Who will win the NFC North - NFL, Minnesota Vikings

You Might Like

Asked By: bwhs

Who liked it? 27

Jahiegel (+)
Green Bay Packers

Peytonrob (+)
Indianapolis Colts

sportsfreak008 (+)
Calgary Flames

CrazyC (+)
Kansas City Chiefs

BoBoBeast202124 (+)
Arizona Cardinals

ilovecy (+)
Chicago Bears

the_white_indian (+)
New York Giants

Phillip (+)
Minnesota Vikings

ImmortallEyesz (+)
Arizona Cardinals

woody77 (+)
New York Giants

... and 17 other fans

Skip to Next Poll »

Like it?

Who will win the NFC North (Edited 08/02/08 11:41AM by Seth)

With the addition of Jared Allen from the the Cheifs who lead the leauge in sack last year. I think the Vikings have the best team in this division even with an unstable QBThis poll is closed but has not yet been scored. Check back later to see the final results.

Outcome Date 09/02/08 | Closed on 08/14/08 at 12:00AM
FanIQ Pts? Yes | NFL, Minnesota Vikings | Multiple Choice Prediction Poll

76 Fans
7%	a. Chicago Bears
4%	b. Detriot Lions
34%	c. Green Bay Packers
55%	d. Minnesota Vikings

	&nbp;
TOP COMMENT
#1 \| 203 days ago Cdat (+)	(Edited by Cdat) +7 It really is a toss up between the Packers and the Vikings, seeing that they both have unproven QB's. As far as defense I see both of them in the top ten next season. Vikings have the runiing game while the Packers have the air game. Pretty good match up. Minnesota Vikings
	Was this comment...? (7)


41 Comments \| Sorted by Most Recent First \| Red = You Disagreed
Vote for your favorite comments. Fans decide the Top Comment (3+ votes) and also hide poor quality comments (4+ votes).
#1 \| 203 days ago Cdat (+)	(Edited by Cdat) +7 It really is a toss up between the Packers and the Vikings, seeing that they both have unproven QB's. As far as defense I see both of them in the top ten next season. Vikings have the runiing game while the Packers have the air game. Pretty good match up. Minnesota Vikings
	Was this comment...? (7)
#2 \| 203 days ago bwhs (+)	Cdat wrote: It really is a toss up between the Packers and the Vikings, seeing that they both have unproven QB's. As far as defense I see both of them in the top ten next season. Vikings have the runiing game while the Packers have the air game. Pretty good match up. +1 good answer Minnesota Vikings
	Was this comment...? (1)
#3 \| 203 days ago majikmanseven (+)	+3 Across all 53 guys... I think Packers are younger, deeper, and better coached. But Vikings have a scary defense that if it can actually stay healthy ( which hasn't happened in last few years) can win games for them. Obviously, AP is the real deal... best RB in this division since Sanders and the late great sweetness. But not having a QB and a weak WR crew make them vulnerable. Plus...their secondary is not that good. Here is my breakdown: QB - Packers ( think most Viking fans would take Rogers or brohm over Jackson or Booty) RB- Vikes (best running attack in NFC?) WR/TE - Packers Off line - tie def line - Vikes ( one of best in NFL w/ Allen) LB- Packers secondary - packers ( both are vulnerable) special teams - Packers Vikes will have to win on the road and outdoors after october to win the division. Packers have very tough schedule. Rogers is a huge??? my bias says packers win it and Vikes a wild card Green Bay Packers
	Was this comment...? (3)
#4 \| 203 days ago bwhs (+)	+2 good answer the only thing that bothers me is the jersey in your pic Minnesota Vikings
	Was this comment...? (2)
#5 \| 203 days ago majikmanseven (+)	+2 yes... and it is a majikowski jersey! Though I love favre...am actually somewhat excited he left and move into new era. Any news on these rumors i keep hearing about an outdoor stadium for Vikes? Makes me remember those snowy games at the Met back in tjhe days of tarkenton when I was a little kid. Those were classics! Green Bay Packers
	Was this comment...? (1)
#6 \| 203 days ago bwhs (+)	+1 the magic man Minnesota Vikings
	Was this comment...? (1)
#7 \| 203 days ago YankeeDudeL (+)	+2 I gotta go w/ the Vikings on this. I think they far underachieved last year for the talent they had. They've only increased in talent, while the rest of the divsion has raised questions. That defense should be pretty tight, now. But how's this for a shocker, the team in the NFC North w/ the most secure QB, is the Lions!! I don't know how the Pack will fair w/o Favre, but I think Detroit's on the up, too. I'll say Vikes, Lions, Pack, Bears. I know, I know... Minnesota Vikings
	Was this comment...? (1) (1)
#8 \| 203 days ago majikmanseven (+)	+3 I'd be happy to wager you that Packers finish ahead of Lions! For those of you who weren't paying attention due to the ridiculous over coverage of favre... packers have a young and deep roster Green Bay Packers
	Was this comment...? (1) (2)
#9 \| 203 days ago danny_n94 (+)	+3 I would take the Vikings over the Packers. Based on the fact that the Vikings have a really good running game. The Packers do not. Both teams have question marks at QB. But I think the Vikings have a better defense, or at least a better front 4. I think the Lions will finish last. Where they belong. The have not improved and Millen still runs that team. Green Bay Packers
	Was this comment...? (2)
#10 \| 203 days ago majikmanseven (+)	+2 Ryan Grant ( not AP) led NFC in rushing in second half of season last year... last 9 weeks packers had one of the better running games in NFL... and Grant will only get better. I agree, Vikes have a better running game and a better front 4 on defense... I think Packers are better in all other areas Green Bay Packers
	Was this comment...? (1) (1)
#11 \| 203 days ago bwhs (+)	majikmanseven wrote: Ryan Grant ( not AP) led NFC in rushing in second half of season last year... last 9 weeks packers had one of the better running games in NFL... and Grant will only get better. I agree, Vikes have a better running game and a better front 4 on defense... I think Packers are better in all other areas +2 im still not sold on Ryan Grant...i think he just got hot at the right time and teams wear not excepting the Pack to run the ball since they didnt do much running during the 1st half of the season Minnesota Vikings
	Was this comment...? (2)
#12 \| 203 days ago vindog (+)	+2 I still have to go with the Packers- even with Rodgers at QB! The Vikings have got nothing as far as a passing game on offense and most teams have already figured this out. A.P. is one of the best RB's in the NFL, but he cant do it all. both defenses are good and should keep them in alot of games, but you still have to go uptop to win in the NFL and Jackson (so far at least) has been horrible.... Advantage- Packers! Green Bay Packers
	Was this comment...? (2)
#13 \| 203 days ago bwhs (+)	vindog wrote: I still have to go with the Packers- even with Rodgers at QB! The Vikings have got nothing as far as a passing game on offense and most teams have already figured this out. A.P. is one of the best RB's in the NFL, but he cant do it all. both defenses are good and should keep them in alot of games, but you still have to go uptop to win in the NFL and Jackson (so far at least) has been horrible.... Advantage- Packers! +1 disagree mainly because, I'll admit Jackson isnt a good QB but he has experince that Rodgers doesnt have. All young QB's need a good running game. The Vikings have the best in the NFL so we jus basicly need him not to lose the game for us. It work with the Ravens why not with the Vikes. The defense is also #1 agianst the run and with the addition of Allen the pass D will get better. They were last against the pass last year but it was misleading only because they were throw against the most as well because teams couldnt run against them Minnesota Vikings
	Was this comment...? (1)
#14 \| 202 days ago MIKE! (+)	+2 i don't know what to think about Rodgers. But, I will put it this way. I believe that the defense for GB is stronger and will be able to shut down the lions, bears and vikings offense. Sure, the Vikings have AP, who is a great player, but was completely shut down in the game @ Lambeau and wasn't a huge factor at the dome. I think that GB's recievers and defense are all better than the Vikings recievers and defense. The RB is hard to compare right now. Was AP's rookie year a fluke? Was season Grant had after being picked up by GB a fluke? I think the Viking have a SLIGHT edge on Running Back, but I would take Rodgers and Bohm over Jackson and Booty. The Vikings are a good team and should get a Wild-Card, but I think Green Bay will take the division Green Bay Packers
	Was this comment...? (1) (1) (1)
#15 \| 202 days ago vindog (+)	bwhs wrote: disagree mainly because, I'll admit Jackson isnt a good QB but he has experince that Rodgers doesnt have. All young QB's need a good running game. The Vikings have the best in the NFL so we jus basicly need him not to lose the game for us. It work with the Ravens why not with the Vikes. The defense is also #1 agianst the run and with the addition of Allen the pass D will get better. They were last against the pass last year but it was misleading only because they were throw against the most as well because teams couldnt run against them +1 I'll have to disagree that Jackson has experience that Rodgers doesn't have. Sure he played in alot more games, but merely playing in a game and not producing doesn't necessarily give you the "experience edge". Jackson cant handle learning the whole playbook, therefore the pass plays have been scaled back, his mechanics are horrible, his arm strength is just so-so, and his accuracy is horrendous- experience on the field cant change his physical attributes- can it? Green Bay Packers
	Was this comment...?