Predict the Top 5 finishers in The Big Ten.

You Might Like

More Polls By: ttt128

Who liked it? 15

Woodruff2 (+)
South Carolina Gamecocks

Jahiegel (+)
Modern Pentathalon

derms33 (+)
Ohio St. Buckeyes

wil1018 (+)
Ohio St. Buckeyes

kmjohnson1 (+)
Michigan Wolverines

Yossarian (+)
Indiana Hoosiers

Motzarelle (+)
Ohio St. Buckeyes

woody77 (+)
Syracuse Orange

CrazyC (+)
Iowa St. Cyclones

JBrenn (+)
Ohio St. Buckeyes

... and 5 other fans

NCAAF Results Skip to Next Poll »

Like it?

Predict the Top 5 finishers in The Big Ten.

| Closed on 08/31/08 at 05:00PM
FanIQ Pts? No | NCAAF | Opinion List

Tagged as: Rankings

Team Breakout:

Rank	29 Fans	Avg (1st)
1.	Ohio State	4.6 (22)
2.	Wisconsin	3.0 (2)
3.	Illinois	2.3
4.	Michigan	2.2 (4)
5.	Penn State	1.8 (1)
Also receiving votes:	Michigan State	0.4
	Purdue	0.4
	Iowa	0.1
	Minnesota	0.1
	Indiana	0.0
	Northwestern	0.0


12 Comments \| Sorted by Most Recent First \| Red = You Disagreed
Vote for your favorite comments. Fans decide the Top Comment (3+ votes) and also hide poor quality comments (4+ votes).
#1 \| 120 days ago SOS (+)	+1 Penn State I feel strong about . WI is good enough to finish 2nd as are all of top 6. Michigan is a ? mark. Which will be answered early as they have early games against WI amd IL 1. Penn State 2. Ohio State 3. Illinois 4. Michigan 5. Wisconsin
	Was this comment...? (1)
#2 \| 118 days ago ttt128 (+)	SOS wrote: Penn State I feel strong about . WI is good enough to finish 2nd as are all of top 6. Michigan is a ? mark. Which will be answered early as they have early games against WI amd IL I dont know about Penn State. They have a QB to replace, but you never know. I think everyone is overrating Illinois. They lost their best defensive and offensive players. Zook recruits well, but I think they are going to do a little worse than people expect. I couldn't pick Michigan to do awful either, although they should with everytihng that has happened and all the talent they lost and don't have. If OSU mixes up the playing calling in the passing game a little it is all over. If they just drop back and throw bombs into coverage to receivers who do not have burner speed then it will allow someone else to have a chance. 1. Ohio State 2. Wisconsin 3. Penn State 4. Michigan 5. Illinois
	Was this comment...?
#3 \| 118 days ago SOS (+)	ttt128 wrote: I dont know about Penn State. They have a QB to replace, but you never know. I think everyone is overrating Illinois. They lost their best defensive and offensive players. Zook recruits well, but I think they are going to do a little worse than people expect. I couldn't pick Michigan to do awful either, although they should with everytihng that has happened and all the talent they lost and don't have. If OSU mixes up the playing calling in the passing game a little it is all over. If they just drop back and throw bombs into coverage to receivers who do not have burner speed then it will allow someone else to have a chance. I don't know what penn state will do . But I think they will play a 2 qb rotation. Or get the ball in the hands of that young man who was the qb in the bowl game. And be ala West Virginia offense. Any way I think Wolves will surprise. As Nobody knows what to expect . Hell not even them. Cut down on mistakes and like I said for awhile it will be a guess what to defend.Buckeyes yes I do not like. Are strong/ Wisconsin seems to be a problem for them. I hope Michigan has gotten rid of a few problems Chad had talent . How arrogant. Mario the only player I can remember to ever play for Michigan who cared more for himself then as BO would say the team the team the team 1. Penn State 2. Ohio State 3. Illinois 4. Michigan 5. Wisconsin
	Was this comment...?
#4 \| 118 days ago Motzarelle (+)	+1 Did yall pick Penn State before or after you heard about the scandal? There year is over before it started, and Joe Pa does not help the situation. The man is legend but he is in the same boat as Brett Farve. 1. Ohio State 2. Illinois 3. Penn State 4. Michigan 5. Michigan State
	Was this comment...? (1)
#5 \| 117 days ago kmjohnson1 (+)	+1 OSU this year, Mich next 1. Ohio State 2. Michigan 3. Illinois 4. Wisconsin 5. Penn State
	Was this comment...? (1)
#6 \| 111 days ago wil1018 (+)	SOS wrote: Penn State I feel strong about . WI is good enough to finish 2nd as are all of top 6. Michigan is a ? mark. Which will be answered early as they have early games against WI amd IL It's always tough trying to compete in this conference without a proven QB. It's gonna be very interesting watching Uof M trying to win games with defense and a running game ONLY....where's Steve Breaston when you need him... 1. Ohio State 2. Illinois 3. Wisconsin 4. Purdue 5. Michigan State
	Was this comment...?
#7 \| 110 days ago kmjohnson1 (+)	wil1018 wrote: It's always tough trying to compete in this conference without a proven QB. It's gonna be very interesting watching Uof M trying to win games with defense and a running game ONLY....where's Steve Breaston when you need him... +1 I dont know about the defense and runnning game only part. They did recruit some good recievers. My this is the QB position and O-Line. With a poor O-line your running game will tank. Unless your running back is Barry Sanders. 1. Ohio State 2. Michigan 3. Illinois 4. Wisconsin 5. Penn State
	Was this comment...? (1)
#8 \| 110 days ago wil1018 (+)	kmjohnson1 wrote: I dont know about the defense and runnning game only part. They did recruit some good recievers. My this is the QB position and O-Line. With a poor O-line your running game will tank. Unless your running back is Barry Sanders. Are saying your concerned about running the ball? I know that Hart and Long are gone but you HAVE to believe between Rodriguez's scheme and your O-Line (Michigan ALWAYS has a good if not great O-Line)..you guys should be able to muster anywhere from 150-200 ypg...right?? 1. Ohio State 2. Illinois 3. Wisconsin 4. Purdue 5. Michigan State
	Was this comment...?
#9 \| 110 days ago kmjohnson1 (+)	wil1018 wrote: Are saying your concerned about running the ball? I know that Hart and Long are gone but you HAVE to believe between Rodriguez's scheme and your O-Line (Michigan ALWAYS has a good if not great O-Line)..you guys should be able to muster anywhere from 150-200 ypg...right?? I am somewhat concerned about the O-line, Yes. I do know Michigan has some good talent at the running back position. We'll see if it enough 1. Ohio State 2. Michigan 3. Illinois 4. Wisconsin 5. Penn State
	Was this comment...?
#10 \| 96 days ago derms33 (+)	O-H! 1. Ohio State 2. Wisconsin 3. Illinois 4. Michigan 5. Penn State
	Was this comment...? (1)
#11 \| 96 days ago EMart (+)	NO NO 1. Michigan 2. Ohio State 3. Wisconsin 4. Penn State 5. Purdue
	Was this comment...?
#12 \| 82 days ago ttt128 (+)	derms33 wrote: O-H! I-O 1. Ohio State 2. Wisconsin 3. Penn State 4. Michigan 5. Illinois
	Was this comment...? (1)

Post a Comment Already a user? Sign in here

Join FanIQ - It's Free