Please sign in to complete your action
 
DONE!
Cheer and debate with
6,000,000+ fans!
My Team:
Charlotte
My Team:
Michael
My Team:
Britney


Polls
Home
NFL
MLB
NBA
NHL
NCAAF
NCAABB
NASCAR
Soccer
Golf
Tennis
You Might Like


Asked By: Nate


Who liked it? 15
borchers76 (+)
Dallas Cowboys

kramer (+)
Pittsburgh Steelers

Jebediah (+)
New England Patriots

pappa prc (+)
Arizona Cardinals

anmpwp12 (+)
New England Patriots

yankees_fan82 (+)
Dallas Cowboys

Damondogg31 (+)
Dallas Cowboys

sfelber9 (+)
Philadelphia Eagles

The_Hawg (+)
Dallas Cowboys

kellylong1332 (+)
Detroit Lions

... and 5 other fans
   |  Skip to Next Poll »
15
Does Emmitt Smith deserve to get in to the HOF in 2010 when he is eligible. (Edited 02/19/07 04:59PM by Seth)
Call it a morbid curiosity.  After reading so many people's opinion on Emmitt Smith, I have decided to find out how many people felt that he did not deserve to get into the HOF when he was eligible.
| Closed on 04/25/07 at 05:00PM
FanIQ Pts? No | NFL, Dallas Cowboys | Multiple Choice Opinion Poll
Teams:  Dallas Cowboys
Team Breakout:
152 Fans 
95%a. yes
4%b. no
1%c. other

 &nbp;
TOP COMMENT * * * * * * * * * * * *
#156 | 1073 days ago

 MattL wrote:

I just dont think he'd get in in 2010, he'll still get in but not in 2010, its a truthiness thing.

Listen if he doesn't get in on his first ballot, then the NFL should extend drug testing to anyone who has a vote. The guy is the all-time rushing yards leader!! You can't be serious.
yes  
5

  
180 Comments | Sorted by Most Recent First | Red = You Disagreed
Vote for your favorite comments. Fans decide the Top Comment (3+ votes) and also hide poor quality comments (4+ votes).
#1 | 1099 days ago

 I'm as big an Emmitt detractor as anyone...but...let's be serious.
yes  

#2 | 1099 days ago

 Is this really a question that's up for debate?
yes  

#3 | 1099 days ago

 Pat wrote:
I'm as big an Emmitt detractor as anyone...but...let's be serious.
I don't think so, but I was curious to see who said NO.  There is bound to be one.
yes  

#4 | 1099 days ago

 Nate wrote:
I don't think so, but I was curious to see who said NO.  There is bound to be one.
You're probably right.  I bet people are just waiting to pounce on that idiot!
yes  

#5 | 1099 days ago
Lyndah (+)

The_Hawg wrote:
You're probably right.  I bet people are just waiting to pounce on that idiot!
when you say idiot, you are referring to the person who would think that Emmit doesn't deserve to get in the HOF right?
yes  

#6 | 1099 days ago

 A person would be totally dominated if they were stupid enough to say "no" to this.
yes  

#7 | 1099 days ago

 Yes ma'am.
yes  

#8 | 1099 days ago

 is this a serious question? the All-Time NFL Rushing Leader may deserve to get snubbed? 
yes  

#9 | 1099 days ago

 emmit was the man!
yes  

#10 | 1099 days ago

 He has the all time record for rushing yards and touchdowns, of course he gets in first time.
yes  

#11 | 1099 days ago

 I seriously laughed out loud when I saw the title of this poll.  It's like asking if Jerry Rice deserves to get in when he becomes eligible.
yes  

#12 | 1099 days ago

 Who is Emmitt Smith?
yes  
4

#13 | 1099 days ago

 (Edited by Nate)
Wow, maybe I was wrong, maybe there really is no one retarded enough to say no.
yes  

#14 | 1099 days ago

 wow this is kind of a dumb question. he is the all time leading rusher. of coarse he deserves to be in.
yes  

#15 | 1099 days ago

 Illini1145 wrote:
wow this is kind of a dumb question. he is the all time leading rusher. of coarse he deserves to be in.
I only asked because so many people think he is really over rated.  I wanted to see how many of those people thought he didn't deserve to get into the HOF.
yes  

#16 | 1099 days ago

 Nate wrote:
I only asked because so many people think he is really over rated.  I wanted to see how many of those people thought he didn't deserve to get into the HOF.
He's only overrated in the "Best RB Ever" conversations. But you don't have to be the best RB ever to make the Hall of Fame.
yes  

#17 | 1099 days ago

 (Edited by Nate)
Pat wrote:
He's only overrated in the "Best RB Ever" conversations. But you don't have to be the best RB ever to make the Hall of Fame.
That's true. well on the you don't have to be the best RB to get in.  On the other hand I was still sure someone would say no.   BTW, I no I said I was going to make this poll for you, but I really got curious if anyone actually believed he didn't deserve to get in.  Curiosity got the best of me, I guess.  So I had to see.
yes  

#18 | 1099 days ago

 Wow! 39 people on here actually agree about something!
yes  

#19 | 1099 days ago

 suedon70 wrote:
Wow! 39 people on here actually agree about something!
Well I guess if I accomplished anything, I accomplished getting Fan IQ to agree.
yes  

#20 | 1099 days ago

 The_Hawg wrote:
You're probably right.  I bet people are just waiting to pounce on that idiot!
  Why is he an idiot? Are we jealous of him?
yes  

#21 | 1099 days ago

 I hate the Cowboys and Emmitt but... LORD YES HE DESERVES IT!
yes  

#22 | 1099 days ago
PewterPower (+)

aw damn  i ment to click no .................................just kidding
yes  

#23 | 1098 days ago

 This is a dumb question.
yes  

#24 | 1098 days ago

 If he doesn't get in on the first ballot, they might as well tear down the hall and build a mall.
yes  

#25 | 1098 days ago

 57 fans and still going
yes  

#26 | 1098 days ago

I think the HOF should make a special exception and put him in early.   That is how much he belongs in the HOF!

 

He might need his own wing.

yes  

#27 | 1098 days ago

 Are we talking about the Dancing Hall of Fame?
yes  
2

#28 | 1098 days ago

 1001 wrote:
Are we talking about the Dancing Hall of Fame?
uh NO!!
yes  

#29 | 1097 days ago

 I'm really starting to regret my answer. I should have said "No" to make it interesting. I could have justified it too.
yes  

#30 | 1097 days ago

 Pat wrote:
I'm really starting to regret my answer. I should have said "No" to make it interesting. I could have justified it too.
You know, I wouldn't be surprised if there were a resounding number of yes answers, but the fact that not one person, not even a Giants or Philly fan that said no.  Seriously didn't you think at least one person would say No?
yes  

#31 | 1097 days ago

 Nate wrote:
You know, I wouldn't be surprised if there were a resounding number of yes answers, but the fact that not one person, not even a Giants or Philly fan that said no.  Seriously didn't you think at least one person would say No?
It is a little surprising. If Cal Ripken and Tony Gwynn didn't get unanimously voted in for the Baseball HOF on their first try, then it wouldn't have shocked me to see someone like Emmitt lose a vote or two.
yes  

#32 | 1097 days ago

 (Edited by Pat)
Pat wrote:
I'm really starting to regret my answer. I should have said "No" to make it interesting. I could have justified it too.
Just for kicks, I'd like to hear how you could justify it.  I could use a good laugh.

*edited by Pat: Language*
yes  

#33 | 1097 days ago

 come on now... he is the ALL TIME LEADING RUSHER...stupid question

#34 | 1097 days ago

 Shawner wrote:
Just for kicks, I'd like to hear how you could justify it.  I could use a good laugh.

*edited by Pat: Language*
Justification #1:
Art Monk is very deserving, IMO. He has been waiting for almost 10 years. Emmitt Smith isn't 10 times the player that Art Monk is. Therefore, he shouldn't get in 10 times faster.
Justification #2:
He may deserve to be inducted, but I voted no, because he doesn't deserve to be inducted unanimously. If Cal Ripken and Tony Gwynn can't get in unanimously in baseball, then Emmitt(the Cal Ripken of football) doesn't deserve the unanimous honor either.
yes  

#35 | 1097 days ago

 (Edited by Shawner)
Those are pretty weak arguments, but it's not like I was expecting anything more in a case against Emmitt going to the Hall of Fame. 
yes  
1

#36 | 1097 days ago

 Shawner wrote:
Those are pretty weak arguments, but it's not like I was expecting anything more in a case against Emmitt going to the Hall of Fame. 
Well...I guess that's why I answered "yes". Sure, I could use a little twisted circular logic to give reasons to NOT vote for him, but seriously...what's the point? He deserves it, and of course he shouldn't have to wait.
yes  

#37 | 1097 days ago

 Hope he gets to take his o-line, since they got him there. (just kiddin' relax Cowboy fans)
yes  

#38 | 1097 days ago

 willeerules wrote:
Hope he gets to take his o-line, since they got him there. (just kiddin' relax Cowboy fans)
No you're not. You're completely serious. And completely accurate. If he was on the Cardinals his WHOLE career, he wouldn't be a HOF candidate today.
yes  

#39 | 1097 days ago

 Pat wrote:
No you're not. You're completely serious. And completely accurate. If he was on the Cardinals his WHOLE career, he wouldn't be a HOF candidate today.
Neither would Barry Sanders with the Arizona Cardinals. I'll agree that the offensive line is very deserving but it does take a real running back to take advantage of a good line. A real running back has to have great awareness and within a split second know which hole is the best exact one. I've heard it plenty of times when a commentator will show that the running back missed a great hole and 9 times out of 10 that running back isn't a great one.
yes  

#40 | 1096 days ago

 Wow this must be an accomplishment I have gotten at least one fan of each of the NFC East rivals to agree with Dallas fans on one thing.  Not to mention 65 people of non specific fan lineage to agree on one thing.
yes  

#41 | 1096 days ago
pogoowner (+)

Pat wrote:
I'm as big an Emmitt detractor as anyone...but...let's be serious.
Same here.
yes  

#42 | 1096 days ago

 vindog wrote:
57 fans and still going
up to 66...im impressed, havent seen that many agree all on one thing before
yes  

#43 | 1095 days ago

 Pat wrote:
I'm as big an Emmitt detractor as anyone...but...let's be serious.
He not the greatest of all time, but he is a shoe in for the Hall
yes  

#44 | 1092 days ago

i know this is off topic but since there is a consensus on emmitt.... what do yall think about tiki barber?

yes  

#45 | 1092 days ago

 coocooguy04 wrote:

i know this is off topic but since there is a consensus on emmitt.... what do yall think about tiki barber?

Uhm, what did he actually accomplish in his time in the NFL?  I would have to say no.
yes  

#46 | 1092 days ago
PewterPower (+)

Nate wrote:
Uhm, what did he actually accomplish in his time in the NFL?  I would have to say no.
he did something emmitt never did 10,000 yards rushing 5,000 yards receiving
yes  
1

#47 | 1092 days ago

 PewterPower wrote:
he did something emmitt never did 10,000 yards rushing 5,000 yards receiving
He did something else that Emmitt never did, too.

He fumbled the ball 44 times in his career. Emmitt only fumbled it 38 times, even though he played 5 more years, 72 more games, and got almost twice as many touches.

There you go, Cowboys fans...I defended Emmitt Smith. How was that?
yes  

#48 | 1092 days ago

 PewterPower wrote:
he did something emmitt never did 10,000 yards rushing 5,000 yards receiving
So he has the record rushing yards?
yes  

#49 | 1092 days ago

 Pat wrote:
He did something else that Emmitt never did, too.

He fumbled the ball 44 times in his career. Emmitt only fumbled it 38 times, even though he played 5 more years, 72 more games, and got almost twice as many touches.

There you go, Cowboys fans...I defended Emmitt Smith. How was that?
I am impressed Pat, but you will do something to let me down later I am sure.
yes  

#50 | 1092 days ago

 Nate wrote:
I am impressed Pat, but you will do something to let me down later I am sure.
Eh...can't please everyone, I suppose.
yes  

#51 | 1092 days ago

 Pat wrote:
Eh...can't please everyone, I suppose.
lol, I am just joking, I actually agree with you more times then other people.  Just seldom on Emmit Smith.
yes  

#52 | 1092 days ago

 Nate wrote:
lol, I am just joking, I actually agree with you more times then other people.  Just seldom on Emmit Smith.
That's because you still see the world through silver and blue glasses shaped like the Dallas Star, and they're not allowing you to see things clearly. Someday, you'll be enlightened.
yes  
1

#53 | 1092 days ago

 Pat wrote:
That's because you still see the world through silver and blue glasses shaped like the Dallas Star, and they're not allowing you to see things clearly. Someday, you'll be enlightened.
 well I found the star a lot less obtrusive for my vision than the patriot head. 
yes  

#54 | 1092 days ago

 Nate wrote:
 well I found the star a lot less obtrusive for my vision than the patriot head. 
Ahhh...yes...but the Patriots head glasses make you smarter. Those stars just blind you from the truth.
yes  

#55 | 1092 days ago

 Pat wrote:
Ahhh...yes...but the Patriots head glasses make you smarter. Those stars just blind you from the truth.
Ah, like Jimmy Johnson was the best thing to happen to Pro Football, outside of that I have no idea.
yes  

#56 | 1092 days ago

 Nate wrote:
Ah, like Jimmy Johnson was the best thing to happen to Pro Football, outside of that I have no idea.
See what I mean? It wasn't Jimmy...you're thinking of Dave Campo.
yes  

#57 | 1092 days ago

 Pat wrote:
See what I mean? It wasn't Jimmy...you're thinking of Dave Campo.
uhm, Dave Campo?  I would have said Bill Parcells before him.
yes  

#58 | 1092 days ago

 Nate wrote:
uhm, Dave Campo?  I would have said Bill Parcells before him.
That's because of those glasses. I'm telling you. Look into my eyes....you are getting verrrrryyyy sleeeeeeepy...repeat after me...Dave Campo was the best thing ever to happen to Pro Football...Dave Campo was the best thing ever to happen to Pro Football...
yes  

#59 | 1092 days ago

 Pat wrote:
That's because of those glasses. I'm telling you. Look into my eyes....you are getting verrrrryyyy sleeeeeeepy...repeat after me...Dave Campo was the best thing ever to happen to Pro Football...Dave Campo was the best thing ever to happen to Pro Football...
why is that again because he made th cowboys suck?
yes  

#60 | 1092 days ago

 Nate wrote:
why is that again because he made th cowboys suck?
No. They always sucked...he just revealed their suckiness.
yes  

#61 | 1092 days ago

 Pat wrote:
No. They always sucked...he just revealed their suckiness.
might want to take those patriot glasses off now, I think they may have fried your brain.
yes  

#62 | 1092 days ago
pogoowner (+)

Nate wrote:
might want to take those patriot glasses off now, I think they may have fried your brain.
Nah, because I'm seeing the same thing through my red and gold glasses.
yes  

#63 | 1092 days ago

 pogoowner wrote:
Nah, because I'm seeing the same thing through my red and gold glasses.
Your a 49ers fan, what in the world else would I expect you to see?
yes  

#64 | 1092 days ago

 Nate wrote:
Your a 49ers fan, what in the world else would I expect you to see?
Pot calling the kettle black
yes  
1

#65 | 1092 days ago

 MarkTheShark wrote:
Pot calling the kettle black
racial orientation had nothing to do with this conversation.
yes  

#66 | 1092 days ago

 Nate wrote:
racial orientation had nothing to do with this conversation.
pot calling the kettle burned
yes  

#67 | 1092 days ago

 MarkTheShark wrote:
pot calling the kettle burned
I expect any fan of any team to like their team over someone else's.  I am a Cowboys fan first and foremost, then it would be New England and Tampa, because my mom lives in Tampa.  But I know being a Cowboys fan means more people dislike my team, so excuse me when I poke a little fun of those people as well.  It's not personal, I actually like the old 49er teams, I only have animosity against one team, but nothing against most of the fans of any team.
yes  

#68 | 1092 days ago
PewterPower (+)

Nate wrote:
I expect any fan of any team to like their team over someone else's.  I am a Cowboys fan first and foremost, then it would be New England and Tampa, because my mom lives in Tampa.  But I know being a Cowboys fan means more people dislike my team, so excuse me when I poke a little fun of those people as well.  It's not personal, I actually like the old 49er teams, I only have animosity against one team, but nothing against most of the fans of any team.
lets recap you like the old niner teams (super bowls years i'm sure) , tampa, new england  hmmmm........ can you say bandwagon
yes  

#69 | 1092 days ago

 PewterPower wrote:
lets recap you like the old niner teams (super bowls years i'm sure) , tampa, new england  hmmmm........ can you say bandwagon
oops- dont know if you should have gone there with that bandwaggon stuff.
yes  

#70 | 1092 days ago
pogoowner (+)

Wow, I didn't expect so much response to that.  I was just jumping in with the whole glasses theme and poking some fun at myself for how obviously biased I am within this discussion.
yes  

#71 | 1092 days ago
PewterPower (+)

vindog wrote:
oops- dont know if you should have gone there with that bandwaggon stuff.
if it smells like a rat
yes  

#72 | 1092 days ago

 Bandwagon, I like the New England Patriots because of this young QB that was really impressive, I assure you that's about it.  I like Tampa Bay, because my mother lives in Tampa Bay, and they have interesting people on the team.  I am A DALLAS COWBOYS FAN.  I have been a Dallas fan before SB XXVII, and have been since.  What if I like a team (I am only listed as a Cowboys fan) I am band wagon fan.  How about I wish them well?  Kinda like this year, when I pulled for Indianapolis over New England, I guess that was bandwagon.  Why are you fan of the Bucs, thought it was just a good thing to do?  Maybe your dad was a fan so you felt you should be to, that isn't jumping on a bandwagon now is it? 
yes  

#73 | 1092 days ago

 By the way, I was like born in 79 so that 80s team was when I was really young. 
yes  

#74 | 1092 days ago

 Nate wrote:
Bandwagon, I like the New England Patriots because of this young QB that was really impressive, I assure you that's about it.  I like Tampa Bay, because my mother lives in Tampa Bay, and they have interesting people on the team.  I am A DALLAS COWBOYS FAN.  I have been a Dallas fan before SB XXVII, and have been since.  What if I like a team (I am only listed as a Cowboys fan) I am band wagon fan.  How about I wish them well?  Kinda like this year, when I pulled for Indianapolis over New England, I guess that was bandwagon.  Why are you fan of the Bucs, thought it was just a good thing to do?  Maybe your dad was a fan so you felt you should be to, that isn't jumping on a bandwagon now is it? 
told you dude- you shouldnt have gone there.
yes  

#75 | 1092 days ago

 vindog wrote:
told you dude- you shouldnt have gone there.
me?
yes  

#76 | 1092 days ago

 Nate wrote:
me?
no- the dude who called you a band-waggoner!
yes  

#77 | 1092 days ago

 I really don't get it, what I am not allowed to like other teams?  It's not like I am watching their games over the Cowboys games, I catch the other teams when and if I can, and I don't root for them against my team.  But because I am a Cowboys fan, that means I am supposed to not like anyother team.  They try to stereotype us that way, and don't like it when it isn't true. 
yes  

#78 | 1092 days ago
PewterPower (+)

Nate wrote:
Bandwagon, I like the New England Patriots because of this young QB that was really impressive, I assure you that's about it.  I like Tampa Bay, because my mother lives in Tampa Bay, and they have interesting people on the team.  I am A DALLAS COWBOYS FAN.  I have been a Dallas fan before SB XXVII, and have been since.  What if I like a team (I am only listed as a Cowboys fan) I am band wagon fan.  How about I wish them well?  Kinda like this year, when I pulled for Indianapolis over New England, I guess that was bandwagon.  Why are you fan of the Bucs, thought it was just a good thing to do?  Maybe your dad was a fan so you felt you should be to, that isn't jumping on a bandwagon now is it? 
i am a fan of the bucs because i was born and raised in tampa and when the were the laughing stock of the league i was still a fan i've been going to bucs games since i was 13 i've been to 7 different nfl stadiums (new orleans and atlanta twice) to see the bucs fully dressed in all my bucs gear taking no shit from the home fans so therefore i would in no way be anything other than a huge fan of the bucs and only the bucs by the way have you ever even been to a cowboys game? an away game? you liked the 49ers cause they were winning super bowls same with new england and tampa therefore bandwagon 
yes  

#79 | 1092 days ago
PewterPower (+)

Nate wrote:
I really don't get it, what I am not allowed to like other teams?  It's not like I am watching their games over the Cowboys games, I catch the other teams when and if I can, and I don't root for them against my team.  But because I am a Cowboys fan, that means I am supposed to not like anyother team.  They try to stereotype us that way, and don't like it when it isn't true. 
its funny the other teams you liked was 49ers back with montana and the 2 teams that won super bowls 36-39 now if you would have said you also like the lions and cardinals then there would be no cause for the bandwagon label
yes  

#80 | 1092 days ago

 PewterPower wrote:
i am a fan of the bucs because i was born and raised in tampa and when the were the laughing stock of the league i was still a fan i've been going to bucs games since i was 13 i've been to 7 different nfl stadiums (new orleans and atlanta twice) to see the bucs fully dressed in all my bucs gear taking no shit from the home fans so therefore i would in no way be anything other than a huge fan of the bucs and only the bucs by the way have you ever even been to a cowboys game? an away game? you liked the 49ers cause they were winning super bowls same with new england and tampa therefore bandwagon 
can i take a shot at this first? ive been a Cowboys fan since 1970- thats 36 years!! ive been to games at EVERY NFL Stadium except Oakland and Chicago(AWAY GAMES)- i bleed Silver and Blue- yet i also like the Steelers because my Brother, Wife, and Neice are Steeler fans and i enjoy seeing them cheer on their teams. does that make me a bandwaggon Steelers fan?
yes  

#81 | 1092 days ago
PewterPower (+)

vindog wrote:
can i take a shot at this first? ive been a Cowboys fan since 1970- thats 36 years!! ive been to games at EVERY NFL Stadium except Oakland and Chicago(AWAY GAMES)- i bleed Silver and Blue- yet i also like the Steelers because my Brother, Wife, and Neice are Steeler fans and i enjoy seeing them cheer on their teams. does that make me a bandwaggon Steelers fan?
i find it hard to believe you have been to that many games and know this little about football
yes  

#82 | 1092 days ago

 PewterPower wrote:
its funny the other teams you liked was 49ers back with montana and the 2 teams that won super bowls 36-39 now if you would have said you also like the lions and cardinals then there would be no cause for the bandwagon label
Okay first of all, I didn't jump on the Pittsburgh bandwagon, because they won the SB, and I haven't done it for the Indianapolis Colts, though I wanted to see them win the big game.  So I fail to see your point.  I haven't gone to a single Dallas game, shame I value my rent and a place to live in more than the ability to go see my team play.  I would love to go to a game though.  Nice rubbing it in though.  As for bandwagon, I am a Dallas Cowboys fan, if I were a Bandwagon fan, I would not keep saying the Cowboys were my team for as long as I called myself that.  So again, what is your point.  And what in the heck did I say to you to deserve you attacking me? 
yes  

#83 | 1092 days ago

 PewterPower wrote:
i find it hard to believe you have been to that many games and know this little about football
actually, i go to 4 NFL games a year and have been doing it for about 15 years now. so i really do care what you find hard to believe.
yes  

#84 | 1092 days ago
PewterPower (+)

vindog wrote:
actually, i go to 4 NFL games a year and have been doing it for about 15 years now. so i really do care what you find hard to believe.

what 4 did you go to this year?

yes  

#85 | 1092 days ago

Colts- in Dallas, @ Titans, @ Jaguars, @ Cardinals.

yes  

#86 | 1092 days ago

 PewterPower wrote:

what 4 did you go to this year?

lol why does that matter?
yes  

#87 | 1092 days ago

 vindog wrote:

Colts- in Dallas, @ Titans, @ Jaguars, @ Cardinals.

Stub Hub is a miracle website.
yes  
1

#88 | 1092 days ago

 Nate wrote:
lol why does that matter?
guess he was testing me??????????
yes  

#89 | 1092 days ago

 vindog wrote:
guess he was testing me??????????
lol but if I were to test you I would ask you to make a copy of you ticket stubs and mail them to me.
yes  

#90 | 1092 days ago

 Nate wrote:
lol but if I were to test you I would ask you to make a copy of you ticket stubs and mail them to me.
that will be next- im Sure of it!
yes  

#91 | 1092 days ago

 Nate wrote:
lol but if I were to test you I would ask you to make a copy of you ticket stubs and mail them to me.
some of those tickets cost my some freaking cash too- like the Colts were $386 a piece for 35 yard line and the Jaguars were $215 for 20 yard line.
yes  

#92 | 1092 days ago

 vindog wrote:
that will be next- im Sure of it!
It might be a few minutes though, I am sure he is writing down all the reasons he hates us.  It's probably going to be a long list, but it's good therapy.
yes  

#93 | 1092 days ago

 Nate wrote:
It might be a few minutes though, I am sure he is writing down all the reasons he hates us.  It's probably going to be a long list, but it's good therapy.
yeah, too bad i might miss it- gotta get up at 3am West Coast time so its almost nighty night.
yes  

#94 | 1092 days ago

 vindog wrote:
yeah, too bad i might miss it- gotta get up at 3am West Coast time so its almost nighty night.
So what do you do in Las Vegas?
yes  

#95 | 1091 days ago

 Nate wrote:
So what do you do in Las Vegas?
Foreman for a Union Electrical Company- right now we are getting ready to do a 4000 room remodel of the Venetian Hotel. so, they want it done as fast as humanly possible of course so im working 6 days- 12 hours a day for right now till things calm down a bit and we get into a groove.
yes  

#96 | 1091 days ago

 vindog wrote:
Foreman for a Union Electrical Company- right now we are getting ready to do a 4000 room remodel of the Venetian Hotel. so, they want it done as fast as humanly possible of course so im working 6 days- 12 hours a day for right now till things calm down a bit and we get into a groove.
wow, that's no small feat, good luck with that.
yes  

#97 | 1091 days ago

 Nate wrote:
wow, that's no small feat, good luck with that.
thanks dude- but i gotta go now. maybe tomorrow around this time?
yes  

#98 | 1091 days ago

 I'll be around.
yes  

#99 | 1091 days ago

 vindog wrote:
thanks dude- but i gotta go now. maybe tomorrow around this time?
maybe YOU shouldn't gone there......
yes  

#100 | 1091 days ago
PewterPower (+)

MarkTheShark wrote:
maybe YOU shouldn't gone there......
i think the made a love connection
yes  

#101 | 1091 days ago
Lyndah (+)

looks like someone finally jumped out there and said no.....hope he's ready
yes  

#102 | 1091 days ago

 Hahaha...and it was a Cowboys fan, too. At least he usually seems like it.
yes  

#103 | 1091 days ago

A Cowboys fan said no?

yes  

#104 | 1091 days ago
Lyndah (+)

Nate wrote:

A Cowboys fan said no?

doesn't look like it was a cowboy's fan...apparently he's not a true fan of football if he truly feels that way
yes  

#105 | 1091 days ago

 Lyndah wrote:
doesn't look like it was a cowboy's fan...apparently he's not a true fan of football if he truly feels that way
I'll give him the benifit of the doubt and say he accidently said no.
yes  

#106 | 1091 days ago
Lyndah (+)

(Edited by Lyndah)
Nate wrote:
I'll give him the benifit of the doubt and say he accidently said no.
you're nicer than me  but I hope you're right
yes  
1

#107 | 1091 days ago

 Lyndah wrote:
you're nicer than me  but I hope you're right
I hope so too, but in all honesty I expected a no answer sooner than this.
yes  

#108 | 1091 days ago

 oh and can I get an explanation of other, I knew I should not have put other in this poll.
yes  

#109 | 1090 days ago

In the event that anyone has ANY legitimate questions, I shamelessy plagerized this from Dallascowboys.com:

 

In 15 seasons, Emmitt Smith made an impact on the NFL that few players can match at any position or in any era. As the NFL's all-time rushing leader, Smith won four NFL rushing titles, three Super Bowl titles and a league (1993) and Super Bowl (XXVIII) MVP award. He was selected to the Pro Bowl eight times, with only Barry Sanders (10) having been selected more times among NFL running backs.

Smith is the seventh player in NFL history to carry the title of all-time rushing leader, and he is the only player in NFL history to rush for more than 18,000 yards. Smith is also the NFL's career rushing touchdowns leader with 164, and he stands second in league annals in total touchdowns with 175, trailing the all-time leader, Jerry Rice, by 32.

The first player in NFL history with five straight seasons with over 1,400 rushing yards, Smith and Jim Brown are the only players with seven straight 10-touchdown seasons to start their career. With 1,021 yards rushing in 2001, Smith became the first player in NFL history to rush for 1,000 yards in 11 consecutive seasons and the first to post 11 1,000-yard rushing seasons in a career. He is also the NFL's alltime leader in rushing attempts with 4,409. With a then NFL record 25 touchdowns in 1995, Smith scored 100 career touchdowns in just six seasons, the fastest anyone in league history has reached that mark (he tied Brown's NFL record by scoring 100 touchdowns in just 93 career games). His 164 career rushing touchdowns in 226 games gives him a 0.73 touchdown-per-game scoring average, second behind Brown's 0.90 for tops among the all-time rushing touchdown scorers (John Riggins 0.59 and Walter Payton 0.58 are next on the list). Smith's longevity and ability to score touchdowns have combined to give him three of the five best touchdown totals against a single opponent in league history. His 25 career scores against the Arizona Cardinals is the third best total by a player against an opponent since 1970, followed by his 24 scores against Washington and his 23 against the N.Y Giants.

Smith is one of only three players in Cowboys history with three career 100-point seasons, and he is the only non-kicker to accomplish the feat. His value to his team's success can be seen in the clubs' 101-26 mark (93-24 in regular season) when he carried the ball 20-or-more times a game and 65-18 record (58-18 in regular season) when he rushed for 100 yards. The century mark became a big number in Smith's career, having rushed for 100 yards in 155-of-326 games dating back to high school (45-of-49 at Escambia High School, 25-of-34 at Florida, 81-of-202 at Dallas, including playoffs, and two-of-25 at Arizona). His 45 100-yard games in high school is still the national record, and in NFL annals, Smith's 78 100-yard rushing games makes him the NFL's all-time leader - just ahead of Payton (77) and Sanders (76). Included in Smith's leaguerecord 78 regular season 100-yard rushing games are 18 days with over 150 yards (the fourth highest total of 150-yard games in NFL history).

Smith has rushed for over 100-yards against 23 of the 33 NFL teams he faced. In addition, he rushed for 2,466 yards against the Philadelphia Eagles in his 15- year career, his best output against any single opponent. That total ranks second since 1970 for running backs against one team. Smith also has the third and fifth best totals in that category.

yes  

#110 | 1090 days ago

 The_Hawg wrote:

In the event that anyone has ANY legitimate questions, I shamelessy plagerized this from Dallascowboys.com:

 

In 15 seasons, Emmitt Smith made an impact on the NFL that few players can match at any position or in any era. As the NFL's all-time rushing leader, Smith won four NFL rushing titles, three Super Bowl titles and a league (1993) and Super Bowl (XXVIII) MVP award. He was selected to the Pro Bowl eight times, with only Barry Sanders (10) having been selected more times among NFL running backs.

Smith is the seventh player in NFL history to carry the title of all-time rushing leader, and he is the only player in NFL history to rush for more than 18,000 yards. Smith is also the NFL's career rushing touchdowns leader with 164, and he stands second in league annals in total touchdowns with 175, trailing the all-time leader, Jerry Rice, by 32.

The first player in NFL history with five straight seasons with over 1,400 rushing yards, Smith and Jim Brown are the only players with seven straight 10-touchdown seasons to start their career. With 1,021 yards rushing in 2001, Smith became the first player in NFL history to rush for 1,000 yards in 11 consecutive seasons and the first to post 11 1,000-yard rushing seasons in a career. He is also the NFL's alltime leader in rushing attempts with 4,409. With a then NFL record 25 touchdowns in 1995, Smith scored 100 career touchdowns in just six seasons, the fastest anyone in league history has reached that mark (he tied Brown's NFL record by scoring 100 touchdowns in just 93 career games). His 164 career rushing touchdowns in 226 games gives him a 0.73 touchdown-per-game scoring average, second behind Brown's 0.90 for tops among the all-time rushing touchdown scorers (John Riggins 0.59 and Walter Payton 0.58 are next on the list). Smith's longevity and ability to score touchdowns have combined to give him three of the five best touchdown totals against a single opponent in league history. His 25 career scores against the Arizona Cardinals is the third best total by a player against an opponent since 1970, followed by his 24 scores against Washington and his 23 against the N.Y Giants.

Smith is one of only three players in Cowboys history with three career 100-point seasons, and he is the only non-kicker to accomplish the feat. His value to his team's success can be seen in the clubs' 101-26 mark (93-24 in regular season) when he carried the ball 20-or-more times a game and 65-18 record (58-18 in regular season) when he rushed for 100 yards. The century mark became a big number in Smith's career, having rushed for 100 yards in 155-of-326 games dating back to high school (45-of-49 at Escambia High School, 25-of-34 at Florida, 81-of-202 at Dallas, including playoffs, and two-of-25 at Arizona). His 45 100-yard games in high school is still the national record, and in NFL annals, Smith's 78 100-yard rushing games makes him the NFL's all-time leader - just ahead of Payton (77) and Sanders (76). Included in Smith's leaguerecord 78 regular season 100-yard rushing games are 18 days with over 150 yards (the fourth highest total of 150-yard games in NFL history).

Smith has rushed for over 100-yards against 23 of the 33 NFL teams he faced. In addition, he rushed for 2,466 yards against the Philadelphia Eagles in his 15- year career, his best output against any single opponent. That total ranks second since 1970 for running backs against one team. Smith also has the third and fifth best totals in that category.

That's interesting, I didn't know all of that.  Do you have link to that?

yes  

#111 | 1090 days ago

 Nate wrote:

That's interesting, I didn't know all of that.  Do you have link to that?

From the Dallas Cowboys home page (I'm sure you already know that one www.dallascowboys.com), just click on Team on the bar across the top, then scroll down to Ring of Honor and select the inductee you're interested in...  They also have the same feature for HoF'ers...  It's really well done.
yes  

#112 | 1090 days ago

 The_Hawg wrote:
From the Dallas Cowboys home page (I'm sure you already know that one www.dallascowboys.com), just click on Team on the bar across the top, then scroll down to Ring of Honor and select the inductee you're interested in...  They also have the same feature for HoF'ers...  It's really well done.
It is a great site, and I have been to it yet today.  I need to go there now...
yes  

#113 | 1090 days ago

 Nate wrote:
It is a great site, and I have been to it yet today.  I need to go there now...
It's an integral part of any nutritious breakfast!
yes  

#114 | 1090 days ago

 The_Hawg wrote:
It's an integral part of any nutritious breakfast!
Yeah, well that's interesting, Wade Phillips hired Jason Garrett's brother on as a Tight Ends coach.  Talking about really making it a family environment.  Dat, Wes, the other Garrett, is there anyone else that he wants to add on who has some sort of connection either with the team, his family or someone on the teams family?
yes  

#115 | 1090 days ago

 Nate wrote:
Yeah, well that's interesting, Wade Phillips hired Jason Garrett's brother on as a Tight Ends coach.  Talking about really making it a family environment.  Dat, Wes, the other Garrett, is there anyone else that he wants to add on who has some sort of connection either with the team, his family or someone on the teams family?
If there is anyone else out there, I'm sure they're scheduled for an interview.  Well, with the possible exception of say, Nate Newton...  Don't know much about Garrett's brother, you?
yes  

#116 | 1090 days ago

 The_Hawg wrote:
If there is anyone else out there, I'm sure they're scheduled for an interview.  Well, with the possible exception of say, Nate Newton...  Don't know much about Garrett's brother, you?
Other than tight ends coach, and Garrett's brother-that's about it.
yes  

#117 | 1090 days ago

 Nate wrote:
Other than tight ends coach, and Garrett's brother-that's about it.
At the risk of sounding blindly optimistic about my (America's) team, there must be something there.  Although I have no factual reason to back that up.
yes  

#118 | 1090 days ago

 The_Hawg wrote:
At the risk of sounding blindly optimistic about my (America's) team, there must be something there.  Although I have no factual reason to back that up.
It's the job of the fan to be blindly optimistic about their team.  If we weren't then well we wouldn't be fans, just spectators.  I for one have been optimistic since seeing the emergence of Tony Romo, and the shaping of an improving defense.
yes  
1

#119 | 1090 days ago

 Nate wrote:
It's the job of the fan to be blindly optimistic about their team.  If we weren't then well we wouldn't be fans, just spectators.  I for one have been optimistic since seeing the emergence of Tony Romo, and the shaping of an improving defense.
Yeah, me too.  No matter what anyone says.  Doing anything cool for Draft Day?
yes  

#120 | 1090 days ago

 The_Hawg wrote:
Yeah, me too.  No matter what anyone says.  Doing anything cool for Draft Day?
that depends if I am able to get back into the army before then or not.  If I don't I might enjoy draft day, with a nice draft.
yes  

#121 | 1090 days ago

 Are you kidding me?!?!    Even while passing his prime, he almost rushed for 1000 yds while at Arizona.   Definite 1st ballot HOF.     God Bless.
yes  
1

#122 | 1090 days ago

 Nate wrote:
I expect any fan of any team to like their team over someone else's.  I am a Cowboys fan first and foremost, then it would be New England and Tampa, because my mom lives in Tampa.  But I know being a Cowboys fan means more people dislike my team, so excuse me when I poke a little fun of those people as well.  It's not personal, I actually like the old 49er teams, I only have animosity against one team, but nothing against most of the fans of any team.

and what team do you have animosity for?  im guessing.... eagles

 

i personally hate all other teams in the NFC EAST except the cowboys... its rivalry... its tradition... even my kids will grow to hate the NFC EAST foes... what other division is so competive year in and year out? i mean 3 teams made it to the playoffs from that division

yes  
1

#123 | 1090 days ago

 Who ever voted no is a complete IDIOT!!!
yes  
1

#124 | 1090 days ago

 coocooguy04 wrote:

and what team do you have animosity for?  im guessing.... eagles

 

i personally hate all other teams in the NFC EAST except the cowboys... its rivalry... its tradition... even my kids will grow to hate the NFC EAST foes... what other division is so competive year in and year out? i mean 3 teams made it to the playoffs from that division

You know I would say if I had to pick a team to despise the most it would be the Eagles, but I have made it a point not to hold a grudge against any teams fans.  Although if the Eagles lost every game in a single season, I would shed no tears.  Mostly though I share your views of the NFC East, the rivalry is the best in the NFL. 
yes  
1

#125 | 1089 days ago
hummus (+)

no brainer
yes  

#126 | 1089 days ago
hummus (+)

oh wait, maybe i should say "no" for 2010, maybe they shiould drag it out like he dragged out his career. Perhaps 2014? hahaha. seriously he is in the first year
yes  

#127 | 1089 days ago

 hummus wrote:
oh wait, maybe i should say "no" for 2010, maybe they shiould drag it out like he dragged out his career. Perhaps 2014? hahaha. seriously he is in the first year
LOL, someone did say no though.
yes  

#128 | 1089 days ago

 Nate wrote:
You know I would say if I had to pick a team to despise the most it would be the Eagles, but I have made it a point not to hold a grudge against any teams fans.  Although if the Eagles lost every game in a single season, I would shed no tears.  Mostly though I share your views of the NFC East, the rivalry is the best in the NFL. 

lol i dont hold grudges against fans of rivals just a nice, healthy disdain for the teams in the NFC EAST that they happen to cheer for...

yes  
1

#129 | 1085 days ago

 y wouldnt he...all-time leadin rusher
yes  

#130 | 1085 days ago

 Pat wrote:
Justification #1:
Art Monk is very deserving, IMO. He has been waiting for almost 10 years. Emmitt Smith isn't 10 times the player that Art Monk is. Therefore, he shouldn't get in 10 times faster.
Justification #2:
He may deserve to be inducted, but I voted no, because he doesn't deserve to be inducted unanimously. If Cal Ripken and Tony Gwynn can't get in unanimously in baseball, then Emmitt(the Cal Ripken of football) doesn't deserve the unanimous honor either.

#1 Art Monk, liked the guy, but come on! Don't compare apples to oranges.

#2 Even more of apples to oranges comparison. Baseball is totally different when HOF is conscerned. Cal was simply iron man. Emmett was simply THE ALL TIME RUSHING LEADER!!! An awesome pass blocker and could catch the ball out of the backfield. Your argument doesn't really hold much water with me. Howeer, I know you know he is a first ballot HOFer...

yes  
1

#131 | 1084 days ago

 Noclone wrote:

#1 Art Monk, liked the guy, but come on! Don't compare apples to oranges.

#2 Even more of apples to oranges comparison. Baseball is totally different when HOF is conscerned. Cal was simply iron man. Emmett was simply THE ALL TIME RUSHING LEADER!!! An awesome pass blocker and could catch the ball out of the backfield. Your argument doesn't really hold much water with me. Howeer, I know you know he is a first ballot HOFer...

You saw my answer. Obviously he should get in on the first try. I was only pointing out that it WAS possible to at least give an almost reasonable argument to not vote for him.
yes  

#132 | 1084 days ago

 Pat wrote:
You saw my answer. Obviously he should get in on the first try. I was only pointing out that it WAS possible to at least give an almost reasonable argument to not vote for him.
no problem with your comment, for the most part, but can you take out the almost reasonable part.  That was not even remotely close to reasonable.  Though maybe I should let it go so that you don't sit and think of more reasonable arguments.
yes  

#133 | 1083 days ago

 Joefromthej wrote:
emmit was the man!
Emmit still is the man!
yes  
1

#134 | 1082 days ago
Lyndah (+)

phillary wrote:
Emmit still is the man!
yes  

#135 | 1082 days ago

 Lyndah wrote:
Wow, I am not the only person still awake?
yes  

#136 | 1082 days ago
Lyndah (+)

Nate wrote:
Wow, I am not the only person still awake?
nope....although I'm almost gone
yes  
1

#137 | 1082 days ago

 Lyndah wrote:
nope....although I'm almost gone
ah, well then, goodnight.
yes  

#138 | 1082 days ago
Lyndah (+)

Nate wrote:
ah, well then, goodnight.
why aren't you sleeping yet?
yes  

#139 | 1082 days ago

 Lyndah wrote:
why aren't you sleeping yet?
I got off work at 10 pm, I have to do laundry, and I am waiting on the dishwasher to finish (forgot to start it earlier) so I can cook me some dinner.
yes  
1

#140 | 1082 days ago
Lyndah (+)

Nate wrote:
I got off work at 10 pm, I have to do laundry, and I am waiting on the dishwasher to finish (forgot to start it earlier) so I can cook me some dinner.
that sucks....lol....Hope you have a great evening...enjoy your dinner
yes  

#141 | 1082 days ago

 Lyndah wrote:
that sucks....lol....Hope you have a great evening...enjoy your dinner
It's all good, you have a goodnight now.
yes  

#142 | 1082 days ago

 Nate wrote:
It's all good, you have a goodnight now.
Rome?
yes  

#143 | 1082 days ago

 MarkTheShark wrote:
Rome?
Rome??
yes  

#144 | 1081 days ago

 Nate wrote:
Rome??
You said "GoodNight Now"
yes  

#145 | 1081 days ago

 MarkTheShark wrote:
You said "GoodNight Now"
thank you for pointing out a misspelling.  I bet you never do that.
yes  

#146 | 1081 days ago

 Nate wrote:
thank you for pointing out a misspelling.  I bet you never do that.
Rome....nevermind...I thought you were imitating Jim Rome. He always says that at the end of his show
yes  

#147 | 1081 days ago
Lyndah (+)

MarkTheShark wrote:
Rome....nevermind...I thought you were imitating Jim Rome. He always says that at the end of his show
that's what I thought you meant
yes  

#148 | 1081 days ago

 MarkTheShark wrote:
Rome....nevermind...I thought you were imitating Jim Rome. He always says that at the end of his show
ah, I see.  Actually I thought about it later and was like I didn't mis spell anything.  Oh well, yeah I am not a big fan of Jim Rome.
yes  

#149 | 1081 days ago

 The_Hawg wrote:
Is this really a question that's up for debate?
You took the words right outta my mouth.
yes  

#150 | 1073 days ago

I thought this was a stupid poll at first, then I saw all the debate its caused (as one sided as it may be). But I think The_Hawg said it best, "Is this really a question that's up for debate?

yes  

#151 | 1073 days ago

How about explaining why you said no DB? Or are you too scared?

yes  

#152 | 1073 days ago

 You gonna give an explanation? Cause you look really stupid right now, maybe you could justify that?
yes  

#153 | 1073 days ago

 Too scared to explain why you say no huh?
yes  

#154 | 1073 days ago

 What other answer could there be? Its Yes or Yes. Other and No were just there to be politically correct.
yes  

#155 | 1073 days ago

I just dont think he'd get in in 2010, he'll still get in but not in 2010, its a truthiness thing.

no  

#156 | 1073 days ago

 MattL wrote:

I just dont think he'd get in in 2010, he'll still get in but not in 2010, its a truthiness thing.

Listen if he doesn't get in on his first ballot, then the NFL should extend drug testing to anyone who has a vote. The guy is the all-time rushing yards leader!! You can't be serious.
yes  
5

#157 | 1073 days ago

 Gazzo wrote:
Listen if he doesn't get in on his first ballot, then the NFL should extend drug testing to anyone who has a vote. The guy is the all-time rushing yards leader!! You can't be serious.
that's so true.
yes  

#158 | 1051 days ago

 He's the all-time rushing leader, but he did stay in the NFL a few extra years to break that record.  There's no question he'd still be in as a first ballot hall of famer if he hadn't broken the record though.
yes  

#159 | 1051 days ago

 kramer wrote:
He's the all-time rushing leader, but he did stay in the NFL a few extra years to break that record.  There's no question he'd still be in as a first ballot hall of famer if he hadn't broken the record though.

He broke the record long before he retired, his staying in only makes it harder to beat.

yes  

#160 | 1051 days ago

 He only broke the record a year or two before he retired.  He didn't break it until he went to Arizona.
yes  

#161 | 1051 days ago

 kramer wrote:
He only broke the record a year or two before he retired.  He didn't break it until he went to Arizona.
Alright, you are probably right, I was thinking the TD record which came shortly after Super Bowl XXX.  He however holds a lot more career records then just All Time Leading Rusher.  My point is he didn't stay in to beat the record because he would have retired right after breaking them.  He actually just liked the game that much.
yes  

#162 | 1051 days ago

 Nate wrote:
Alright, you are probably right, I was thinking the TD record which came shortly after Super Bowl XXX.  He however holds a lot more career records then just All Time Leading Rusher.  My point is he didn't stay in to beat the record because he would have retired right after breaking them.  He actually just liked the game that much.
I believe he did stay to break Walter Payton's all-time rushing record.  Like I said, had he not overstayed his welcome to hit that mark, he'd still be a first ballot lock.
yes  

#163 | 1051 days ago
PewterPower (+)

kramer wrote:
He only broke the record a year or two before he retired.  He didn't break it until he went to Arizona.
are you talking about the all time rushing record? cause he definately broke it as a cowboy (against the seahawks) i remember the nfl taking a game break to show the run that broke it
yes  

#164 | 1051 days ago

 kramer wrote:
I believe he did stay to break Walter Payton's all-time rushing record.  Like I said, had he not overstayed his welcome to hit that mark, he'd still be a first ballot lock.
Well, like I said, that might explain why he stayed on the Cowboys so many years, but he broke the record on the Cowboys, so there was no need for him to go to Arizona.  So I doubt for that reason alone he did it just to break another record.
yes  

#165 | 1051 days ago

 PewterPower wrote:
are you talking about the all time rushing record? cause he definately broke it as a cowboy (against the seahawks) i remember the nfl taking a game break to show the run that broke it
Yeah, I remember that game too.  Do you live in Tampa Bay?  Just curious I am going to be moving there in about two weeks.
yes  

#166 | 1051 days ago

 Nate wrote:
Yeah, I remember that game too.  Do you live in Tampa Bay?  Just curious I am going to be moving there in about two weeks.
Yeah he lives in Pinellas county. Moving, like moving to stay or just a temporary relocation?!
yes  

#167 | 1051 days ago

Ummmm...all-time rushing leader, three time SB champion...

 

Two words: First Ballot

 

(I realize I'm jumping on this boat late, but I had to comment.)

yes  

#168 | 1051 days ago

 MarkTheShark wrote:
Yeah he lives in Pinellas county. Moving, like moving to stay or just a temporary relocation?!
Temporary until I can get back in the army.  I got out a year ago, and decided recently that I actually enjoyed that life more (nevermind got paid better).
yes  

#169 | 1027 days ago

 Why even ask, this is dumb how does he not make it? I mean come on.
yes  

#170 | 1022 days ago

 andrew23 wrote:
Why even ask, this is dumb how does he not make it? I mean come on.
Yeah, but somebody said no.
yes  

#171 | 1022 days ago

 (Edited by andrew23)
Nate wrote:
Yeah, but somebody said no.
Yeah but that 4% must just have something against Emmitt because they can't actually believe that he wont get in first ballot.  I mean come on he is the all time leading rusher iI dont care if you think it is only because of his line. If you hold that record you are in, and that is all there is to it
yes  

#172 | 1022 days ago

 andrew23 wrote:
Yeah but that 4% must just have something against Emmitt because they can't actually believe that he wont get in first ballot.  I mean come on he is the all time leading rusher iI dont care if you think it is only because of his line. If you hold that record you are in, and that is all there is to it
I made up this poll, when I started getting frustrated with a lot of the anti Emmitt sentiment.  So that lead me to find out how many people were going to say he did not deserve to get in to the HOF. 
yes  

#173 | 1022 days ago

 MattL wrote:

I just dont think he'd get in in 2010, he'll still get in but not in 2010, its a truthiness thing.

Are you kidding me? hes one of the greatest running backs ever n u say no? are you kidding me?
yes  

#174 | 1022 days ago

 fish7718 wrote:
Are you kidding me? hes one of the greatest running backs ever n u say no? are you kidding me?
I'm dont really like emmit due to the fact he broke Paytons record so for selfish reason i dont think he will be first ballot.
no  

#175 | 1022 days ago

 MattL wrote:
I'm dont really like emmit due to the fact he broke Paytons record so for selfish reason i dont think he will be first ballot.
that is the dubest thing i have ever herd, how do you say that, he beat someone who definatly desrves to be a first ballot so he doesn't? you must be a little bit of stupid to say that
yes  

#176 | 1022 days ago

 MattL wrote:
I'm dont really like emmit due to the fact he broke Paytons record so for selfish reason i dont think he will be first ballot.

If that isn't the worst reasoning I have ever heard I don't know what is.

 

yes  
1

#177 | 1019 days ago

 (Edited by Gazzo)
MattL wrote:
I'm dont really like emmit due to the fact he broke Paytons record so for selfish reason i dont think he will be first ballot.
Thats just plain dumb.
yes  
1

#178 | 1019 days ago

 Gazzo wrote:
Thats just plain dumb.
i never said i was smart.
no  
2

#179 | 1019 days ago
PewterPower (+)

MattL wrote:
i never said i was smart.
i gave you a thumbs up for that one
yes  
2

#180 | 1018 days ago

 MattL wrote:
i never said i was smart.
"I'm dont really like" <----After that comment you didn't need to say anything else
yes  


Post a Comment   Already a user? Sign in here
Join FanIQ - It's Free
FanIQ is the ultimate free community for sports fans.
•Talk sports with fans from all over - 1,649,417+ Comments
•Track your game picks - 38,670,182,382+ Sports Predictions
•Prove you know sports - 116,275+ Trivia Questions
•Find fans of your teams - 11,453,110+ New Friends
Polls You Might Like

All Time NFL Logo Tournament NFC East
Asked by redsox1002003 | NFL, DAL, NYG | 4 questions asked Yesterday
28 opinions | 1 comment | Last by eaglesgarry
Dallas Cowboys Top 5 Defensive Linemen
Asked by tndodger | NFL, DAL, NFC East | 5 questions asked 12/19/09
215 opinions | 7 comments | Last by bigdog29118
Dallas Cowboys Top 5 Linebackers
Asked by tndodger | NFL, DAL, NFC East | 5 questions asked 12/19/09
205 opinions | 10 comments | Last by jesselinneman
Dallas Cowboys All Time Offensive Team
Asked by tndodger | NFL, DAL, NFC East | 6 questions asked 12/18/09
324 opinions | 11 comments | Last by jesselinneman
waht happened
Asked by rhett1999 | NFL, MIN, DAL | 4 questions asked 01/13/10
152 opinions | 10 comments | Last by BDV4U


Join Today
About FanIQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
DMCA Policy
Contact Us
Report A Bug
Help

Copyright 2010 Sportelligence, Inc. All Rights Reserved