If you was a coach who would you rather have on your team? - NFL, Philadelphia Eagles, Buffalo Bills

Asked by: brucek863 (+)

» Contact me
» Send Gift

» me

Answers Created: 48
Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Last Answer: johnkwolves (+)

» Contact me
» Send Gift

» me

Answers: 14
Philadelphia Eagles

Who liked it? 15

hwsteelers (+)
Pittsburgh Steelers

chevyim2008 (+)
Pittsburgh Steelers

USMC_0369_8541 (+)
New York Giants

joe_lindberg (+)
Pittsburgh Steelers

icedee (+)
Philadelphia Eagles

fourtime7 (+)
Philadelphia Eagles

UltimateSureno (+)
San Diego Chargers

BUCS863FAN (+)
Tampa Bay Buccaneers

bucembrando (+)
Tampa Bay Buccaneers

DckyJay (+)
Pittsburgh Steelers

... and 5 other fans

« NFL Polls

If you was a coach who would you rather have on your team?

Both players both have new teams that signed them this year and have heard a lot of critisism, but they also both have the skills to maybe help a team. Which player would you rather have.

FanIQ Pts? No | NFL, Philadelphia Eagles, Buffalo Bills | Closes 32 days | Multiple Choice Opinion Poll
Players: Michael Vick

	&nbp;
TOP COMMENT
#8 \| 75 days ago nk1956 (+)	This is like choosing death by hanging or the electric chair! Enter the poll to see my answer
	3


19 Comments \| Sorted by Most Recent First \| Red = You Disagreed
Vote for your favorite comments. Fans decide the Top Comment (3+ votes) and also hide poor quality comments (4+ votes).
#1 \| 89 days ago VoodooChild1970 (+)	Vick isn't really a drama queen. He will just bring controversy. Not only that, he has something to prove now and I think he's going to work hard to try to be an elite player in this league again. Enter the poll to see my answer
	2
#2 \| 89 days ago wyldePHX (+)	I would put a lot of pressure on both players and make them work hard for their starting spots, but it's about tie. I would probably go with Owens over Vick, because there's more pressure on a starting Quarterback. Unless I was the coach of the Lions, Rams or Browns, then I would take whatever I could get my hands on.
	2
#3 \| 89 days ago gayskip3girl (+)	Well I really don't know can I wait and see who does better then pick who I would want lol not too much a fan of neither but maybe they will do so good .

#4 \| 87 days ago danny_n94 (+)	neither

#5 \| 86 days ago johnshirey54 (+)	I choose the future HOFer. Enter the poll to see my answer
	2
#6 \| 86 days ago DckyJay (+)	johnshirey54 wrote: I choose the future HOFer. i gave u a funny rating b/c T.O. so far away from that title. its insane u would even think that u could call him that. what has he won? did he ever help his team more than hurt them? the correct answer here is no. Enter the poll to see my answer
	1
#7 \| 86 days ago vindog (+)	I'll take the 1st Ballot HOFer and 2nd leading receiver in NFL History by far! Enter the poll to see my answer
	3
#8 \| 75 days ago nk1956 (+)	This is like choosing death by hanging or the electric chair! Enter the poll to see my answer
	3
#9 \| 70 days ago johnshirey54 (+)	T.O has won himself the title as the second best WR of all- time statistically,I'm not saying he is the second best ever, but a HOFer for sure. Sorry this is so old. Enter the poll to see my answer

#10 \| 50 days ago icedee (+)	Vick over drama queen Enter the poll to see my answer

#11 \| 29 days ago USMC_0369_8541 (+)	T.O. is loud, arrogant, and whatever else you want to call him, but he is and always will be a performer on the field. He can make those big plays when you need them come crunch time. With Plaxico gone we could use someone just like that at this point. Enter the poll to see my answer

#12 \| 27 days ago vinnieg521 (+)	The lesser of two evils.... at least TO has proven to be a player when he wants to .,.. Vick is just overated Enter the poll to see my answer

#13 \| 24 days ago Tigerettepa (+)	I would want Vick, McNabb just ain't cutting it with me no more, I used to lie him, was playing good, but too many low blows, Enter the poll to see my answer

#14 \| 21 days ago PHILLYFAN35 (+)	Not T.O. he has killed teams and quarterbacks no way not on my team Enter the poll to see my answer

#15 \| 20 days ago solomonrichardson96 (+)	Hands down, the quarterback. Both are explosive in their own rights and actually superstars of the game today. Both have something to prove. My nod goes to Vick because of youth and position. Vick gives a coach more options that a legitimate threats. The big factor is attitude. Other than the dog fights, there is no controversy surrounding Vick. He has consistently tried against all odds to win. He more than likely will supplant McNabb. The Bears should have went for him. They'd have a much better chance to compete against Minn. Enter the poll to see my answer

#16 \| 20 days ago hwsteelers (+)	You said coach not baby sitter. T.O . whines to much.Vick made a mistake and paid his dues. Enter the poll to see my answer

#17 \| 7 days ago DarkSexy (+)	I will take Vick over Owen at anytime. Vick is going to do what he need to do when Owens is going to cry like a litte Bit$$!!! VICK ALL THE WAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Enter the poll to see my answer
	1
#18 \| 6 days ago eataylor41 (+)	T.O. destroys teams. Vick destroyed no one but himself and now he is trying to make amends. T. O . is selfish and self-centered.

#19 \| 3 days ago solomonrichardson96 (+)	TO does have issues, always has. He is like me, was a problem child. Think about it, I call myself the Black Bobby Knight. Thus, I grew up to be a problemed man. Seriously though, people who go against the grain are the ones that can have the most or a significant amount of the impact on winning. TO has had his share of impacting wins for every team he has been on. I think we and the media make to much of things. Switch perspectives for a moment. Everytime the ball is thrown, TO wants it thrown to him. When TO is happy, there isn't a bigger threat on the field than he. So, why, if I am the quarterback, would I not make sure most of my balls go to TO? Other receivers would have better more effective receptions. They should with less coverage. Each time TO had issues, it was because his quarterbacks threw the ball to the lesser recievers the most. That always caused TO to lose his concentration. In those times, he is not good at all. He drops balls and even run bad pass patterns. This is because, he stops looking for and expecting the ball. More significantly, his anger management deficiency emerges. Then the quarterback always becomes his enemy. In Philly's case and Dallas case, I don't really remember much about his 49'er experiences, but in those other cases, don't you think McNabb and Romo had a lot to do with ticking TO off? Not to justify TO's attitude adjustment problems, but he is what he is and the organizations knew this to be so. The more balls thrown his way, the better he is and that is when both teams were winning. So, why stop throwing him the ball. Let him shine and shine with him. It takes two to tangle. TO isn't the only one with anger management problems. And, how good has McNabb and Romo really been in TO's absence? I haven't done it; but, I think it safe to say that both of their QB ratings are lower than they were with TO to throw to. I think it safe to say that most if not all of the other receivers stats suffered as well. TO opened the field up for the others. You better put two or three players in the general area of TO on every down or you will get burned. Everytime the ball goes his way, we all know it is very possible to be six. Give the man a break. He hates to lose. He handles losses bad. Who doesn't really? Enter the poll to see my answer