Which is the worst current running NFL franchise?

Asked by: Chaseisawsome19 (+)

» Contact me

» me

Answers Created: 241
Green Bay Packers
"Goodbye Brett"

Last Answer: bhopp4p1 (+)

» Contact me

» me

Answers: 17114
Bernard Hopkins
"Dreamlords 4ever!"

Who liked it? 37

bhopp4p1 (+)
Buffalo Bills

RichmondSpider (+)
Washington Redskins

joebloom53 (+)
New England Patriots

Rommel-19 (+)
New Orleans Saints

tdellison79 (+)
Indianapolis Colts

mwillie1 (+)
Detroit Lions

alsp1958 (+)
New England Patriots

johnny_d_80 (+)
Chicago Bears

j4r3ds (+)
Detroit Lions

100%InjuryRate (+)
San Francisco 49ers

... and 27 other fans

« NFL Polls

Like it?

Which is the worst current running NFL franchise?

Which is the worst current running NFL franchise? Photo

Atlanta Falcons: Have never had a Back to Back winning season.

Which is the worst current running NFL franchise? Photo

Arizona Cardinals: Are the Arizona Cardinals. (No explanation needed)

Which is the worst current running NFL franchise? Photo

Buffalo Bills: May not be the worst franchise but have been to 4 super bowls and lost all of them

Which is the worst current running NFL franchise? Photo

Detroit Lions: Have only won one post season game since 1957.

FanIQ Pts? No | NFL | Closes 17 days | Multiple Choice Opinion Poll

	&nbp;
TOP COMMENT
#2 \| 97 days ago Chachi_Azzhola (+)	+15 Nice to see this this poll without the Saints as a listed choice. Dunno 'bout Buffalo being on this list: if losing four superbowls is your criteria, then where are the Vikings? Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (13)


40 Comments \| Sorted by Most Recent First \| Red = You Disagreed
Vote for your favorite comments. Fans decide the Top Comment (3+ votes) and also hide poor quality comments (4+ votes).
#1 \| 97 days ago JCMurphy4 (+)	+1 Tough to argue with Arizona or Detroit but I'll stay in my backyard and go Kansas City. The only real difference between Carl Peterson and Matt Millen is Peterson has been ineffective a lot longer. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (1)
#2 \| 97 days ago Chachi_Azzhola (+)	+15 Nice to see this this poll without the Saints as a listed choice. Dunno 'bout Buffalo being on this list: if losing four superbowls is your criteria, then where are the Vikings? Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (13)
#3 \| 97 days ago danny_n94 (+)	+2 I say Arizona, but the Lions are a close second. I mean neither have won a championship in over 50 years and are rarely even in competing for a playoff spot. But I give it to Arizona. I mean they have gone from Chicago to Arizona with same family screwing them up forever. The Bidwells MUST go of thet franchise is to ever win Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (2)
#4 \| 96 days ago mandisdad (+)	+6 Kind of silly to put a team (Bills) on the list because they lost four Super Bowls. You have to be a pretty good franchise to even get to four Super Bowls. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (6)
#5 \| 96 days ago mavsoccer23 (+)	+4 Cincinnati Bengals. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (3) (1)
#6 \| 96 days ago MIKE! (+)	+2 tossup right now between the Lions and the Falcons. The Falcons are in the worst position right now, because they will be dependent on a rookie QB for this season, dont really have a solid back-up behind him and doesnt have a ton around him. The Lions, at least, have Kitna, who can get things started, and hand it down to Stanton who should be able to do something good, they have talented recievers, but the O-Line is horrible, and the RB situation will not be that scary to opponents. the "D" is like the most inconsistant Defense in the league. there are some games when you watch them and think "OMG! THE LIONS ARE DOING DECENT!" because the defense is able to create some offense, but most games, you think "here we go again" i think, even though the lions havent won a play-off game in over 50 years, as of right now, it is the Falcons because of the stage they are at Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (2)
#7 \| 96 days ago Angie (+)	(Edited by Angie) +9 Not being weird, but they need to build moral...Get rid of the stupid 10 year old baton twirlers in the corners of both end zones and get some fawking Cheerleader's for Pete's sake! What man wouldn't run tward boobs bouncin in the air with short skirts for a touchdown?!?!? DUH! I DO Love My Lions, maybe one Year, just One fawking year, we'll make the F*C#IN PLAYOFFS!! Even if it's on a damn wild card I wouldn't mind! Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (6) (3)
#8 \| 96 days ago JRE1969 (+)	+1 If you have to say over the past few years I would go with the Oakland Raiders. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (1)
#9 \| 96 days ago forrest_viv (+)	danny_n94 wrote: I say Arizona, but the Lions are a close second. I mean neither have won a championship in over 50 years and are rarely even in competing for a playoff spot. But I give it to Arizona. I mean they have gone from Chicago to Arizona with same family screwing them up forever. The Bidwells MUST go of thet franchise is to ever win Wasn't St. Louis in there too???????????????????? Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...?
#10 \| 96 days ago forrest_viv (+)	MIKE! wrote: tossup right now between the Lions and the Falcons. The Falcons are in the worst position right now, because they will be dependent on a rookie QB for this season, dont really have a solid back-up behind him and doesnt have a ton around him. The Lions, at least, have Kitna, who can get things started, and hand it down to Stanton who should be able to do something good, they have talented recievers, but the O-Line is horrible, and the RB situation will not be that scary to opponents. the "D" is like the most inconsistant Defense in the league. there are some games when you watch them and think "OMG! THE LIONS ARE DOING DECENT!" because the defense is able to create some offense, but most games, you think "here we go again" i think, even though the lions havent won a play-off game in over 50 years, as of right now, it is the Falcons because of the stage they are at +1 The Lions beat the 'Boys in the early '90s Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (1)
#11 \| 96 days ago forrest_viv (+)	To start 6-2, and end up 7-9, is pretty bad. They are headed in the right direction. I really like their receivers, but if Kitna goes down, they are in serious trouble. Jordan Dizon will help(stud LB from CU Buffs), but their schedule is brutal. They'll be lucky to win 7 games, imo. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...?
#12 \| 96 days ago Pat (+)	+1 Pittsburgh Steelers. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (1)
#13 \| 96 days ago Roe (+)	Miami Dolphins Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (1)
#14 \| 96 days ago kantwistaye (+)	+1 I hadn't realized that the Falcons have never had back to back winning seasons. Thats just depressing. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (1)
#15 \| 95 days ago danny_n94 (+)	my meaning is they started out in Chicago and now are in Arizona. No true stablility. Sure they were in St Louis for 25 years and went to the playoffs 3 times and never won a game. Heck that franchise under the Bidwell leadership went from 1947 to 1998 without a playoff win. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...?
#16 \| 95 days ago mooser58 (+)	+5 HOW can the Cincinnati BUNGLES not be on your list???? Wait, I guess you did not ask which team had the most convicts. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (4) (1)
#17 \| 95 days ago MIKE! (+)	forrest_viv wrote: The Lions beat the 'Boys in the early '90s my bad. i remember reading that under the Lions picture. i think i meant to put have only won 1 play-off game.........wow........that has GOT to be embarassing to not only the Lions, but the Cowboys Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...?
#18 \| 95 days ago mandisdad (+)	(Edited by mandisdad) Roe wrote: Miami Dolphins I guess you could say this if you are basing it on last year's record only. However, one year does not make or break a franchise. The Dolphins are tied with the Bears as the winningest franchise (as a percentage) in NFL history. 2004, 2006 and 2007 were losing seasons for the Dolphins. Prior to that, you have to go back to 1988 for their last losing season. How can you say they are worse than your Falcons? Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...?
#19 \| 95 days ago forrest_viv (+)	MIKE! wrote: my bad. i remember reading that under the Lions picture. i think i meant to put have only won 1 play-off game.........wow........that has GOT to be embarassing to not only the Lions, but the Cowboys It's alright. The loss @ Detroit was their first playoff game in a while. They came from 1-15 in '89(the one win @ the Redskins), to winning 3 out of 4 Super Bowls within 6 or 7 years. That helped take away the sting of losing to Detroit Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...?
#20 \| 95 days ago Roe (+)	mandisdad wrote: I guess you could say this if you are basing it on last year's record only. However, one year does not make or break a franchise. The Dolphins are tied with the Bears as the winningest franchise (as a percentage) in NFL history. 2004, 2006 and 2007 were losing seasons for the Dolphins. Prior to that, you have to go back to 1988 for their last losing season. How can you say they are worse than your Falcons? Yeah..I was basing it on what the poll question was...current worse franchise. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...?
#21 \| 95 days ago mandisdad (+)	Roe wrote: Yeah..I was basing it on what the poll question was...current worse franchise. Last season's record doesn't make you the worst franchise. If it did, the poll maker could simply have asked, "Which team had the worst record last year?" Being a bad franchise encompasses so much more than just a team's record. How about management? Having someone like Matt Millen making decisions hurts a franchise much more than last year's record. The Dolphins have made quite a few moves to better themselves in the offseason...good draft, new coach, Parcells, etc. I think they are CURRENTLY a better franchise than a number of others in the NFL...including the Falcons, Cardinals and Lions. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...?
#22 \| 95 days ago danny_n94 (+)	mandisdad wrote: Last season's record doesn't make you the worst franchise. If it did, the poll maker could simply have asked, "Which team had the worst record last year?" Being a bad franchise encompasses so much more than just a team's record. How about management? Having someone like Matt Millen making decisions hurts a franchise much more than last year's record. The Dolphins have made quite a few moves to better themselves in the offseason...good draft, new coach, Parcells, etc. I think they are CURRENTLY a better franchise than a number of others in the NFL...including the Falcons, Cardinals and Lions. +1 I dont know who could be worse between the Lions and the Cardinals. They both have a history of losing and its not even close. Atlanta is right there. I mean never having back to back winning seasons takes a ton of craptastic leadership to accomplish. When I think or hear bad franchise the Dolphins are not even on my radar. They may have struggled since Marinos retirement but they will get better in a hurry. We all need some team in the AFC east to start beating on the Pats, which will happen sooner than later Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (1)
#23 \| 93 days ago kramer (+)	Pat wrote: Pittsburgh Steelers. +2 What a surprise. How many times have the Lions, Cardinals, and Falcons made the playoffs combined? It doesn't equal as many as the Steelers have alone. Sometimes you get carried away with your hatred for them, Pat. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (2)
#24 \| 93 days ago Pat (+)	kramer wrote: What a surprise. How many times have the Lions, Cardinals, and Falcons made the playoffs combined? It doesn't equal as many as the Steelers have alone. Sometimes you get carried away with your hatred for them, Pat. +1 I don't know what's funnier... your reaction, or the fact that someone took all of this seriously enough to give you a "smart". Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...? (1) (1)
#25 \| 93 days ago kramer (+)	Pat wrote: I don't know what's funnier... your reaction, or the fact that someone took all of this seriously enough to give you a "smart". What's wrong with my reaction, Pat? You'd do the same thing if I were to answer the Patriots for this question, but it would be much worse on your part, and I think we all know that. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...?
#26 \| 93 days ago Pat (+)	kramer wrote: What's wrong with my reaction, Pat? You'd do the same thing if I were to answer the Patriots for this question, but it would be much worse on your part, and I think we all know that. I'd probably just give you a funny... I would feel no need whatsoever to try to justify anything. And I never said your reaction was wrong... only that it amuses me. Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...?
#27 \| 93 days ago MIKE! (+)	forrest_viv wrote: It's alright. The loss @ Detroit was their first playoff game in a while. They came from 1-15 in '89(the one win @ the Redskins), to winning 3 out of 4 Super Bowls within 6 or 7 years. That helped take away the sting of losing to Detroit ya, thats true. so now we all know that if you want to make the Super Enter the poll to see my answer
	Was this comment...?
#28 \| 93 days ago