Welcome to FanIQ Videos

Need help? » Learn more about FanIQ videos

1-10 of 168 videos

One Of The Cooler Plays You'll See In A While - 2 3 days ago	Are You Serious? Yet Another Fight This Week? - 1 >7 days ago
Because One Interview Wasn't Good Enough - 12 >7 days ago	Josh Hamilton Destroys Bobby Abreu's Home Run... - 3 >7 days ago
Busch Wins Yet Another - 2 >7 days ago	Look Out Below - 2 >7 days ago
I Think You Had One Too Many, Pal - 3 >7 days ago	Federer Is Still Pretty Awesome >7 days ago
Kyle Busch Gets A Taste Of His Own Medicine - 3 >7 days ago	Guy Takes Golf Ball To The Stomach >7 days ago

1-10 of 168 videos

Next >

Which NFL stadium is this?

POINT VALUE
+10

Soldier Field

FedEx Field

Lincoln Financial Field

Lambeau Field

Created by:

Jess

Brett Favre Interview Part II With Greta Van Susteren Of Fox News - Video

Because One Interview Wasn't Good Enough

FanIQ's Rating: 10.0 (3 votes)

Submitted >7 days ago
by:

100%InjuryRate

Sport: NFL

Tagged as:

Share this Video

Add to Your Collection

	&nbp;
TOP COMMENT
#13 \| 51 days ago ChicaQueso (+)	+4 He wants to play for Green Bay as a starter -- he is not asking too much. Jordan retired three times -- Chicago didn't turn their back on him. Quite frankly Thompson is an IDIOT. WHEN Rodgers does not perform like they think he will -- they'll be BEGGING Brett to start. He deserves better.
	Was this comment...? (2)


12 Comments \| Sorted by Most Recent First
Vote for your favorite comments. Fans decide the Top Comment (3+ votes) and also hide poor quality comments (4+ votes).
#1 \| 51 days ago country323 (+)	+1 Thanks for posting. Its almost as if he does not even know what he wants to do. The packers told him we are moving on and he seems to not want to accept his fate and is being defiant. Just retire and keep what respect you have. Its dwindling with every word you utter.
	Was this comment...? (1)
#2 \| 51 days ago ChicaQueso (+)	+4 He wants to play for Green Bay as a starter -- he is not asking too much. Jordan retired three times -- Chicago didn't turn their back on him. Quite frankly Thompson is an IDIOT. WHEN Rodgers does not perform like they think he will -- they'll be BEGGING Brett to start. He deserves better.
	Was this comment...? (2)
#3 \| 51 days ago RichmondSpider (+)	When Farve reaches the level of Jordan you might have a small argument. THE MAN HAS A CONTRACT with Green Bay - so he returns to Green Bay, sits his ass on the bench and supports Rodgers every way he can. This is what is job is now and the ONLY way he can regain his status as a professional and as a man.
	Was this comment...?
#4 \| 51 days ago ChicaQueso (+)	+2 Now Favre is out of Jordan's reach? Are you joking???????????? I guess that's a matter of opinion... You can thinking Michael Jordan's career with the Bulls was different... but it wasn't. He never lost his status as a professional or a man, btw -- NOR did I say HE SHOULD NOT return to the Packers. I said WHEN Rodgers FAILS they will beg him to get off that bench and start... and that's when he should tell them where to stick that football... and I sincerely hope he does. And I'm aware the MAN HAS A CONTRACT -- which means he SHOULD PLAY. Last I heard people don't get paid that kind of money TO SIT ON THE BENCH.
	Was this comment...? (2)
#5 \| 50 days ago DeeRigga (+)	ChicaQueso wrote: Now Favre is out of Jordan's reach? Are you joking???????????? I guess that's a matter of opinion... You can thinking Michael Jordan's career with the Bulls was different... but it wasn't. He never lost his status as a professional or a man, btw -- NOR did I say HE SHOULD NOT return to the Packers. I said WHEN Rodgers FAILS they will beg him to get off that bench and start... and that's when he should tell them where to stick that football... and I sincerely hope he does. And I'm aware the MAN HAS A CONTRACT -- which means he SHOULD PLAY. Last I heard people don't get paid that kind of money TO SIT ON THE BENCH. Chica...I know you are a GB fan, but really, is it fair that Farve can say "Today, I retire..." then two weeks later say " Naww, I changed my mind...", then flip flop again? Honestly, I feel he will be less effective than last year, which was by far one of his greatest seasons EVER; plus, he said he doesn't have the drive anymore in his retirement press conference, and suddenly he's a Spring Chicken? GB would be smart to release him...
	Was this comment...?
#6 \| 50 days ago mandisdad (+)	ChicaQueso wrote: Now Favre is out of Jordan's reach? Are you joking???????????? I guess that's a matter of opinion... You can thinking Michael Jordan's career with the Bulls was different... but it wasn't. He never lost his status as a professional or a man, btw -- NOR did I say HE SHOULD NOT return to the Packers. I said WHEN Rodgers FAILS they will beg him to get off that bench and start... and that's when he should tell them where to stick that football... and I sincerely hope he does. And I'm aware the MAN HAS A CONTRACT -- which means he SHOULD PLAY. Last I heard people don't get paid that kind of money TO SIT ON THE BENCH. I think that most sports fans would agree that Favre does not compare to Jordan. Jordan was the face of the NBA for a long time. Favre was the face of the Packers for a long time. People turned on Bulls games just to see Jordan play. I don't personally think people (other than Green Bay fans) would turn on Packers games just to see Favre. Jordan was responsible in a very large part for the popularity of the NBA during for many years. Favre was not responsible for the popularity of the NFL for a long period of time. There was a BIG difference between their careers.
	Was this comment...?
#7 \| 50 days ago mandisdad (+)	DeeRigga wrote: Chica...I know you are a GB fan, but really, is it fair that Farve can say "Today, I retire..." then two weeks later say " Naww, I changed my mind...", then flip flop again? Honestly, I feel he will be less effective than last year, which was by far one of his greatest seasons EVER; plus, he said he doesn't have the drive anymore in his retirement press conference, and suddenly he's a Spring Chicken? GB would be smart to release him... +1 "GB would be smart to release him..." I think they would be foolish to release him. There is a very good chance he would go to the Vikes or Bears and that could be a disaster for GB. Imagine Favre leading one of them and winning the division. He dug his own hole here. If he had said he would keep playing a few months ago, GB would not have drafted two QB's. Favre put the team in a very bad situation. I like him, but think he is being a typical spoiled athlete right now.
	Was this comment...? (1)
#8 \| 50 days ago DeeRigga (+)	mandisdad wrote: "GB would be smart to release him..." I think they would be foolish to release him. There is a very good chance he would go to the Vikes or Bears and that could be a disaster for GB. Imagine Favre leading one of them and winning the division. He dug his own hole here. If he had said he would keep playing a few months ago, GB would not have drafted two QB's. Favre put the team in a very bad situation. I like him, but think he is being a typical spoiled athlete right now. I don't think he'd be that good...then again, I'm being a cynic due to his age and the fact that both Minnesota nor Chicago's front lines pass block very well. I'm not sure, but is Farve a good dome QB? I want to say he is very sub-par on indoor fields, but I don't keep track of that. I agree with your last statement 110%...spoiled and feeling very 'Tori Spelling'-like right now
	Was this comment...?
#9 \| 50 days ago ChicaQueso (+)	DeeRigga wrote: Chica...I know you are a GB fan, but really, is it fair that Farve can say "Today, I retire..." then two weeks later say " Naww, I changed my mind...", then flip flop again? Honestly, I feel he will be less effective than last year, which was by far one of his greatest seasons EVER; plus, he said he doesn't have the drive anymore in his retirement press conference, and suddenly he's a Spring Chicken? GB would be smart to release him... +1 It's definitely not fair. Huge mistake on his part. He admitted it -- gave the reason behind it -- and I agree -- they had to make a decision -- they moved forward. My problem is that they should release him and respect him as a player. Not say hey we don't want you, but we also don't want anyone else to have you. That's the only infuriating thing to me (that and all of this trash talking about Brett).
	Was this comment...? (1)
#10 \| 50 days ago ChicaQueso (+)	mandisdad wrote: I think that most sports fans would agree that Favre does not compare to Jordan. Jordan was the face of the NBA for a long time. Favre was the face of the Packers for a long time. People turned on Bulls games just to see Jordan play. I don't personally think people (other than Green Bay fans) would turn on Packers games just to see Favre. Jordan was responsible in a very large part for the popularity of the NBA during for many years. Favre was not responsible for the popularity of the NFL for a long period of time. There was a BIG difference between their careers. +1 It's not the actual comparison of athletes per say... the reason I compared them is because you have a player -- considered ONE of the greats (there were many before Jordan -- though I do love him) -- you have a city that backed them the majority of their career -- they were known not only for their playing skills, but because that was THEIR team. Favre is not responsible for the popularity of the NFL -- but saying Jordan is popular for the popularity of the NBA is ludicrous. Bird, Johnson, Chamberlain? My point was -- their team's embraced both of them -- their fans had a love affair with both of them -- and regardless -- when Jordan flip flopped three times he wasn't getting drug through the mud. Additionally -- I know die hard Cowboy, Patriot, Viking ...actually any team fans that DO tune in to watch Brett Favre. So any player -- of any sport -- that hold's several records and is considered ONE of the greats in that sports history -- has the right to change their mind. It's not JUST that I'm a Packers fan -- this could be Joe Montana or any current player today -- even one I don't like -- and I would still think this is MESSED UP. The fact that I live and breathe the Packers just makes it more irritating. Lastly, I'm more disgusted with the dishonesty of Teddy Thompson -- and also disgusted by finding out the truth last night (in part 3 of the interview I'm sure someone will post and BLAST AGAIN -- like Brett made the choice to split the interview up too) about Randy Moss. I'm disappointed in the Packers organization. I'm not saying let Brett start and screw up your plans. I'm saying the man wants to play ball. He gave them most of his career -- trade him, release him, whatever. Don't bench him til Rodgers screws up. How insulted would you feel?
	Was this comment...? (1)
#11 \| 50 days ago mandisdad (+)	ChicaQueso wrote: It's not the actual comparison of athletes per say... the reason I compared them is because you have a player -- considered ONE of the greats (there were many before Jordan -- though I do love him) -- you have a city that backed them the majority of their career -- they were known not only for their playing skills, but because that was THEIR team. Favre is not responsible for the popularity of the NFL -- but saying Jordan is popular for the popularity of the NBA is ludicrous. Bird, Johnson, Chamberlain? My point was -- their team's embraced both of them -- their fans had a love affair with both of them -- and regardless -- when Jordan flip flopped three times he wasn't getting drug through the mud. Additionally -- I know die hard Cowboy, Patriot, Viking ...actually any team fans that DO tune in to watch Brett Favre. So any player -- of any sport -- that hold's several records and is considered ONE of the greats in that sports history -- has the right to change their mind. It's not JUST that I'm a Packers fan -- this could be Joe Montana or any current player today -- even one I don't like -- and I would still think this is MESSED UP. The fact that I live and breathe the Packers just makes it more irritating. Lastly, I'm more disgusted with the dishonesty of Teddy Thompson -- and also disgusted by finding out the truth last night (in part 3 of the interview I'm sure someone will post and BLAST AGAIN -- like Brett made the choice to split the interview up too) about Randy Moss. I'm disappointed in the Packers organization. I'm not saying let Brett start and screw up your plans. I'm saying the man wants to play ball. He gave them most of his career -- trade him, release him, whatever. Don't bench him til Rodgers screws up. How insulted would you feel? I didn't mean that Jordan was the only person to ever play that made the NBA popular. I remember as a kid in the Philly area watching Dr. J and Bird play against each other...AWESOME. What I meant was that during the period he played, Jordan was the one player, more than any other during that time, that people loved to watch and idolized. I have heard people say, "I have to watch the Bulls playoff game tonight to see what Jordan does.' I have never heard anyone say, "I have to watch the GB game to see Favre." Maybe that's because a player can showcase his talents more visibly in the NBA. I think Jordan didn't get as much grief over coming out of retirement because his team could still use him without really hurting their future too bad. The guys behind him could be rotated in and out of the game. That's not really as practical in the NFL. I do think the Packers will, and should, try to trade him. First, it doesn't make sense to waste $12 million on a back-up QB. Second, I think it is the fair thing to do. He was a very loyal player for a very long time. I know he was paid well, so I won't say he deserves it. I just think that if the Packers can get something of value for him, it would be in their best interest to do so.
	Was this comment...?
#12 \| 45 days ago derms33 (+)	If Green Bay wants to win they start Favre...period
	Was this comment...?