Please sign in to complete your action
 
DONE!
Cheer and debate with
6,000,000+ fans!
My Team:
Charlotte
My Team:
Michael
My Team:
Britney
Asked by: proudhoutexfan (+)
Answers Created: 74
Texas Longhorns



Last Answer: veliae (+)
Answers: 1
Texas Longhorns




« NCAAF Polls  |  Skip to Next Poll »
4
could Oklahoma have won if Bradford didn't get injured?
 
FanIQ Pts? No | NCAAF, Texas Longhorns, Oklahoma Sooners | Closes 39 days | Multiple Choice Opinion Poll
yes
no
4

(Caution -- you will be unable to change your answer.)


 &nbp;
TOP COMMENT * * * * * * * * * * * *
#3 | 33 days ago

As a die hard Texas fan, I think we still would of won the game,Bradford in or out, Mack Brown always devises a game plan to adjust to the "NOW" (if you will) game.  Im sure if Bradford was in we would of played a little harder.  Keep Texas healthy, stamina up, minimal injuries and here we come for the title.  Florida vs Texas should be the teams that play for the title.  Just like it should have been last year.  PS. OU Sucks
  
17 Comments | Sorted by Most Recent First | Red = You Disagreed
Vote for your favorite comments. Fans decide the Top Comment (3+ votes) and also hide poor quality comments (4+ votes).
#1 | 34 days ago

Consider that OU has lost three games by a total of five points where Bradford missed some or all of each of those losses.  If you figure the offense would have scored one more touchdown each game with Bradford healthy, then the Sooners could be undefeated and in the BCS mix....
Enter the poll to see my answer
#2 | 34 days ago

They could have won even with him injured.
Enter the poll to see my answer
#3 | 33 days ago

As a die hard Texas fan, I think we still would of won the game,Bradford in or out, Mack Brown always devises a game plan to adjust to the "NOW" (if you will) game.  Im sure if Bradford was in we would of played a little harder.  Keep Texas healthy, stamina up, minimal injuries and here we come for the title.  Florida vs Texas should be the teams that play for the title.  Just like it should have been last year.  PS. OU Sucks
#4 | 32 days ago

Definitely could have won with Bradford. should have won without Bradford. The coordinators for Oklahoma didn't do a very good job in the second half The defense got predictable were in the first half they had Texas so confused they didn't know how to lace up there football cleats. The offensive play calling falls apart almost every game. Time for the sooners to make some changes with the assistants to shake things up a lil bit.
Enter the poll to see my answer
#5 | 31 days ago

The Sooners should have won that game....they didn't need Bradford.  BTW I think Jones is doing a damn good job.

Enter the poll to see my answer
#6 | 31 days ago

Not with that Oline. Why do you think he got hurt in the first place. The OU oline is the worst I have seen under Stoops
Enter the poll to see my answer
#7 | 28 days ago

Colt McCoy had an injured thumb AND was sick. That's the only reason Oklahoma didn't get run out of town. When Colt was healthy, we won 41-7
Enter the poll to see my answer
#8 | 26 days ago

TxBurntOrange wrote:
As a die hard Texas fan, I think we still would of won the game,Bradford in or out, Mack Brown always devises a game plan to adjust to the "NOW" (if you will) game.  Im sure if Bradford was in we would of played a little harder.  Keep Texas healthy, stamina up, minimal injuries and here we come for the title.  Florida vs Texas should be the teams that play for the title.  Just like it should have been last year.  PS. OU Sucks
hey texas have fun losing to the cowboys this weekend, anyone who thinks beating a team by 3 when they've lost the best player in college football(ie heisman trophy winner) is ab ig accomplishment is well dumb,
Enter the poll to see my answer
#9 | 24 days ago

Well, the IF game dont count here. So all you Chokelahoma fans need to quit crying about Bradford's injury. Tell him to hit the weights and maybe he wont be so injury prone!!!
Enter the poll to see my answer
#10 | 23 days ago
nancy05sun (+)

When Bradford got hurt it totally through OU off.  OU was not as strong this year, lost so much with the off. line.   So to lose Bradford was just a blow they could not take.  Love OU, but not this year!
Enter the poll to see my answer
#11 | 21 days ago

(Edited by Texas_Rebel_71)
billywa wrote:
Consider that OU has lost three games by a total of five points where Bradford missed some or all of each of those losses.  If you figure the offense would have scored one more touchdown each game with Bradford healthy, then the Sooners could be undefeated and in the BCS mix....
Considered but it didn't happen. Bradford wanted to be a hero and played when he knew he wasn't well. One man does not make a team. You play together...you win or you lose together. Ya gotta give Texas credit where credit is due. They played good and played hard...the comeback is the proof in the pudding. Texas plays as a team. They are in tune mentally, physically and spiritually and well, you know ya gotta give God the Glory for it all.
#12 | 21 days ago

tbone2269 wrote:
Definitely could have won with Bradford. should have won without Bradford. The coordinators for Oklahoma didn't do a very good job in the second half The defense got predictable were in the first half they had Texas so confused they didn't know how to lace up there football cleats. The offensive play calling falls apart almost every game. Time for the sooners to make some changes with the assistants to shake things up a lil bit.
Jokelahoma fans are whining again. If they could have and should have won without bradford or with bradford why didn't they? Give me a real excuse...by the way, here's a quarter, call someone who cares
#13 | 21 days ago

As the man said, McCoy was sick and had an injured hand and I agree that Jokelahoma otherwise would have been run out of town...Get over it bubba!
#14 | 16 days ago

Considering that OU has a pretty bad O-Line this season- I have to say NO! 
Enter the poll to see my answer
#15 | 13 days ago

Wasn't Bradford healthy last year?
Enter the poll to see my answer
#16 | 12 days ago

its hard to tell.
i still think texas would have won. they had to set up a different game-plan to adjust to Oklahoma's offense because they have to do things differently with a different quarterback. i think that actually favored oklahoma because they dont have a bad back-up qb and they were able to run plays against a texas defense that wasnt sure how to stop it
Enter the poll to see my answer
#17 | 6 days ago

Texas_Rebel_71 wrote:
Jokelahoma fans are whining again. If they could have and should have won without bradford or with bradford why didn't they? Give me a real excuse...by the way, here's a quarter, call someone who cares
You saxet fans can't talk about whining most are the biggest whine babies in the country led by your coach!!
Enter the poll to see my answer

Post a Comment   Already a user? Sign in here
Join FanIQ - It's Free
FanIQ is the ultimate free community for sports fans.
Talk sports with fans from all over - 1,649,417+ Comments
Track your game picks - 38,670,182,382+ Sports Predictions
Prove you know sports - 116,275+ Trivia Questions
Find fans of your teams - 11,453,110+ New Friends



Join Today
About FanIQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Contact Us
Report A Bug
Help