fight does not seem like good support for any team.  Who wants to pay a fortune to go to a game and listen to and see all the crap? I don't.  I know that you are going to say that it happens during regular division games that is true but the fight that I saw at inter league game was unnecessary on a lot of levels.  So that is my take on fans and inter league games.
Oh and this NEVER happens when  ST . Louis plays the Cubs or Boston v. NYY. Gimme a break!!!!!! You are trying to use a lame argument because you really have no facts to back up your argument.
Disagree  
#22 | 51 days ago

tj244 wrote:
CWS vs CHC... always something happening in the stands... same goes for NYM and NYY.... Houston Astros and the Texas Rangers.. it seems when they are in the same city or even the same state the fans make a@@es out of themselves.  Seriously, it is not that they are stupid they just chose to act that way. I do not enjoy taking my boys to a game so that they can see grown men and women act like children.  No one is more serious about baseball than I am but inciting a fight does not seem like good support for any team.  Who wants to pay a fortune to go to a game and listen to and see all the crap? I don't.  I know that you are going to say that it happens during regular division games that is true but the fight that I saw at inter league game was unnecessary on a lot of levels.  So that is my take on fans and inter league games.
+1 thumbs up

And it's the entire country's (or baseball's) fault that some people don't know how to act?  Absolutely not.  And the majority of Cubs fans I know bring it on themselves in the first place (that nacho cheese stain on my Griffey Jr. jersey didn't just get there through magic), so I'll say it again: it's the fan bases themselves, not the games, that cause people to act like this.  If it wasn't a crosstown rival game, it would be Cubs-Cards, Yanks-Red Sox, White Sox-Tigers, or Mets-Phillies that people acting like fools would be happening at.  Besides, we've never known Chicagoans and New Yorkers to riot, or Texans to start a revolution, have we?

Disagree  
#23 | 51 days ago

(Edited by tj244)
RedBirdRage wrote:

And it's the entire country's (or baseball's) fault that some people don't know how to act?  Absolutely not.  And the majority of Cubs fans I know bring it on themselves in the first place (that nacho cheese stain on my Griffey Jr. jersey didn't just get there through magic), so I'll say it again: it's the fan bases themselves, not the games, that cause people to act like this.  If it wasn't a crosstown rival game, it would be Cubs-Cards, Yanks-Red Sox, White Sox-Tigers, or Mets-Phillies that people acting like fools would be happening at.  Besides, we've never known Chicagoans and New Yorkers to riot, or Texans to start a revolution, have we?

Grant you that the behavior of the Cubs fans have seem to have gotten more out of control over the years but you cannot just blame the situation on them.  Did I blame the entire country or baseball? NO. I believe I said that the fans CHOSE to act up. But why have more fighting than necessary?  You already mentioned the divisional problems.. why create more? Do you remember the White Sox fans who beat up the first base coach of the KC Royals? I am just waiting for that to happen during inter league game. It just amazes me how fierce the fans become during the inter league games more so than  during the regular divisional games. Why risk it?  Why have two rivals that you know have volatile fans play each other? For the money.. the more volatile the fan base the fiercer the rivalry the more money it brings in. To me that is sitting on an atomic bomb waiting for it to go off. When it does I will remember how much it benefits baseball.

Agree  
#24 | 51 days ago

tj244 wrote:

Grant you that the behavior of the Cubs fans have seem to have gotten more out of control over the years but you cannot just blame the situation on them.  Did I blame the entire country or baseball? NO. I believe I said that the fans CHOSE to act up. But why have more fighting than necessary?  You already mentioned the divisional problems.. why create more? Do you remember the White Sox fans who beat up the first base coach of the KC Royals? I am just waiting for that to happen during inter league game. It just amazes me how fierce the fans become during the inter league games more so than  during the regular divisional games. Why risk it?  Why have two rivals that you know have volatile fans play each other? For the money.. the more volatile the fan base the fiercer the rivalry the more money it brings in. To me that is sitting on an atomic bomb waiting for it to go off. When it does I will remember how much it benefits baseball.

+2 thumbs up

"I believe I said the fans CHOSE to act up."  Which pretty much means that the game is merely an excuse for said "fans" to act up.  More or less if the interleague games weren't there, they'd be beating each other up somewhere else, whether it has to do with baseball or not.  Generally it's the same stuff that happens normally, but it just so happens there's media attention because there's a game nearby.

 

You're acting like baseball is going to become a haven for hooligans and street fights like Soccer is in South America and Europe, but that's more paranoid emotional thought rather than the product of any logical trend studies.  Generally, you get that many people together in one place you're going to have some of them act like idiots (and then add alcohol...), but you're going to have that anywhere, regardless of place or a sporting event or anything.  It's not enough of a justification to warrant screwing everyone else, simply because a small percentage want to let their cajones drop and act tough to get attention.

Disagree  
#25 | 51 days ago

RedBirdRage wrote:

"I believe I said the fans CHOSE to act up."  Which pretty much means that the game is merely an excuse for said "fans" to act up.  More or less if the interleague games weren't there, they'd be beating each other up somewhere else, whether it has to do with baseball or not.  Generally it's the same stuff that happens normally, but it just so happens there's media attention because there's a game nearby.

 

You're acting like baseball is going to become a haven for hooligans and street fights like Soccer is in South America and Europe, but that's more paranoid emotional thought rather than the product of any logical trend studies.  Generally, you get that many people together in one place you're going to have some of them act like idiots (and then add alcohol...), but you're going to have that anywhere, regardless of place or a sporting event or anything.  It's not enough of a justification to warrant screwing everyone else, simply because a small percentage want to let their cajones drop and act tough to get attention.

Fans aside maybe that was just my experience. Here is a thought was so wrong with baseball that all this had to be added to it in the first place?  When Cartwright wrote the rules it was a simple, clean, and pure game. Now over the years it just keeps getting mucked up. We went to a 162 games (that was okay because that meant more baseball), the DH, the Wild Card (no I am not a fan of the wild card and being a Cubs fan maybe I should be) and inter league games. Baseball is a beautifully pure and simple game that just keeps getting more and more crap added to it. Come on enough is enough.

Agree