FanIQ

  • join now
  • login
  • Login






Skip to Next Poll »
7
Calling all Lib Tards, the summer session is now in order.
 I am calling this meeting of the Lib Tards  to discuss Michele Bachmann. And fiqure out a way to get her the Redumblican nomination for the Presidential race. Calling all Lib Tards, the summer session is now in order. Photo

   This woman makes Sara Palin look just plain smart.   I love how she feels America is the Saudi Arabia of just about everything.  Or how she feels that gay marriage is being pushed upon us opening the doors for even worse things. I have never seen someone so outspoken on matters that she knows absolutely nothing about.  One of my faves is how she says, that we should respect all cultures but, not all cultures are equal.   This woman really is a democrats best friend.

So let's now call the meeting to order.  


Please remember that this is a political poll for the liberal Q'ers. All opinions are welcome, just please keep in mind that this poll can and does get heated, so if you can't take the heat stay out of the poll. And also please remember the coc...


| Closed on 08/05/11 at 05:00PM
FanIQ Pts? No | Locker Room, Politics | Multiple Choice Opinion Poll
17 Fans 
12%a. Michele vs. Janet
6%b. Michele vs. Becky
18%c. Michele vs. Sarah Palin
29%d. Let's pretend shes smart.
0%e. Michele vs. Glenda.
35%f. Beaneaters.

 &nbp;
TOP COMMENT * * * * * * * * * * * *
#26 | 714 days ago

cubsgirl2 wrote:
 Lmao, I think 9 may have been mine.   
My favorite is #8...of course, we could wipe out unemployment...but we'd all earn $1 per day.

Sounds like a Republican's wet dream. 
Let's pretend shes smart.  
  
128 Comments | Sorted by Most Recent First | Red = You Disagreed
Vote for your favorite comments. Fans decide the Top Comment (3+ votes) and also hide poor quality comments (4+ votes).
#1 | 714 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

(Edited by cubsgirl2)
 Lmao, I forgot about the  swine flu seems to pop up under democratic presidents..  Michele you gotta love her. 
#2 | 714 days ago
NorseHeathen (+)

I hope she gets the nomination....  Between her lack of historical knowledge, and her husband's inability to keep is bigoted mouth shut, 80% of the voters would hate them by the time the election arrives....
#3 | 714 days ago

 Michele Bachmann is now surging in New Hampshire, which should be an easy win for Romney.  If she takes Iowa and NH, its her. Romney would get destroyed by the media.
#4 | 714 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

(Edited by cubsgirl2)
kantwistaye wrote:
 Michele Bachmann is now surging in New Hampshire, which should be an easy win for Romney.  If she takes Iowa and NH, its her. Romney would get destroyed by the media.
 Hi Mike. 



It's amazing how anyone could even take her seriously. 
#5 | 714 days ago

cubsgirl2 wrote:
 Hi Mike. 



It's amazing how anyone could even take her seriously. 
 Hi.

And if Sarah Palin has proven anything, its that looking pretty and smiling will win over the GOP base.
#6 | 714 days ago

 I kid with everyone around me that I can't wait till election time just to see her in action..........................but in reality------------she full out SCARES the SH*T out of me because I actually think she's smarter than Sarah Palin. Sure her lack of knowledge in history is hilarious but so is most of the country's (sadly). I mean.............it's obvious that many could care less about history considering------ we keep repeating the same nonsense over and over, we continue to promote higher test scores over critical thinking skills, blame teachers, ect....

The lady should be taken seriously. She's not an idiot. She knows what she's doing and clearly has a strong following. Look at her education------------it's impressive (if you take out the holy roller stuff .......which turns me off).
Beaneaters.   
#7 | 714 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

(Edited by cubsgirl2)
kteacher wrote:
 I kid with everyone around me that I can't wait till election time just to see her in action..........................but in reality------------she full out SCARES the SH*T out of me because I actually think she's smarter than Sarah Palin. Sure her lack of knowledge in history is hilarious but so is most of the country's (sadly). I mean.............it's obvious that many could care less about history considering------ we keep repeating the same nonsense over and over, we continue to promote higher test scores over critical thinking skills, blame teachers, ect....

The lady should be taken seriously. She's not an idiot. She knows what she's doing and clearly has a strong following. Look at her education------------it's impressive (if you take out the holy roller stuff .......which turns me off).
 The lady just scares me period. She is so outwardly  anti gay, and has said stuff that is down right close to being racist. And the fact is she does have a lot of followers. But no I disagree with her being smarter than Palin. I have yet to hear anything that I could even say, well that makes a little sense with her. I have never been so put off by someone.  I do not believe she could pass the constitution test.   I know a lot of Americans couldn't, but they are not running for the Presidency. 
#8 | 714 days ago



4 more years!!
Thank you Michelle.
Beaneaters.   
#9 | 714 days ago
NorseHeathen (+)

One thing is for sure, Senator Obama was being painted as an extremist during his presidential run.  If Rep. Bachman or someone with her mentality achieves the Republican nomination (e.g. Texas Gov. Rick Perry) this nation is going to explode.....

Well, perhaps not explode, but it will definitely demonstrate the fractured essence that seems to be ever-growing with each passing day.
#10 | 714 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

NorseHeathen wrote:
One thing is for sure, Senator Obama was being painted as an extremist during his presidential run.  If Rep. Bachman or someone with her mentality achieves the Republican nomination (e.g. Texas Gov. Rick Perry) this nation is going to explode.....

Well, perhaps not explode, but it will definitely demonstrate the fractured essence that seems to be ever-growing with each passing day.
 To me there is no scarier extreme in a politician than a religious one. The God says gays are going to hell, the pro choice believers are going to hell, the we need a return to the simpler days politician, you know the ones that believed segregation was a good thing, and that everyone is equal, unless they want to have an opinion that differs from ours.  
#11 | 714 days ago

(Edited by kteacher)
cubsgirl2 wrote:
 The lady just scares me period. She is so outwardly  anti gay, and has said stuff that is down right close to being racist. And the fact is she does have a lot of followers. But no I disagree with her being smarter than Palin. I have yet to hear anything that I could even say, well that makes a little sense with her. I have never been so put off by someone.  I do not believe she could pass the constitution test.   I know a lot of Americans couldn't, but they are not running for the Presidency. 
I get what your typing here, but you have to remember she (and her people) aren't hoping to get "us" on their side...................they are working their "magic" on those people who are just as craz....I mean passionate as they are about certain things..........or people who just need someone to give them someone to blame.
Beaneaters.   
#12 | 714 days ago
John_Daly (+)

Number 5 is my favorite...


http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/the-10-craziest-michele-bachmann-quotes
#13 | 714 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

kteacher wrote:
I get what your typing here, but you have to remember she (and her people) aren't hoping to get "us" on their side...................they are working their "magic" on those people who are just as craz....I mean passionate as they are about certain things..........or people who just need someone to give them someone to blame.
Amen, and it amazes me that in this day and age, so many Americans are still so outwardly bigoted. 
#14 | 714 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

John_Daly wrote:  Lmao, I think 9 may have been mine.   
#15 | 714 days ago

kteacher wrote:
I get what your typing here, but you have to remember she (and her people) aren't hoping to get "us" on their side...................they are working their "magic" on those people who are just as craz....I mean passionate as they are about certain things..........or people who just need someone to give them someone to blame.

.  "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." 

That pesky old Declaration of Independence, so passe'

Beaneaters.   
#16 | 714 days ago

 I don't think Michele Bachmann is particularly intelligent in terms of policy, history, or really just facts, but she does understand election politics.  She's an unbelievable fundraiser and at least within the GOP base always hits the right notes.  Problem for her is that eventually she has to court moderates.
#17 | 714 days ago
NorseHeathen (+)

cubsgirl2 wrote:
 To me there is no scarier extreme in a politician than a religious one. The God says gays are going to hell, the pro choice believers are going to hell, the we need a return to the simpler days politician, you know the ones that believed segregation was a good thing, and that everyone is equal, unless they want to have an opinion that differs from ours.  
I can definitely agree with that in a general sense as religion has historically, and even in our current international community, been a unifying element to some of the most extreme and violent conflicts.  In that regard, I just remind myself of those I know who are of faith who put that kind of energy into following the tenants of their faith in their own lives versus into the element of adversity for others.  When people see extremists, it's easy to turn against an entire group.  (I know you realize this, but I wanted to expand upon the topic for those who may be new to the Q and don't get the wrong idea).

One time, in Philadelphia, there was a racially motivated stand off between a group of skin-heads and members of a neighborhood community.  Though I was standing against those racist pieces of shite, after the stand-off disipated, one of the minorities in the group with whom I was standing turned on me with: "You phuquing white people...etc., etc., etc...."  It took another individual to come over and get the guy to calm down as (speaking metaphorically) he was seeing red, but when those passions are generated, such passions are motivated into a self-destructive manifestation of anger and resentment.  Later the individual in question came over an apologized over and again for turning on me, but whether it's race, religion, and in some case politics (which up until now has only been present to that degree in other countries), is also the sociological effect of such divisions.

My personal view is that this country is soon going to experience the repercussions of failing to live up to the responsibilities lain upon us by our founders, and the shallow means upon which society has developed.

I'll stop talking now, and give this soap-box to my son so he can take it outside and smash it with a hammer.......
#18 | 714 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

(Edited by cubsgirl2)
 Ok Janet where the hell are you? 





(she actually asked for this meeting)
#19 | 714 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

(Edited by cubsgirl2)
NorseHeathen wrote:
I can definitely agree with that in a general sense as religion has historically, and even in our current international community, been a unifying element to some of the most extreme and violent conflicts.  In that regard, I just remind myself of those I know who are of faith who put that kind of energy into following the tenants of their faith in their own lives versus into the element of adversity for others.  When people see extremists, it's easy to turn against an entire group.  (I know you realize this, but I wanted to expand upon the topic for those who may be new to the Q and don't get the wrong idea).

One time, in Philadelphia, there was a racially motivated stand off between a group of skin-heads and members of a neighborhood community.  Though I was standing against those racist pieces of shite, after the stand-off disipated, one of the minorities in the group with whom I was standing turned on me with: "You phuquing white people...etc., etc., etc...."  It took another individual to come over and get the guy to calm down as (speaking metaphorically) he was seeing red, but when those passions are generated, such passions are motivated into a self-destructive manifestation of anger and resentment.  Later the individual in question came over an apologized over and again for turning on me, but whether it's race, religion, and in some case politics (which up until now has only been present to that degree in other countries), is also the sociological effect of such divisions.

My personal view is that this country is soon going to experience the repercussions of failing to live up to the responsibilities lain upon us by our founders, and the shallow means upon which society has developed.

I'll stop talking now, and give this soap-box to my son so he can take it outside and smash it with a hammer.......
 Thank you, you are right. I made to broad of a statement.  And yes, I am talking the extremists in religion, I am a religious person, but I do not believe that you are going to hell for being who God made you.  I also meant that the politicians who want to govern on the Bible and not the Constitution  of this country.  Because you cannot say you believe in this constitution where ALL MEN ARE EQUAL, and then be so outwardly against all having the same rights. 




(and thank you for knowing me well enough to know what I was trying to say. )
#20 | 714 days ago
NorseHeathen (+)

ohwell_ wrote:

.  "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." 

That pesky old Declaration of Independence, so passe'

Unfortunately, the ".....Declaration of Independence, so passë" is so true as such principles are utilized as a manner of convenience anymore.....

On my facebook account, I typed the following on July 4th:

"As we celebrate the 4th of July, with the modern version of "bombs bursting in air", take a moment tomorrow to actually read the Declaration of Independence, which initiated the tradition of which we are now celebrating. As you're reading, think of the associative nature of what our founder's were rebelling against and see if you can recognize any associations with the adversities we experience in today's society.
"

I got "one" like.  Apathy and denial has as much to do with such principles being rationalized as anything else.  If people would only take time to read, understand, --and BELIEVE that such could again be a reality.
#21 | 714 days ago
NorseHeathen (+)

cubsgirl2 wrote:
Amen, and it amazes me that in this day and age, so many Americans are still so outwardly bigoted. 
Unfortunately, it's growing and getting more open. 

This is a hypothesis that can be tested and either validated or not during this next election (depending upon the nature of the nominee)
as I saw on the news earlier that former Klansman David Duke just submitted his paperwork to make his 3rd run at the Presidency.  It will be interesting to compare the number of votes he gets considering his last run was in '92.
#22 | 714 days ago

(Edited by MIKELIN8)
She is the darling of the Tea Party, but didn't I read something about her accepting annual farm subsidies? Doesn't her husband also recieve some kind of government subsidy for his clinic?

Here's the article I read:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/1209/Antisocialist_Bachmann_got_250k_in_federal_farm_subsidies.html

This one explains more thorougly, and adds info about her husband's clinic.
 http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/1209/Antisocialist_Bachmann_got_250k_in_federal_farm_subsidies.html
Let's pretend shes smart.  
#23 | 714 days ago

MIKELIN8 wrote:
She is the darling of the Tea Party, but didn't I read something about her accepting annual farm subsidies? Doesn't her husband also recieve some kind of government subsidy for his clinic?

Here's the article I read:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/1209/Antisocialist_Bachmann_got_250k_in_federal_farm_subsidies.html

This one explains more thorougly, and adds info about her husband's clinic.
 http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/1209/Antisocialist_Bachmann_got_250k_in_federal_farm_subsidies.html
No way. She or her hubby would never be assisted by the government. 


On to another topic.........................those 20 something foster kids she's "raised". I bet she never accepted that money either. 
Beaneaters.   
#24 | 714 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

(Edited by cubsgirl2)
NorseHeathen wrote:
Unfortunately, it's growing and getting more open. 

This is a hypothesis that can be tested and either validated or not during this next election (depending upon the nature of the nominee)
as I saw on the news earlier that former Klansman David Duke just submitted his paperwork to make his 3rd run at the Presidency.  It will be interesting to compare the number of votes he gets considering his last run was in '92.
 Yes that will be very interesting. I truly believed with each generation of Americans the race issue and the sex issue would begin to go away.  I do not know why people do not believe that we are all the same. And it truly breaks my heart for people to have to fight to be equal. To fight for what is granted to them in our constitution. 
#25 | 714 days ago

NorseHeathen wrote:
Unfortunately, the ".....Declaration of Independence, so passë" is so true as such principles are utilized as a manner of convenience anymore.....

On my facebook account, I typed the following on July 4th:

"As we celebrate the 4th of July, with the modern version of "bombs bursting in air", take a moment tomorrow to actually read the Declaration of Independence, which initiated the tradition of which we are now celebrating. As you're reading, think of the associative nature of what our founder's were rebelling against and see if you can recognize any associations with the adversities we experience in today's society.
"

I got "one" like.  Apathy and denial has as much to do with such principles being rationalized as anything else.  If people would only take time to read, understand, --and BELIEVE that such could again be a reality.
 I don't usually post in these (and I might regret it this time)...but if I had you on my list of FB friends, you'd have had 2 "likes". Just sayin'.
#26 | 714 days ago

cubsgirl2 wrote:
 Lmao, I think 9 may have been mine.   
My favorite is #8...of course, we could wipe out unemployment...but we'd all earn $1 per day.

Sounds like a Republican's wet dream. 
Let's pretend shes smart.  
#27 | 714 days ago

cubsgirl2 wrote:
 The lady just scares me period. She is so outwardly  anti gay, and has said stuff that is down right close to being racist. And the fact is she does have a lot of followers. But no I disagree with her being smarter than Palin. I have yet to hear anything that I could even say, well that makes a little sense with her. I have never been so put off by someone.  I do not believe she could pass the constitution test.   I know a lot of Americans couldn't, but they are not running for the Presidency. 
Yeah, I think she's very Stepford Wife (like she's got wires under her skin and she's programmed ... poorly ... to say certain things at certain times, even when they have no bearing on the topic at-hand).  

And I think it's hysterical that she's SO anti-gay when her husband is such a raging homosexual.  Like "sitting pool-side in South Beach wearing bronzer and coolots, sipping a Malibu Bay Breeze and smoking a Virginia Slim out of a long cigarette holder" kinda gay.
Michele vs. Janet  
#28 | 714 days ago




Wow ,  all i really noticed was in this one poll we have  -  Passe' ,  J's Super Super Gay , and Politicians at Play. 


Graphic
#29 | 714 days ago

Sharp Square wrote:



Wow ,  all i really noticed was in this one poll we have  -  Passe' ,  J's Super Super Gay , and Politicians at Play. 


Graphic
Meh.  I've seen gayer.
Michele vs. Janet  
#30 | 714 days ago

janet011685 wrote:
Meh.  I've seen gayer.


LoL   OH  I have no doubts J 
#31 | 714 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

janet011685 wrote:
Yeah, I think she's very Stepford Wife (like she's got wires under her skin and she's programmed ... poorly ... to say certain things at certain times, even when they have no bearing on the topic at-hand).  

And I think it's hysterical that she's SO anti-gay when her husband is such a raging homosexual.  Like "sitting pool-side in South Beach wearing bronzer and coolots, sipping a Malibu Bay Breeze and smoking a Virginia Slim out of a long cigarette holder" kinda gay.
 Kinda? I'm thinking Rock Hudson right now.    
#32 | 713 days ago

cubsgirl2 wrote:
 Kinda? I'm thinking Rock Hudson right now.    
No.  Gayer.  
That dude makes Liberace look butch.
Michele vs. Janet  
#33 | 713 days ago
NorseHeathen (+)

Well, well, well.......

Corporations already did the down-sizing thing, so next to moving jobs overseas to pad their own pockets (in addition to the tax break they receive for their private jets), here's the option for their "fellow" Americans:

finance.yahoo.com/career-work/article/113075/end-40-hour-workweek-mainstreet
#34 | 713 days ago

John_Daly wrote: #9 made me laugh out loud. But this is just great:

6.

Michele vs. Becky  
#35 | 713 days ago

kteacher wrote:
 I kid with everyone around me that I can't wait till election time just to see her in action..........................but in reality------------she full out SCARES the SH*T out of me because I actually think she's smarter than Sarah Palin. Sure her lack of knowledge in history is hilarious but so is most of the country's (sadly). I mean.............it's obvious that many could care less about history considering------ we keep repeating the same nonsense over and over, we continue to promote higher test scores over critical thinking skills, blame teachers, ect....

The lady should be taken seriously. She's not an idiot. She knows what she's doing and clearly has a strong following. Look at her education------------it's impressive (if you take out the holy roller stuff .......which turns me off).

I was awake at 4 a.m.. (roof starting leaking again) and as I was going over this poll again, I asked myself
how much of American history i was able to retain.  It has been a few years since I took civics, government and
American history (cough, cough).  I found a link that perhaps, we all should check out. 
www.stevenspointjournal.com/article/20110707/SPJ06/107070428/Our-view-US-citizenship-Can-you-pass-test-

I FAILED!!!          I am going to study, and retake it in a few days.          
Beaneaters.   
#36 | 713 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

ohwell_ wrote:

I was awake at 4 a.m.. (roof starting leaking again) and as I was going over this poll again, I asked myself
how much of American history i was able to retain.  It has been a few years since I took civics, government and
American history (cough, cough).  I found a link that perhaps, we all should check out. 
www.stevenspointjournal.com/article/20110707/SPJ06/107070428/Our-view-US-citizenship-Can-you-pass-test-

I FAILED!!!          I am going to study, and retake it in a few days.          
 I so did well on the test. I am very proud of me. Of course Social Studies was the only thing I was really good at in school. Then having 2 daughters in high school didn't hurt either. But I am still proud of me. 
#37 | 713 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

 Hey, who's the p'qer?   
#38 | 713 days ago

cubsgirl2 wrote:
 Hey, who's the p'qer?   
Some frustrated Rethuglican............      Wear ' em like a badge of honor!!!
Beaneaters.   
#39 | 713 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

ohwell_ wrote:
Some frustrated Rethuglican............      Wear ' em like a badge of honor!!!
lol.  well I don't understand why they wouldn't try to make their case for her in the poll. 
#40 | 713 days ago

Palin is sexier!
Michele vs. Sarah Palin  
#41 | 713 days ago



WORD!
Michele vs. Sarah Palin  
#42 | 713 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

Cactus_Jack wrote:


WORD!
 ewwww, those aren't real.  
#43 | 713 days ago

cubsgirl2 wrote:
 ewwww, those aren't real.  
Well, they aint imaginary either!
Michele vs. Sarah Palin  
#44 | 713 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

Cactus_Jack wrote:
Well, they aint imaginary either!






nope.  
#45 | 713 days ago

cubsgirl2 wrote:






nope.  
Maybe I have seen one too many episodes of Toddlers and Tiarras.  That chick-------ewww...........
Beaneaters.   
#46 | 713 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

ohwell_ wrote:
Maybe I have seen one too many episodes of Toddlers and Tiarras.  That chick-------ewww...........
 Oh God, now that's another poll.   
#47 | 713 days ago

cubsgirl2 wrote:
 Oh God, now that's another poll.   
A polll about real vs. fake???

I love it!
Michele vs. Sarah Palin  
#48 | 713 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

Cactus_Jack wrote:
A polll about real vs. fake???

I love it!
 Or as women with implants say, real or really expensive.  
#49 | 713 days ago
NorseHeathen (+)

cubsgirl2 wrote:
 Hey, who's the p'qer?   
Oh it's one of the fox robots--the one that if you put a lump of coal between their butt-cheeks, you'd have a flawless diamond a week later.
#50 | 713 days ago

NorseHeathen wrote:
Oh it's one of the fox robots--the one that if you put a lump of coal between their butt-cheeks, you'd have a flawless diamond a week later.
The coal being corked up there could also help explain why they're all so full of sh*t.
Michele vs. Janet  
#51 | 713 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

NorseHeathen wrote:
Oh it's one of the fox robots--the one that if you put a lump of coal between their butt-cheeks, you'd have a flawless diamond a week later.
Is it just me, or does anyone else want to go to thier station, slap them in the head with a dictionary, and say, look up the meaning of fair and balanced you bitches!!!!!  
#52 | 713 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

janet011685 wrote:
The coal being corked up there could also help explain why they're all so full of sh*t.
And I nominate you to do it  Janet.
#53 | 712 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

Cactus_Jack wrote:
A polll about real vs. fake???

I love it!
 You got it dude!  
#54 | 712 days ago
NorseHeathen (+)

I've been waiting for this to pop-up again....

Just read in the local paper that the clean-up effort of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation will be laying-off over 1,700 workers during this fiscal year.  As this is just one example, it makes me wonder just how many other worth-while programs will be affected in lieu of corporate tax breaks for private jets and oil subsidies.

During the 2010 elections, the Republicans ran their campaigns on the promise of job creation.  When they were elected, they promised to remember the "will of the people" as a reason for the populous backlash against the Republican party back in 1995; now they talk about being leaders and having to do the "right thing" despite the will of the people and have turned their promise of hope for progress into their own twisted ideology of social fascism and corporate dominance.

People can argue all they want, but facts don't lie.
#55 | 712 days ago

NorseHeathen wrote:
I've been waiting for this to pop-up again....

Just read in the local paper that the clean-up effort of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation will be laying-off over 1,700 workers during this fiscal year.  As this is just one example, it makes me wonder just how many other worth-while programs will be affected in lieu of corporate tax breaks for private jets and oil subsidies.

During the 2010 elections, the Republicans ran their campaigns on the promise of job creation.  When they were elected, they promised to remember the "will of the people" as a reason for the populous backlash against the Republican party back in 1995; now they talk about being leaders and having to do the "right thing" despite the will of the people and have turned their promise of hope for progress into their own twisted ideology of social fascism and corporate dominance.

People can argue all they want, but facts don't lie.
"Facts don't lie" made me think of this:

Michele vs. Becky  
#56 | 712 days ago
NorseHeathen (+)

kobe_lova wrote:
"Facts don't lie" made me think of this:

LOL.....too true.....that's why I verified the information....
#57 | 712 days ago

My friends, I'm losing hope by the day (although living in the Beltway can't help). Today's jobs report was awful, and all the rhetoric here is concentrated on policy that won't help the situation a bit. The debt ceiling deal, if it actually happens, looks worse and worse. If this is any indication, I'm about to get screwed as a fed employee (and for the record, I've never dealt with a union or paid union dues in the 3 years I've been in the government). The concept of "shared sacrifice" looks completely out the window. A President Romney, Bachmann, or even Perry looks more and more likely by the day. Those that are on the record as saying their main goal is for Obama to be a one termer are winning, and Obama is aiding and abetting them.

Anyone have any good news to take me off the ledge?
#58 | 712 days ago

Eric_ wrote:
My friends, I'm losing hope by the day (although living in the Beltway can't help). Today's jobs report was awful, and all the rhetoric here is concentrated on policy that won't help the situation a bit. The debt ceiling deal, if it actually happens, looks worse and worse. If this is any indication, I'm about to get screwed as a fed employee (and for the record, I've never dealt with a union or paid union dues in the 3 years I've been in the government). The concept of "shared sacrifice" looks completely out the window. A President Romney, Bachmann, or even Perry looks more and more likely by the day. Those that are on the record as saying their main goal is for Obama to be a one termer are winning, and Obama is aiding and abetting them.

Anyone have any good news to take me off the ledge?
 Wish I did, but today's news combined with Obama's sudden betrayal of the American people on the debt talks has me suddenly wondering if he is a one termer.  Post health care, the man is far too obsessed with agreement than what is right.
#59 | 712 days ago

Eric_ wrote:
My friends, I'm losing hope by the day (although living in the Beltway can't help). Today's jobs report was awful, and all the rhetoric here is concentrated on policy that won't help the situation a bit. The debt ceiling deal, if it actually happens, looks worse and worse. If this is any indication, I'm about to get screwed as a fed employee (and for the record, I've never dealt with a union or paid union dues in the 3 years I've been in the government). The concept of "shared sacrifice" looks completely out the window. A President Romney, Bachmann, or even Perry looks more and more likely by the day. Those that are on the record as saying their main goal is for Obama to be a one termer are winning, and Obama is aiding and abetting them.

Anyone have any good news to take me off the ledge?
The zombie revolution is supposed to happen soon?
#60 | 711 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

Eric_ wrote:
My friends, I'm losing hope by the day (although living in the Beltway can't help). Today's jobs report was awful, and all the rhetoric here is concentrated on policy that won't help the situation a bit. The debt ceiling deal, if it actually happens, looks worse and worse. If this is any indication, I'm about to get screwed as a fed employee (and for the record, I've never dealt with a union or paid union dues in the 3 years I've been in the government). The concept of "shared sacrifice" looks completely out the window. A President Romney, Bachmann, or even Perry looks more and more likely by the day. Those that are on the record as saying their main goal is for Obama to be a one termer are winning, and Obama is aiding and abetting them.

Anyone have any good news to take me off the ledge?
 There is no way in hell this country will ever elect Bachmann,  I do not believe that this country and her people are just that ignorant. 
  I am or was an Obama supporter, I am not sure if the democratic party offers us another choice that I will not take it.  

  I do believe however, that I do not ever remember a President, that was met with more opposition with every decision that he made.  The powers that be made sure that he was fighting an upward battle. 

  As far as your ledge, dude I am right there with you on one. I am a 47 year old waitress, with no insurance. And I will never lose my paid for home to a long disease.  I really am at the point of not believing in anything as far as this government goes. Do I believe the government owes me anything? No I do not. But I do know that, I have worked since the age of 16, pay my taxes and bills. And I do believe that health care needs to be affordable to all. 
#61 | 711 days ago
NorseHeathen (+)

cubsgirl2 wrote:
 There is no way in hell this country will ever elect Bachmann,  I do not believe that this country and her people are just that ignorant. 
  I am or was an Obama supporter, I am not sure if the democratic party offers us another choice that I will not take it.  

  I do believe however, that I do not ever remember a President, that was met with more opposition with every decision that he made.  The powers that be made sure that he was fighting an upward battle. 

  As far as your ledge, dude I am right there with you on one. I am a 47 year old waitress, with no insurance. And I will never lose my paid for home to a long disease.  I really am at the point of not believing in anything as far as this government goes. Do I believe the government owes me anything? No I do not. But I do know that, I have worked since the age of 16, pay my taxes and bills. And I do believe that health care needs to be affordable to all. 
Agreed Glenda.  Unfortunately, with the skewed history that's been propagated by those who do not desire such, people fail to realize that with all of the talk about the default of America to it's creditors (and yes Michelle with the 'sexappeal' Bachman, and Ricky-boy "the theocratic fascist" Santorum) would be a default, as would changing social security to the point that it does not take care of the needs of the retired persons of this nation would also be a default upon the promise they received during their working lives.  Instead of recognizing such a responsibility, current politicians would rather change their task instead of paying for the "sins" of their predecessors who did not manage social security properly and are paying for it now.
#62 | 711 days ago

         <<<---------  Thanks for the PQ!!!    Moving on,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,




We had dinner at my brother in laws last night.  His wife is a first grade teacher, he is a county fire-fighter paramedic.
As of July 01, they both had to start contributing to their pensions under the new law under Gov. Valdimor/Rick Scott and
the new R regime.   Their income is now cut by $500.00 a momth.              Another example of default.
Beaneaters.   
#63 | 711 days ago

ohwell_ wrote:
         <<<---------  Thanks for the PQ!!!    Moving on,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,




We had dinner at my brother in laws last night.  His wife is a first grade teacher, he is a county fire-fighter paramedic.
As of July 01, they both had to start contributing to their pensions under the new law under Gov. Valdimor/Rick Scott and
the new R regime.   Their income is now cut by $500.00 a momth.              Another example of default.
I already contribute to my own pension, so I wonder what they have planned for us folks (who caused this big ol mess------>rolling eyes)
Beaneaters.   
#64 | 711 days ago

cubsgirl2 wrote:
 There is no way in hell this country will ever elect Bachmann,  I do not believe that this country and her people are just that ignorant. 
  I am or was an Obama supporter, I am not sure if the democratic party offers us another choice that I will not take it.  

  I do believe however, that I do not ever remember a President, that was met with more opposition with every decision that he made.  The powers that be made sure that he was fighting an upward battle. 

  As far as your ledge, dude I am right there with you on one. I am a 47 year old waitress, with no insurance. And I will never lose my paid for home to a long disease.  I really am at the point of not believing in anything as far as this government goes. Do I believe the government owes me anything? No I do not. But I do know that, I have worked since the age of 16, pay my taxes and bills. And I do believe that health care needs to be affordable to all. 
Don't underestimate the....ridiculousness of the American people (and the electoral process) I remember when people assumed that Bush wouldn't get a second term based on the way he got in the first time and the fact that he was horrible for the most part, and you see how that worked out...
Michele vs. Becky  
#65 | 711 days ago
NorseHeathen (+)

  Flawless Diamond Boy

#66 | 711 days ago
NorseHeathen (+)

ohwell_ wrote:
         <<<---------  Thanks for the PQ!!!    Moving on,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,




We had dinner at my brother in laws last night.  His wife is a first grade teacher, he is a county fire-fighter paramedic.
As of July 01, they both had to start contributing to their pensions under the new law under Gov. Valdimor/Rick Scott and
the new R regime.   Their income is now cut by $500.00 a momth.              Another example of default.
They've cut the threshold for assistance for veterans the past 2 years.....

Funny how the news always seems to miss that happening.
#67 | 711 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

kobe_lova wrote:
Don't underestimate the....ridiculousness of the American people (and the electoral process) I remember when people assumed that Bush wouldn't get a second term based on the way he got in the first time and the fact that he was horrible for the most part, and you see how that worked out...
I knew Bush would get a second term, not once in this countries history, has a President been voted out of office during a war. His second term was a given. The fact still remains that the man was selected not elected to run this country.  But , let's not get on W cause my blood pressure can not do that right now.

As far as Bachmann goes, I see her as the republicans move to pull the tea part y closer in to them. They will certainly use her, but she will be discarded.  She is great for the tea party, but the tea party, as of right now, does not stand a chance at a real Presidential chance.  But, before you guys yell at me lol. I do know that this is the scariest party to ever form and come close to making it a three party election. I see it  in 4 to 8 more years, if it still stays together. But not this election,.
#68 | 710 days ago

cubsgirl2 wrote:
I knew Bush would get a second term, not once in this countries history, has a President been voted out of office during a war. His second term was a given. The fact still remains that the man was selected not elected to run this country.  But , let's not get on W cause my blood pressure can not do that right now.

As far as Bachmann goes, I see her as the republicans move to pull the tea part y closer in to them. They will certainly use her, but she will be discarded.  She is great for the tea party, but the tea party, as of right now, does not stand a chance at a real Presidential chance.  But, before you guys yell at me lol. I do know that this is the scariest party to ever form and come close to making it a three party election. I see it  in 4 to 8 more years, if it still stays together. But not this election,.
I agree, except I don't think the Teabaggers () will be viable in a presidential election in 4 or 8 years, either.  They're FAR too radical in their social conservatism to have wide-spread, nationwide appeal.  They'll have an almost impossible time swaying independents in an election.
Michele vs. Janet  
#69 | 710 days ago
NorseHeathen (+)

janet011685 wrote:
I agree, except I don't think the Teabaggers () will be viable in a presidential election in 4 or 8 years, either.  They're FAR too radical in their social conservatism to have wide-spread, nationwide appeal.  They'll have an almost impossible time swaying independents in an election.
Generally, I definitely agree Janet.  Unfortunately, I have a "however"....LOL!

The trend in the modern political environment is already polarized.  What the tea party has done is to more distinctly define that breach, and either drawn people in with the various forms of the issues 'protected' by the right (I have a friend that all he cares about is his freedom under the 2nd Amendment--and he's become a huge Tea Party supporter)  or created an aversion to such a degree that others have been pushed to the left.  Thus, the essence of polarization has become even greater.

Granted, those that have either been drawn in, or pushed into one party loyalty or the other is stupid IMNSHO as independents have always been a moderating force in the voting spectrum.  Without such moderation, this is just another element in the fracture of American society.  I really hate to say it, as I truly believe in the virtues of the American constitution (which have been manipulated and used for political desire--by BOTH parties), and have done so to the point that I have infused the perspective that such should be built upon when considering the road to an independent Cascadian nation.  But with every passing event, the division in this nation only seems greater, and without any desire to reconcile.
#70 | 710 days ago

NorseHeathen wrote:
Generally, I definitely agree Janet.  Unfortunately, I have a "however"....LOL!

The trend in the modern political environment is already polarized.  What the tea party has done is to more distinctly define that breach, and either drawn people in with the various forms of the issues 'protected' by the right (I have a friend that all he cares about is his freedom under the 2nd Amendment--and he's become a huge Tea Party supporter)  or created an aversion to such a degree that others have been pushed to the left.  Thus, the essence of polarization has become even greater.

Granted, those that have either been drawn in, or pushed into one party loyalty or the other is stupid IMNSHO as independents have always been a moderating force in the voting spectrum.  Without such moderation, this is just another element in the fracture of American society.  I really hate to say it, as I truly believe in the virtues of the American constitution (which have been manipulated and used for political desire--by BOTH parties), and have done so to the point that I have infused the perspective that such should be built upon when considering the road to an independent Cascadian nation.  But with every passing event, the division in this nation only seems greater, and without any desire to reconcile.
I see what you're saying, but my argument would be that your friend isn't really an "independent" voter, then.  Independents tend to have views that hover somewhere between the right and left, conceding a bit on both sides of the aisle (or they might hold steadfast to some right values - a la the right to bear arms with no real restrictions - but also hold on to some left principles just as vehemently, in essence, balancing out somewhere in the middle).  

I think that for every person out there like your friend, who can be easily swayed based on one issue, there is someone on the opposite end of the spectrum who will sway the other way based on a single issue, as well (I know that Tea Party candidates' strong opposition to a woman's right to choose, and their FAR right stance on gay rights will prevent them from getting votes from ANY of the moderates/independents that I personally know).
Michele vs. Janet  
#71 | 710 days ago
NorseHeathen (+)

janet011685 wrote:
I see what you're saying, but my argument would be that your friend isn't really an "independent" voter, then.  Independents tend to have views that hover somewhere between the right and left, conceding a bit on both sides of the aisle (or they might hold steadfast to some right values - a la the right to bear arms with no real restrictions - but also hold on to some left principles just as vehemently, in essence, balancing out somewhere in the middle).  

I think that for every person out there like your friend, who can be easily swayed based on one issue, there is someone on the opposite end of the spectrum who will sway the other way based on a single issue, as well (I know that Tea Party candidates' strong opposition to a woman's right to choose, and their FAR right stance on gay rights will prevent them from getting votes from ANY of the moderates/independents that I personally know).
You're exactly right in the context to which you are addressing.

It's my fault for not being more specific and separating my general comments from my example.  With regard to the general interpretation of how the Tea(r) Party is further fracturing America is the interpretation I was trying to portray.

My friend started out as a moderate Republican with his only real concern being his unyielding dedication to his Second Amendment rights, with moderate views otherwise.  The Tea(r) Party has really pushed him to the far right with their misleading rhetoric and other stances.

My apologies for not better defining the above last night.....it was late, I was tired, and didn't separate my thoughts as I should have to present a clearer picture.
#72 | 710 days ago

Well, at least Obama is showing some balls in *something.*

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/11/world/middleeast/11yemen.html?_r=2&hp
#73 | 710 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

janet011685 wrote:
I agree, except I don't think the Teabaggers () will be viable in a presidential election in 4 or 8 years, either.  They're FAR too radical in their social conservatism to have wide-spread, nationwide appeal.  They'll have an almost impossible time swaying independents in an election.
 btw, I love the little smiley in the " " when you say teabaggers. 
#74 | 709 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

janet011685 wrote:
I agree, except I don't think the Teabaggers () will be viable in a presidential election in 4 or 8 years, either.  They're FAR too radical in their social conservatism to have wide-spread, nationwide appeal.  They'll have an almost impossible time swaying independents in an election.
 From your typing fingers to Gods ears. 
#75 | 709 days ago

Regarding the debt limit "negotiations," Ezra Klein was right today when he said that politically, this should work out great for Obama. He's pushed for a $4 trillion deficit reduction deal, put *Medicare* and *Social Security* on the table, and the GOP still won't play ball. Over what? Tax increases for the wealthy. How do Republicans win the PR battle there (save for FOX News, which will just ignore the "for the wealthy" part)? They can't. Unfortunately, Ezra was also right when he said that economically of course, the result of these "negotiations," whatever they are, are going to hurt and hurt bad.
#76 | 709 days ago
NorseHeathen (+)

I am literally sick to my stomach right now.

--elitism
--greed
--gluttony

The 'right' talks about jobs being dependent upon not having wealth cut to create jobs, whilst allowing them to enjoy the fruits of their labors.  The sad truth of modern society  is that no amount of wealth is enough--and the philosophy of not cutting taxes upon the rich is as valid as trickle down economics.  It only works if those at the top contribute.   The good news is, people are getting pissed off; and the number of people getting their ire raised are far greater in number than the pundits that rationalize their self-loathing, perspective dedication to austerity that support the power-elite.
#77 | 709 days ago

 Its a shame we didn't realize this depression was our opportunity to upgrade our infrastructure in terms of travel and energy.  This was the perfect time to make ourselves a 21st century power instead of still reveling in the 20th century power we're stuck as.  As such our economy hasn't improved and we're still stuck in the past.
#78 | 709 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

kantwistaye wrote:
 Its a shame we didn't realize this depression was our opportunity to upgrade our infrastructure in terms of travel and energy.  This was the perfect time to make ourselves a 21st century power instead of still reveling in the 20th century power we're stuck as.  As such our economy hasn't improved and we're still stuck in the past.
Amen,  in ww2, the largest American employer was the United States Government.  We put people to work, the money started to finally boost the economy. That is how the depression finally ended. Yes this is a depression. I fully believe history will prove that although NO politician will admit it. The money that this President tried to give the states to put people to work, once again got caught up in the red tape and beuracy this government has become.

 The President stated, this money needs to go to the infrastructure of this Country. To bad no one was willing to say hey, you know what he's right.

The partisinship of this Country will be this countries greatest downfall.
#79 | 709 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

God, I missed this poll.  





Where I live, the Bible belt, trust me, the liberals are few and far between.
#80 | 708 days ago

Mike, how are things on the ground in Wisconsin? The primary elections for the recalls are today. Of course, they're primary elections because the Republicans nominated fake Democrats to run against the real Dems, solely to give them one more month to campaign. The brazenness of that is just mind-boggling.
#81 | 708 days ago

Eric_ wrote:
Mike, how are things on the ground in Wisconsin? The primary elections for the recalls are today. Of course, they're primary elections because the Republicans nominated fake Democrats to run against the real Dems, solely to give them one more month to campaign. The brazenness of that is just mind-boggling.
 And let's not forget, to buy another month of complete government control.  Redistricting is coming up and the Republicans plan on changing state law so they can get their map done in time.

I wasn't able to help GOTV today, but here in LaCrosse where we will be ousting Dan Kapanke, the Dem movement is as unified as ever.

Here's a good site to keep track of the primaries for those interested.
#82 | 708 days ago

(Edited by Eric_)
kantwistaye wrote:
 And let's not forget, to buy another month of complete government control.  Redistricting is coming up and the Republicans plan on changing state law so they can get their map done in time.

I wasn't able to help GOTV today, but here in LaCrosse where we will be ousting Dan Kapanke, the Dem movement is as unified as ever.

Here's a good site to keep track of the primaries for those interested.
Thanks. How will I know which ones are the real Dems?

Nevermind: I read the election primer. Looking good so far.
#83 | 688 days ago

I'm reviving this thread to note that the wretched debt ceiling "compromise" has passed the House 269-161. Exactly half the Democrats who voted voted for this, 95-95. Here's the vote. This was so depressing it ruined what should've been an amazing feel good moment, the return of Gabby Giffords to the floor of the House. Giffords voted aye, so did Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the DNC chair. Even Nancy Pelosi voted for this, even though I'm hoping that's just for the political optics of the #1 Democrat in the House needing to support the president.

About the only plus I can think of is as a federal employee, my salary is exempt from the "trigger." If that sounds selfish, well, that's the new way in Tea Party America. I got mine. F-you.

In happier news, Chris Hayes got a show on MSNBC on Saturday and Sunday mornings. Unfortunately, that means he's no longer available to replace Ed Schultz. Paging Ezra Klein...
#84 | 688 days ago

Eric_ wrote:
I'm reviving this thread to note that the wretched debt ceiling "compromise" has passed the House 269-161. Exactly half the Democrats who voted voted for this, 95-95. Here's the vote. This was so depressing it ruined what should've been an amazing feel good moment, the return of Gabby Giffords to the floor of the House. Giffords voted aye, so did Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the DNC chair. Even Nancy Pelosi voted for this, even though I'm hoping that's just for the political optics of the #1 Democrat in the House needing to support the president.

About the only plus I can think of is as a federal employee, my salary is exempt from the "trigger." If that sounds selfish, well, that's the new way in Tea Party America. I got mine. F-you.

In happier news, Chris Hayes got a show on MSNBC on Saturday and Sunday mornings. Unfortunately, that means he's no longer available to replace Ed Schultz. Paging Ezra Klein...
 I've gotta say, I'm in selfish mode too. At this point I'm just glad my husband will still be getting paid.
#85 | 688 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

Eric_ wrote:
I'm reviving this thread to note that the wretched debt ceiling "compromise" has passed the House 269-161. Exactly half the Democrats who voted voted for this, 95-95. Here's the vote. This was so depressing it ruined what should've been an amazing feel good moment, the return of Gabby Giffords to the floor of the House. Giffords voted aye, so did Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the DNC chair. Even Nancy Pelosi voted for this, even though I'm hoping that's just for the political optics of the #1 Democrat in the House needing to support the president.

About the only plus I can think of is as a federal employee, my salary is exempt from the "trigger." If that sounds selfish, well, that's the new way in Tea Party America. I got mine. F-you.

In happier news, Chris Hayes got a show on MSNBC on Saturday and Sunday mornings. Unfortunately, that means he's no longer available to replace Ed Schultz. Paging Ezra Klein...
 I really do not understand this whole debt ceiling thing. So if you can very easily in laymans term explain it a little I would appreciate it. Cause all I know is no one seems to be happy except the tea party and that is no bueno. 
#86 | 688 days ago

cubsgirl2 wrote:
 I really do not understand this whole debt ceiling thing. So if you can very easily in laymans term explain it a little I would appreciate it. Cause all I know is no one seems to be happy except the tea party and that is no bueno. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-05OfTp6ZEE
Beaneaters.   
#87 | 688 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

ohwell_ wrote:  Thank you very much, that was very informative. Now what the hell, its been raised all the time, now when Obama wants to there has to be concessions, hell they would have raised it. He should have stood his ground. 
#88 | 688 days ago

Khan Academy is our go-to tutor for all things.   I can't afford private tutoring for the kids
so we rely on their website a lot. 
Beaneaters.   
#89 | 688 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

ohwell_ wrote:
Khan Academy is our go-to tutor for all things.   I can't afford private tutoring for the kids
so we rely on their website a lot. 
 That really was very cool. 
#90 | 687 days ago

Eric_ wrote:
I'm reviving this thread to note that the wretched debt ceiling "compromise" has passed the House 269-161. Exactly half the Democrats who voted voted for this, 95-95. Here's the vote. This was so depressing it ruined what should've been an amazing feel good moment, the return of Gabby Giffords to the floor of the House. Giffords voted aye, so did Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the DNC chair. Even Nancy Pelosi voted for this, even though I'm hoping that's just for the political optics of the #1 Democrat in the House needing to support the president.

About the only plus I can think of is as a federal employee, my salary is exempt from the "trigger." If that sounds selfish, well, that's the new way in Tea Party America. I got mine. F-you.

In happier news, Chris Hayes got a show on MSNBC on Saturday and Sunday mornings. Unfortunately, that means he's no longer available to replace Ed Schultz. Paging Ezra Klein...
 If the rumors are true that Biden told the Dem caucus that Obama was willing to invoke the 14th Amendment if he had to, I'm really disappointed in every Democrat that voted for the bill.
#91 | 681 days ago

(Edited by Eric_)
Call me an Eeyore, but to review recent events:
  • Despite getting caught with a $2 trillion error, as well as in theory having no credibilty, S&P downgraded our credit rating.
  • As a result, the markets are tanking.
  • Despite a specific warning by S&P about the GOP's refusal to raise taxes, it seems like Obama is getting the blame with the general public (see today's F/E, although I'm sure all of those people are hard core Republicans; I still don't trust the media on this one).
  • London is rioting for no apparent reason, or at least not a coherent one.
  • Rick Perry is about to announce he's running for President, and his prayer thing this weekend scares the crap out of me. He might be the biggest theocrat of all.
Basically, there is nothing positive going on right now, *unless* tomorrow's recall elections in Wisconsin go well. Stay strong Badgers. We're counting on you.
#92 | 680 days ago
NorseHeathen (+)

I've been following the Wisconsin recall group on Facebook.  Yesterday, I passed on a very short affirmation of my support: 

"This is your time Wisconsin. Freedom-minded Americans stand with you."
#93 | 680 days ago

Here's the best link I've seen with Wisconsin races. Two of the six have been called for the Republicans, albeit the two the GOP was must likely to hold. 4 to go, Dems need 3, and I'm really not sure how this is going to play out.
#94 | 680 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

NorseHeathen wrote:
I've been following the Wisconsin recall group on Facebook.  Yesterday, I passed on a very short affirmation of my support: 

"This is your time Wisconsin. Freedom-minded Americans stand with you."
 For the first time since all of this has started, I am very scared. 
#95 | 680 days ago

Eric_ wrote:
Here's the best link I've seen with Wisconsin races. Two of the six have been called for the Republicans, albeit the two the GOP was must likely to hold. 4 to go, Dems need 3, and I'm really not sure how this is going to play out.
 JSOnline (biggest paper in Wisconsin) is good site too.

3 are R's already.  Dems are up in the other 3, but I don't know enough about the results that are in and about those districts to know if we're doing good enough.
#96 | 680 days ago

The third race has been called for the Republicans. Democrats need to sweep the remaining three. The 32nd District is looking pretty good. The 18th District is practically even with 14 precincts left, but what's left to be counted looks promising. The Dem leads 56-44 in the 8th District, but there's still 60% percent of the vote left to be counted and it isn't as favorable as the 18th.

As I write this, the 32nd has been called for the Democrat. 1 down, 2 to go.
#97 | 680 days ago

kantwistaye wrote:
 JSOnline (biggest paper in Wisconsin) is good site too.

3 are R's already.  Dems are up in the other 3, but I don't know enough about the results that are in and about those districts to know if we're doing good enough.
Schilling was just declared winner. King-Hopper is basically a tie, but what's left to be counted looks good for King. Pasch-Darling is still too early to tell.
#98 | 680 days ago

Eric_ wrote:
Schilling was just declared winner. King-Hopper is basically a tie, but what's left to be counted looks good for King. Pasch-Darling is still too early to tell.
Had heard Waukesha County was slow with their results tonight.  Waukesha County, as in the county 7,000 Prosser votes magically appeared this Spring.  Not good news for Pasch unless those were the votes that just got added to results. 
#99 | 680 days ago

kantwistaye wrote:
Had heard Waukesha County was slow with their results tonight.  Waukesha County, as in the county 7,000 Prosser votes magically appeared this Spring.  Not good news for Pasch unless those were the votes that just got added to results. 
The votes just added came from Washington County. If the AP count is correct, it's 15 precincts left from Milwaukee County and 10 for Waukesha. Nail-bitingly tight regardless.
#100 | 680 days ago

Eric_ wrote:
The votes just added came from Washington County. If the AP count is correct, it's 15 precincts left from Milwaukee County and 10 for Waukesha. Nail-bitingly tight regardless.
 That's scary.  We could easily have two recounts tonight, which Wisconsin really doesn't need.  But, if they turn out okay, we'll be better off as a result in the end.
#101 | 680 days ago

kantwistaye wrote:
 That's scary.  We could easily have two recounts tonight, which Wisconsin really doesn't need.  But, if they turn out okay, we'll be better off as a result in the end.
I missed 5 precincts left in Ozaukee County. 3 of the Milwaukee precincts make it 52-48 Pasch.
#102 | 680 days ago

18th District called for the Democrat. It's down to the 8th, but that damn Waukesha County is looming large.
#103 | 680 days ago

 Waukesha County is going to f*** us again.  Milwaukee is really going to have to finish strong for us.
#104 | 679 days ago
NorseHeathen (+)

(Edited by NorseHeathen)
It's ironic how the Dem was leading by 2%, then the County Clerk said that there was going to be a delay in reporting, now the Rep is up by 6%.  This is the same county in question during the recent election of the Supreme Court Justice.

Being raised by-in-large by the influence of my Grandfather, and the ghost of what I thought my father would have expected, I grew up with an ideological mindset that people naturally try to do the right thing.  Ironic, how as I have grown and gained in life's experience, attained knowledge through study and research, and seen the manner upon which processes exist, I have gone from being very conservative to very liberal.

Oh, I almost forgot, the Dems have called for a federal investigation into the above "inconsistency".

Even so, I do not begrudge those with conservative beliefs; being one who supports constitutional freedoms as if it were my life's essence, I will always support such rights that are considered 'conservative' and advocate and seek to defend the rights when I see such rights in peril.

Did I grow up in a state of disillusionment, or has America truly fallen this far?
#105 | 679 days ago

 Interesting Reading. hmmmmmmm......mmmmmmm.
Beaneaters.   
#106 | 679 days ago
NorseHeathen (+)

kteacher wrote: Yea....the hypocrisy of her smaller government versus readily accepting subsidies and other government backed funding is a perfect example of why--for the poor, such things are entitlements to be taken away; whilst for the rich, they're benefits to be protected.
#107 | 679 days ago

NorseHeathen wrote:
It's ironic how the Dem was leading by 2%, then the County Clerk said that there was going to be a delay in reporting, now the Rep is up by 6%.  This is the same county in question during the recent election of the Supreme Court Justice.

Being raised by-in-large by the influence of my Grandfather, and the ghost of what I thought my father would have expected, I grew up with an ideological mindset that people naturally try to do the right thing.  Ironic, how as I have grown and gained in life's experience, attained knowledge through study and research, and seen the manner upon which processes exist, I have gone from being very conservative to very liberal.

Oh, I almost forgot, the Dems have called for a federal investigation into the above "inconsistency".

Even so, I do not begrudge those with conservative beliefs; being one who supports constitutional freedoms as if it were my life's essence, I will always support such rights that are considered 'conservative' and advocate and seek to defend the rights when I see such rights in peril.

Did I grow up in a state of disillusionment, or has America truly fallen this far?
With the caveat that I am possibly the most pessimistic person in the world, but yes, it has.
#108 | 679 days ago

This session is now closed.
Michele vs. Becky  
#109 | 678 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

(Edited by cubsgirl2)
kobe_lova wrote:
This session is now closed.
 





#110 | 678 days ago

Michele vs. Sarah Palin  
#111 | 678 days ago
NorseHeathen (+)

(Edited by NorseHeathen)
You know, I've been listening to Michelle Bachman's rhetoric the past few months and have come to the firm conclusion that all that aggression is merely pent up frustration for never having experienced a proper orgasm--the kind that if a man truly pays attention to the needs of the woman whereas at the point that upon completion, his partner can't move for 10 minutes because her body has been brought to such a state of sensitivity that the only release of that temporary state of paralyzation is a cascade of lesser orgasms which occur in succession to release the sensation.
#112 | 678 days ago

Michele vs. Becky  
#113 | 678 days ago

kobe_lova wrote:
#114 | 678 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

 I think they are still having fun.  Leave them alone guys. 
#115 | 678 days ago

Hey, who's the as*hole who pq'd me for posting free tutoring?    Bite me.
Beaneaters.   
#116 | 678 days ago

NorseHeathen wrote:
You know, I've been listening to Michelle Bachman's rhetoric the past few months and have come to the firm conclusion that all that aggression is merely pent up frustration for never having experienced a proper orgasm--the kind that if a man truly pays attention to the needs of the woman whereas at the point that upon completion, his partner can't move for 10 minutes because her body has been brought to such a state of sensitivity that the only release of that temporary state of paralyzation is a cascade of lesser orgasms which occur in succession to release the sensation.
This is because:

A)  Her husband is a raging homosexual.
B)  There are always 79 kids running around her house (sponsored by the US taxpayers).
C)  Sex is only for procreation.  Jesus will swoop down on his Pterodactyl and smite her if she Os.
Michele vs. Janet  
#117 | 678 days ago

NorseHeathen wrote:
You know, I've been listening to Michelle Bachman's rhetoric the past few months and have come to the firm conclusion that all that aggression is merely pent up frustration for never having experienced a proper orgasm--the kind that if a man truly pays attention to the needs of the woman whereas at the point that upon completion, his partner can't move for 10 minutes because her body has been brought to such a state of sensitivity that the only release of that temporary state of paralyzation is a cascade of lesser orgasms which occur in succession to release the sensation.
Geezus Norse, that even made me hot.
Michele vs. Sarah Palin  
#118 | 678 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

(Edited by cubsgirl2)
janet011685 wrote:
This is because:

A)  Her husband is a raging homosexual.
B)  There are always 79 kids running around her house (sponsored by the US taxpayers).
C)  Sex is only for procreation.  Jesus will swoop down on his Pterodactyl and smite her if she Os.
But they have the cure for " the gays"  Janet, so how could he be.  big ass eye roll right now.  You know she gives stupid a whole new meaning.
#119 | 678 days ago
NorseHeathen (+)

Cactus_Jack wrote:
Geezus Norse, that even made me hot.
ROFL......thanks, that's a vision I didn't need.....
#120 | 678 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

NorseHeathen wrote:
ROFL......thanks, that's a vision I didn't need.....
 well me too kinda.  
#121 | 677 days ago

Oh.....how they change. 
Beaneaters.   
#122 | 677 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

kteacher wrote:  Amazing,    she got 3 months, I got 2 weeks.     And how shes all for them if they benefit her. 
#123 | 677 days ago

cubsgirl2 wrote:
But they have the cure for " the gays"  Janet, so how could he be.  big ass eye roll right now.  You know she gives stupid a whole new meaning.
I heard that sh*t was cureable...

Michele vs. Sarah Palin  
#124 | 677 days ago

Cactus_Jack wrote:
I heard that sh*t was cureable...

Extra Strength for those with a severe d*ck-tooth.

  @  "The Meat Substitute"


Michele vs. Janet  
#125 | 677 days ago

So, are we done for now? Will a new thread be created? Can I point how liberals have already lost the SuperCongress fight because Max Baucus is in it?
#126 | 677 days ago
NorseHeathen (+)

Eric_ wrote:
So, are we done for now? Will a new thread be created? Can I point how liberals have already lost the SuperCongress fight because Max Baucus is in it?
The "Super Committee" was rendered defunct with the selection of the Republican representatives--all six of whom signed Fürher Norquist's 'No tax pledge'.
#127 | 677 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

Eric_ wrote:
So, are we done for now? Will a new thread be created? Can I point how liberals have already lost the SuperCongress fight because Max Baucus is in it?
 Yeah I do this as a series poll.  I will even call special sessions. 
#128 | 677 days ago
cubsgirl2 (+)

janet011685 wrote:
Extra Strength for those with a severe d*ck-tooth.

  @  "The Meat Substitute"


 Why did I know you would see that comment.  lol

Post a Comment   Already a user? Sign in here
Join FanIQ - It's Free
FanIQ is the ultimate free community for sports fans.
Talk sports with fans from all over - 1,649,417+ Comments
Track your game picks - 38,670,182,382+ Sports Predictions
Prove you know sports - 116,275+ Trivia Questions
Find fans of your teams - 11,453,110+ New Friends
Right to Free Speech - Did I Cross the Line .....
Asked by BikerBaby | Locker Room, Politics | 1 questions asked 09/17/12
9 opinions | 16 comments | Last by huskerdoug2009
Jess's Daily Q - 6/19/13
Asked by Jess | Locker Room | 1 questions asked Today
10 opinions | 11 comments | Last by Beaneaters
Humpty Humpday Filter-Error
Asked by marcus_nyce | Locker Room | 1 questions asked Today
4 opinions | 7 comments | Last by Beaneaters
Music Storytellers - THE WHITE STRIPES
Asked by Nick__ | Locker Room, Music | 1 questions asked Today
6 opinions | 4 comments | Last by marcus_nyce
Jess's Daily Q - 6/18/13
Asked by Jess | Locker Room | 1 questions asked Yesterday
13 opinions | 18 comments | Last by davonthedl