Who's REALLY to blame for the Brett Favre 'saga' ???

You Might Like

More Polls By: Keeter

Who liked it? 13

Jahiegel (+)
Green Bay Packers

AL_58 (+)
New England Patriots

derms33 (+)
Cleveland Browns

sassylass72 (+)
Green Bay Packers

Anthonyg7575 (+)
Miami Dolphins

irbe38 (+)
Chicago Bears

Nick S (+)
New England Patriots

Yossarian (+)
Indianapolis Colts

theshrewdone (+)
Arizona Cardinals

YankeeDudeL (+)
New York Giants

... and 3 other fans

Skip to Next Poll »

Like it?

Who's REALLY to blame for the Brett Favre 'saga' ???

Is everyone else as tired of this as I am ? Look, he's NOT the first player to change his mind about retiring. In any event, can we start to focus on the rest of the NFL for a change ?

As a result, let's get the opinion of the 'Collective Q', as to who is to blame for this whole thing. I'll compile the results, and I just may personally deliver the results to whomever is deemed the 'winner' of this !

Let the games begin !!

| Closed on 08/12/08 at 05:00PM
FanIQ Pts? No | NFL, Green Bay Packers | Multiple Choice Opinion Poll

45 Fans
0%	a. Aaron Rodgers
53%	b. Brett Favre
2%	c. Coach McCarthy
2%	d. Deanna Favre
0%	e. Electronic Arts (EA Sports)
13%	f. ESPN
2%	g. John Madden
18%	h. Ted Thompson / Green Bay Front Office
7%	i. Other

	&nbp;
TOP COMMENT
#1 \| 334 days ago Keeter (+)	+9 OK, I'm blaming the media in general; ESPN in particular I guess. We've all seen this before, where a player is "not ready to admit that they can't compete anymore" (ie - retire), and wants to give it another try. OK, no problem. But this constant covering of it is just getting to be too much people !! Wait, I think Stuart Scott is breaking in to whatever ESPN is showing now, with breaking news - "Stuart Scott here in the capital of the free world, Bristol, CN. Wait, let me take off my Red Sox jersy & hat before we go on air ! OK, it appears that Brett Favre, when walking past the front door of the Packers front office, sneezed. Wait, we're getting conflicting reports - was it a sneeze, perhaps just a cough, or did Brett make a rude gesture to the front office ? Let's go to Sal Palantonio for an update: "Yes Stuart, I am camped out here in front of the Packers front office, and have been for 6 days without showering. I have accumulated enough Monopoly pieces from McDonalds to buy Park Place outright from Donald Trump. Back to the issue at hand - was it a sneeze or something else ? My sources tell me that Brett has been feeling fine lately; he regularly drinks 3 glasses of orange juice for breakfast so he's getting vitamin C. We know this for a fact because I have Shelley Smith going through the Favre's garbage cans at night to verify this fact. So, it likely is NOT a sneeze, for he's hydrated and taking his vitamins. There were bugs flying around the front office, so it's possible that a bug flew into front of Brett's face; we'll go to an expert on that in a second. However, Chris Mortensen now has breaking news about a possible 'gesture'; Chris ?" "Thanks Sal, Chris Mortensen here, and not only haven't I showered for a week, but I've been crapping in the bushes to make sure I am here just in case of breaking news. I have word just in that it likely was NOT a rude gesture; rather, Brett may have seen his reflection in the mirror, realized how grey his hair & beard are, and that perhaps he should NOT be coming back. No word on whether he contacted Walt Frazier or Keith Hernandez on joining the 'Just for Men' commericals, though my source tells me that the Just For Men people have already contacted Brett by using the Minnesota Vikings cell phone #. Back to you Sal" "Thanks Chris, and now on to John Clayton, standing by with Herman Whogivesaflyingf*ck, the curator of the Green Bay musuem, John:" "Thanks Sal, John Clayton here, and I've been camping out so long here that I'm starting to pick up desparate chicks here in Green Bay. Herman, what can you tell us about the flies ?" "Well John, there's not much to say - there are a lot of bugs in this area this time of year......plus with Mortensen crapping in the bushes, there's going to be a lot of flies !" "Thanks Herman, back to you Stuart.....I got to run, I see another local chick, crying & wearing her #4 jersey.....John Clayton reporting, and getting lucky for the first time in my life !!!" "Thank you all, and a big 'BOO-YAH' to each of you for that hard hitting report. This is Stuart Scott reporting on the lastest in the Brett Favre situation and, oh, wait, I gotta adjust my glass eye.....OK.....better now. For any breaking news, please turn to our new flagship station, ESPN-FAVRE, for all the latest news & worthless predictions. I'm out of here to grab some grub with The Schwab now !" ESPN
	Was this comment...? (1) (8) (1)


19 Comments \| Sorted by Most Recent First \| Red = You Disagreed
Vote for your favorite comments. Fans decide the Top Comment (3+ votes) and also hide poor quality comments (4+ votes).
#1 \| 334 days ago Keeter (+)	+9 OK, I'm blaming the media in general; ESPN in particular I guess. We've all seen this before, where a player is "not ready to admit that they can't compete anymore" (ie - retire), and wants to give it another try. OK, no problem. But this constant covering of it is just getting to be too much people !! Wait, I think Stuart Scott is breaking in to whatever ESPN is showing now, with breaking news - "Stuart Scott here in the capital of the free world, Bristol, CN. Wait, let me take off my Red Sox jersy & hat before we go on air ! OK, it appears that Brett Favre, when walking past the front door of the Packers front office, sneezed. Wait, we're getting conflicting reports - was it a sneeze, perhaps just a cough, or did Brett make a rude gesture to the front office ? Let's go to Sal Palantonio for an update: "Yes Stuart, I am camped out here in front of the Packers front office, and have been for 6 days without showering. I have accumulated enough Monopoly pieces from McDonalds to buy Park Place outright from Donald Trump. Back to the issue at hand - was it a sneeze or something else ? My sources tell me that Brett has been feeling fine lately; he regularly drinks 3 glasses of orange juice for breakfast so he's getting vitamin C. We know this for a fact because I have Shelley Smith going through the Favre's garbage cans at night to verify this fact. So, it likely is NOT a sneeze, for he's hydrated and taking his vitamins. There were bugs flying around the front office, so it's possible that a bug flew into front of Brett's face; we'll go to an expert on that in a second. However, Chris Mortensen now has breaking news about a possible 'gesture'; Chris ?" "Thanks Sal, Chris Mortensen here, and not only haven't I showered for a week, but I've been crapping in the bushes to make sure I am here just in case of breaking news. I have word just in that it likely was NOT a rude gesture; rather, Brett may have seen his reflection in the mirror, realized how grey his hair & beard are, and that perhaps he should NOT be coming back. No word on whether he contacted Walt Frazier or Keith Hernandez on joining the 'Just for Men' commericals, though my source tells me that the Just For Men people have already contacted Brett by using the Minnesota Vikings cell phone #. Back to you Sal" "Thanks Chris, and now on to John Clayton, standing by with Herman Whogivesaflyingf*ck, the curator of the Green Bay musuem, John:" "Thanks Sal, John Clayton here, and I've been camping out so long here that I'm starting to pick up desparate chicks here in Green Bay. Herman, what can you tell us about the flies ?" "Well John, there's not much to say - there are a lot of bugs in this area this time of year......plus with Mortensen crapping in the bushes, there's going to be a lot of flies !" "Thanks Herman, back to you Stuart.....I got to run, I see another local chick, crying & wearing her #4 jersey.....John Clayton reporting, and getting lucky for the first time in my life !!!" "Thank you all, and a big 'BOO-YAH' to each of you for that hard hitting report. This is Stuart Scott reporting on the lastest in the Brett Favre situation and, oh, wait, I gotta adjust my glass eye.....OK.....better now. For any breaking news, please turn to our new flagship station, ESPN-FAVRE, for all the latest news & worthless predictions. I'm out of here to grab some grub with The Schwab now !" ESPN
	Was this comment...? (1) (8) (1)
#2 \| 334 days ago Michael (+)	I blame Brett Favre's Ego. Yes, the media helped to shape that ego but it was Favre that took everything TO the media. The organization sat back, accepted the resigantion and it was over. They made it clear it was time to move forward to a MOBILE, YOUNG quarterback which Farve is neither!!!!!!!! But yo and behold Favre goes public through the press to rattle the cage to secure sympathies for the poor La. boy who is richer than anybody I know and in part DEMANDS to get re-instated. B.S.===the organization owns his rights===period!!! Just like a poor little bottom of the trough anybody...Favre gets NO special treatment just cause he retired in my book. Trade him, he won't have the year he had last year, he isn't in the shape he started last year, he won't be in the SAME style offense no matter WHAT the media says----he'll be above average and that is all---image TARNISHED!!!! Brett Favre
	Was this comment...? (3)
#3 \| 334 days ago YankeeDudeL (+)	It's both Favre and the Packers. I won't say Thompson's trying to ruin Brett or make him retire, but it's probably not coincidence that he retired after they wouldn't get Randy Moss, who he'd been campaigning for 2 years to bring to GB. But still, he retired, even though everyone knew he was going to come back. They gave him opportunities to before the draft, but he wasn't waivering. So they commited to moving on by using 2 draft picks on QBs, that could have been used to address any other need to put them over the hump. They planned his jersey retirement, during a game vs. a hated rival, and now he wants to come back and play for them? Now he's the aggressor, he's making the stink. I dunno, this is just driving me crazy. John Madden
	Was this comment...? (2)
#4 \| 334 days ago mandisdad (+)	Yeah, it is overhyped by the media, but it is still Favre's fault. He put the team in a bad spot when they had to plan for the future with draft picks. Brett Favre
	Was this comment...? (2)
#5 \| 334 days ago vindog (+)	Brett Favre and Brett Favre's EGO!!! When it all comes down to it- he made his choice, and forced the Packers to invest elsewhere. They spent TWO draft picks on QB's for crying out loud- while Brett sat back and said nothing!!! As long as he has been a Packer- I'm sure he has the Owners and Coaches phone numbers and if he really wanted to- could have called them during the draft and said" Hey Guys- I want to come back, DONT DRAFT ANOTHER QB!!!" Instead, he said NOTHING!!! Brett Favre
	Was this comment...? (2)
#6 \| 334 days ago danny_n94 (+)	I blame both. First Favre and his ego plus his waffling on retirement for so long. GB's fromt office has handled this horrible from the start. In the beginning it was all on Favre, especailly when given the chance to come back and he declined. Then Pack FO for not being firm, and letting reports leak that Favre would be backing up Rodgers then offering him a bribe to stay retired to then saying he could compete to now saying its Rodgers job. He needs to be traded NOW. But the thing is now, the Packers season is gonna be wasted no matter. This is gonna linger. This is gonna divide the locker room. Anyone thinks it isnt is naive. Then you got FSPN all Favre all the time. When they are not licking the boots of the RedSox and Yankees they are sucking up to Favre. Well I hope GB fans are happy now, they are the ones that are really gonna lose out in all of this. Other
	Was this comment...? (1)
#7 \| 333 days ago irbe38 (+)	ESPN ,otherwise I would not be hearing about it 15 hours a day ESPN
	Was this comment...?
#8 \| 333 days ago kantwistaye (+)	+2 Ted Thompson. No matter how you feel about Favre and the way he's handled this, ultimately he had the right to come back and used it. He isn't blameless, but nothing he did is actually wrong. Thompson could've ended this quickly by either deciding to move forward and move Brett, or stick with Brett and give Rodgers a shot elsewhere. It really isn't a very complicated situation at its core. The man who made it complicated is Thompson. Ted Thompson / Green Bay Front Office
	Was this comment...? (2)
#9 \| 332 days ago mandisdad (+)	kantwistaye wrote: Ted Thompson. No matter how you feel about Favre and the way he's handled this, ultimately he had the right to come back and used it. He isn't blameless, but nothing he did is actually wrong. Thompson could've ended this quickly by either deciding to move forward and move Brett, or stick with Brett and give Rodgers a shot elsewhere. It really isn't a very complicated situation at its core. The man who made it complicated is Thompson. +1 Sure he had the "right", but remember a few years ago when everyone crucified Ricky Williams for waiting until the last minute to "retire". The Dolphins had made plans based on Ricky being their starting RB, just as GB made plans (in the draft) to move on without Favre. His timing was terrible. Favre also asked for his release. Why should they simply release him and get nothing in return when he is under contract? Brett Favre
	Was this comment...? (1) (1)
#10 \| 332 days ago kantwistaye (+)	mandisdad wrote: Sure he had the "right", but remember a few years ago when everyone crucified Ricky Williams for waiting until the last minute to "retire". The Dolphins had made plans based on Ricky being their starting RB, just as GB made plans (in the draft) to move on without Favre. His timing was terrible. Favre also asked for his release. Why should they simply release him and get nothing in return when he is under contract? +1 We shouldn't have released, and I'm glad we didn't. That said, its not too hard to find a team that will take in a guy coming off a MVP caliber season. Its over now though, and thank God. Now everyone can move on. Ted Thompson / Green Bay Front Office
	Was this comment...? (1)
#11 \| 332 days ago Keeter (+)	+1 So Uncle Brett is now off to NY. Why not - even more coverage now from ESPN on New York & Boston !! ESPN
	Was this comment...? (1)
#12 \| 330 days ago tntsk8er (+)	+1 I think it was more the Team pressuring him to leave after last year for whatever reason, but i could be wrong. The team as in Ted Thompson and McCarthy Ted Thompson / Green Bay Front Office
	Was this comment...? (1)
#13 \| 330 days ago pogoowner (+)	+1 It's Brett Favre's fault. He's loves having all the attention on himself. Brett Favre
	Was this comment...? (1) (1)
#14 \| 330 days ago DLay (+)	Michael wrote: I blame Brett Favre's Ego. Yes, the media helped to shape that ego but it was Favre that took everything TO the media. The organization sat back, accepted the resigantion and it was over. They made it clear it was time to move forward to a MOBILE, YOUNG quarterback which Farve is neither!!!!!!!! But yo and behold Favre goes public through the press to rattle the cage to secure sympathies for the poor La. boy who is richer than anybody I know and in part DEMANDS to get re-instated. B.S.===the organization owns his rights===period!!! Just like a poor little bottom of the trough anybody...Favre gets NO special treatment just cause he retired in my book. Trade him, he won't have the year he had last year, he isn't in the shape he started last year, he won't be in the SAME style offense no matter WHAT the media says----he'll be above average and that is all---image TARNISHED!!!! +2 Oh so many things to say to this post..... First, yeah Favre ain't Mike Vick but he is far from being Marino-esque. The guy even still last year at 38 years old still got out of the pocket as well as anyone in the league(better than P. Manning for sure). Who cares if he isn't young? He still is a top 5 QB in this league even now. The Packers deserve the blame for not handling this better. So what if he is under contract? He's done enough for that team and that city that if the Packers didn't want him and wanted to move on with Rodgers, they should've done as they did and traded him or gave him his release. What is the point of the contract if you're not allowing him to play? You can't tell me that you don't want a guy back who led you to a 13-3 record last year. 38 years old or not, that's retarded. Favre's image isn't tarnished, it's Green Bay's front office. And corrections to your post....the word is retirement, not resignation(or your misspelling of it) and it is LOW and behold, not yo and behold. Brett is from Mississippi, not Louisiana. Ted Thompson / Green Bay Front Office
	Was this comment...? (2)
#15 \| 330 days ago Michael (+)	+1 I stated my opinion as did you; as for you correcting my errors---bite me! Brett Favre
	Was this comment...? (1) (1)
#16 \| 329 days ago Alphapotent (+)	+1 What you will find below is a clear and accurate description of all the decisions and events that prove that Ted Thompson has been a horrible GM for the Packers. It also describes the conflict between Brett Favre and Ted Thompson and lists all the reasons why Brett Favre should be rightfully trusted, valued and brought back to The Packers fold. Ted Thompson: Probably was a problem in Seattle Has made many moves that have been detrimental to The Green Bay Packers team and organization for no legitimate reason Shows a probably personality defect shown in his business actions and personal lifestyle Shown a clear lack of respect to those within The Packers organization and the rest of the NFL Demonstrated a compete lack of trustworthiness When looking at his complete body of work for The Packers, it would be easier to explain his actions and decisions were the for the cause of inflicting the most amount of harm to the team and organization than doing it the most good and that some of his decisions and actions that have been beneficial to The Packers have been only by accident. Far be it that I might scribe the facts about The Green Bay Packers GM only because of the current rift between himself and Future Hall of Famer, Brett Favre. Hardly. It is a truth known by everyone around me that I have thought very little of the man, as both a person and a GM since his first transaction as GM for The Packers. This controversy between, almost solely between Ted Thompson and Brett Favre, has actually only been the last straw and the most defining of my case against Ted Thompson. The turning point of my argument mainly rests on the evidence that Ted Thompson is not incompetent, nor un-intelligent (in the traditional, quantifiable sense, at least) but actually plagued by a severe personality disorder. Partially evident by the wide spread reports that, not only, has Ted Thompson never been married, but also has virtually no close friends. Without further ado, I will now make the case that, not only is Ted Thompson is actually a very poor GM, but that his designs, moves, transactions and bargaining practices have less to do with doing The Packers organization and football team the most amount of good, but is more accurately described as giving his own ego the most amount of strokes. Jan 15^th 2005: "As Bob Harlan mentioned yesterday, this whole thing, this whole movement here is about structure. It's not about individuals. It's not about Ted Thompson, it's not about Mike Sherman - it's not about even Bob Harlan. It's about what's best for the Packers, both now and going forward. It's about structure, and it's a structure that I think Bob and the Packers were best comfortable with in terms of the way he had it set up previously with Ron Wolf and Mike Holmgren, and Ron Wolf and Mike Sherman." – Ted Thompson 2005 I think it important to remember the events preceding this hire by the Packers as it will weigh in heavily in this case later on. There were a lot of similarities between the 2004 Packers and Seahawks and from the notes and interviews that would be given in the next year, it would seem that the similarities went beyond the fact that both teams were first round KO victims by division rivals. Without naming names, Mike Holmgren said in interviews held around the time of Super Bowl XL, that his relationship with certain members of the front office had deteriorated and that the working environment had become unbearable to him. This had come to a head at the end of the 2004 season and led to Mike Holmgren and owner Paul Allen to discuss not only his future, but the future of the organization and franchise. After that discussion a greater commitment was given to Mike Holmgren and part of that was going to be a shake up in the front office. The result was that Paul Allen fired team president and longtime business associate Bob Whitsitt and team Vice President, Ted Thompson, was also allowed to leave The Seahawks for The Packers GM position, even though, public consensus and conventional wisdom at the time, led many in the local media to believe that The Seahawks would not allow Ted to go in the couple of short months leading up to the draft because of his heavy involvement in the draft process with The Seahawks. It would be easy to speculate now that Ted Thompson was also a part of the problems that Mike Holmgren had with the front office and that Ted’s departure to Green Bay was simply a more easy and delicate way to alleviate that problem. We now know that Brett Favre asked Ted Thompson to try and retain the services of his two starting guards, Mike Wahle and Marco Riverra. Now before Cletus the Slack-Jawed Yokel stands up from the back of the room to protest that this is a player trying to run the team let me state what should be the obvious. When you have an aging Hall of Fame QB asking to keep or attain players on offense, especially those that have done a superb job of protecting him in seasons past, this is neither selfish nor out of the ordinary. Elite QB’s have commonly done this, and, by and large, those requests have been fulfilled by various organizations throughout the years. However, instead of granting Brett’s request, The Packers GM, Ted Thompson, decided to let both of them go right at the start of free agency. To be fair, there were cap issues to consider especially at that time when Mike Sherman had left such mess with bloated contracts for par or sub-par players, however, in the case of Mike Wahle, he had said in a Jan 10th, 2005 interview that can be found on Packers.com, "Like I said before, it's not always just about the money. You really want to put yourself in a good situation and I think those kind of things have to be looked at. When we were 1-4, my household was pretty miserable. I don't think you would want to take money to be with a team where you're going to be 1-4 all the time. I think there's a lot more things in life and in football than money alone.” He had also stated in an interview with ESPN early in that season while with the Carolina Panthers that he “would have re-signed with Green Bay for ANY money”. Clearly, this was the first step in Ted Thompson’s campaign against Brett Favre and the first of many transactions that show a clear and well defined personality disorder, clinical narcissism. The next thing, I feel, was another clog in the machine of Ted Thompson’s narcissism was in the release of Darren Sharper. Now, mind you, I think this worked for us, but it wasn’t by design. Yes Darren did play a few more productive years while we did, and maybe still are, trying to find that great safety to play his position, however, Darren has never been a good tackler, opting instead for the big shoulder-let knock-down hit instead of wrapping up and making a sure tackle. Even though his ball prowess is eagle-eyed sharp, not making good tackles as a safety should get you removed from a team. However, I don’t feel that Ted Thompson ever really understood or knew of these points; I feel he made that decision based surely on the fact that Darren wasn’t his guy. None of them were. And for that reason, and that reason alone, they should all be replaced, in the mind of Ted Thompson…including Brett Favre. This leads to Ted’s biggest blunder, and simultaneously, the best evidence that the media is full of ‘Box Score Only’ reporters that know next to nothing. The pick of Aaron Rodgers. Now despite the media’s hoopla over the grand, wonderful and fortunate luck of this pick, I’m here to interject a little reality. This pick is ONLY a good pick IF your express intention was to pick Aaron Rodgers. Of course you needed some luck to have that happen, so it wasn’t by some slick design by trade that shows the genius of Ted Thompson and we are talking about a QB that, as a backup, can not stay upright for a full season. If the intention was to pick up the heir apparent to Brett Favre, this is a STUPID pick because everyone knew that the big class for QB’s was in the next year’s draft (Matt Lienhart, Jay Cutler, Vince Young, ect…). I mean, could you imagine what having Vince Young would be like right now? Allowed to sit behind Brett Favre, learning how to play QB for 3-4 seasons with his scrambling ability and ability to make plays when things break down and that arm? Wow! Instead we have Aaron, which, sorry to say, is NOT the QB Vince was or should be. Vince got thrown into the fire early and I believe that has stunted his development. Aaron was a not ready for prime-time player that took two seasons to finally learn what is needed to be a successful QB here, and while I think he now possess those tools, his durability is still a HUGE question mark. Now if the objective was to pick the best athlete available, this is an even worse pick. Ted Thompson spent a first round pick to a QB, who is not nearly as good as his peers that were to be coming out the next season, and who will not help The Packers win even a game the coming season and for seasons to come. Even in a couple of opportunities to come in mid-game for a hurt Favre, he didn’t win those games. In fact, there are so many other players that The Packers could have picked that would probably have been the difference in winning one or two games more each season. The first name that comes to mind is Heath Miller. In fact, don’t The Packers need a good all round tight end right now? I’d also take the time to call in just about all but certainly the majority of Ted Thompson’s draft picks, in every draft. About the only one that doesn’t fall into the mold I am just about to describe was the pick of A.J. Hawk, but I believe that to be only because it was SUCH a no brainer that Ted Thompson may have rightfully estimated that to do anything different may have put him into question and punctured the shinny armor he has worn since coming to Green Bay. An armor of perception only really made possible more by the incompetence of Mike Sherman as GM than Ted Thompson’s unique talents at the position. The observation and point I am making here has to do with the fact that all too often he is taking players that should and would normally go in lower rounds at higher rounds. I am having a hard time finding all the exact information I need to make this point so I am going to use one good example of my point and agree that the rest is my perception based upon watching all these Ted Thompson drafts at the time and coming away after the combined experience of all of them and saying to myself that far too often, it seems that Ted Thompson is taking players at higher rounds than those players are projected to go at. Now before I get into this too heavily with my example, I am well aware that this is not that uncommon. If a GM or other draft decision maker sees a player they think has a higher value than their projected pick, and they want that player, but feel there is a very good chance that another team will pick that player before their teams’ pick comes up in that round or late in the earlier round, they will spend an early round draft pick to get that player, that they feel have the potential they are looking for. I totally get and understand that. My point is that Ted Thompson does that too often, and actually in other ways, mishandles the draft, and is not actually doing a good job where his so called expertise lies. The example I point to is Justin Harrell in the 2007 draft. Now I have nothing against this guy. In fact, I hope he does well. But the fact of the matter is that this guy had a serious arm injury that required surgery and rehab. While experts did not conclude that he would fall out of the draft altogether, he was projected by many to be a late 2^nd round or 3^rd round draft pick, despite his first round potential, because of the nature of his injuries. The bottom line is that he could have still been picked later and we could have gotten more value out of that draft pick. I think this whole ideal is also shown in this last 2008 draft, however, I know that arguing this point is still, mostly a matter of speculation and not fact and probably won’t be settled one way or the other for a few more seasons at least. The next item on the agenda is the request of Brett Favre to interview Steve Mariucci and the hiring of Mike McCarthy. At the time of the search for a new Head Coach I was, in fact, a fan of Jim Bates. I thought he did a good job with the defense in a year where there were not that many bright spots for The Packers and that he had done a pretty good job in Miami as their interim Head Coach. When the interview with Mike McCarthy was announced, I was like most laymen and searching for information about this guy I had previously heard little about. I knew he was the Offensive Coordinator for the San Francisco 49ers, which frankly, had me raising my eyebrows because they had been so bad offensively that year, so I looked him up. My reaction at the time was quite severe with disbelief, however, I will say here, very safely that out of all the candidates at the time, Mike McCarthy was probably the least qualified. Again, don’t get me wrong, I think the guy has done a hell of a job. He has brought things to this team that Mike Sherman definitely didn’t. I thought that Mike Sherman was a horrible GM and half of a great Head Coach and half of a bad Head Coach. Mike Sherman was great with creating a complex offense with complex plays and had his teams mentally prepared. However, I believe that on the mental aspect of the game, he would simply out-think himself and on the physical part of the game, he did not have his teams prepared. Most evident by the rash of injuries his Packer teams would consistently sustain throughout his tenure as Head Coach. Mike McCarthy has his teams physically prepared for the season, as well as mentally prepared. My only rip on Mike McCarthy early was that his game plans, offense and plays were too simple, but he has always had the youngest team in the league and his offense has taken on more complexity as the years have progressed. I also understand his steadfast support of Ted Thompson, even though I don’t agree with it and think he should just stand back and be silent while the Ted Thompson\Brett Favre fight finds its conclusion. I know that he probably knows that, if it were not for what ever is driving Ted Thompson’s madness he would probably not be a Head Coach right now. The point in this portion of my argument is just the respect level that Thompson seemingly has none of. The respect of what was a Head Coach in this league and the respect of your Hall of Fame QB that have given FAR more to the franchise than Ted Thompson has, or probably ever will, by a long shot. Favre didn’t ask the guy to hire Steve Mariucci, didn’t give any ultimatums. He simply asked Ted to interview him. Even if, as is now evident, that Ted Thompson would go into an interview with Steve Mariucci knowing that he would not be hiring him under any circumstances, what would have cost Ted to go ahead and do so? Even if it is just to placate the request of your star athlete? Obviously there was probably more to gain for the objectives of Ted Thompson to not interview Steve Mariucci than to do so. It seems that a clear message of disrespect to Brett Favre was the objective. It is the only thing that makes any sense in this scenario. This last point is, what I feel, the pinnacle of the entire case against Ted Thompson and the vindication of Brett Favre. It has everything that you could ever need to exemplify how wrong Ted Thompson is and how bad he actually is for The Packers franchise and how much Brett Favre has earned and deserves his wishes in the current turmoil and how Brett has earned and deserves a vote from every TRUE Packer fan and every fan of the NFL as a whole. The non-deal for Randy Moss. Yes, I know, there is a lot of bad blood between Randy and The Packer faithful and for good reason. However, at the end of the day, Randy Moss is still a unique talent and has been labeled a “Packer Killer” for many, many good reasons. Randy also had a reputation for taking plays off when he was not involved in those plays and that defenses would “key in” on Randy to be able to know if they needed to worry about him in the play or focus on the rest of The Vikings on a particular play. Definitely a stupid, thing for a player to do and obviously something that could not stand pat if Randy was to continue to play in the league and did not, to my knowledge, was a behavior that did not re-appear in his days at Oakland. There was also the rumor that because of Randy’s leg injury had slowed him down to a shadow of his former self and speed. A rumor obliterated by a pre-draft and pre-free agency workout he held that showed amazing speed in the 40. Brett Favre and Randy share an agent through Bus Cook and through that contact Brett lobbied and worked very hard to get Randy Moss to Green Bay. He even got Randy to take 6.5Mil\year less to play in Green Bay AND if The Packers were still strapped for cash or unsure of the deal, Brett offered up that amount from his salary to get the deal with Randy done. I want to pause for a moment and talk about what Brett Favre offered here just a little bit more in depth and go into some of the other things about this guy and what he has done for The Packers organization. This is not the first time Brett Favre has offered up some of his own money to get or keep other players so that The Packers would remain competitive and winning. Brett has so many various charities that he not only gives money to but also his own personal time. He has always stated his own personal high standards for ethics, and has, for the most part, adhered to them. At a time when the Commissioner of the NFL is constantly interjecting new rules governing player behavior both on and off the field to battle a severe image problem the NFL is receiving because of the actions of so many of its star athletes, Brett Favre is one of the few shinning examples of goodwill and sportsmanship the NFL has these days. When you take into account everything the man has done, given and sacrificed, both on and off the field, for The Packers, The NFL and to the community of mankind at large, why would anyone feel safe or justified in attacking this mans character? Better yet, why would anyone doubt Brett Favre over Ted Thompson? There is so much evidence against Ted Thompson as both a person and a GM and there is so much evidence on the side of Brett Favre as a player, a valuable asset to the league and as a person. The fact that ANYONE buys into the media’s farce that Brett Favre is some kind of whinny, flip-flopper and that Ted Thompson is some messianic savior who’s every word and action is as strong and steadfast as it is wise and noble, only shows how boorish, immature and viciously ignorant so many of the populous at large have become. Anyway, back to the Randy, non-deal. So Ted Thompson, after what could probably only be described as a few nano-seconds of thought, decided that this deal, of course, since coming from Brett Favre, must never see fruition. More than that, the wheels must have been turning immediately about how best to position himself to put himself in the best possible light and, simultaneously, but Brett Favre in the worst possible light. That would be with a series of lies, to both Brett and the media. Now we come to this, the conflict of Brett Favre’s retirement\un-retirement. The first thing I would like to direct your attention to is the arbitrary March deadline Ted Thompson gave Brett Favre. There was no reason for this deadline whatsoever. I have heard so many stupid, “Box Score Only” sports reporters’ talk about how The Packers had to draft two QB’s to bolster the roster at QB after Brett left. Fact is, The Packers had to draft two QB’s period, with or without Brett Favre. They had pretty much no other QB on the roster going into this season, except Brett and Aaron. They had the free agent QB’s that were on the market come in and workout, but decided not to sign any of them. There was no other choice for Green Bay than to draft two QB’s, no matter what Brett would have or would not have decided, if given a more appropriate amount of time to make his decision. I have also heard another stupid thing come from the “Box Score Only” hacks (you know, if you want to PAY someone to write about sports and actually GO or WATCH the games and KNOW something about which they are charged with writing about…pick me!) is that when Brett left they crafted this whole new offense specifically tailored to Aaron Rodgers. Complete fiction. I don’t see how anyone would believe that you put Aaron Rodgers holding the clipboard and learning an offense that you are going to change drastically the moment he comes in as the full time starter. Maybe they added a wrinkle or two for him and definitely they have expanded and adjusted the offense as they would from season to season normally. But to think they changed it radically because Brett retired and Aaron is taking over? No. When it comes to Brett Favre and whether or not he should be brought back and start this season, the bottom line is this: Forget every season and every record and all the legend status and talk that goes along with the guy. Forget that he earned every bit of it. Instead just think of this guy, who came in for the Packers last season, and led the team to tie their franchise record in wins and led them to the NFC Championship Game with pretty decent stats across the board in TD's, passing yards, passer rating and the like. Oh, and by the way, he was 70% or better of the teams’ entire offense for the better part of the first half of the season and won several games in the 4th quarter or overtime. Now set that aside and, keep and eye on it, but put it to the side for just a moment. Yeah, right there to the left will be fine. Good. Now, think about all the NFL teams in history with all their varied leadership, from coaches, to GM's to ownership that has ever existed in the NFL since it's earliest inception. Got that in your mind now? Good. Now, just focus on only the most boneheaded teams, the worst teams and especially the worst led teams ever. OK, got your collection? Yeah there's some real stunners in there isn't there? Now try and find one where a team had that player at QB, that situation of the year preceding the coming season, and find the team that did NOT want that QB to come back. Find the example of the team that did not want the QB that led them the year before to those heights, with pretty much the same team coming back the next season, still ranked as either the youngest team in the league or one of the youngest teams in the league, and they did not want that QB back. They wanted instead the guy that they just like but has never even put one full game under his belt, and while he looks good, he has a hard time staying upright. Find that example in the past. Can't? Yeah, me either...that is why we are looking at the most boneheaded NFL team in history. Bottom line. Period. Try and debate that one. Those that might should be warned about losing all credibility. Now, go back and add everything that Brett Favre is to this situation and see if this just got a thousand times more...uh, more...jeeze...I think we have to invent a new word to describe this kind of stupidity and ignorance. Maybe like a medical condition, like Terminal Imbecilious. Ted Thompson wants to see Brett Favre retired so his own guy can shine and Ted can be praised for finding the next QB legend. This is certainly a big departure from his quote that I listed at the top of this letter. Tell me, how is Ted Thompson supposed to tell a player that, while he is one of the best of his position, that the player should take a pay cut to play for Green Bay than he would probably get from the other teams around the league because it is what is best for the team as a whole and winning a Super Bowl? Or showing up for the voluntary workouts or any of the other stuff that every NFL team asks of its players and coaches for the sake of "what's best for the team", when HE can't even push his PRIDE aside for said goal?!? If Ted Thompson was ever true to his word, which, by this documentation of his actions and decisions, he is obviously not, then whether he liked it or not, he would shut up and bring Brett back. Since he is not going to do that, I hope this letter finds the right hands and that those hands will be inspired to do what most definitely needs to be done. Either reign in or fire Ted Thompson. Ted Thompson / Green Bay Front Office
	Was this comment...? (1)
#17 \| 328 days ago vindog (+)	+2 GOOD GOD MAN, was the complete novel really necessary??? That was the longest post I have ever seen on any website. Brett Favre
	Was this comment...? (2) (1)
#18 \| 327 days ago Alphapotent (+)	(Edited by Alphapotent) I just wanted to be thorough. Ted Thompson / Green Bay Front Office
	Was this comment...?
#19 \| 327 days ago irbe38 (+)	(Edited by irbe38) Alphapotent wrote: What you will find below is a clear and accurate description of all the decisions and events that prove that Ted Thompson has been a horrible GM for the Packers. It also describes the conflict between Brett Favre and Ted Thompson and lists all the reasons why Brett Favre should be rightfully trusted, valued and brought back to The Packers fold. Ted Thompson: Probably was a problem in Seattle Has made many moves that have been detrimental to The Green Bay Packers team and organization for no legitimate reason Shows a probably personality defect shown in his business actions and personal lifestyle Shown a clear lack of respect to those within The Packers organization and the rest of the NFL Demonstrated a compete lack of trustworthiness When looking at his complete body of work for The Packers, it would be easier to explain his actions and decisions were the for the cause of inflicting the most amount of harm to the team and organization than doing it the most good and that some of his decisions and actions that have been beneficial to The Packers have been only by accident. Far be it that I might scribe the facts about The Green Bay Packers GM only because of the current rift between himself and Future Hall of Famer, Brett Favre. Hardly. It is a truth known by everyone around me that I have thought very little of the man, as both a person and a GM since his first transaction as GM for The Packers. This controversy between, almost solely between Ted Thompson and Brett Favre, has actually only been the last straw and the most defining of my case against Ted Thompson. The turning point of my argument mainly rests on the evidence that Ted Thompson is not incompetent, nor un-intelligent (in the traditional, quantifiable sense, at least) but actually plagued by a severe personality disorder. Partially evident by the wide spread reports that, not only, has Ted Thompson never been married, but also has virtually no close friends. Without further ado, I will now make the case that, not only is Ted Thompson is actually a very poor GM, but that his designs, moves, transactions and bargaining practices have less to do with doing The Packers organization and football team the most amount of good, but is more accurately described as giving his own ego the most amount of strokes. Jan 15^th 2005: "As Bob Harlan mentioned yesterday, this whole thing, this whole movement here is about structure. It's not about individuals. It's not about Ted Thompson, it's not about Mike Sherman - it's not about even Bob Harlan. It's about what's best for the Packers, both now and going forward. It's about structure, and it's a structure that I think Bob and the Packers were best comfortable with in terms of the way he had it set up previously with Ron Wolf and Mike Holmgren, and Ron Wolf and Mike Sherman." – Ted Thompson 2005 I think it important to remember the events preceding this hire by the Packers as it will weigh in heavily in this case later on. There were a lot of similarities between the 2004 Packers and Seahawks and from the notes and interviews that would be given in the next year, it would seem that the similarities went beyond the fact that both teams were first round KO victims by division rivals. Without naming names, Mike Holmgren said in interviews held around the time of Super Bowl XL, that his relationship with certain members of the front office had deteriorated and that the working environment had become unbearable to him. This had come to a head at the end of the 2004 season and led to Mike Holmgren and owner Paul Allen to discuss not only his future, but the future of the organization and franchise. After that discussion a greater commitment was given to Mike Holmgren and part of that was going to be a shake up in the front office. The result was that Paul Allen fired team president and longtime business associate Bob Whitsitt and team Vice President, Ted Thompson, was also allowed to leave The Seahawks for The Packers GM position, even though, public consensus and conventional wisdom at the time, led many in the local media to believe that The Seahawks would not allow Ted to go in the couple of short months leading up to the draft because of his heavy involvement in the draft process with The Seahawks. It would be easy to speculate now that Ted Thompson was also a part of the problems that Mike Holmgren had with the front office and that Ted’s departure to Green Bay was simply a more easy and delicate way to alleviate that problem. We now know that Brett Favre asked Ted Thompson to try and retain the services of his two starting guards, Mike Wahle and Marco Riverra. Now before Cletus the Slack-Jawed Yokel stands up from the back of the room to protest that this is a player trying to run the team let me state what should be the obvious. When you have an aging Hall of Fame QB asking to keep or attain players on offense, especially those that have done a superb job of protecting him in seasons past, this is neither selfish nor out of the ordinary. Elite QB’s have commonly done this, and, by and large, those requests have been fulfilled by various organizations throughout the years. However, instead of granting Brett’s request, The Packers GM, Ted Thompson, decided to let both of them go right at the start of free agency. To be fair, there were cap issues to consider especially at that time when Mike Sherman had left such mess with bloated contracts for par or sub-par players, however, in the case of Mike Wahle, he had said in a Jan 10th, 2005 interview that can be found on Packers.com, "Like I said before, it's not always just about the money. You really want to put yourself in a good situation and I think those kind of things have to be looked at. When we were 1-4, my household was pretty miserable. I don't think you would want to take money to be with a team where you're going to be 1-4 all the time. I think there's a lot more things in life and in football than money alone.” He had also stated in an interview with ESPN early in that season while with the Carolina Panthers that he “would have re-signed with Green Bay for ANY money”. Clearly, this was the first step in Ted Thompson’s campaign against Brett Favre and the first of many transactions that show a clear and well defined personality disorder, clinical narcissism. The next thing, I feel, was another clog in the machine of Ted Thompson’s narcissism was in the release of Darren Sharper. Now, mind you, I think this worked for us, but it wasn’t by design. Yes Darren did play a few more productive years while we did, and maybe still are, trying to find that great safety to play his position, however, Darren has never been a good tackler, opting instead for the big shoulder-let knock-down hit instead of wrapping up and making a sure tackle. Even though his ball prowess is eagle-eyed sharp, not making good tackles as a safety should get you removed from a team. However, I don’t feel that Ted Thompson ever really understood or knew of these points; I feel he made that decision based surely on the fact that Darren wasn’t his guy. None of them were. And for that reason, and that reason alone, they should all be replaced, in the mind of Ted Thompson…including Brett Favre. This leads to Ted’s biggest blunder, and simultaneously, the best evidence that the media is full of ‘Box Score Only’ reporters that know next to nothing. The pick of Aaron Rodgers. Now despite the media’s hoopla over the grand, wonderful and fortunate luck of this pick, I’m here to interject a little reality. This pick is ONLY a good pick IF your express intention was to pick Aaron Rodgers. Of course you needed some luck to have that happen, so it wasn’t by some slick design by trade that shows the genius of Ted Thompson and we are talking about a QB that, as a backup, can not stay upright for a full season. If the intention was to pick up the heir apparent to Brett Favre, this is a STUPID pick because everyone knew that the big class for QB’s was in the next year’s draft (Matt Lienhart, Jay Cutler, Vince Young, ect…). I mean, could you imagine what having Vince Young would be like right now? Allowed to sit behind Brett Favre, learning how to play QB for 3-4 seasons with his scrambling ability and ability to make plays when things break down and that arm? Wow! Instead we have Aaron, which, sorry to say, is NOT the QB Vince was or should be. Vince got thrown into the fire early and I believe that has stunted his development. Aaron was a not ready for prime-time player that took two seasons to finally learn what is needed to be a successful QB here, and while I think he now possess those tools, his durability is still a HUGE question mark. Now if the objective was to pick the best athlete available, this is an even worse pick. Ted Thompson spent a first round pick to a QB, who is not nearly as good as his peers that were to be coming out the next season, and who will not help The Packers win even a game the coming season and for seasons to come. Even in a couple of opportunities to come in mid-game for a hurt Favre, he didn’t win those games. In fact, there are so many other players that The Packers could have picked that would probably have been the difference in winning one or two games more each season. The first name that comes to mind is Heath Miller. In fact, don’t The Packers need a good all round tight end right now? I’d also take the time to call in just about all but certainly the majority of Ted Thompson’s draft picks, in every draft. About the only one that doesn’t fall into the mold I am just about to describe was the pick of A.J. Hawk, but I believe that to be only because it was SUCH a no brainer that Ted Thompson may have rightfully estimated that to do anything different may have put him into question and punctured the shinny armor he has worn since coming to Green Bay. An armor of perception only really made possible more by the incompetence of Mike Sherman as GM than Ted Thompson’s unique talents at the position. The observation and point I am making here has to do with the fact that all too often he is taking players that should and would normally go in lower rounds at higher rounds. I am having a hard time finding all the exact information I need to make this point so I am going to use one good example of my point and agree that the rest is my perception based upon watching all these Ted Thompson drafts at the time and coming away after the combined experience of all of them and saying to myself that far too often, it seems that Ted Thompson is taking players at higher rounds than those players are projected to go at. Now before I get into this too heavily with my example, I am well aware that this is not that uncommon. If a GM or other draft decision maker sees a player they think has a higher value than their projected pick, and they want that player, but feel there is a very good chance that another team will pick that player before their teams’ pick comes up in that round or late in the earlier round, they will spend an early round draft pick to get that player, that they feel have the potential they are looking for. I totally get and understand that. My point is that Ted Thompson does that too often, and actually in other ways, mishandles the draft, and is not actually doing a good job where his so called expertise lies. The example I point to is Justin Harrell in the 2007 draft. Now I have nothing against this guy. In fact, I hope he does well. But the fact of the matter is that this guy had a serious arm injury that required surgery and rehab. While experts did not conclude that he would fall out of the draft altogether, he was projected by many to be a late 2^nd round or 3^rd round draft pick, despite his first round potential, because of the nature of his injuries. The bottom line is that he could have still been picked later and we could have gotten more value out of that draft pick. I think this whole ideal is also shown in this last 2008 draft, however, I know that arguing this point is still, mostly a matter of speculation and not fact and probably won’t be settled one way or the other for a few more seasons at least. The next item on the agenda is the request of Brett Favre to interview Steve Mariucci and the hiring of Mike McCarthy. At the time of the search for a new Head Coach I was, in fact, a fan of Jim Bates. I thought he did a good job with the defense in a year where there were not that many bright spots for The Packers and that he had done a pretty good job in Miami as their interim Head Coach. When the interview with Mike McCarthy was announced, I was like most laymen and searching for information about this guy I had previously heard little about. I knew he was the Offensive Coordinator for the San Francisco 49ers, which frankly, had me raising my eyebrows because they had been so bad offensively that year, so I looked him up. My reaction at the time was quite severe with disbelief, however, I will say here, very safely that out of all the candidates at the time, Mike McCarthy was probably the least qualified. Again, don’t get me wrong, I think the guy has done a hell of a job. He has brought things to this team that Mike Sherman definitely didn’t. I thought that Mike Sherman was a horrible GM and half of a great Head Coach and half of a bad Head Coach. Mike Sherman was great with creating a complex offense with complex plays and had his teams mentally prepared. However, I believe that on the mental aspect of the game, he would simply out-think himself and on the physical part of the game, he did not have his teams prepared. Most evident by the rash of injuries his Packer teams would consistently sustain throughout his tenure as Head Coach. Mike McCarthy has his teams physically prepared for the season, as well as mentally prepared. My only rip on Mike McCarthy early was that his game plans, offense and plays were too simple, but he has always had the youngest team in the league and his offense has taken on more complexity as the years have progressed. I also understand his steadfast support of Ted Thompson, even though I don’t agree with it and think he should just stand back and be silent while the Ted Thompson\Brett Favre fight finds its conclusion. I know that he probably knows that, if it were not for what ever is driving Ted Thompson’s madness he would probably not be a Head Coach right now. The point in this portion of my argument is just the respect level that Thompson seemingly has none of. The respect of what was a Head Coach in this league and the respect of your Hall of Fame QB that have given FAR more to the franchise than Ted Thompson has, or probably ever will, by a long shot. Favre didn’t ask the guy to hire Steve Mariucci, didn’t give any ultimatums. He simply asked Ted to interview him. Even if, as is now evident, that Ted Thompson would go into an interview with Steve Mariucci knowing that he would not be hiring him under any circumstances, what would have cost Ted to go ahead and do so? Even if it is just to placate the request of your star athlete? Obviously there was probably more to gain for the objectives of Ted Thompson to not interview Steve Mariucci than to do so. It seems that a clear message of disrespect to Brett Favre was the objective. It is the only thing that makes any sense in this scenario. This last point is, what I feel, the pinnacle of the entire case against Ted Thompson and the vindication of Brett Favre. It has everything that you could ever need to exemplify how wrong Ted Thompson is and how bad he actually is for The Packers franchise and how much Brett Favre has earned and deserves his wishes in the current turmoil and how Brett has earned and deserves a vote from every TRUE Packer fan and every fan of the NFL as a whole. The non-deal for Randy Moss. Yes, I know, there is a lot of bad blood between Randy and The Packer faithful and for good reason. However, at the end of the day, Randy Moss is still a unique talent and has been labeled a “Packer Killer” for many, many good reasons. Randy also had a reputation for taking plays off when he was not involved in those plays and that defenses would “key in” on Randy to be able to know if they needed to worry about him in the play or focus on the rest of The Vikings on a particular play. Definitely a stupid, thing for a player to do and obviously something that could not stand pat if Randy was to continue to play in the league and did not, to my knowledge, was a behavior that did not re-appear in his days at Oakland. There was also the rumor that because of Randy’s leg injury had slowed him down to a shadow of his former self and speed. A rumor obliterated by a pre-draft and pre-free agency workout he held that showed amazing speed in the 40. Brett Favre and Randy share an agent through Bus Cook and through that contact Brett lobbied and worked very hard to get Randy Moss to Green Bay. He even got Randy to take 6.5Mil\year less to play in Green Bay AND if The Packers were still strapped for cash or unsure of the deal, Brett offered up that amount from his salary to get the deal with Randy done. I want to pause for a moment and talk about what Brett Favre offered here just a little bit more in depth and go into some of the other things about this guy and what he has done for The Packers organization. This is not the first time Brett Favre has offered up some of his own money to get or keep other players so that The Packers would remain competitive and winning. Brett has so many various charities that he not only gives money to but also his own personal time. He has always stated his own personal high standards for ethics, and has, for the most part, adhered to them. At a time when the Commissioner of the NFL is constantly interjecting new rules governing player behavior both on and off the field to battle a severe image problem the NFL is receiving because of the actions of so many of its star athletes, Brett Favre is one of the few shinning examples of goodwill and sportsmanship the NFL has these days. When you take into account everything the man has done, given and sacrificed, both on and off the field, for The Packers, The NFL and to the community of mankind at large, why would anyone feel safe or justified in attacking this mans character? Better yet, why would anyone doubt Brett Favre over Ted Thompson? There is so much evidence against Ted Thompson as both a person and a GM and there is so much evidence on the side of Brett Favre as a player, a valuable asset to the league and as a person. The fact that ANYONE buys into the media’s farce that Brett Favre is some kind of whinny, flip-flopper and that Ted Thompson is some messianic savior who’s every word and action is as strong and steadfast as it is wise and noble, only shows how boorish, immature and viciously ignorant so many of the populous at large have become. Anyway, back to the Randy, non-deal. So Ted Thompson, after what could probably only be described as a few nano-seconds of thought, decided that this deal, of course, since coming from Brett Favre, must never see fruition. More than that, the wheels must have been turning immediately about how best to position himself to put himself in the best possible light and, simultaneously, but Brett Favre in the worst possible light. That would be with a series of lies, to both Brett and the media. Now we come to this, the conflict of Brett Favre’s retirement\un-retirement. The first thing I would like to direct your attention to is the arbitrary March deadline Ted Thompson gave Brett Favre. There was no reason for this deadline whatsoever. I have heard so many stupid, “Box Score Only” sports reporters’ talk about how The Packers had to draft two QB’s to bolster the roster at QB after Brett left. Fact is, The Packers had to draft two QB’s period, with or without Brett Favre. They had pretty much no other QB on the roster going into this season, except Brett and Aaron. They had the free agent QB’s that were on the market come in and workout, but decided not to sign any of them. There was no other choice for Green Bay than to draft two QB’s, no matter what Brett would have or would not have decided, if given a more appropriate amount of time to make his decision. I have also heard another stupid thing come from the “Box Score Only” hacks (you know, if you want to PAY someone to write about sports and actually GO or WATCH the games and KNOW something about which they are charged with writing about…pick me!) is that when Brett left they crafted this whole new offense specifically tailored to Aaron Rodgers. Complete fiction. I don’t see how anyone would believe that you put Aaron Rodgers holding the clipboard and learning an offense that you are going to change drastically the moment he comes in as the full time starter. Maybe they added a wrinkle or two for him and definitely they have expanded and adjusted the offense as they would from season to season normally. But to think they changed it radically because Brett retired and Aaron is taking over? No. When it comes to Brett Favre and whether or not he should be brought back and start this season, the bottom line is this: Forget every season and every record and all the legend status and talk that goes along with the guy. Forget that he earned every bit of it. Instead just think of this guy, who came in for the Packers last season, and led the team to tie their franchise record in wins and led them to the NFC Championship Game with pretty decent stats across the board in TD's, passing yards, passer rating and the like. Oh, and by the way, he was 70% or better of the teams’ entire offense for the better part of the first half of the season and won several games in the 4th quarter or overtime. Now set that aside and, keep and eye on it, but put it to the side for just a moment. Yeah, right there to the left will be fine. Good. Now, think about all the NFL teams in history with all their varied leadership, from coaches, to GM's to ownership that has ever existed in the NFL since it's earliest inception. Got that in your mind now? Good. Now, just focus on only the most boneheaded teams, the worst teams and especially the worst led teams ever. OK, got your collection? Yeah there's some real stunners in there isn't there? Now try and find one where a team had that player at QB, that situation of the year preceding the coming season, and find the team that did NOT want that QB to come back. Find the example of the team that did not want the QB that led them the year before to those heights, with pretty much the same team coming back the next season, still ranked as either the youngest team in the league or one of the youngest teams in the league, and they did not want that QB back. They wanted instead the guy that they just like but has never even put one full game under his belt, and while he looks good, he has a hard time staying upright. Find that example in the past. Can't? Yeah, me either...that is why we are looking at the most boneheaded NFL team in history. Bottom line. Period. Try and debate that one. Those that might should be warned about losing all credibility. Now, go back and add everything that Brett Favre is to this situation and see if this just got a thousand times more...uh, more...jeeze...I think we have to invent a new word to describe this kind of stupidity and ignorance. Maybe like a medical condition, like Terminal Imbecilious. Ted Thompson wants to see Brett Favre retired so his own guy can shine and Ted can be praised for finding the next QB legend. This is certainly a big departure from his quote that I listed at the top of this letter. Tell me, how is Ted Thompson supposed to tell a player that, while he is one of the best of his position, that the player should take a pay cut to play for Green Bay than he would probably get from the other teams around the league because it is what is best for the team as a whole and winning a Super Bowl? Or showing up for the voluntary workouts or any of the other stuff that every NFL team asks of its players and coaches for the sake of "what's best for the team", when HE can't even push his PRIDE aside for said goal?!? If Ted Thompson was ever true to his word, which, by this documentation of his actions and decisions, he is obviously not, then whether he liked it or not, he would shut up and bring Brett back. Since he is not going to do that, I hope this letter finds the right hands and that those hands will be inspired to do what most definitely needs to be done. Either reign in or fire Ted Thompson. +3 Don't mince words tell us how you really feel. LOL ESPN
	Was this comment...? (3)

Post a Comment Already a user? Sign in here

Join FanIQ - It's Free

FanIQ is the ultimate free community for sports fans.

•Talk sports with fans from all over - 1,649,417+ Comments

•Track your game picks - 38,670,182,382+ Sports Predictions

•Prove you know sports - 116,275+ Trivia Questions

•Find fans of your teams - 11,453,110+ New Friends

Start here >> Select your favorite teams. It's free.

Polls You Might Like
	Will you cheer or boo Brett Favre? Asked by PackRat \| NFL, GB, MIN \| 1 questions asked 06/24/09 136 predictions \| 41 comments \| Last by derms33 \| 1 hours left
	What's your opinion about Brett Favre? Asked by alexmauer96 \| NFL, GB, MIN \| 3 questions asked 05/20/09 246 opinions \| 28 comments \| Last by PackertallicA
	Will Aaron Rodgers end up beating Brett Favre's passing record before he retires? Asked by bulbasuarman \| NFL, GB \| 3 questions asked 04/16/09 81 opinions \| 17 comments \| Last by PackertallicA
	Green Bay Packers upcoming season Asked by fbfan1 \| NFL, GB \| 6 questions asked 06/06/09 78 opinions \| 1 comment \| Last by PackertallicA
	The Best Current QB (UPDATE!) Asked by virzi81 \| NFL \| 1 questions asked 06/09/09 20 opinions \| 3 comments \| Last by sosa \| 1 hours left

Answer Breakdown

Answers are sorted in reverse chronological order

#	Name	FanIQ	Answer (Red= You Disagreed)
45	CMB 08/12/2008 10:32AM		Brett Favre
44	BestofChicago 08/12/2008 02:29AM		Coach McCarthy
43	Variant 08/12/2008 01:44AM		Ted Thompson / Green Bay Front Office
42	sportsfreak008 08/12/2008 01:44AM		Brett Favre
41	Jahiegel 08/12/2008 12:10AM
40	spaycemuuse 08/11/2008 02:06PM		Deanna Favre
39	AL_58 08/10/2008 10:10PM		Brett Favre
38	Alphapotent 08/10/2008 10:05PM		Ted Thompson / Green Bay Front Office
37	derms33 08/10/2008 12:45AM		ESPN
36	DLay 08/09/2008 02:43PM		Ted Thompson / Green Bay Front Office
35	ImmortallEyesz 08/09/2008 02:34PM		Brett Favre
34	pogoowner 08/09/2008 01:54PM		Brett Favre
33	sassylass72 08/09/2008 11:05AM		Other
32	tntsk8er 08/09/2008 10:50AM		Ted Thompson / Green Bay Front Office
31	donm454 08/09/2008 10:12AM		Brett Favre
30	sapphire_and_diamond 08/08/2008 09:34PM		Brett Favre
29	pfloyd 08/08/2008 08:32PM		Brett Favre
28	woody77 08/08/2008 04:01PM		Brett Favre
27	backpacker 08/08/2008 03:56PM		Ted Thompson / Green Bay Front Office
26	Anthonyg7575 08/08/2008 02:04PM		Brett Favre
25	mwillie1 08/06/2008 01:22PM		Brett Favre
24	Scott 08/06/2008 02:03AM		Brett Favre
23	kantwistaye 08/06/2008 01:29AM		Ted Thompson / Green Bay Front Office
22	golfgranny47 08/06/2008 01:10AM		Brett Favre
21	irbe38 08/06/2008 12:57AM		ESPN
20	JBrenn 08/05/2008 11:18PM		Brett Favre
19	rsalter 08/05/2008 11:17PM		Ted Thompson / Green Bay Front Office
18	Nick S 08/05/2008 09:13PM		Brett Favre
17	danny_n94 08/05/2008 08:53PM		Other
16	Yossarian 08/05/2008 08:34PM		Brett Favre
15	vindog 08/05/2008 06:44PM		Brett Favre
14	theshrewdone 08/05/2008 06:30PM		Brett Favre
13	mandisdad 08/05/2008 05:29PM		Brett Favre
12	Indydave 08/05/2008 04:30PM		Ted Thompson / Green Bay Front Office
11	RichmondSpider 08/05/2008 04:25PM		Brett Favre
10	gau13 08/05/2008 04:08PM		Brett Favre
9	YankeeDudeL 08/05/2008 03:51PM		John Madden
8	Pat 08/05/2008 03:46PM		Brett Favre
7	Michael 08/05/2008 03:36PM		Brett Favre
6	dallasfan27 08/05/2008 03:22PM		ESPN
5	Michael G 08/05/2008 02:48PM		Other
4	81Forever 08/05/2008 02:37PM		Brett Favre
3	CUTiger92 08/05/2008 02:37PM		ESPN
2	Jengirrl 08/05/2008 01:54PM		ESPN
1	Keeter 08/05/2008 01:17PM		ESPN