Let the numbers speak for themself:

Bert Blyleven: 22 years,287 wins,60 shutouts,3701 strikeouts,3.31 ERA

Jim Kaat: 25 years,283 wins,31 shutouts,2461 strikeouts, 3.45 ERA

Tommy John: 26 years,288 wins,46 shutouts,2245 strikouts,3.34 ERA

Curt Schilling:20 years,216 wins,20 shutouts,3316 strikeouts,3.46 ERA

The only thing Schilling has the advantage in is strikeouts.He has less wins,shutouts,and the highest ERA among the 4.

Schilling would have to average 35.5 wins the next 2 seasons to match Blyleven in time played and wins.

Schilling would have to average  13.4 wins the next 5 seasons to match Kaat and 12 wins the next 6 seasons to match John.

Sorry,IT AIN'T GONNA HAPPEN!

Like I said ,NO to the HOF for Schilling until the other 3 get in.

Looks like somebody did thier homework.After reading those numbers,Absolutely NO!!!

And those no BS!

You don't honestly put Pedro and Maddux on the 2nd tier of pitchers the last 20 years do you?  Maddux is the best pitcher of our era.  Pedro dominated for 7 years like only Sandy Koufax did before him.  Those two are first ballot, no doubt.

Schilling's post season numbers are certainly impressive, and the bloody sock game is modern folklore, but his regular season numbers leave much to be desired.  Also, if you compare him to legit hall of famers rather than other borderline guys, you realize he doesn't stack up, i.e.:

Curt Schilling:  20 years; 216-146 .597 WL%;  83 CG's; 20 SO's 3261 IP; 3116 K's: 3.46 ERA

Greg Maddux:  23 years; 350-219 .615 WL%; 109 CG's: 35 SO's: 4621 IP 3322 K's: 3.11 ERA

Maddux's ERA is inflated due to the four years prior to this one where he posted  ERA's over 4.  But over the course of his career Maddux has posted an ERA under 3; 9 times, under 2.50; 6 times (and 4 years in a row) and his two best years for ERA were 1.56 and 1.63 in 94' and 95'.  By contrast Schilling has only posted an ERA mark below 3; 4 times and below 2.50; once. 

Postseason Schilling has Maddux by a decent margin.  But Maddux's postseason W-L doesn't tell the whole story.  His postseason ERA is 3.34 and that number is again inflated from recent years.  If you look at Maddux's postseason resume (scroll down to the post season numbers) you'll notice he dominated much like Schilling has. 

You might say, but we're not comparing Schilling to Maddux, we know Maddux is a shoe-in. But that's my point.  With the Hall of Fame there should be no such thing as borderline.