What would be your lineup?

Asked by: schmidtj (+)

» Contact me

» me

Answers Created: 252
Michigan Wolverines
"How many days til football starts?"

Last Answer: chadesanders (+)

» Contact me

» me

Answers: 167
Florida St. Seminoles
"im back in town baby!!!!"

Who liked it? 19

northwind2008 (+)
Calgary Flames

eletha65 (+)
Dale Earnhardt Jr.

qtowndogg (+)
Philadelphia Phillies

CrazyC (+)
Kansas City Chiefs

joebloom53 (+)
Boston Red Sox

roytan1947 (+)
Cleveland Indians

likkerlicense (+)
New York Yankees

danny_n94 (+)
Colorado Rockies

theshrewdone (+)
Seattle Mariners

TigerTime (+)
Atlanta Braves

... and 9 other fans

« MLB Polls

Like it?

What would be your lineup?

Ok so let's say you are the manager of the greatest team of all-time(including a DH). What would be your lineup?
Arguably the players' in the following list may not be who you might think is the greatest at their position but for arguments sake let's just go with this list. Rank them on where you would hit them in the lineup.

FanIQ Pts? No | MLB | Closes 30 days | Opinion List

Tagged as: Fantasy

	&nbp;
TOP COMMENT
#3 \| 27 days ago irbe38 (+)	derms33 wrote: not a lot of speed +4 Willie Mays, Hank Aaron, and Gehrig were pretty fast, besides you wouldn't need speed with that line-up Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (4)


23 Comments \| Sorted by Most Recent First \| Red = You Disagreed
Vote for your favorite comments. Fans decide the Top Comment (3+ votes) and also hide poor quality comments (4+ votes).
#1 \| 27 days ago derms33 (+)	not a lot of speed Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...?
#2 \| 27 days ago derms33 (+)	+2 Dude. this fantasy team rocks! Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (1) (1)
#3 \| 27 days ago irbe38 (+)	derms33 wrote: not a lot of speed +4 Willie Mays, Hank Aaron, and Gehrig were pretty fast, besides you wouldn't need speed with that line-up Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (4)
#4 \| 27 days ago irbe38 (+)	+1 I think I would have gone with Eddie Mathews at Third base or Mike Schmidt Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (1)
#5 \| 27 days ago alsp1958 (+)	derms33 wrote: not a lot of speed +1 This team doesn't need speed- with the exception of Robinson, they are all mashers. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (1)
#6 \| 27 days ago DABULL43 (+)	INTERESTING.... Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...?
#7 \| 27 days ago maroon&gold4eve (+)	irbe38 wrote: I think I would have gone with Eddie Mathews at Third base or Mike Schmidt +1 Matthews and Schmidt would give the offense more power,but you cant argue with Robinson's glove.Arguably the best glove of all time. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (1)
#8 \| 27 days ago irbe38 (+)	You have a point, it would have been a tough choice if there had been one. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...?
#9 \| 27 days ago irbe38 (+)	maroon&gold4eve wrote: Matthews and Schmidt would give the offense more power,but you cant argue with Robinson's glove.Arguably the best glove of all time. +1 Oops forgot to hit reply to comment so will try again. You have a point, it would have been a tough choice if there had been one. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (1)
#10 \| 26 days ago TigerTime (+)	+2 Hank Aaron batting 7th.That is a line up! Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (2)
#11 \| 26 days ago maroon&gold4eve (+)	+3 That lineup has a combined: AB-75550 Runs-13605 Hits-23057 Avg-.305 HR-4092 RBI-14365 SB-1084 I would say thats pretty imposing. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (3)
#12 \| 26 days ago Pat (+)	+1 I'm pretty sure there's no wrong answer here... Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (1)
#13 \| 25 days ago likkerlicense (+)	+1 No Mantle? No DiMaggio? and sorry cubs fans, but i would take ripken in a heartbeat over banks, besides no one would want to play 2 against these guys. as far as brooks robinson, craig nettles had just as good a glove, but i would take alex rodriguez, i know i'm a little biased, but at a very young age he is rocketing up the charts. how about a pitcher? guess it doesn't matter who pitches, they'll get plenty of run support. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (1)
#14 \| 24 days ago joebloom53 (+)	i agree,schmidt would have been at third. how about the startin' rotation and the pen? gibson,koufax,carlton,maybe pedro in his prime,palmer or seaver?. rivera and eck in the pen did i just open a can of worms?
	Was this comment...?
#15 \| 24 days ago irbe38 (+)	likkerlicense wrote: No Mantle? No DiMaggio? and sorry cubs fans, but i would take ripken in a heartbeat over banks, besides no one would want to play 2 against these guys. as far as brooks robinson, craig nettles had just as good a glove, but i would take alex rodriguez, i know i'm a little biased, but at a very young age he is rocketing up the charts. how about a pitcher? guess it doesn't matter who pitches, they'll get plenty of run support. +2 You had me until you brought up A-Rod. You just can not compare the modern day players with the older players. The improvement in equipement, training, fields, and ball just to name a few makes it like comparing apples and oranges. Yes, A-Rod has some talent but put him back in the old days and I wonder if he would even be a blimp on the radar. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (2)
#16 \| 24 days ago irbe38 (+)	joebloom53 wrote: i agree,schmidt would have been at third. how about the startin' rotation and the pen? gibson,koufax,carlton,maybe pedro in his prime,palmer or seaver?. rivera and eck in the pen did i just open a can of worms? You could have, but what team would be complete without a pitcher of course you could use Ruth he was an OK pitcher. I might have to choose Bob Feller, Whitey Ford or maybe Warren Spahn. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...?
#17 \| 24 days ago joebloom53 (+)	+1 there are so many good choices. it's like, what do you prefer, chocalate or vanilla. this could go on and on. thery're all great ballplayers
	Was this comment...? (1)
#18 \| 24 days ago Pat (+)	irbe38 wrote: You had me until you brought up A-Rod. You just can not compare the modern day players with the older players. The improvement in equipement, training, fields, and ball just to name a few makes it like comparing apples and oranges. Yes, A-Rod has some talent but put him back in the old days and I wonder if he would even be a blimp on the radar. That being said, I wonder if guys like Babe Ruth would be a blip on the radar today, considering how out of shape he was, and how badly he treated his body. Sure, he could hit, but the pitchers weren't anywhere near as good as they are today. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...?
#19 \| 24 days ago likkerlicense (+)	the truth is you can't really compare players from different era by stats, too many variables. like him or not A-rod is generally considered the best player in this era, he has the best chance of not only catching bonds but crushing that record, if he stays healthy that is. And just one note, Babe Ruth would have been a hall of fame pitcher had he continued in that profession, thank god he didn't. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...?
#20 \| 23 days ago irbe38 (+)	(Edited by irbe38) Pat wrote: That being said, I wonder if guys like Babe Ruth would be a blip on the radar today, considering how out of shape he was, and how badly he treated his body. Sure, he could hit, but the pitchers weren't anywhere near as good as they are today. You could be right about Ruth but I think most of the other ones would. Especially if they have all of the advantages of today. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...?
#21 \| 22 days ago SoxandCards39 (+)	+1 Brooks definitely wouldn't be on this team if I were picking it, but this is a fun exercise in lineup creation. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (1)
#22 \| 22 days ago qtowndogg (+)	The only spots I was sure on were Ted Williams (best overall hitter at #3), and Babe Ruth (power hitter at clean-up). It didn't hurt to have Aaron protecting Ruth though. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...?
#23 \| 13 days ago northwind2008 (+)	LET'S PLAY BALL!!! Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...?